{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,10]],"date-time":"2026-10-10T06:03:44Z","timestamp":1791612224424,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,12]],"date-time":"2025-11-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1762905600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Med."],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Although low tidal volume ventilation has been shown to reduce mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), overall mortality remains high (30%\u221240%). Ultra-protective ventilation (\u22644 mL\/kg predicted body weight) has the potential to further decrease ventilator-induced lung injury but may result in severe hypercapnia. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      R) could facilitate ultra-protective ventilation by alleviating carbon dioxide retention; however, supporting evidence remains limited.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      To evaluate the efficacy of ECCO\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      R in enabling ultra-protective ventilation strategies in patients with ARDS.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to June 2025 that met predefined inclusion criteria. Primary outcomes included changes in gas exchange and ventilator settings 24 h after initiating ECCO\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      R. All analyses were performed using a random-effects model. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted to further explore the findings.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Fourteen studies involving 593 ARDS patients were included. ECCO\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      R significantly reduced driving pressure (weighted mean difference [WMD]: \u22123.70 cmH\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      O; 95% CI: \u22124.05 to \u22123.34;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &amp;lt; 0.001), plateau pressure (WMD: \u22123.26 cmH\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      O; 95% CI: \u22123.70 to \u22122.82;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &amp;lt; 0.001), and tidal volume (WMD: \u22121.68 mL\/kg; 95% CI: \u22121.81 to \u22121.55;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &amp;lt; 0.001) at 24 h, while it increased positive end-expiratory pressure (WMD: 0.64 cmH\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      O; 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.85;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &amp;lt; 0.001). No significant changes were observed in PaO\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      \/FiO\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      ratio, pCO\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      , or pH (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &amp;gt; 0.05). The pooled 28-day mortality rate was 29% (95% CI: 19%\u221238%). Notable complications included bleeding (15%; 95% CI: 8%\u221221%), circuit clotting (19%; 95% CI: 13%\u221226%), and hemolysis (15%; 95% CI: 5%\u221225%).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      ECCO\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      R facilitates the implementation of ultra-protective ventilation by significantly improving respiratory mechanics and mitigating the hypercapnia that would otherwise result from ultra-low tidal volumes. However, its use is associated with a notable risk of device-related complications, necessitating careful patient selection and expert management.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Systematic review registration<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>INPLASY platform (registration number: INPLASY202570067.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2025.1707596","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,12]],"date-time":"2025-11-12T12:15:59Z","timestamp":1762949759000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Effects of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in facilitating ultra-protective ventilation strategies for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Weifeng","family":"Zhen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xiaoning","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zhenhua","family":"Shi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yu","family":"Zhu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1277161","DOI":"10.3389\/fimmu.2023.1277161","article-title":"Acute respiratory distress syndrome heterogeneity and the septic ARDS subgroup","volume":"14","author":"Xu","year":"2023","journal-title":"Front Immunol."},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e002439","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjresp-2024-002439","article-title":"Comparing the impact of targeting limited driving pressure to low tidal volume ventilation on mortality in mechanically ventilated adults with COVID-19 ARDS: an exploratory target trial emulation","volume":"11","author":"Tanios","year":"2024","journal-title":"BMJ Open Respir Res"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"684","DOI":"10.5811\/westjem.2020.2.45191","article-title":"Males receive low-tidal volume component of lung protective ventilation more frequently than females in the emergency department west","volume":"21","author":"Isenberg","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Emerg Med"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1186\/s13054-022-04105-x","article-title":"Unshrinking the baby lung to calm the VILI vortex","volume":"26","author":"Nieman","year":"2022","journal-title":"Crit Care."},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1186\/s40560-022-00604-9","article-title":"Ultraprotective versus apneic ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a physiological study","volume":"10","author":"Graf","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Intensive Care"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1097\/imi.0000000000000250","article-title":"Intraoperative management of hypercapnia with an extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal device during giant bullectomy","volume":"11","author":"Dell'Amore","year":"2016","journal-title":"Innovations."