{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T19:14:08Z","timestamp":1789758848682,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1789689600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Oncol."],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      This study compares kinetic parameters (K\n                      <jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub>\n                      , k\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      , k\n                      <jats:sub>3<\/jats:sub>\n                      , K\n                      <jats:sub>i<\/jats:sub>\n                      ) from dynamic chest PET\/CT for lung lesions across different framing protocols, reconstruction algorithms, and software processing, aiming to evaluate quantification consistency and support multi-center standardization.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      This study enrolled 107 patients with 124 lung lesions who underwent 65-min dynamic\n                      <jats:sup>18<\/jats:sup>\n                      F-FDG PET\/CT. Dynamic data were compared across three factors: framing protocols (28 frames vs. 39 frames), reconstruction algorithms (the Block Sequential Regularized Expectation Maximization [BSREM] group vs. the third-order Hermite interpolation [Pitch-In] group), and software platforms (the Matlab group vs. the PMOD group). Kinetic parameters were derived based on an irreversible two-tissue compartment model. Subjective image quality was graded by two experts using a 5-point Likert scale.We performed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Bonferroni correction, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Bland\u2013Altman analysis, and\n                      <jats:italic>post-hoc<\/jats:italic>\n                      power analysis (n=125) to evaluate statistical significance, consistency, and agreement.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The Pitch-In group achieved scores &amp;gt;3 points and demonstrated significantly superior subjective image quality over the BSREM group (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0&amp;lt;\u00a00.05), except for comparable lesion discrimination. For kinetic parameter quantification, no statistically significant systematic differences were observed between the Pitch-In group and the BSREM group for K\n                      <jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub>\n                      , k\n                      <jats:sub>3<\/jats:sub>\n                      , and K\n                      <jats:sub>i<\/jats:sub>\n                      (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &amp;gt; 0.05; ICCs: 0.795\u20130.955), though Pitch-In yielded higher k\n                      <jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub>\n                      values (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0=\u00a00.003). No significant differences were detected between the Matlab group and the PMOD group for K\n                      <jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub>\n                      and K\n                      <jats:sub>i<\/jats:sub>\n                      (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &amp;gt; 0.05), achieving high absolute agreement (ICCs: 0.854 and 0.978; K\n                      <jats:sub>i<\/jats:sub>\n                      bias: 0.000). Between 28 frames and 39 frames protocols, no significant differences were found for all parameters (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &amp;gt; 0.05; ICCs: 0.885\u20130.957), with a minimal K\n                      <jats:sub>i<\/jats:sub>\n                      bias of 0.001 (95% LoA: -0.010 to 0.011).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The primary quantitative endpoint, the K\n                      <jats:sub>i<\/jats:sub>\n                      value, remains highly robust across all evaluated framing protocols, software platforms, and reconstruction algorithms. This strong methodological equivalence facilitates cross-center data harmonization and clinical standardization for multi-center dynamic\n                      <jats:sup>18<\/jats:sup>\n                      F-FDG PET\/CT.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2026.1754075","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T18:53:12Z","timestamp":1789757592000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Differences in the quantitative parameter of lung lesions in dynamic chest FDG PET\/CT imaging: framing protocol, reconstruction algorithm, software processing"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"Yarong","family":"Zhang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center\/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer\/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College","place":["Shenzhen, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xieraili","family":"Wumener","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center\/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer\/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College","place":["Shenzhen, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maoqun","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center\/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer\/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College","place":["Shenzhen, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jiuhui","family":"Zhao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center\/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer\/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College","place":["Shenzhen, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xin","family":"Tian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center\/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer\/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College","place":["Shenzhen, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ying","family":"Liang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center\/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer\/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College","place":["Shenzhen, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0377-1237(09)80099-3","article-title":"Clinical