{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,15]],"date-time":"2026-07-15T07:03:36Z","timestamp":1784099016274,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":73,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,15]],"date-time":"2026-07-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1784073600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001711","name":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur F\u00f6rderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["P0BEP1_188154"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["P0BEP1_188154"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001711","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Glob. Women\u2019s Health"],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Childbirth in women with obesity (body mass index \u226530\u2005kg\/m\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      ) has been linked to high medical intervention rates, adverse biomedical and psychosocial outcomes, and increased resource utilization. Person-centered decision-making on high-quality childbirth care should thus account for biopsychosocial and resource-related considerations aligned with individual preferences. This study evaluated childbirth options for women with obesity across obstetric scenarios by integrating multidimensional goals of care and stakeholder preferences with empirical evidence.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We employed multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) using multi-attribute value theory (MAVT). The study population included women with obesity and term, singleton, cephalic pregnancies without compelling indications for cesarean birth. Options encompassed vaginal birth and intrapartum cesarean birth, each with either standard hospital care or continuous midwifery care, and prelabor cesarean birth. Stakeholder-informed goals related to biomedical safety, physiological processes, psychosocial care experience, physical strain for care providers, care setting resource use, and direct healthcare costs. Scenarios accounted for cesarean birth history and maternal comorbidities. We estimated the goal performance of the options using Swiss hospital inpatient data from 22,464 childbirths among women with obesity and assessments from experienced experts. To illustrate how stakeholder preferences may influence person-centered decision-making, we considered four hypothetical extreme and three real preference profiles. All data were aggregated into the options' overall values using a non-additive MAVT model. Sensitivity analyses addressed preference uncertainty. Direct healthcare costs were mapped onto the aggregated value of all other goals in cost-benefit visualizations.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Vaginal birth with standard hospital care or continuous midwifery care achieved similar or higher overall values compared to cesarean birth across a wide range of preference profiles. Prelabor and intrapartum cesarean birth generally achieved lower or comparable overall values, with greater variability depending on stakeholder preferences. Cost-benefit visualizations showed that vaginal birth provided good value at the lowest costs. Findings were largely consistent across obstetric scenarios.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study highlights the importance of integrating multidimensional goals and stakeholder preferences into decision-making on childbirth options, alongside empirical data. In doing so, vaginal birth with either model of care performed well across the considered scenarios and preference profiles, though the findings should not be interpreted as prescriptive. This MCDA approach offers a novel framework to support evidence-based and person-centered decision-making deliberations on high-quality childbirth care for women with obesity.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fgwh.2026.1822385","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,15]],"date-time":"2026-07-15T06:04:09Z","timestamp":1784095449000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Evaluating childbirth options for women with obesity: a multi-criteria decision analysis"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"7","author":[{"given":"Carmen","family":"Wyss","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Applied Research and Development, Division of Midwifery, Department of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Sciences","place":["Bern, Switzerland"]},{"name":"Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern","place":["Bern, Switzerland"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Judit","family":"Lienert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Decision Analysis Group, Department of Environmental Social Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag)","place":["Duebendorf, Switzerland"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Evelyne M.","family":"Aubry","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Applied Research and Development, Division of Midwifery, Department of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Sciences","place":["Bern, Switzerland"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","year":""},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100041","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2019.100041","article-title":"Maternal body mass index and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and metaanalysis","volume":"1","author":"D\u2019Souza","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMra1801040","article-title":"Obesity in pregnancy","volume":"387","author":"Creanga","year":"2022","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"536","DOI":"10.1016\/j.orcp.2021.10.005","article-title":"Impact of maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index on maternal, fetal and neonatal adverse outcomes in the worldwide populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"15","author":"Vats","year":"2021","journal-title":"Obes Res Clin Pract"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"499","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-020-03202-5","article-title":"Pregnant and postpartum women\u2019s experiences of weight stigma in healthcare","volume":"20","author":"Incollingo Rodriguez","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0227377","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0227377","article-title":"Economic burden of maternal morbidity: a systematic review of cost-of-illness studies","volume":"15","author":"Moran","year":"2020","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13334","article-title":"Management of prepregnancy, pregnancy, and postpartum obesity from the FIGO pregnancy and non-communicable diseases committee: a FIGO guideline","volume":"151","author":"McAuliffe","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1055\/a-1330-7466","article-title":"Obesity and pregnancy: guideline of the German society of gynecology and obstetrics (level S3, AWMF registry no. 015-081, June 2019)","volume":"81","author":"Sch\u00e4fer-Graf","year":"2021","journal-title":"Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004395","article-title":"ACOG practice bulletin: obesity in