{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,3]],"date-time":"2025-10-03T00:45:23Z","timestamp":1759452323201,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,2]],"date-time":"2025-10-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1759363200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Med."],"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title><jats:p>Artificial rupture of membranes (AROM) is a common intervention during delivery, usually done in order to expedite delivery. Studies to determine optimal timing of AROM according to cervical dilation were inconclusive. However, other important factors, which are known to be associated with timing of delivery were ignored. One of these factors is fetal head station (FHS). We sought to investigate the association between FHS during AROM and time to delivery and other obstetrical outcomes.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Material and methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>A retrospective cohort study encompassing data from labors during a 12-year period were analyzed. All cases of singleton, term pregnancy with documented AROM time were included. The study population was stratified by parity.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>This study cohort included 45,898 singleton, term vaginal delivery parturients with time stamp at time of AROM and delivery. Stratification by parity yielded 11,947 primiparas (26%) and 33,951 multiparas (74%). Across all sub-cohorts, as fetal head station decreased at AROM the duration from ROM to delivery was shorter. This trend seems to be stronger for multiparas than primiparas. Rates of cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and low 5-min Apgar scores were also negatively associated with decrease in fetal head station at AROM across all cervical dilations.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Lower fetal head station at AROM is associated with shorter time to delivery as well as lower rates of cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, NICU admission, and 5-min Apgar \u2264 7. Fetal head station should be considered alongside cervical dilation during AROM. Our findings underscore the necessity for personalized timing of AROM, especially in multiparous women, to enhance maternal and neonatal health outcomes.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2025.1612947","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,2]],"date-time":"2025-10-02T15:10:29Z","timestamp":1759417829000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Fetal head station during artificial rupture of membranes: a large retrospective cohort study"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Yishai","family":"Sompolinsky","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Joshua","family":"Guedalia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Naama","family":"Vilk-Ayalon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sarah M.","family":"Cohen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shirley","family":"Greenbaum","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Doron","family":"Kabiri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Simcha","family":"Yagel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michal","family":"Lipschuetz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"320","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.07.049","article-title":"Early AROM after cervical ripening for induction of labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"222","author":"De Vivo","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.08.032","article-title":"The efficacy of early AROM in nulliparous labor induction: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"207","author":"Macones","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"352","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1285893","article-title":"Early AROM after dinoprostone insert used for the induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"31","author":"Bostanci","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-013-2747-6","article-title":"Early AROM after vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"288","author":"Makarem","year":"2013","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"168","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01137.x","article-title":"A randomised comparison of early versus late AROM following cervical ripening with a Foley catheter","volume":"109","author":"Levy","year":"2002","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.2.5655.477","article-title":"Prevention of prolonged labour","volume":"2","author":"O'Driscoll","year":"1969","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"548","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11530.x","article-title":"Early AROM increases the frequency of fetal heart rate abnormalities. AROM study group","volume":"104","author":"Goffinet","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"406","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003081","article-title":"766 Summary. Approaches to limit intervention during labor and birth","volume":"133","author":"ACOG","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"g6886","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g6886","article-title":"Intrapartum care of healthy women and their babies: summary of updated NICE guidance","volume":"349","author":"Delgado Nunes","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMJ."},{"key":"B10","volume-title":"WHO Recommendations for Augmentation of Labour","year":"2014"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1007\/s004040000071","article-title":"The impact of early AROM on mode of delivery and pregnancy outcome","volume":"264","author":"Sheiner","year":"2000","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet."},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(99)00058-5","article-title":"Early AROM \u2013 high risk factor for cesarean section","volume":"86","author":"Segal","year":"1999","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol."},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-015-3645-x","article-title":"Effect of early AROM on dystocia risk and cesarean delivery in nulliparous women: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"292","author":"Ghafarzadeh","year":"2015","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD006167","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006167.pub4","article-title":"AROM for shortening spontaneous labour","volume":"2013","author":"Smyth","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e77760","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.77760","article-title":"Artificial rupture of membranes and spontaneous rupture of membranes: a systematic review of feto-maternal outcomes","volume":"17","author":"Khodke","year":"2025","journal-title":"Cureus."},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.15399","article-title":"Amniotomy versus expectant management during the active phase of labor defined by the new WHO definition on the duration of labor: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"165","author":"Khunpradit","year":"2024","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet."},{"key":"B17","first-page":"266","article-title":"Pelvic scoring for elective induction","volume":"24","author":"Bishop","year":"1964","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"724","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.11.1368","article-title":"Early vs expectant artificial rupture of membranes following Foley catheter ripening: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"226","author":"Gomez Slagle","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.09.006","article-title":"The association between fetal head station at the first diagnosis of the second stage of labor and delivery outcomes","volume":"224","author":"Ashwal","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100100","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eurox.2019.100100","article-title":"Station of the fetal head at complete cervical dilation impacts duration of second stage of labor","volume":"7","author":"Ludvigsen","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X."},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"546","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.07.019","article-title":"Normal labor curve in twin gestation","volume":"225","author":"Hochler","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e14","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0040-1702989","article-title":"A novel partogram for stages 1 and 2 of labor based on fetal head station measured by ultrasound: a prospective multicenter cohort study","volume":"38","author":"Haberman","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol."},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"360","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.005","article-title":"Descent of the fetal head (station) during the first stage of labor","volume":"214","author":"Hamilton","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.10.016","article-title":"Assessing first-stage labor progression and its relationship to complications","volume":"214","author":"Hamilton","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"654","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2008.00996.x","article-title":"Relations between fetal head descent and cervical dilatation during individual uterine contractions in the active stage of labor","volume":"35","author":"Barnea","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.230","article-title":"Sonographic large fetal head circumference and risk of cesarean delivery","volume":"218","author":"Lipschuetz","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.05.025","article-title":"Real-time data analysis using a machine learning model significantly improves prediction of successful vaginal deliveries","volume":"223","author":"Guedalia","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1824","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16700","article-title":"Prediction of severe adverse neonatal outcomes at the second stage of labour using machine learning: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"128","author":"Guedalia","year":"2021","journal-title":"BJOG."},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.12.267","article-title":"Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean deliveries using machine learning","volume":"222","author":"Lipschuetz","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2007.11.020","article-title":"Interobserver agreement in intrapartum estimation of fetal head station","volume":"101","author":"Buchmann","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"B31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.2196\/28120","article-title":"Transporting an artificial intelligence model to predict emergency cesarean delivery: overcoming challenges posed by interfacility variation","volume":"23","author":"Guedalia","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res."}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Medicine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fmed.2025.1612947\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,2]],"date-time":"2025-10-02T15:10:29Z","timestamp":1759417829000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fmed.2025.1612947\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,2]]},"references-count":31,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fmed.2025.1612947"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fmed.2025.1612947","relation":{},"ISSN":["2296-858X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2296-858X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,2]]},"article-number":"1612947"}}