},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"631","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0000000000000504","article-title":"Effects of ultraprotective ventilation, extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal, and spontaneous breathing on lung morphofunction and inflammation in experimental severe acute respiratory distress syndrome","volume":"122","author":"G\u00fcldner","year":"2015","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1186\/s13054-025-05352-4","article-title":"Questioning the classification of \u201chigh blood flow\u201d versus \u201clow blood flow\u201d ECCO2R in ultra-low tidal volume ventilation studies: a call for functional classification","volume":"29","author":"Wang","year":"2025","journal-title":"Crit Care"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1007\/s00063-024-01197-x","article-title":"Is there still a place for ECCO2R?","volume":"119","author":"Staudinger","year":"2024","journal-title":"Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed."},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"n71","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"d5928","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d5928","article-title":"The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials","volume":"343","author":"Higgins","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMJ."},{"key":"B12","volume-title":"The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses","author":"Wells","year":"2009"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"646","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X05282643","article-title":"The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models","volume":"25","author":"Ades","year":"2005","journal-title":"Med Decis Making"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.11.019","article-title":"GRADE Working Group. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) notes: extremely serious, GRADE's terminology for rating down by three levels","volume":"120","author":"Piggott","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470712184.ch9","article-title":"Analyzing data and undertaking meta-analyses","volume-title":"Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.0.1","author":"Deeks","year":"2008"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","article-title":"Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses","volume":"327","author":"Higgins","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"B17","first-page":"15","article-title":"Assessing the influence of a single study in meta-analysis","volume":"47","author":"Tobias","year":"1999","journal-title":"Stata Tech Bull."},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.326.7382.219","article-title":"Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates","volume":"326","author":"Altman","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.629","article-title":"Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test","volume":"315","author":"Egger","year":"1997","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1088","DOI":"10.2307\/2533446","article-title":"Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias","volume":"50","author":"Begg","year":"1994","journal-title":"Biometrics."},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"826","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0b013e3181b764d2","article-title":"Tidal volume lower than 6 ml\/kg enhances lung protection: role of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal","volume":"111","author":"Terragni","year":"2009","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"847","DOI":"10.1007\/s00134-012-2787-6","article-title":"Lower tidal volume strategy (\u22483 ml\/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO2 removal versus \u2018conventional' protective ventilation (6 ml\/kg) in severe ARDS: the prospective randomized Xtravent-study","volume":"39","author":"Bein","year":"2013","journal-title":"Intensive Care Med"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2570","DOI":"10.1097\/CCM.0000000000001296","article-title":"Safety and efficacy of combined extracorporeal CO2 removal and renal replacement therapy in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute kidney injury: the pulmonary and renal support in acute respiratory distress syndrome study","volume":"43","author":"Allardet-Servent","year":"2015","journal-title":"Crit Care Med"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1186\/s13054-016-1211-y","article-title":"Feasibility and safety of low-flow extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal to facilitate ultra-protective ventilation in patients with moderate acute respiratory distress sindrome","volume":"20","author":"Fanelli","year":"2016","journal-title":"Crit Care"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1186\/s12871-017-0445-9","article-title":"Low flow extracorporeal CO2 removal in ARDS patients: a prospective short-term crossover pilot study","volume":"17","author":"Peperstraete","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Anesthesiol."},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1186\/s40560-018-0304-x","article-title":"Daily use of extracorporeal CO2 removal in a critical care unit: indications and results","volume":"6","author":"Winiszewski","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Intensive Care."},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1186\/s13054-018-2038-5","article-title":"Feasibility and safety of low-flow extracorporeal CO2 removal managed with a renal replacement platform to enhance lung-protective ventilation of patients with mild-to-moderate ARDS","volume":"22","author":"Schmidt","year":"2018","journal-title":"Crit Care."