{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T04:18:24Z","timestamp":1787026704183,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,28]],"date-time":"2026-01-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769558400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Med."],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The study aimed to develop and validate a predictive nomogram model of vaginal delivery in women with fetal growth restriction (FGR) who undergo labor induction.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, involving 507 singleton pregnancies complicated with fetal growth restriction (FGR) between October 2017 and December 2022. These pregnancies underwent labor induction with dinoprostone or Cook\u2019s double balloon. The cohort was randomly divided into two groups: 75% of pregnancies (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 380) were utilized to identify independent factors associated with vaginal delivery using multi-logistic regression and develop a predictive nomogram model, while 25% (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 127) were allocated for internal validation of the model.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A predictive nomogram model was constructed with five validated factors including maternal age, multiparity, oligohydramnios (borderline significant), Bishop score after cervical ripening and Cook\u2019s double balloon. The trained and validated area under the curve were 0.811 (95% confident interval 0.757\u20130.865) and 0.760 (95% confident interval 0.669\u20130.860), respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated no statistically significant difference between the predicted and observed outcomes (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &amp;gt; 0.050). The clinical decision curve demonstrated that both the model and the validation groups achieved the greatest net benefit at threshold probability values ranging from 0.20 to 0.95 and exceeding 0.40, respectively.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The nomogram model could be utilized to inform patients with FGR about their success of vaginal delivery during labor induction. Moreover, this model established a foundation for clinical intervention and the development of personalized medical treatment strategies.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2026.1650365","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,28]],"date-time":"2026-01-28T06:44:41Z","timestamp":1769582681000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Construction of a nomogram model for predicting vaginal birth after induction of labor in pregnant women with fetal growth restriction at term"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"13","author":[{"given":"Liping","family":"Huang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics","place":["Fuzhou, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ting","family":"Yao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics","place":["Fuzhou, China"]},{"name":"College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University","place":["Fuzhou, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lin","family":"Lin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics","place":["Fuzhou, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wenqiang","family":"You","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics","place":["Fuzhou, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mingxing","family":"Yan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics","place":["Fuzhou, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e97","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003070","article-title":"ACOG practice bulletin No. 204: fetal growth restriction.","volume":"133","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S855","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.004","article-title":"Evidence-based national guidelines for the management of suspected fetal growth restriction: comparison, consensus, and controversy.","volume":"218","author":"McCowan","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4","article-title":"Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements\u2013a prospective study.","volume":"151","author":"Hadlock","year":"1985","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.11.1357","article-title":"Clinical opinion: the diagnosis and management of suspected fetal growth restriction: an evidence-based approach.","volume":"226","author":"Lees","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"B2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.05.010","article-title":"Society for maternal-fetal medicine consult series #52: diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: (replaces clinical guideline number 3, april 2012).","volume":"223","author":"Martins","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1159\/000491784","article-title":"Labor induction in late-onset fetal growth restriction: foley balloon versus vaginal dinoprostone.","volume":"46","author":"Villalain","year":"2019","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"777","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4492-8","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of misoprostol, dinoprostone and Cook\u2019s balloon for labour induction in women with foetal growth restriction at term.","volume":"296","author":"Duro-G\u00f3mez","year":"2017","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"536","DOI":"10.1159\/000503390","article-title":"Prognostic factors of successful cervical ripening and labor induction in late-onset fetal growth restriction.","volume":"47","author":"Villalain","year":"2020","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.07.032","article-title":"Prognostic factors for successful induction of labor in intrauterine growth restriction after 36 weeks of gestation.","volume":"276","author":"Metrop","year":"2022","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8691","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2021.1998442","article-title":"Feasibility and learning curve of performing first trimester fetal anatomy screening among operators with varying experience using the protocol of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG).","volume":"35","author":"Sripilaipong","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-022-06891-9","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of double balloon catheter and dinoprostone for labor induction in multipara at term.","volume":"309","author":"Yuan","year":"2024","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1313","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14135","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by late fetal growth restriction undergoing induction of labor with dinoprostone compared with cervical balloon: a retrospective, international study.","volume":"100","author":"Di Mascio","year":"2021","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.07.020","article-title":"Adverse intrapartum outcome in pregnancies complicated by small for gestational age and late fetal growth restriction undergoing induction of labor with Dinoprostone, Misoprostol or mechanical methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"252","author":"Familiari","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5","article-title":"ACOG practice bulletin No. 107: cervical ripening and labor induction.","volume":"114","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.08.382","article-title":"Safety of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"289","author":"Taliento","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"H687","DOI":"10.1152\/ajpheart.00294.2023","article-title":"A novel role for PGE2-EP4 in the developmental programming of the mouse ductus arteriosus: consequences for vessel maturation and function.","volume":"325","author":"Yarboro","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"360","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2019.1647516","article-title":"Clinical factors and ultrasound parameters to predict successful vaginal delivery following labour induction.","volume":"40","author":"Won","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"946","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2018.1441814","article-title":"Influence of maternal factors and mode of induction on labour outcomes: a pragmatic retrospective cohort study.","volume":"38","author":"Jonker","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2010.00439.x","article-title":"Older maternal age and intervention in labor: a population-based study comparing older and younger first-time mothers in Victoria.","volume":"38","author":"Carolan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Australia. Birth"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"352","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2017.1361388","article-title":"Induction of labour: clinical predictive factors for success and failure.","volume":"38","author":"Batinelli","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e946357","DOI":"10.12659\/MSM.946357","article-title":"Association between pre-pregnancy body mass index and labor induction success rates: a case control study.","volume":"30","author":"Marlina","year":"2024","journal-title":"Med Sci Monit"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1515\/jom-2024-0025","article-title":"The impact of prepregnancy body mass index on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.","volume":"124","author":"Mackeen","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Osteopath Med"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"459","DOI":"10.1111\/jmwh.13238","article-title":"Review of evidence-based methods for successful labor induction.","volume":"66","author":"Carlson","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Midwifery Womens Health"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"713","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14807","article-title":"Cervical condition and fetal cerebral doppler as determinants of adverse perinatal outcome after labor induction for late-onset small-for-gestational-age fetuses.","volume":"46","author":"Garcia-Simon","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1739","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.13715","article-title":"Prediction of the efficacy of dinoprostone slow release vaginal insert (Propess) for cervical ripening: a prospective cohort study.","volume":"44","author":"Daykan","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100534","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100534","article-title":"Favorable Simplified Bishop Score after cervical ripening associated with decreased cesarean birth rate.","volume":"4","author":"Lee","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0262387","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0262387","article-title":"Pre-induction cervical assessment using transvaginal ultrasound versus Bishops cervical scoring as predictors of successful induction of labour in term pregnancies: a hospital-based comparative clinical trial.","volume":"17","author":"Abdullah","year":"2022","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1077","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.14270","article-title":"Predicting labor induction success by cervical funneling in uncomplicated pregnancies.","volume":"46","author":"Kim","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.23757","article-title":"External validation of prognostic models to predict stillbirth using International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications (IPPIC) Network database: individual participant data meta-analysis.","volume":"59","author":"Allotey","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Medicine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fmed.2026.1650365\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,28]],"date-time":"2026-01-28T06:44:42Z","timestamp":1769582682000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fmed.2026.1650365\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,28]]},"references-count":29,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fmed.2026.1650365"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fmed.2026.1650365","relation":{},"ISSN":["2296-858X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2296-858X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,28]]},"article-number":"1650365"}}