{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]],"date-time":"2026-09-09T10:33:59Z","timestamp":1788950039707,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,2]],"date-time":"2024-08-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1722556800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Med."],"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>To investigate the robustness and variability of a novel kinetic visual field (VF) screening method termed rapid campimetry (RC).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>In RC visual field (VF) screening is enabled via kinetic-based testing on any computer (10\u00b0\/4.7 s at 40-cm viewing distance) and high contrast in a dark room (1 cd\/cm<jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>). In experiment (1): 30 participants [20 healthy participants (HC), 5 glaucoma patients (GLA) and 5 patients with cataract (CAT)] were included to test the intra-session variability (fatigue effect) and the following effects on RC: room illumination (140 cd\/m<jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>), \u00b13 D refractive errors, media opacity. In experiment (2): Inter-session variability (1\u20133 weeks apart) was assessed in 10 HC and 10 GLA. Since RC detects absolute scotomas, the outcome measure was the size of physiological (blindspot) and pathological (glaucoma) scotomas in degrees. A repeated measures ANOVA was employed in experiment 1 and intraclass correlation (ICC) in experiment 2.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Neither the size of the blindspot nor the VF defects differed significantly between the different testing conditions. For intra-session variability, the average bias of blindspot size was \u22120.6 \u00b1 2.5\u00b0, limits of agreement (LOA), in comparison to 0.3 \u00b1 1.5\u00b0 for VF defects, both with ICC of 0.86 and 0.93, respectively. For the inter-session repeatability, the average bias and LOA for blindspot size was 0.2 \u00b1 3.85\u00b0 in comparison 1.6 \u00b1 3.1\u00b0 for VF defects, both with ICC of 0.87 and 0.91, respectively.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>RC was robust to suboptimal testing VF conditions and showed good-to-excellent reliability between VF testing visits holding high potential for teleophthalmology.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2024.1419147","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,2]],"date-time":"2024-08-02T04:49:29Z","timestamp":1722574169000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Rapid campimetry - a novel robust kinetic approach for visual field screening in glaucoma"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Khaldoon O.","family":"Al-Nosairy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Katharina","family":"Rodenbeck","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sophie","family":"Vorholt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nidele","family":"Djouoma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hagen","family":"Thieme","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fabian","family":"M\u00fcller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael B.","family":"Hoffmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2081","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2014.05.013","article-title":"Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"121","author":"Tham","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ophthalmology."},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.2007.135012","article-title":"Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma.","volume":"92","author":"Chauhan","year":"2008","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1627","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.06-1074","article-title":"Retesting visual fields: utilizing prior information to decrease test-retest variability in glaucoma.","volume":"48","author":"Turpin","year":"2007","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci."},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm11082156","article-title":"Rapid campimetry\u2014A novel screening method for glaucoma diagnosis.","volume":"11","author":"M\u00fcller","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Clin Med."},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.preteyeres.2012.08.003","article-title":"Glaucomatous damage of the macula.","volume":"32","author":"Hood","year":"2013","journal-title":"Prog Retin Eye Res."},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02582983","article-title":"Little correlation of the pattern electroretinogram (PERG) and visual field measures in early glaucoma.","volume":"94","author":"Bach","year":"1997","journal-title":"Doc Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1449","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2017.04.021","article-title":"24-2 visual fields miss central defects shown on 10-2 tests in glaucoma suspects, ocular hypertensives, and early glaucoma.","volume":"124","author":"De Moraes","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ophthalmology."},{"key":"B8","first-page":"128","article-title":"[Subjective examination methods in glaucoma diagnosis].","volume":"69","author":"Aulhorn","year":"1976","journal-title":"Buch Augenarzt."},{"key":"B9","first-page":"84","article-title":"The early field defects in glaucoma.","volume":"8","author":"Drance","year":"1969","journal-title":"Investig Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaophthalmol.2013.7656","article-title":"Prevalence and Nature of Early Glaucomatous Defects in the Central 10\u00b0 of the Visual Field.","volume":"132","author":"Traynis","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1066","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(91)32175-4","article-title":"Effect of cataract on automated perimetry.","volume":"98","author":"Lam","year":"1991","journal-title":"Ophthalmology."},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9394(87)90409-0","article-title":"The effect of refractive error on automated global analysis program G-1.","volume":"104","author":"Goldstick","year":"1987","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4022","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.08-2934","article-title":"The robustness of various forms of perimetry to different levels of induced intraocular stray light.","volume":"50","author":"Anderson","year":"2009","journal-title":"Investig Ophthalmol Visual Sci."},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"704","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.1984.01040030560017","article-title":"Differential light threshold: short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma.","volume":"102","author":"Flammer","year":"1984","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B15","first-page":"2654","article-title":"Properties of Perimetric Threshold Estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast Strategies.","volume":"43","author":"Artes","year":"2002","journal-title":"Investig Ophthalmol Visual Sci."