{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T16:51:50Z","timestamp":1786121510226,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1786060800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Med."],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (iFTMH) is treated by pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. Conventional peeling achieves high closure in small holes but may yield inferior closure morphology in larger lesions. The temporal inverted ILM flap technique may improve closure quality, yet observational data stratified by Type 1 versus Type 2 closure require careful handling of baseline imbalance.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 202 consecutive iFTMH eyes from 202 unique patients operated by a single team between January 2022 and December 2024. The strict primary-endpoint cohort comprised 198 eyes with 12-month OCT within a prespecified \u00b1 4-week window (flap,\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 100; conventional peeling,\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 98). The primary endpoint was Type 1 closure at 12 months and the primary estimand was the average treatment effect in the overlap population (ATO). Propensity scores used pre-treatment covariates including hole dimensions, symptom duration, baseline BCVA, and calendar year. Common outcomes used g-computation with 1,000 bootstrap replicates (adjusted probabilities, risk differences, risk ratios); sparse-event outcomes used unweighted covariate-adjusted Firth-penalized regression as exploratory sensitivity analyses.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The flap group had larger baseline holes, worse baseline BCVA, and longer symptom duration (all\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &amp;lt; 0.001). After overlap weighting, all standardized mean differences were &amp;lt;0.001, reflecting exact mean balance of included covariates (weighted effective sample size 111.5 of 202 eyes). Type 1 closure occurred in 82\/100 (82.0%) flap versus 44\/98 (44.9%) peeling eyes. In the ATO population the adjusted absolute risk difference was +33.5 percentage points (95% bootstrap CI +14.5 to +51.1), the adjusted risk ratio was 1.68 (95% CI 1.24\u20132.39), and the adjusted odds ratio was 4.84 (95% CI 1.95\u201312.00;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.001). Exploratory secondary analyses suggested greater BCVA improvement, shorter EZ and ELM defect lengths, and fewer secondary surgeries in the flap group.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this retrospective single-center cohort with predominantly large iFTMH, temporal inverted ILM flap coverage was associated with a higher adjusted probability of Type 1 closure at 12 months than conventional ILM peeling within an overlap-population estimand. Exploratory secondary functional and microstructural findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating associations rather than confirmatory evidence.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2026.1827641","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T05:28:35Z","timestamp":1786080515000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["ILM flap coverage versus conventional ILM peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole: a retrospective cohort study"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"13","author":[{"given":"Wendie","family":"Li","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Ningbo Eye Hospital, Ningbo","place":["Zhejiang, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yanyan","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Ningbo Eye Hospital, Ningbo","place":["Zhejiang, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sangsang","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Ningbo Eye Hospital, Ningbo","place":["Zhejiang, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jinghai","family":"Mao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Ningbo Eye Hospital, Ningbo","place":["Zhejiang, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2611","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2013.07.042","article-title":"The international vitreomacular traction study group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole.","volume":"120","author":"Duker","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1186\/s40662-025-00446-0","article-title":"Controversies, consensuses, and guidelines on macular hole surgery by the Asia-Pacific Vitreo-retina Society (APVRS) and the Asia-Pacific Academy of Professors in Ophthalmology (AAPPO).","volume":"12","author":"Radke","year":"2025","journal-title":"Eye Vis"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3334","DOI":"10.1038\/s41433-024-03301-z","article-title":"Vitrectomy in small idiopathic MAcuLar hoLe (SMALL) study: conventional internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted flap.","volume":"38","author":"Fallico","year":"2024","journal-title":"Eye"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1342","DOI":"10.1159\/000534873","article-title":"Inverted internal limiting membrane flap versus internal limiting membrane peeling for <400 \u03bcm macular hole: a meta-analysis and systematic review.","volume":"66","author":"Li","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Res"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"731","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-04739-x","article-title":"Effect of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique on small-medium size macular holes.","volume":"12","author":"Yamada","year":"2022","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1165","DOI":"10.1097\/IAE.0000000000004099","article-title":"Management of large full-thickness macular holes: long-term outcomes of internal limiting membrane flaps and internal limiting membrane peels.","volume":"44","author":"Richards","year":"2024","journal-title":"Retina"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1876","DOI":"10.1038\/s41433-024-03024-1","article-title":"Comparison of the use of internal limiting membrane flaps versus conventional ILM peeling on post-operative anatomical and visual outcomes in large macular holes.","volume":"38","author":"Riding","year":"2024","journal-title":"Eye"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0302481","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0302481","article-title":"Efficacy of inverted inner limiting membrane flap technique for macular holes of \u2264400 \u03bcm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"19","author":"Lee","year":"2024","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1186\/s40942-023-00509-1","article-title":"Anatomical and functional results after vitrectomy with conventional ILM peeling versus inverted ILM flap technique in large full-thickness macular holes.","volume":"9","author":"Dera","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int J Retina Vitreous"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD015031","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD015031.pub2","article-title":"Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane flap versus pars plana vitrectomy with conventional internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular