{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,10]],"date-time":"2026-04-10T13:44:25Z","timestamp":1775828665973,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,10]],"date-time":"2026-04-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1775779200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Med."],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The proximal humerus is an easily overlooked site for metastatic bone tumors, and pathological fractures here can cause severe pain and functional impairment. The selection of surgical regimens should take into account the location of bone metastases, the patient\u2019s physical status, and other relevant factors. Therefore, the optimal surgical strategy remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate and compare the clinical efficacy of two surgical approaches\u2014tumor resection combined with prosthesis implantation versus plate fixation combined with bone cement augmentation\u2014in patients with pathological fractures of the proximal humerus induced by metastatic tumors. By evaluating functional recovery, local tumor control, complications, and survival rate, this study clarified the applicable scenarios of the two surgical modalities, thereby providing a reference for clinical treatment decision-making.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A retrospective analysis was performed on 40 patients with metastatic pathological fractures of the proximal humerus who were admitted to our institution from July 2017 to May 2025 (24 males and 16 females, with a mean age of 57\u202fyears). According to the surgical procedures, the patients were divided into two groups: the prosthesis group (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u202f=\u202f15) underwent tumor resection combined with modular anatomical hemiarthroplasty, while the plate-cement group (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u202f=\u202f25) was treated with open reduction, plate internal fixation plus bone cement augmentation. Baseline data and perioperative indicators including operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and incision length were collected and compared between the two groups. In addition, postoperative pain assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), functional outcomes evaluated via the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score, postoperative complications, and survival rate were also compared between the two cohorts. The mean follow-up duration was 13.03\u202f\u00b1\u202f19.59\u202fmonths.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A total of 40 patients were enrolled in this study, consisting of 15 cases in the prosthesis group and 25 cases in the plate-cement group. No significant differences were observed in gender, primary tumor type and fracture type between the two groups (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u202f&amp;gt;\u202f0.05). With respect to perioperative indicators, the plate-cement group showed significantly superior outcomes to the prosthesis group in terms of intraoperative blood loss (374.00\u202f\u00b1\u202f100.13\u202fmL vs. 973.33\u202f\u00b1\u202f749.49\u202fmL,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u202f&amp;lt;\u202f0.05) and operation duration (93.40\u202f\u00b1\u202f20.19\u202fmin vs. 146.87\u202f\u00b1\u202f17.65\u202fmin,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u202f&amp;lt;\u202f0.05). At the 3-month postoperative follow-up, the plate-cement group achieved significantly lower VAS pain scores (0.72\u202f\u00b1\u202f0.80 vs. 1.27\u202f\u00b1\u202f0.80,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      &amp;lt;\u202f0.001) and significantly higher MSTS functional scores (27.20\u202f\u00b1\u202f1.38 vs. 21.53\u202f\u00b1\u202f1.19,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      &amp;lt;\u202f0.001) compared with the prosthesis group. Regarding complications during the short-term follow-up, two cases of shoulder instability occurred in the prosthesis group, whereas the plate-cement group presented with one case of humeral head collapse and two cases of transient radial nerve injury.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Plate fixation with bone cement augmentation provides superior short-term functional recovery and pain relief for metastatic proximal humeral fractures. However, these findings must be interpreted with caution due to the selection bias inherent in our non-randomized surgical approach.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2026.1788879","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,10]],"date-time":"2026-04-10T12:47:40Z","timestamp":1775825260000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparison of short-term clinical efficacy between shoulder arthroplasty and plate fixation combined with bone cement augmentation for pathological fractures of the proximal humerus caused by metastatic tumors: a retrospective study of 40 cases"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"13","author":[{"given":"Jinxian","family":"Zhao","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"The Eighth Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine","place":["Guangzhou, China"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Haiwen","family":"Pan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine","place":["Foshan, China"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jianfeng","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine","place":["Foshan, China"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Guokai","family":"Feng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine","place":["Foshan, China"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Zongquan","family":"Mo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine","place":["Foshan, China"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yongqiang","family":"Lao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine","place":["Foshan, China"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1653","DOI":"10.1007\/s00256-025-04875-9","article-title":"Are we underestimating pathological fracture risk in malignant bone lesions of the proximal humerus?","volume":"54","author":"Weschenfelder","year":"2025","journal-title":"Skeletal Radiol"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2342","DOI":"10.1111\/os.70101","article-title":"Which factors affect functional outcomes and survival in metastatic humeral fractures treated with nails?","volume":"17","author":"Eravsar","year":"2025","journal-title":"Orthop Surg"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1547","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-021-03136-4","article-title":"What\u2019s new in the management of metastatic bone