applications of PET and PET-CT","volume":"65","author":"Anand","year":"2009","journal-title":"Med J Armed Forces India"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2217\/fon.15.28","article-title":"PET-based molecular imaging in personalized oncology: potential of the assessment of therapeutic outcome","volume":"11","author":"Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss","year":"2015","journal-title":"Future Oncol"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-014-2961-x","article-title":"FDG PET\/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0","volume":"42","author":"Boellaard","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"643","DOI":"10.1016\/S0969-8051(00)00155-4","article-title":"Anatomy of SUV. Standardized uptake value","volume":"27","author":"Huang","year":"2000","journal-title":"Nucl Med Biol"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11307-011-0514-2","article-title":"Importance of quantification for the analysis of PET data in oncology: review of current methods and trends for the future","volume":"14","author":"Tomasi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Mol Imaging Biol"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/1-84628-007-9_6","article-title":"6 Tracer Kinetic Modeling in PET","author":"Carson","year":"","journal-title":"Positron Emission Tomography"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.5402\/2012\/349351","article-title":"The potential benefit by application of kinetic analysis of PET in the clinical oncology","volume":"2012","author":"Takesh","year":"2012","journal-title":"ISRN Oncol"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-018-4153-6","article-title":"Dynamic whole-body PET imaging: principles, potentials and applications","volume":"46","author":"Rahmim","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2022.1005924","article-title":"Dynamic FDG-PET imaging for differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes of lung cancer","volume":"12","author":"Wumener","year":"2022","journal-title":"Front Oncol"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1378\/chest.114.4.1105","article-title":"Dynamic positron emission tomography with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose imaging in differentiation of benign from Malignant lung\/mediastinal lesions","volume":"114","author":"Gupta","year":"1998","journal-title":"Chest"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1186\/s12890-024-02997-9","article-title":"The value of dynamic FDG PET\/CT in the differential diagnosis of lung cancer and predicting EGFR mutations","volume":"24","author":"Wumener","year":"2024","journal-title":"BMC Pulm Med"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-002-0981-4","article-title":"Comparison of SUV and Patlak slope for monitoring of cancer therapy using serial PET scans","volume":"30","author":"Freedman","year":"2003","journal-title":"Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-010-1705-9","article-title":"Measuring response to therapy using FDG PET: semi-quantitative and full kinetic analysis","volume":"38","author":"Cheebsumon","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/TRPMS.2020.3025086","article-title":"PET parametric imaging: past, present, and future","volume":"4","author":"Wang","year":"2020","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-022-05731-x","article-title":"Parametric image generation with the uEXPLORER total-body PET\/CT system through deep learning","volume":"49","author":"Huang","year":"2022","journal-title":"Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2967\/jnumed.119.230565","article-title":"Total-body dynamic reconstruction and parametric imaging on the uEXPLORER","volume":"61","author":"Zhang","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Nucl Med"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1186\/s40658-023-00577-0","article-title":"Framing protocol optimization in oncological Patlak parametric imaging with uKinetics","volume":"10","author":"Ye","year":"2023","journal-title":"EJNMMI Phys"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-025-07231-0","article-title":"Leveraging machine learning with dynamic 18F-FDG PET\/CT: integrating metabolic and flow features for lung cancer differential diagnosis","volume":"52","author":"Yao","year":"2025","journal-title":"Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s40336-014-0069-8","article-title":"Advanced kinetic modelling strategies: towards adoption in clinical PET imaging","volume":"2","author":"Kotasidis","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Transl Imaging"},{"key":"B20","article-title":"Time-varying kinetic modeling of high temporal-resolution dynamic 18F-FDG PET data for multiparametric imaging","volume-title":"J Nucl Med","author":"Wang","year":"2018"},{"key":"B21","article-title":"Quantification of glucose transport using high temporal resolution dynamic PET imaging","volume-title":"J Nucl