{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,22]],"date-time":"2026-10-22T01:31:54Z","timestamp":1792632714791,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":55,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,19]],"date-time":"2024-08-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1724025600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Neurol."],"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title><jats:p>Stroke-induced upper limb disabilities can be characterized by both motor impairments and activity limitations, commonly assessed using Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMMA-UE) and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), respectively. The relationship between the two assessments during recovery is largely unstudied. Expectedly they diverge over time when recovery of impairment (restitution) plateaus, but compensation-driven improvements still occur. The objective of this study is to evaluate the alignment between FMMA-UE and ARAT in defining upper limb functional recovery categories by ARAT scores. We aimed to establish cut-off scores for both measures from the acute\/early subacute, subacute and chronic stages of stroke recovery.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>Secondary analysis of four prospective cohort studies (acute\/early subacute: <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u2009133, subacute: <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u2009113, chronic: <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u200992) stages post-stroke. Receiver operating characteristic curves calculated the area under the curve (AUC) to establish optimal FMMA-UE cut-offs based on predefined ARAT thresholds distinguishing five activity levels from no activity to full activity. Weighted kappa was used to determine agreement between the two assessments. We used minimally clinically important difference (MCID) and minimal detectable change (MDC<jats:sub>95<\/jats:sub>) for comparison.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>FMMA-UE and ARAT scores showed no relevant divergence across all recovery stages. Results indicated similar cut-off scores in all recovery stages with variability below MCID and MDC<jats:sub>95<\/jats:sub> levels. Cut-off scores demonstrated robust AUC values from 0.77 to 0.86 at every recovery stage. Only in highly functional patients at the chronic stage, we found a reduced specificity of 0.55. At all other times sensitivity ranged between 0.68 and 0.99 and specificity between 0.71 and 0.99. Weighted kappa at the acute\/early subacute, subacute and chronic stages was 0.76, 0.83, and 0.81, respectively.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Discussion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Our research shows a strong alignment between FMMA-UE and ARAT cut-off scores throughout stroke recovery, except among the subgroup of highly recovered patients at the chronic stage. Discrepancies in specificity potentially stem from fine motor deficits affecting dexterity outcomes that are not captured by FMMA-UE. Additionally, the high congruence of both measures suggests they are not suited to distinguish between restitution and compensation. Calling for more comprehensive assessment methods to better understand upper limb functionality in rehabilitation.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fneur.2024.1429929","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,19]],"date-time":"2024-08-19T16:54:47Z","timestamp":1724086487000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["The association between dexterity and upper limb impairment during stroke recovery"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"Belen","family":"Valladares","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Robinson Georg","family":"Kundert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Johannes","family":"Pohl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jeremia P. O.","family":"Held","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andreas R.","family":"Luft","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Janne Marieke","family":"Veerbeek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Meret","family":"Branscheidt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","first-page":"299","volume-title":"International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF","year":"2013"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.1186\/s12984-021-00979-0","article-title":"Characterization of stroke-related upper limb motor impairments across various upper limb activities by use of kinematic core set measures","volume":"19","author":"Schwarz","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Neuroeng Rehabil"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.2340\/16501977-0351","article-title":"Evidence of a logarithmic relationship between motor capacity and actual performance in daily life of the paretic arm following stroke","volume":"41","author":"Michielsen","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Rehabil Med"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1016\/S1474-4422(09)70150-4","article-title":"Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review","volume":"8","author":"Langhorne","year":"2009","journal-title":"Lancet Neurol"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1177\/1747493017711813","article-title":"Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: consensus-based core recommendations from the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable","volume":"12","author":"Kwakkel","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Stroke"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"880","DOI":"10.1177\/23969873231191304","article-title":"Motor rehabilitation after stroke: European stroke organisation (ESO) consensus-based definition and guiding framework","volume":"8","author":"Kwakkel","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur Stroke J"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1186\/s12984-021-00951-y","article-title":"European evidence-based recommendations for clinical assessment of upper limb in neurorehabilitation (CAULIN): data synthesis from systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus","volume":"18","author":"Prange-Lasonder","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Neuroeng Rehabil"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.3389\/fneur.2020.00875","article-title":"Consensus-based Core set of outcome measures for clinical motor rehabilitation after stroke\u2014A Delphi study","volume":"11","author":"Pohl","year":"2020","journal-title":"Front