hole.","volume":"8","author":"Ghoraba","year":"2023","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"713","DOI":"10.1159\/000515283","article-title":"Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular holes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","volume":"64","author":"Yu","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Res"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0236431","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0236431","article-title":"Inverted ILM flap technique versus conventional ILM peeling for idiopathic large macular holes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","volume":"15","author":"Chen","year":"2020","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-019-1271-2","article-title":"Comparative efficacy evaluation of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"20","author":"Shen","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMC Ophthalmol"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S75","DOI":"10.4103\/IJO.IJO_484_23","article-title":"Closure rate and recovery of subfoveal microstructures following conventional internal limiting membrane peeling versus per fluoro octane-assisted inverted flap for large macular holes - a randomized controlled trial (INFLAP Study).","volume":"72","author":"Baskaran","year":"2024","journal-title":"Indian J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1955","DOI":"10.1097\/IAE.0000000000002707","article-title":"Effect of inverted internal limiting membrane flap on closure rate, postoperative visual acuity, and restoration of outer retinal layers in primary idiopathic macular hole surgery.","volume":"40","author":"Baumann","year":"2020","journal-title":"Retina."},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2018","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2010.02.011","article-title":"Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular holes.","volume":"117","author":"Michalewska","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1844","DOI":"10.1097\/IAE.0000000000000555","article-title":"Temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus classic inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique: a comparative study.","volume":"35","author":"Michalewska","year":"2015","journal-title":"Retina"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"717","DOI":"10.1016\/j.oret.2025.02.003","article-title":"Internal limiting membrane flaps in macular hole surgery: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.","volume":"9","author":"Tzoumas","year":"2025","journal-title":"Ophthalmol Retina"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1186\/s40942-025-00707-z","article-title":"Comparison of ILM peeling vs. inverted ILM flap for macular hole closure and visual outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"11","author":"Reynaldo","year":"2025","journal-title":"Int J Retina Vitreous."},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"174","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-025-04011-0","article-title":"Critical analysis of macular hole repair techniques: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis comparing internal limiting membrane flap and internal limiting membrane peeling for any size of macular hole.","volume":"25","author":"Akhtar","year":"2025","journal-title":"BMC Ophthalmol"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.4103\/ijo.IJO_685_22","article-title":"Comparative study of conventional internal limiting membrane peeling versus temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap for large macular hole treatment.","volume":"71","author":"Ko\u00e7ak","year":"2023","journal-title":"Indian J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1016\/j.oret.2022.09.002","article-title":"Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance after macular hole surgery: a randomized controlled trial comparing the temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique with conventional peeling.","volume":"7","author":"Ehhardt","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ophthalmol Retina"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1207","DOI":"10.1038\/s41433-022-02103-5","article-title":"Comparison of long-term visual and anatomical outcomes between internal limiting membrane flap and peeling techniques for macular holes with a propensity score analysis.","volume":"37","author":"Kwak","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eye"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-023-03006-z","article-title":"Microstructural and microperimetric comparison of internal limiting membrane peeling and insertion in large idiopathic macular hole.","volume":"23","author":"Liu","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMC Ophthalmol"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"919","DOI":"10.1016\/j.oret.2020.03.021","article-title":"Inverted internal limiting membrane flap versus internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia.","volume":"4","author":"Matsumae","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ophthalmol Retina"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1186\/s40942-022-00439-4","article-title":"Surgical classification for large macular hole: based on different surgical techniques results: the CLOSE study group.","volume":"9","author":"Rezende","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int J Retina Vitreous"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2024.08.012","article-title":"Facedown positioning in macular hole surgery: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.","volume":"132","author":"Raimondi","year":"2025","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2022.08.028","article-title":"The effect of macular hole duration on surgical outcomes: an individual participant data study of randomized controlled trials.","volume":"130","author":"Murphy","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e35809","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000035809","article-title":"Treatment of persistent flap closure with fluid gas exchange after inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for idiopathic macular hole.","volume":"102","author":"Wu","year":"2023","journal-title":"Medicine"},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"751","DOI":"10.1055\/a-2217-2568","article-title":"Foveal-sparing ILM peeling with ILM flap transposition over the macular hole for repair of full-thickness macular holes.","volume":"241","author":"Leisser","year":"2024","journal-title":"Klin Monbl Augenheilkd"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Medicine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fmed.2026.1827641\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T05:28:35Z","timestamp":1786080515000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fmed.2026.1827641\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]]},"references-count":30,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fmed.2026.1827641"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fmed.2026.1827641","relation":{},"ISSN":["2296-858X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2296-858X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]]},"article-number":"1827641"}}