{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T04:14:13Z","timestamp":1787026453360,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,24]],"date-time":"2024-06-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1719187200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Glob. Womens Health"],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring (EFM) has been widely used in obstetric practice for over 40 years to improve perinatal outcomes. Its popularity is growing in Ethiopia and other sub-Saharan African countries to reduce high perinatal morbidity and mortality rates. However, its impact on delivery mode and perinatal outcomes in low-risk pregnancies remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the effect of continuous EFM on delivery mode and neonatal outcomes among low-risk laboring mothers at Debre Markos Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A prospective follow-up study was conducted from November 20, 2023, to January 10, 2024. All low-risk laboring mothers meeting the inclusion criteria were included. Data were collected via pretested structured questionnaires and observation, then analyzed using Epi-data 4.6 and SPSS. The incidences of cesarean delivery and continuous EFM were compared using the chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The study found higher rates of instrumental-assisted vaginal delivery (7% vs. 2.4%) and cesarean sections (16% vs. 2%) due to unsettling fetal heart rate patterns in the continuous EFM group compared to the intermittent auscultation group. However, there were no differences in immediate neonatal outcomes between the groups.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>When compared to intermittent auscultation with a Pinard fetoscope, the routine use of continuous EFM among low-risk laboring mothers was associated with an increased risk of cesarean sections and instrumental vaginal deliveries, without significantly improving immediate newborn outcomes. However, it is important to note that our study faced significant logistical constraints due to the limited availability of EFM devices, which influenced our ability to use EFM comprehensively. Given these limitations, we recommend avoiding the routine use of continuous EFM for low-risk laboring mothers to help reduce the rising number of operative deliveries, particularly cesarean sections. Our findings should be interpreted with caution, and further research with adequate resources is needed to draw definitive conclusions.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fgwh.2024.1385343","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,24]],"date-time":"2024-06-24T00:33:22Z","timestamp":1719189202000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["The effect of continuous electronic fetal monitoring on mode of delivery and neonatal outcome among low-risk laboring mothers at Debre Markos comprehensive specialized hospital, Northwest Ethiopia"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"5","author":[{"given":"Tirusew Nigussie","family":"Kebede","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kidist Ayalew","family":"Abebe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Moges Sisay","family":"Chekol","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tebabere","family":"Moltot Kitaw","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Muhabaw Shumye","family":"Mihret","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bezawit Melak","family":"Fentie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yared Alem","family":"Sibhat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael Amera","family":"Tizazu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Solomon Hailemeskel","family":"Beshah","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Birhan Tsegaw","family":"Taye","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","volume-title":"Newborn Mortality","year":"2022"},{"key":"B2","volume-title":"Newborns: Improving Survival and Well-Being","year":"2020"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1874","DOI":"10.1007\/s43032-021-00749-2","article-title":"Changing perspectives of electronic fetal monitoring","volume":"29","author":"Evans","year":"2022","journal-title":"Reprod Sci"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1097\/01.aoa.0000661388.92379.8c","article-title":"Electronic fetal monitoring to prevent fetal brain injury: a ubiquitous yet flawed tool","volume":"40","author":"Hirsch","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006066.pub3","article-title":"Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour","volume":"2","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"730","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820dbf91","article-title":"Electronic fetal monitoring as a public health screening program: the arithmetic of failure","volume":"117","author":"Grimes","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1097\/FM9.0000000000000148","article-title":"Evolving frameworks for the foundation and practice of electronic fetal monitoring","volume":"4","author":"Evans","year":"2022","journal-title":"Matern Fetal Med"},{"key":"B8","first-page":"653a\u2013b","article-title":"How does electronic fetal heart rate monitoring affect labor and delivery outcomes?","volume":"59","author":"Barstow","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Fam Pract."