Neurol"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1186\/s12883-015-0292-6","article-title":"An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke","volume":"15","author":"Murphy","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Neurol"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"404","DOI":"10.1191\/0269215505cr832oa","article-title":"Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the FugI-Meyer test, action research arm test and box and block test: a multicentre study","volume":"19","author":"Platz","year":"2005","journal-title":"Clin Rehabil"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.2340\/1650197771331","article-title":"The post stroke hemiplegic patient: A method for evaluation of physical performance","volume":"7","author":"Fugl Meyer","year":"1975","journal-title":"Scand J Rehabil Med"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968307305353","article-title":"A standardized approach to performing the action research arm test","volume":"22","author":"Yozbatiran","year":"2008","journal-title":"Neurorehabil Neural Repair"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1527","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2013.03.007","article-title":"Rasch analysis staging methodology to classify upper extremity movement impairment after stroke","volume":"94","author":"Woodbury","year":"2013","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1563","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2007.12.041","article-title":"Longitudinal stability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity","volume":"89","author":"Woodbury","year":"2008","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.1097\/MRR.0000000000000466","article-title":"Analysing the action research arm test (ARAT): a cautionary tale from the RATULS trial","volume":"44","author":"Wilson","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Rehabil Res"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.2340\/16501977-2534","article-title":"Evaluation of a short assessment for upper extremity activity capacity early after stroke","volume":"51","author":"Kristersson","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Rehabil Med"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.23736\/S1973-9087.20.06070-0","article-title":"Task-based mirror therapy enhances the upper limb motor function in subacute stroke patients: a randomized control trial","volume":"56","author":"Madhoun","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur J Phys Rehabil Med"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1609304","DOI":"10.1080\/19932820.2019.1609304","article-title":"Comparison of the effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy and intensive conventional therapy with a botulinum-a toxin injection on upper limb motor function recovery in patients with stroke","volume":"14","author":"Nasb","year":"2019","journal-title":"Libyan J Med"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1545","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(21)00475-X","article-title":"Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation for upper limb motor function after ischaemic stroke (VNS-REHAB): a randomised, blinded, pivotal, device trial","volume":"397","author":"Dawson","year":"2021","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1177\/15459683211062898","article-title":"Reward during arm training improves impairment and activity after stroke: A randomized controlled trial","volume":"36","author":"Widmer","year":"2022","journal-title":"Neurorehabil Neural Repair"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1845","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2015.06.009","article-title":"How do Fugl-Meyer arm motor scores relate to dexterity according to the action research arm test at 6 months Poststroke?","volume":"96","author":"Hoonhorst","year":"2015","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"ref22","volume-title":"Broken Movement. The neurobiology of motor recovery after stroke","author":"John","year":"2017"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2348","DOI":"10.1161\/01.STR.0000238594.91938.1e","article-title":"Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke","volume":"37","author":"Kwakkel","year":"2006","journal-title":"Stroke"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"627","DOI":"10.1177\/0269215510395793","article-title":"Longer versus shorter mental practice sessions for affected upper extremity movement after stroke: A randomized controlled trial","volume":"25","author":"Page","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Rehabil"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"856","DOI":"10.1152\/jn.00447.2021","article-title":"Dissociation between abnormal motor synergies and impaired reaching dexterity after stroke","volume":"127","author":"Hadjiosif","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Neurophysiol"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1605","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2006.09.003","article-title":"Measurement of upper-extremity function early after stroke: properties of the action research arm test","volume":"87","author":"Lang","year":"2006","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"444","DOI":"10.1177\/1747493017711816","article-title":"Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable taskforce","volume":"12","author":"Bernhardt","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Stroke"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"800","DOI":"10.1097\/EDE.0b013e3181577654","article-title":"The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies","volume":"18","author":"Von Elm","year":"2007","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"918","DOI":"10.4414\/smf.2012.01293","article-title":"Stroke Units und Stroke Centers in der Schweiz: Richtlinien und Anforderungsprofil","volume":"12","author":"Hirnschlaggesellschaft","year":"2012","journal-title":"Schweiz Med Forum"},{"key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9(JAN)","DOI":"10.3389\/fneur.2018.00013","article-title":"Encouragement-induced real-world upper limb use after stroke by a tracking and feedback device: A study protocol for a multi-center, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial","volume":"9","author":"Held","year":"2018","journal-title":"Front Neurol"},{"key":"ref31","year":"2023"},{"key":"ref32","year":"2023"},{"key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1093\/ptj\/46.4.357","article-title":"Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia: based on sequential recovery stages","volume":"46","author":"Brunnstr\u00f6m","year":"1966","journal-title":"Phys Ther Rehabil