{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T06:30:36Z","timestamp":1777617036585,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":47,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,8]],"date-time":"2022-04-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1649376000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Med."],"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>To investigate the accuracy of 6 intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas in predicting refractive outcomes in extremely long eyes.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Setting<\/jats:title><jats:p>Department of Ophthalmology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taiwan.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design<\/jats:title><jats:p>Retrospective comparative study.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>In this retrospective single-center study, we reviewed 70 eyes of 70 patients with axial length (AL) \u2265 28 mm who had received an uneventful 2.2 mm corneal wound phacoemulsification and in-the-bag IOL placement. The actual postoperative refractive results were compared to the predicted refraction calculated with 6 formulas (Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK\/T, T2, Barrett Universal II formulas) using IOLMaster 500 as optical biometry in the User Group for Laser Interference Biometry (ULIB) constants.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Overall, the Haigis and Barrett formulas achieved the lowest level of mean prediction error (PE) and median absolute error (MedAE). Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK\/T, and T2 had hyperopic prediction errors (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> &amp;lt; 0.05). The Hoffer Q and Holladay 1 had significantly more MedAE between the 6 formulas. After the mean PE was zeroed out, the MedAE had no significant difference between each group. The absolute error tends to be larger in patients with longer AL. The absolute errors were 30.0\u201337.1% and 60.0\u201364.3% within 1.0 D of all patients compared to predicted refraction calculated using various formulas.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>The Haigis and Barrett Universal II formulas had a better success rate in predicting IOL power in high myopic eyes with AL longer than 28 mm using the ULIB constant in this study. The postoperative refractive results were inferior to the benchmark standards, which indicated that the precision of IOL power calculation in patients with high myopia still required improvement.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2022.762761","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,8]],"date-time":"2022-04-08T05:13:18Z","timestamp":1649394798000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Predictability of 6 Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in People With Very High Myopia"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Yi-Ching","family":"Chu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tzu-Lun","family":"Huang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Pei-Yao","family":"Chang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Wei-Ting","family":"Ho","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yung-Ray","family":"Hsu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shu-Wen","family":"Chang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jia-Kang","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1713","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2008.03.016","article-title":"Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in the Singapore malay eye survey","volume":"115","author":"Saw","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ophthalmology."},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1080\/09286580701535517","article-title":"Myopic and hyperopic refractive error in adults: an overview","volume":"14","author":"Hyman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Epidemiol."},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1036","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2016.01.006","article-title":"Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050","volume":"123","author":"Holden","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ophthalmology."},{"key":"B4","first-page":"684","article-title":"Epidemiologic study of the prevalence and severity of myopia among schoolchildren in Taiwan in 2000","volume":"100","author":"Lin","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Formos Med Assoc."},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.21037\/aes.2018.01.05","article-title":"Myopia prevention in Taiwan","volume":"3","author":"Wu","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ann Eye Sci."},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1739","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(12)60272-4","article-title":"Myopia","volume":"379","author":"Morgan","year":"2012","journal-title":"Lancet."},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"302","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1475-1313.2005.00306.x","article-title":"Refractive error and ocular biometry in jordanian adults","volume":"25","author":"Mallen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Physiol Opt."},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1016\/S1726-4901(09)70038-3","article-title":"Relationship between central corneal thickness, refractive error, corneal curvature, anterior chamber depth and axial length","volume":"72","author":"Chen","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Chin Med Assoc."},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2211","DOI":"10.7860\/JCDR\/2013\/7015.3473","article-title":"Axial length, anterior chamber depth-a study in different age groups and refractive errors","volume":"7","author":"Bhardwaj","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Clin Diagn Res."},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2415-12-50","article-title":"The distribution of axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, and vitreous chamber depth in an adult population of shahroud, Iran","volume":"12","author":"Hashemi","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMC Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1038\/eye.1999.16","article-title":"The development and maintenance of emmetropia","volume":"13","author":"Brown","year":"1999","journal-title":"Eye."},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2007.10.031","article-title":"Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation","volume":"34","author":"Norrby","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg."},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"700","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(13)80338-0","article-title":"The hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas","volume":"19","author":"Hoffer","year":"1993","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg."},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(88)80059-2","article-title":"Three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations","volume":"14","author":"Holladay","year":"1988","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg."},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(13)80705-5","article-title":"Development of the Srk\/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula","volume":"16","author":"Retzlaff","year":"1990","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg."},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1829","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.05.031","article-title":"Improving the prediction accuracy of the Srk\/T formula: the T2 formula","volume":"36","author":"Sheard","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg."},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"765","DOI":"10.1007\/s004170000188","article-title":"Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to haigis","volume":"238","author":"Haigis","year":"2000","journal-title":"Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"713","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(13)80339-2","article-title":"An improved universal theoretical formula for intraocular lens power prediction","volume":"19","author":"Barrett","year":"1993","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg."},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(87)80037-8","article-title":"Intraocular lens calculation formulas for new intraocular lens implants","volume":"13","author":"Barrett","year":"1987","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg."