{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T05:46:56Z","timestamp":1782798416544,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1782777600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Med."],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) remains a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Mid-trimester transvaginal cervical length (CL) measurement is an established screening tool, but it is unclear whether longitudinal change in CL between the 1st and 2nd trimesters (\u0394Cx) adds predictive value in women with a normal mid-trimester cervix.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This prospective longitudinal cohort study included singleton pregnancies with 1st and 2nd trimester transvaginal CL measurements. Women with a normal mid-trimester cervix and no antenatal progesterone exposure comprised the primary low-risk cohort, while women with a short cervix were analyzed separately as an exploratory comparison cohort. CL was measured at 11\u201314 weeks (C1) and 18\u201324 weeks (C2). \u0394Cx and cervical slope were calculated. The primary outcome was sPTB &amp;lt;37 weeks. Additional analyses examined preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) and PROM at term.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A total of 2,354 women had cervical length data in both trimesters; 2,292 constituted the primary low-risk cohort and 62 the exploratory short-cervix cohort. The overall rate of sPTB was 8.00 and 30.6% in the low-risk and short cervix cohorts, respectively (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      &amp;lt;0.001). In the low-risk cohort, C1 (35.74 \u00b1 4.61 mm vs. 35.50 \u00b1 4.77 mm,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.497) and C2 (37.44 \u00b1 5.50 mm vs. 36.83 \u00b1 5.55 mm,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.148), \u0394Cx (1.69 \u00b1 7.19 mm vs. 1.33 \u00b1 6.81 mm,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.515), and cervical slope were similar between term and preterm pregnancies (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.558). In multivariable analysis, cervical slope was not associated with sPTB and did not improve discrimination beyond C2 and maternal characteristics. By contrast, the short-cervix cohort had markedly shorter C1 (30.31 \u00b1 5.51 mm vs. 35.72 \u00b1 4.62 mm,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      &amp;lt; 0.001), C2 (21.61 \u00b1 6.55 mm vs. 37.39 \u00b1 5.50 mm,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:bold>&amp;lt;<\/jats:bold>\n                      0.001) a more negative cervical slope (\u20130.99 \u00b1 1.00 mm vs. 0.19 \u00b1 0.81 mm,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      &amp;lt; 0.001). PPROM was more frequent (12.7% vs. 43.1%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      &amp;lt; 0.001) among preterm births in the low-risk cohort, and cervical slope was associated with PPROM (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.030).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In women with a normal mid-trimester cervix, longitudinal CL change does not improve prediction of sPTB beyond a single 2nd trimester measurement. The clinical value of cervical screening appears to lie primarily in identifying the short-cervix subgroup.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2026.1870436","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T05:39:28Z","timestamp":1782797968000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The value of cervical length changes for the prediction of preterm birth with normal mid-trimester cervical length; a prospective longitudinal study"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"13","author":[{"given":"Sebile","family":"Guler Cekic","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ko\u00e7 University School of Medicine","place":["Istanbul, T\u00fcrkiye"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ceren","family":"Unal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ko\u00e7 University School of Medicine","place":["Istanbul, T\u00fcrkiye"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Can","family":"Benlioglu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ko\u00e7 University School of Medicine","place":["Istanbul, T\u00fcrkiye"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M. Atay","family":"Ozten","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ko\u00e7 University School of Medicine","place":["Istanbul, T\u00fcrkiye"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mert","family":"Turgal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ko\u00e7 University School of Medicine","place":["Istanbul, T\u00fcrkiye"]},{"name":"Perinatology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ko\u00e7 University School of Medicine","place":["Istanbul, T\u00fcrkiye"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ebru","family":"Celik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ko\u00e7 University School of Medicine","place":["Istanbul, T\u00fcrkiye"]},{"name":"Perinatology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ko\u00e7 University School of Medicine","place":["Istanbul, T\u00fcrkiye"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e65","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004479","article-title":"Prediction and prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: ACOG practice bulletin, number 234.","volume":"138","year":"2021","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1853","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1421166","article-title":"Decrease in the incidence of threatened preterm labor after implementation of transvaginal ultrasound cervical length universal screening.","volume":"32","author":"Navathe","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med."},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"462","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa067815","article-title":"Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix.","volume":"357","author":"Fonseca","year":"2007","journal-title":"N Engl J Med."},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"610","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.26093","article-title":"Change in prevalence of preterm birth in Israel following publication of national guidelines recommending routine sonographic cervical-length measurement at 19-25 weeks\u2019 gestation.","volume":"61","author":"Maymon","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-022-06882-w","article-title":"Screening vs. no screening for preterm delivery in low-risk singleton pregnancies: comparison by propensity score analysis.","volume":"309","author":"Souka","year":"2024","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet."},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101343","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101343","article-title":"Universal cervical length screening and risk of spontaneous preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"6","author":"Hessami","year":"2024","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM."},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e025050","DOI":"10.1161\/JAHA.121.025050","article-title":"Temporal trends in adverse pregnancy outcomes in birthing individuals aged 15 to 44 years in the United States, 2007 to 2019.","volume":"11","author":"Freaney","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Am Heart Assoc."