},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5985","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.12-10428","article-title":"The relationship between variability and sensitivity in large-scale longitudinal visual field data.","volume":"53","author":"Russell","year":"2012","journal-title":"Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci."},{"key":"B17","author":"Crabb","year":"2014","journal-title":"Frequency of visual field testing when monitoring patients newly diagnosed with glaucoma: mixed methods and modelling [Internet]."},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2015.10.053","article-title":"Primary open-angle glaucoma preferred practice pattern(\u00ae) guidelines.","volume":"123","author":"Prum","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ophthalmology."},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1007\/s10633-019-09715-5","article-title":"Use of diffusing filters for artificially reducing visual acuity when testing equipment and procedures.","volume":"140","author":"Heinrich","year":"2020","journal-title":"Doc Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1007\/s10633-008-9146-5","article-title":"Can we do without mydriasis in multifocal ERG recordings?","volume":"118","author":"Poloschek","year":"2009","journal-title":"Doc Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1023\/a:1002432113628","article-title":"Effects of refractive blur on the multifocal electroretinogram.","volume":"99","author":"Palmowski","year":"1999","journal-title":"Doc Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcm.2016.02.012","article-title":"Guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research.","volume":"15","author":"Koo","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Chiropr Med."},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1167\/tvst.5.6.2","article-title":"Comparison of perimetric results from a tablet perimeter and Humphrey field analyzer in glaucoma patients.","volume":"5","author":"Kong","year":"2016","journal-title":"Transl Vis Sci Technol."},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2018.03.009","article-title":"Six-month longitudinal comparison of a portable tablet perimeter with the Humphrey field analyzer.","volume":"190","author":"Prea","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.1997.01100150028003","article-title":"Motion perimetry identifies nerve fiber bundle like defects in ocular hypertension.","volume":"115","author":"Wall","year":"1997","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B26","first-page":"722","article-title":"Motion perception is abnormal in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.","volume":"31","author":"Silverman","year":"1990","journal-title":"Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci."},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9394(89)90006-8","article-title":"Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields.","volume":"108","author":"Heijl","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1167\/tvst.11.10.9","article-title":"Moving stimulus perimetry: a new functional test for glaucoma.","volume":"11","author":"Gardiner","year":"2022","journal-title":"Transl Vis Sci Technol."},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1327","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuron.2018.02.006","article-title":"Neural mechanisms mediating motion sensitivity in parasol ganglion cells of the primate retina.","volume":"97","author":"Manookin","year":"2018","journal-title":"Neuron."},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2379","DOI":"10.1016\/s0042-6989(00)00106-1","article-title":"Visual motion detection in man is governed by non-retinal mechanisms.","volume":"40","author":"Bach","year":"2000","journal-title":"Vision Res."},{"key":"B31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1167\/tvst.5.4.3","article-title":"Validation of a tablet as a tangent perimeter.","volume":"5","author":"Vingrys","year":"2016","journal-title":"Transl Vis Sci Technol."},{"key":"B32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.3109\/09286589609071600","article-title":"Visual sensitivity and age-related eye diseases. The Beaver dam eye study.","volume":"3","author":"Klein","year":"1996","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Epidemiol."},{"key":"B33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0420.1997.tb00121.x","article-title":"Perimetric probability maps to separate change caused by glaucoma from that caused by cataract.","volume":"75","author":"Bengtsson","year":"1997","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol Scand."},{"key":"B34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9394(01)00920-5","article-title":"Influence of cataract surgery on automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma.","volume":"132","author":"Hayashi","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo-2022-322274","article-title":"Accuracy of pattern deviation in estimating the glaucomatous damage in the central 10\u00b0 visual field in eyes with glaucoma and cataract.","volume":"108","author":"Tomita","year":"2024","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B36","first-page":"611","article-title":"Factors influencing normal perimetric thresholds obtained using the Humphrey Field Analyzer.","volume":"33","author":"Herse","year":"1992","journal-title":"Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci."},{"key":"B37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0000000000002005","article-title":"Effect of correcting peripheral refractive errors on retinal sensitivity in younger and older healthy adults.","volume":"100","author":"Jo\u00e3o","year":"2023","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci."},{"key":"B38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"742","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaophthalmol.2017.1396","article-title":"Association between undetected 10-2 visual field damage and vision-related quality of life in patients with glaucoma.","volume":"135","author":"Blumberg","year":"2017","journal-title":"JAMA Ophthalmol."},{"key":"B39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2015.10.007","article-title":"Clinical clues to predict the presence of parafoveal scotoma on Humphrey 10-2 visual field using a Humphrey 24-2 visual field.","volume":"161","author":"Park","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol."}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Medicine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fmed.2024.1419147\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,2]],"date-time":"2024-08-02T04:49:43Z","timestamp":1722574183000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fmed.2024.1419147\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,2]]},"references-count":39,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fmed.2024.1419147"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fmed.2024.1419147","relation":{},"ISSN":["2296-858X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2296-858X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,2]]},"article-number":"1419147"}}