pregnancy","volume":"137","year":"2021","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e086409","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2024-086409","article-title":"Identifying fundamental goals of childbirth care for women with higher body weight in Swiss maternity care: an embedded mixed methods multi-stakeholder study","volume":"15","author":"Wyss","year":"2025","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"B11","year":""},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-015-0673-2","article-title":"Obesity and normal birth: a qualitative study of clinician\u2019s management of obese pregnant women during labour","volume":"15","author":"Kerrigan","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2012.745506","article-title":"Cesarean delivery in obese women: a comprehensive review","volume":"26","author":"Wispelwey","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"472","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)35244-6","article-title":"Delivery by caesarean section in super-obese women: beyond Pfannenstiel","volume":"34","author":"Kingdom","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12751","article-title":"Mediating processes underlying the associations between maternal obesity and the likelihood of cesarean birth","volume":"51","author":"Wyss","year":"2024","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12319","article-title":"Why do women request an elective cesarean delivery for non-medical reasons? A systematic review of the qualitative literature","volume":"45","author":"O'Donovan","year":"2018","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0200941","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0200941","article-title":"Clinicians\u2019 views of factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies","volume":"13","author":"Panda","year":"2018","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2023.07.001","article-title":"Listening to larger bodied women: time for a new approach to maternity care","volume":"36","author":"Griffiths","year":"2023","journal-title":"Women Birth"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"Cd004667","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004667.pub6","article-title":"Midwife continuity of care models versus other models of care for childbearing women","volume":"4","author":"Sandall","year":"2024","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-02851-9","volume-title":"Rational Decision Making","author":"Eisenf\u00fchr","year":"2010"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4615-1495-4","volume-title":"Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach","author":"Belton","year":"2002"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2015.12.003","article-title":"Multiple criteria decision analysis for health care decision making - an introduction: report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA emerging good practices task force","volume":"19","author":"Thokala","year":"2016","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-47540-0_1","article-title":"Introduction","volume-title":"Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Support Healthcare Decisions","author":"Marsh","year":"2017"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2015.12.016","article-title":"Multiple criteria decision analysis for health care decision making - emerging good practices: report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA emerging good practices task force","volume":"19","author":"Marsh","year":"2016","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.2165\/11539470-000000000-00000","article-title":"Multi-criteria clinical decision support: a primer on the use of multiple criteria decision making methods to promote evidence-based, patient-centered healthcare","volume":"3","author":"Dolan","year":"2010","journal-title":"Patient"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105361","DOI":"10.1016\/j.envsoft.2022.105361","article-title":"ValueDecisions, a web app to support decisions with conflicting objectives, multiple stakeholders, and uncertainty","volume":"150","author":"Haag","year":"2022","journal-title":"Environ Model Softw"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2018.05.011","article-title":"Identifying non-additive multi-attribute value functions based on uncertain indifference statements","volume":"85","author":"Haag","year":"2019","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1007\/s40273-014-0135-0","article-title":"Assessing the value of healthcare interventions using multi-criteria decision analysis: a review of the literature","volume":"32","author":"Marsh","year":"2014","journal-title":"Pharmacoeconomics"},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9793","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-019-46179-8","article-title":"Adverse perinatal outcomes for obese women are influenced by the presence of comorbid diabetes and hypertensive disorders","volume":"9","author":"Aubry","year":"2019","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"B30","author":"Wyss","year":""},{"key":"B31","year":""},{"key":"B32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"472","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2012.01.055","article-title":"Methodological aspects of multi-criteria decision analysis for policy support: a case study on pharmaceutical removal from hospital wastewater","volume":"220","author":"Schuwirth","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur J Oper Res"},{"key":"B33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266462317001118","article-title":"Patient-centered decision making: lessons from multi-criteria decision analysis for quantifying patient preferences","volume":"34","author":"Marsh","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Technol Assess Health Care"},{"key":"B34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2899","DOI":"10.5194\/hess-26-2899-2022","article-title":"The role of multi-criteria decision analysis in a transdisciplinary process: co-developing a flood forecasting system in western Africa","volume":"26","author":"Lienert","year":"2022","journal-title":"Hydrol Earth Syst Sci"},{"key":"B35","author":"Ball","year":""},{"key":"B36","year":""},{"key":"B37","year":""},{"key":"B38","year":""},{"key":"B39","author":"Oakley","year":""},{"key":"B40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2107","DOI":"10.1080\/00036846.2012.654914","article-title":"Preference uncertainty in stated preference studies: facts and artefacts","volume":"45","author":"Akter","year":"2013","journal-title":"Appl Econ"},{"key":"B41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jenvman.2016.09.027","article-title":"A scenario-based MCDA framework for wastewater infrastructure planning under uncertainty. SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL","volume":"183","author":"Zheng","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Environ Manage."