},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.10.002","article-title":"Association between change in cervical length and spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies.","volume":"216","author":"Moroz","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"789","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.27614","article-title":"Longitudinal evaluation of cervical length and shear wave elastography in women with spontaneous preterm birth.","volume":"63","author":"Nguyen-Hoang","year":"2024","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e244592","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2024.4592","article-title":"Longitudinal cervical length measurements and spontaneous preterm birth in singleton and twin pregnancies.","volume":"7","author":"Wu","year":"2024","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open."},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14742","article-title":"How to measure cervical length.","volume":"45","author":"Kagan","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"997","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2011.30.7.997","article-title":"Cervical length changes from the first to second trimester of pregnancy, and prediction of preterm birth by first-trimester sonographic cervical measurement.","volume":"30","author":"Souka","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med."},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.32","article-title":"Cervical length at 11-14 weeks\u2019 and 22-24 weeks\u2019 gestation evaluated by transvaginal sonography, and gestational age at delivery.","volume":"21","author":"Carvalho","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1159\/000335686","article-title":"First-trimester screening for spontaneous preterm delivery with maternal characteristics and cervical length.","volume":"31","author":"Greco","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther."},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5333","article-title":"Cervical length and obstetric history predict spontaneous preterm birth: development and validation of a model to provide individualized risk assessment.","volume":"31","author":"Celik","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"650","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.13514","article-title":"The perceptions of obstetric care providers about cervical length screening for preterm birth prevention.","volume":"62","author":"Pedretti","year":"2022","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol."},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"523.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.02.002","article-title":"Universal cervical length screening: implementation and outcomes.","volume":"214","author":"Temming","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"778","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.24884","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of cervical length screening and progesterone treatment to prevent spontaneous preterm delivery in Sweden.","volume":"59","author":"Wikstr\u00f6m","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.11.576","article-title":"Vaginal progesterone for preventing preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations with a short cervix: a meta-analysis of individual patient data.","volume":"218","author":"Romero","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.13676","article-title":"Short cervix and preterm birth in the top end.","volume":"63","author":"Brown","year":"2023","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol."},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1007\/s10396-018-0919-5","article-title":"Associations of temporal changes in cervical length and lower uterine segment length with spontaneous preterm delivery risk: a prospective study of 727 Japanese women.","volume":"46","author":"Oi","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Med Ultrason."},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"604","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17556","article-title":"Transvaginal sonographic cervical length in first and second trimesters in a low-risk population: a prospective study.","volume":"51","author":"Wulff","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.03.003","article-title":"First-trimester prediction of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes incorporating cervical length measurement.","volume":"284","author":"Rode","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol."},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e90943","DOI":"10.7554\/eLife.90943","article-title":"The vaginal immunoproteome for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth: A retrospective longitudinal study.","volume":"13","author":"Shaffer","year":"2024","journal-title":"Elife."},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.08.001","article-title":"Vaginal microbiome in preterm rupture of membranes.","volume":"47","author":"Bennett","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am."},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1471027","DOI":"10.3389\/fcimb.2024.1471027","article-title":"The microbiome biomarkers of pregnant women\u2019s vaginal area predict preterm prelabor rupture in Western China.","volume":"14","author":"Tang","year":"2024","journal-title":"Front Cell Infect Microbiol."},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.29269","article-title":"Alterations in vaginal microbiome in women with short cervix: longitudinal study of microbial diversity and impact of vaginal progesterone treatment.","volume":"66","author":"Celik","year":"2025","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"789","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.06.015","article-title":"Predictive accuracy of changes in transvaginal sonographic cervical length over time for preterm birth: a systematic review and metaanalysis.","volume":"213","author":"Conde-Agudelo","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2107","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1425990","article-title":"Can sonographic measurements and changes in cervical length during pregnancy predict preterm labour in an asymptomatic low-risk population?","volume":"32","author":"Weitzner","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med."},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1346","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0706834","article-title":"Cervical length at mid-pregnancy and the risk of primary cesarean delivery.","volume":"358","author":"Smith","year":"2008","journal-title":"N Engl J Med."},{"key":"B31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.21203\/rs.3.rs-8827201\/v1","article-title":"The value of cervical length changes for the prediction of preterm birth with normal mid-trimester cervical length; a prospective longitudinal study [preprint].","author":"Guler Cekic","year":"2026","journal-title":"Res Square."}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Medicine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fmed.2026.1870436\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T05:39:29Z","timestamp":1782797969000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fmed.2026.1870436\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]]},"references-count":31,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fmed.2026.1870436"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fmed.2026.1870436","relation":{},"ISSN":["2296-858X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2296-858X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]]},"article-number":"1870436"}}