J"},{"key":"ref34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"443","DOI":"10.1093\/brain\/74.4.443","article-title":"The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man","volume":"74","author":"Twitchell","year":"1951","journal-title":"Brain"},{"key":"ref35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1097\/00004356-198112000-00001","article-title":"A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research","volume":"4","author":"Lyle","year":"1981","journal-title":"Int J Rehabil Res"},{"key":"ref36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1186\/s12984-023-01148-1","article-title":"Predicting later categories of upper limb activity from earlier clinical assessments following stroke: an exploratory analysis","volume":"20","author":"Barth","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Neuroeng Rehabil"},{"key":"ref37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2527","DOI":"10.1093\/brain\/aws146","article-title":"The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke","volume":"135","author":"Stinear","year":"2012","journal-title":"Brain J. Neurol"},{"key":"ref38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.2340\/16501977-0560","article-title":"A comparison of two validated tests for upper limb function after stroke: the wolf motor function test and the action research arm test","volume":"42","author":"Nijland","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Rehabil Med"},{"key":"ref39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"732","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968313491000","article-title":"A standardized approach to the Fugl-Meyer assessment and its implications for clinical trials","volume":"27","author":"See","year":"2013","journal-title":"Neurorehabil Neural Repair"},{"key":"ref40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1017\/S1481803500013336","article-title":"Understanding receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves","volume":"8","author":"Fan","year":"2006","journal-title":"Can J Emerg Med"},{"key":"ref41","author":"Power","year":"2013"},{"key":"ref42","author":"Lowry","year":"2022"},{"key":"ref43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1037\/h0031619","article-title":"Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters","volume":"76","author":"Fleiss","year":"1971","journal-title":"Psychol Bull"},{"key":"ref44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"545","DOI":"10.1177\/15459683231186985","article-title":"Sensitivity to change and responsiveness of the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer assessment in individuals with moderate to severe acute stroke","volume":"37","author":"Huynh","year":"2023","journal-title":"Neurorehabil Neural Repair"},{"key":"ref45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1310\/tsr18s01-599","article-title":"Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of an upper extremity recovery measure in subacute stroke patients","volume":"18","author":"Arya","year":"2011","journal-title":"Top Stroke Rehabil"},{"key":"ref46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"791","DOI":"10.2522\/ptj.20110009","article-title":"Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke","volume":"92","author":"Page","year":"2012","journal-title":"Phys Ther"},{"key":"ref47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"652","DOI":"10.2522\/ptj.20070255","article-title":"Reproducibility and minimal detectable change of three-dimensional kinematic analysis of reaching tasks in people with hemiparesis after stroke","volume":"88","author":"Wagner","year":"2008","journal-title":"Phys Ther"},{"key":"ref48","volume-title":"R foundation for statistical computing. R: A language and environment for statistical computing","year":"2020"},{"key":"ref49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"342","DOI":"10.1002\/ana.24734","article-title":"Dose response of task-specific upper limb training in people at least 6 months poststroke: A phase II, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial","volume":"80","author":"Lang","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann Neurol"},{"key":"ref50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1007\/s41669-022-00323-9","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy implementation in Neurorehabilitation: the ACTIveARM project","volume":"6","author":"Christie","year":"2022","journal-title":"Pharmacoecon Open"},{"key":"ref51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23295411","DOI":"10.1101\/2023.09.19.23295411v1","article-title":"Neurorehabilitation of the upper extremity \u2013 immersive virtual reality vs. robot-assisted training. A comparative study","author":"L\u00fclsdorff","year":"2023","journal-title":"medRxiv"},{"key":"ref52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1177\/15459683211000730","article-title":"Comparing a novel Neuroanimation experience to conventional therapy for high-dose intensive upper-limb training in subacute stroke: the SMARTS2 randomized trial","volume":"35","author":"Krakauer","year":"2021","journal-title":"Neurorehabil Neural Repair"},{"key":"ref53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.2522\/ptj.20060029","article-title":"Modified constraint-induced therapy in chronic stroke: results of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial","volume":"88","author":"Page","year":"2008","journal-title":"Phys Ther"},{"key":"ref54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968312452631","article-title":"Improvement after constraint-induced movement therapy: recovery of normal motor control or task-specific compensation?","volume":"27","author":"Kitago","year":"2013","journal-title":"Neurorehabil Neural Repair"},{"key":"ref55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968317714576","article-title":"Do activity level outcome measures commonly used in neurological practice assess upper-limb movement quality?","volume":"31","author":"Demers","year":"2017","journal-title":"Neurorehabil Neural Repair"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Neurology"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fneur.2024.1429929\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,19]],"date-time":"2024-08-19T16:54:52Z","timestamp":1724086492000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fneur.2024.1429929\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,19]]},"references-count":55,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fneur.2024.1429929"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fneur.2024.1429929","relation":{},"ISSN":["1664-2295"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1664-2295","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,19]]},"article-number":"1429929"}}