Med","author":"Wang","year":"2019"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/TRPMS.2020.3031274","article-title":"Multiparametric cardiac 18 F-FDG PET in humans: kinetic model selection and identifiability analysis","volume":"4","author":"Zuo","year":"2020","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/TBME.2022.3176097","article-title":"High temporal resolution total-body dynamic PET imaging based on pixel-level time-activity curve correction","volume":"69","author":"Chen","year":"2022","journal-title":"IEEE Trans BioMed Eng"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1038\/jcbfm.1983.1","article-title":"Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data","volume":"3","author":"Patlak","year":"1983","journal-title":"J Cereb Blood Flow Metab"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2967\/jnumed.119.227801","article-title":"Image quality and semiquantitative measurements on the Biograph Vision PET\/CT system: initial experiences and comparison with the Biograph mCT","volume":"61","author":"Van Sluis","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Nucl Med"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3522\u201333","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-022-09237-w","article-title":"Deep learning\u2013based dynamic PET parametric Ki image generation from lung static PET","volume":"33","author":"Wang","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1158\/1078-0432.CCR-10-2649","article-title":"PET tumor metabolism in locally advanced breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: value of static versus kinetic measures of fluorodeoxyglucose uptake","volume":"17","author":"Dunnwald","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Cancer Res"},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00259-020-04726-w","article-title":"Dynamic whole-body 18F-FDG PET for differentiating abnormal lesions from physiological uptake","volume":"47","author":"Nishimura","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging"},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers13051019","article-title":"Quantitative dynamic 18F-FDG PET\/CT in survival prediction of metastatic melanoma under PD-1 inhibitors","volume":"13","author":"Sachpekidis","year":"2021","journal-title":"Cancers"},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2967\/jnumed.114.140962","article-title":"18 F-FDG kinetics parameters depend on the mechanism of injury in early experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome","volume":"55","author":"De Prost","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Nucl Med"},{"key":"B31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/TMI.2018.2869868","article-title":"High temporal-resolution dynamic PET image reconstruction using a new spatiotemporal kernel method","volume":"38","author":"Wang","year":"2019","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Med Imaging"},{"key":"B32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/ACCESS.2021.3069236","article-title":"Dynamic PET image denoising using deep image prior combined with regularization by denoising","volume":"9","author":"Sun","year":"2021","journal-title":"IEEE Access"},{"key":"B33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1109\/NSSMIC.2011.6153735","article-title":"Dynamic multi-bed FDG PET imaging: feasibility and optimization","author":"Karakatsanis","year":"2011"},{"key":"B34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/58\/20\/7391","article-title":"Dynamic whole-body PET parametric imaging: I. Concept, acquisition protocol optimization and clinical application","volume":"58","author":"Karakatsanis","year":"2013","journal-title":"Phys Med Biol"},{"key":"B35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/58\/20\/7419","article-title":"Dynamic whole-body PET parametric imaging: II. Task-oriented statistical estimation","volume":"58","author":"Karakatsanis","year":"2013","journal-title":"Phys Med Biol"},{"key":"B36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-018-5966-1","article-title":"Does whole-body Patlak 18F-FDG PET imaging improve lesion detectability in clinical oncology","volume":"29","author":"Fahrni","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"B37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/60\/22\/8643","article-title":"Generalized whole-body Patlak parametric imaging for enhanced quantification in clinical PET","volume":"60","author":"Karakatsanis","year":"2015","journal-title":"Phys Med Biol"},{"key":"B38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/61\/15\/5456","article-title":"Whole-body direct 4D parametric PET imaging employing nested generalized Patlak expectation\u2013maximization reconstruction","volume":"61","author":"Karakatsanis","year":"2016","journal-title":"Phys Med Biol"},{"key":"B39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20170508","article-title":"Towards enhanced PET quantification in clinical oncology","volume":"91","author":"Zaidi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Oncology"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fonc.2026.1754075\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T18:53:13Z","timestamp":1789757593000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fonc.2026.1754075\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]]},"references-count":39,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fonc.2026.1754075"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fonc.2026.1754075","relation":{},"ISSN":["2234-943X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2234-943X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]]},"article-number":"1754075"}}