},{"key":"B42","volume-title":"Stata Statistical Software. Release 15","year":"2017"},{"key":"B43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110922","DOI":"10.1016\/j.buildenv.2023.110922","article-title":"Comparing PV-green and PV-cool roofs to diverse rooftop options using decision analysis","volume":"245","author":"Maurer","year":"2023","journal-title":"Build Environ"},{"key":"B44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1230","DOI":"10.1111\/risa.12360","article-title":"Cognitive and motivational biases in decision and risk analysis","volume":"35","author":"Montibeller","year":"2015","journal-title":"Risk Anal"},{"key":"B45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109652","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jenvman.2019.109652","article-title":"Integrating uncertainty of preferences and predictions in decision models: an application to regional wastewater planning","volume":"252","author":"Haag","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Environ Manage"},{"key":"B46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121962","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jenvman.2024.121962","article-title":"A participatory multi-criteria decision analysis framework reveals transition potential towards non-grid wastewater management","volume":"367","author":"Beutler","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Environ Manage"},{"key":"B47","year":""},{"key":"B48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0194906","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0194906","article-title":"What matters to women during childbirth: a systematic qualitative review","volume":"13","author":"Downe","year":"2018","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"B49","year":""},{"key":"B50","year":""},{"key":"B51","year":""},{"key":"B52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14011","article-title":"Birth outcomes in women with body mass index of 40 kg\/m2 or greater stratified by planned and actual mode of birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"100","author":"D\u2019Souza","year":"2021","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"B53","volume-title":"Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking","author":"Keeney","year":"1992"},{"key":"B54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4899-7603-1_76","article-title":"Medical practice variations in reproductive, obstetric, and gynaecological care","volume-title":"Medical Practice Variations","author":"Hoxha","year":"2016"},{"key":"B55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-025-07251-6","article-title":"Experiencing weight stigma during childbirth increases the odds of cesarean birth","volume":"25","author":"Schwenk","year":"2025","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"B56","author":"Sandall","year":""},{"key":"B57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"370","DOI":"10.5694\/mja16.00844","article-title":"Models of maternity care: evidence for midwifery continuity of care","volume":"205","author":"Homer","year":"2016","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"key":"B58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e187","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2022.07.001","article-title":"Midwifery continuity of care for women with complex pregnancies in Australia: an integrative review","volume":"36","author":"Fox","year":"2023","journal-title":"Women Birth"},{"key":"B59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"362","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12666","article-title":"Developing a woman-centered, inclusive definition of positive childbirth experiences: a discussion paper","volume":"50","author":"Leinweber","year":"2023","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"B60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-021-03798-2","article-title":"Value-based care in obstetrics: comparison between vaginal birth and caesarean section","volume":"21","author":"Negrini","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"B61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"682","DOI":"10.1097\/ACM.0000000000003122","article-title":"Defining and implementing value-based health care: a strategic framework","volume":"95","author":"Teisberg","year":"2020","journal-title":"Acad Med"},{"key":"B62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1111\/jmwh.13010","article-title":"Estimating the financial impact of reducing primary cesareans","volume":"65","author":"DeJoy","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Midwifery Womens Health"},{"key":"B63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/9781444398557","volume-title":"Structured Decision Making: A Practical Guide to Environmental Management Choices","author":"Gregory","year":"2012"},{"key":"B64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e037547","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-037547","article-title":"Comparing patients\u2019 and other stakeholders\u2019 preferences for outcomes of integrated care for multimorbidity: a discrete choice experiment in eight European countries","volume":"10","author":"Rutten-van M\u00f6lken","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"B65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"320","DOI":"10.1016\/S1364-6613(03)00135-9","article-title":"Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions","volume":"7","author":"Tetlock","year":"2003","journal-title":"Trends Cogn Sci"},{"key":"B66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1006\/obhd.1997.2690","article-title":"Protected values","volume":"70","author":"Baron","year":"1997","journal-title":"Organ Behav Hum Decis Process"},{"key":"B67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2017.02.038","article-title":"Are objectives hierarchy related biases observed in practice? A meta-analysis of environmental and energy applications of multi-criteria decision analysis","volume":"265","author":"Marttunen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Oper Res"},{"key":"B68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1349","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)31930-5","article-title":"Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children","volume":"392","author":"Sandall","year":"2018","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"B69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1358","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)31927-5","article-title":"Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies","volume":"392","author":"Betr\u00e1n","year":"2018","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"B70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e62","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15386","article-title":"Care of women with obesity in pregnancy. Green-top guideline no. 72","volume":"126","author":"Denison","year":"2019","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"B71","author":"Wyss","year":""},{"key":"B72","year":""},{"key":"B73","year":""}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Global Women's Health"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fgwh.2026.1822385\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,15]],"date-time":"2026-07-15T06:04:11Z","timestamp":1784095451000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fgwh.2026.1822385\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,15]]},"references-count":73,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fgwh.2026.1822385"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fgwh.2026.1822385","relation":{},"ISSN":["2673-5059"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2673-5059","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,15]]},"article-number":"1822385"}}