},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1186\/s40560-019-0399-8","article-title":"A 2-year multicenter, observational, prospective, cohort study on extracorporeal CO2 removal in a large metropolis area","volume":"7","author":"Augy","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Intensive Care"},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"592","DOI":"10.1007\/s00134-019-05567-4","article-title":"European society of intensive care medicine trials group and the \u201cStrategy of Ultra-Protective lung ventilation with Extracorporeal CO2 Removal for New-Onset moderate to severe ARDS\u201d (SUPERNOVA) investigators. Feasibility and safety of extracorporeal CO2 removal to enhance protective ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: the SUPERNOVA study","volume":"45","author":"Combes","year":"2019","journal-title":"Intensive Care Med"},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1186\/s13613-020-00784-3","article-title":"Ultraprotective ventilation allowed by extracorporeal CO2 removal improves the right ventricular function in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: a quasi-experimental pilot study","volume":"11","author":"Goursaud","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ann Intensive Care"},{"key":"B31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1013","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2021.13374","article-title":"Effect of lower tidal volume ventilation facilitated by extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal vs standard care ventilation on 90-day mortality in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: the REST randomized clinical trial","volume":"326","author":"McNamee","year":"2021","journal-title":"JAMA."},{"key":"B32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"154092","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrc.2022.154092","article-title":"Long term feasibility of ultraprotective lung ventilation with low-flow extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in ARDS patients","volume":"71","author":"Chiumello","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Crit Care"},{"key":"B33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1186\/s44158-024-s00164-4","article-title":"Lung (extracorporeal CO2 removal) and renal (continuous renal replacement therapy) support: the role of ultraprotective strategy in Covid 19 and non-Covid 19 ARDS. A case-control study","volume":"4","author":"Pasero","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Anesth Analg Crit Care"},{"key":"B34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1186\/s13054-024-05168-8","article-title":"Feasibility and safety of ultra-low volume ventilation ( \u2264 3 ml\/kg) combined with extra corporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) in acute respiratory failure patients","volume":"28","author":"Monet","year":"2024","journal-title":"Crit Care"},{"key":"B35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1186\/s13054-024-04927-x","article-title":"Effects of extracorporeal CO2 removal on gas exchange and ventilator settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"28","author":"Stommel","year":"2024","journal-title":"Crit Care"},{"key":"B36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1062","DOI":"10.1177\/02676591221096225","article-title":"Venovenous extracorporeal CO2 removal to support ultraprotective ventilation in moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature","volume":"38","author":"Worku","year":"2023","journal-title":"Perfusion"},{"key":"B37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"871","DOI":"10.1007\/s00134-015-4167-5","article-title":"Ventilator-associated pneumonia in ARDS patients: the impact of prone positioning. A secondary analysis of the PROSEVA trial","volume":"42","author":"Ayzac","year":"2016","journal-title":"Intensive Care Med"},{"key":"B38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e071284","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2022-071284","article-title":"Cohort profile: evaluation of immune response and household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in Costa Rica: the RESPIRA study","volume":"13","author":"Loria","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"B39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108011","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rmed.2025.108011","article-title":"Extracorporeal CO2 removal in severe respiratory acidotic intubated patients: a seven year experience observational study","volume":"240","author":"Cobeta","year":"2025","journal-title":"Respir Med"},{"key":"B40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1164\/rccm.202403-0618LE","article-title":"Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal to avoid invasive ventilation during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: VENT-AVOID Trial-A randomized clinical trial","volume":"209","author":"Duggal","year":"2024","journal-title":"Am J Respir Crit Care Med."},{"key":"B41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm14010012","article-title":"Recent advances and future directions in extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal","volume":"14","author":"Lamas","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Clin Med."}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Medicine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fmed.2025.1707596\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,12]],"date-time":"2025-11-12T12:16:01Z","timestamp":1762949761000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fmed.2025.1707596\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,12]]},"references-count":41,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fmed.2025.1707596"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fmed.2025.1707596","relation":{},"ISSN":["2296-858X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2296-858X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,12]]},"article-number":"1707596"}}