},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100008","DOI":"10.1016\/j.xagr.2021.100008","article-title":"Electronic intrapartum fetal monitoring: a systematic review of international clinical practice guidelines","volume":"1","author":"Mohan","year":"2021","journal-title":"AJOG Glob Rep"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.021","article-title":"FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: adjunctive technologies","volume":"131","author":"Visser","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1097\/01.aoa.0000527035.85994.d8","article-title":"Electronic fetal monitoring and cesarean birth: a scoping review","volume":"37","author":"Paterno","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1177\/1477750919851055","article-title":"Cerebral palsy, cesarean sections, and electronic fetal monitoring: all the light we cannot see","volume":"14","author":"Sartwelle","year":"2019","journal-title":"Clin Ethics"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12422","article-title":"Impact of continuous electronic fetal monitoring on birth outcomes in low-risk pregnancies","volume":"46","author":"Heelan-Fancher","year":"2019","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S1129","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.11.12","article-title":"Improving the interpretation of electronic fetal monitoring: the fetal reserve index","volume":"228","author":"Evans","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"889","DOI":"10.1155\/2016\/3658527","article-title":"The regional centralization of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and its impact on neonatal acidemia and the cesarean birth rate","volume":"2016","author":"Michikata","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Pregnancy"},{"key":"B16","first-page":"158","article-title":"Intrapartum fetal monitoring","volume":"102","author":"Arnold","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am Fam Physician"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e20","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001905","article-title":"Committee opinion no. 687: approaches to limit intervention during labor and birth","volume":"129","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B18","volume-title":"Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring Guideline","year":"2018"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.019","article-title":"FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: intermittent auscultation","volume":"131","author":"Lewis","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"B20","volume-title":"Management Protocol on Selected Obstetrics Topics for Hospital. Management of Labor and Delivery","year":"2020"},{"key":"B21","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Operative Vaginal Delivery","author":"Wegner","year":"2020"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD005122.pub5","article-title":"Cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of fetal heart on admission to labour ward for assessment of fetal wellbeing","volume":"86","author":"Devane","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"B23","volume-title":"Genius Belabored: Childbed Fever and the Tragic Life of Ignaz Semmelweis","author":"Obenchain","year":"2016"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.1111\/jep.12368","article-title":"Agreement on intrapartum cardiotocogram recordings between expert obstetricians","volume":"21","author":"Hruban","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Eval Clin Pract"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1097\/01.aoa.0000504737.74787.bb","article-title":"Intraobserver and interobserver agreement among obstetric experts in court regarding the review of abnormal fetal heart rate tracings and obstetrical management","volume":"36","author":"Sabiani","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4711","DOI":"10.1113\/JP271205","article-title":"The myths and physiology surrounding intrapartum decelerations: the critical role of the peripheral chemoreflex","volume":"594","author":"Lear","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Physiol (Lond)"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2247","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMe068176","article-title":"Obstetricians still await a deus ex machina","volume":"355","author":"Greene","year":"2006","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.siny.2007.09.005","article-title":"Has electronic fetal heart rate monitoring made a difference","volume":"13","author":"Steer","year":"2008","journal-title":"Semin Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199603073341001","article-title":"Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy","volume":"334","author":"Nelson","year":"1996","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1097\/NMC.0b013e3181caeab3","article-title":"Overcoming the challenges: maternal movement and positioning: to facilitate labor progress","volume":"35","author":"Zwelling","year":"2010","journal-title":"MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs"},{"key":"B31","first-page":"167","volume-title":"In this Issue\u2014the Winds of Change: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Recommends Limiting Interventions in Labor and Birth","author":"Lothian","year":"2017"},{"key":"B32","volume-title":"WHO Recommendations on Maternal Health: Guidelines Approved by the WHO Guidelines Review Committee","author":"Organization","year":"2023"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Global Women's Health"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fgwh.2024.1385343\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,24]],"date-time":"2024-06-24T00:33:33Z","timestamp":1719189213000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fgwh.2024.1385343\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,24]]},"references-count":32,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fgwh.2024.1385343"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fgwh.2024.1385343","relation":{},"ISSN":["2673-5059"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2673-5059","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,24]]},"article-number":"1385343"}}