disease","volume":"31","author":"Tsukamoto","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100427","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbo.2022.100427","article-title":"Outcomes and prognostic factors after surgery for bone metastases in the extremities and pelvis: a retrospective analysis of 140 patients","volume":"34","author":"Raschka","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Bone Oncol"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-22-02-90","article-title":"Surgical management of metastatic long bone fractures: principles and techniques","volume":"22","author":"Scolaro","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"707","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.92B5.23246","article-title":"Pathological fractures of the proximal humerus treated with a proximal humeral locking plate and bone cement","volume":"92","author":"Siegel","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1471","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-017-3401-x","article-title":"Numerical investigation of fracture impaction in proximal humeral fracture fixation with locking plate and intramedullary nail","volume":"41","author":"Chen","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-019-2399-1","article-title":"Locking nail versus locking plate for proximal humeral fracture fixation in an elderly population: a prospective randomised controlled trial","volume":"20","author":"Plath","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1016\/s0748-7983(96)92450-6","article-title":"Treatment of pathological fractures of the humeral shaft due to bone metastases: a comparison of intramedullary locking nail and plate osteosynthesis with adjunctive bone cement","volume":"22","author":"Dijkstra","year":"1996","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1093","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.93B8.26194","article-title":"Fixation of pathological humeral fractures by the cemented plate technique","volume":"93","author":"Weiss","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2015.08.009","article-title":"Complications after surgery for metastatic humeral lesions","volume":"25","author":"Janssen","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elb Surg"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1049","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2011.06.019","article-title":"Complications and survival after surgical treatment of 214 metastatic lesions of the humerus","volume":"21","author":"Wedin","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elb Surg"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.26355\/eurrev_202211_30288","article-title":"Proximal humerus fractures treatment in adult patients with bone metastasis","volume":"26","author":"Rovere","year":"2022","journal-title":"Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"597","DOI":"10.1016\/S0030-5898(05)70178-4","article-title":"Management of metastatic lesions of the humerus","volume":"31","author":"Bashore","year":"2000","journal-title":"Orthop Clin North Am"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.55095\/achot2014\/050","article-title":"Surgical management and outcome of skeletal metastatic disease of the humerus","volume":"81","author":"Schwabe","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cechoslov"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1097\/01.blo.0000165857.12676.00","article-title":"Function after resection of humeral metastases: analysis of 59 consecutive patients","volume":"437","author":"Bickels","year":"2005","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1007\/s10195-008-0097-0","article-title":"Modular prostheses in the treatment of proximal humerus metastases: review of 40 cases","volume":"9","author":"Scotti","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Orthop Traumatol"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7800-3-5","article-title":"Outcome of surgical management of bony metastases to the humerus and shoulder girdle: a retrospective analysis of 93 patients","volume":"3","author":"Thai","year":"2006","journal-title":"Int Semin Surg Oncol"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e22.00070","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.OA.22.00070","article-title":"Predicting pathological fractures at metastatic humeral lesions","volume":"8","author":"Tat","year":"2023","journal-title":"JB JS Open Access"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.12.060","article-title":"Bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited articles related to pathological fractures","volume":"74","author":"B\u00fcy\u00fcktop\u00e7u","year":"2025","journal-title":"J Orthop"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.25.00344","article-title":"Deep learning model for differentiating between neoplastic pathologic fracture and nonpathologic fracture using hip radiographs","volume":"108","author":"Kim","year":"2026","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7672","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm14217672","article-title":"Megaprosthetic reconstruction for pathological proximal Humerus fractures: infection rates, prevention strategies, and functional outcomes-a narrative review","volume":"14","author":"Messina","year":"2025","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6297","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm14176297","article-title":"Epidemiology and treatment of metastatic lesions around the elbow: a systematic review","volume":"14","author":"De Fazio","year":"2025","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"947","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2020.02.124","article-title":"Evaluating the reoperation rate and hardware durability of three stabilizing implants for 105 malignant pathologic humerus fractures","volume":"51","author":"Hoellwarth","year":"2020","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2018.03.009","article-title":"Humeral metastasis of renal cancer: surgical options and review of literature","volume":"104","author":"Casadei","year":"2018","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Medicine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fmed.2026.1788879\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,10]],"date-time":"2026-04-10T12:47:41Z","timestamp":1775825261000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fmed.2026.1788879\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,10]]},"references-count":25,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fmed.2026.1788879"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fmed.2026.1788879","relation":{},"ISSN":["2296-858X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2296-858X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,10]]},"article-number":"1788879"}}