},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"484","DOI":"10.4103\/ijo.IJO_937_18","article-title":"Accuracy of the refractive prediction determined by intraocular lens power calculation formulas in high myopia","volume":"67","author":"Zhou","year":"2019","journal-title":"Indian J Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"976847","DOI":"10.1155\/2015\/976847","article-title":"Accuracy of intraocular lens power formulas involving 148 eyes with long axial lengths: a retrospective chart-review study","volume":"2015","author":"Chen","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.4103\/0974-620X.71888","article-title":"Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation in high myopia","volume":"3","author":"Ghanem","year":"2010","journal-title":"Oman J Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2007.10.017","article-title":"Intraocular lens power calculation using the iolmaster and various formulas in eyes with long axial length","volume":"34","author":"Wang","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg."},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.3980\/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.02.08","article-title":"Optical biometry intraocular lens power calculation using different formulas in patients with different axial lengths","volume":"6","author":"Wang","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int J Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B25","first-page":"71","article-title":"Cataract surgery: new options, new challenges","volume":"13","author":"Chu","year":"2006","journal-title":"Rev Ophthalmolo."},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaophthalmol.2015.5322","article-title":"Geographic variation in the rate and timing of cataract surgery among us communities","volume":"134","author":"Kauh","year":"2016","journal-title":"JAMA Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"360","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9394(14)74917-7","article-title":"Biometry of 7,500 Cataractous eyes","volume":"90","author":"Hoffer","year":"1980","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4498","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.13-12271","article-title":"Myopia, axial length, and age-related cataract: the singapore malay eye study","volume":"54","author":"Pan","year":"2013","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci."},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"725","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2019.01.018","article-title":"Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in chinese eyes with axial myopia","volume":"45","author":"Liu","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg."},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"732","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2018.12.025","article-title":"Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with extreme myopia: comparison of barrett universal ii, haigis, and olsen formulas","volume":"45","author":"Rong","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg."},{"key":"B31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"754","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20210712-08","article-title":"Accuracy of newer generation iol power calculation formulas in eyes with high axial myopia","volume":"37","author":"Lin","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Refract Surg."},{"key":"B32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sjopt.2010.03.006","article-title":"Intra-ocular lens power calculation in patients with high axial myopia before cataract surgery","volume":"24","author":"El-Nafees","year":"2010","journal-title":"Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology."},{"key":"B33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1316","DOI":"10.1080\/02713683.2018.1488265","article-title":"Wang Y. Accuracy of the haigis and srk\/t formulas in eyes longer than 290 mm and the influence of central corneal keratometry reading","volume":"43","author":"Zhang","year":"2018","journal-title":"Curr Eye Res."},{"key":"B34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"906","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2008.12.035","article-title":"Intraocular lens calculation in extreme myopia","volume":"35","author":"Haigis","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg."},{"key":"B35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2010.07.008","article-title":"Accuracy of intraocular lens calculations using the iolmaster in eyes with long axial length and a comparison of various formulas","volume":"118","author":"Bang","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ophthalmology."},{"key":"B36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2017.08.027","article-title":"Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas","volume":"125","author":"Melles","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ophthalmology."},{"key":"B37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1917268","DOI":"10.1155\/2016\/1917268","article-title":"Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas for highly myopic eyes","volume":"2016","author":"Zhang","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.07.032","article-title":"Formula choice: hoffer q, holladay 1, or Srk\/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry","volume":"37","author":"Aristodemou","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg."},{"key":"B39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.22608\/APO.2017338","article-title":"Iol power calculation in short and long eyes","volume":"6","author":"Hoffer","year":"2017","journal-title":"Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)."},{"key":"B40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1490","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2016.07.021","article-title":"Intraocular lens power formula accuracy: comparison of 7 formulas","volume":"42","author":"Kane","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg."},{"key":"B41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-019-1226-7","article-title":"T2 formula in a highly myopic population, comparison with other methods and description of an improved approach for estimating corneal height","author":"Idrobo-Robalino","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMC Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1157","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2016.06.029","article-title":"Comparison of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulas","volume":"42","author":"Cooke","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg."},{"key":"B43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1475-1313.2012.00903.x","article-title":"Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using partial coherence interferometry in patients with high myopia","volume":"32","author":"Roessler","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ophthal Physiol Optics."},{"key":"B44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.eye.6702954","article-title":"Benchmark standards for refractive outcomes after nhs cataract surgery","volume":"23","author":"Gale","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eye."},{"key":"B45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2105","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2011.05.011","article-title":"Determination of valid benchmarks for outcome indicators in cataract surgery: a multicenter, prospective cohort trial","volume":"118","author":"Hahn","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ophthalmology."},{"key":"B46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2013.09.022","article-title":"Achieving target refraction after cataract surgery","volume":"121","author":"Simon","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ophthalmology."},{"key":"B47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm10030542","article-title":"High agreement between barrett universal ii calculations with and without utilization of optional biometry parameters","author":"Vega","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Clin Med."}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Medicine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fmed.2022.762761\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,8]],"date-time":"2022-04-08T05:13:28Z","timestamp":1649394808000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fmed.2022.762761\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,8]]},"references-count":47,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fmed.2022.762761"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fmed.2022.762761","relation":{},"ISSN":["2296-858X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2296-858X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,8]]},"article-number":"762761"}}