{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,24]],"date-time":"2026-06-24T05:46:48Z","timestamp":1782280008540,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,24]],"date-time":"2026-06-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1782259200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Oncol."],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The optimal surgical corridor for craniopharyngioma remains debated. Endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) offers a direct midline trajectory to the sellar\/suprasellar region, whereas transcranial approaches remain important for lesions with complex extension. We compared perioperative and follow-up outcomes between EEA and transcranial craniotomy in a single-center cohort, emphasizing detailed preoperative anatomical classification and domain-specific functional outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing primary craniopharyngioma resection at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University (January 2019\u2013December 2024). Patients were grouped by surgical corridor used in routine care: transcranial craniotomy (TCA, n=33) or EEA (n=34). Preoperative MRI was reviewed for topography, cystic proportion, calcification, lateral extension beyond the internal carotid artery (ICA), vascular encasement, QST type, Kassam type, and Puget grade. Gross total resection (GTR) was defined as no residual enhancing tumor on MRI within 72 hours. Outcomes included extent of resection, length of stay, complications, axis-specific endocrine outcomes and replacement burden at 6 months, objective visual outcomes at 3 months, postoperative radiotherapy, and recurrence\/progression at last follow-up.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Baseline demographic, anatomical, and endocrine characteristics were comparable between groups. EEA achieved a higher GTR rate (82.4% vs. 45.5%, p=0.002) and shorter hospital stay (16.19\u00a0\u00b1\u00a03.97 vs. 18.76\u00a0\u00b1\u00a04.23 days, p=0.019). At 6 months, headache\/ICP-related symptoms improved in 90.9% of EEA patients versus 76.5% of TCA patients (p=0.047). Objective postoperative 3\u2212month best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR) was better after EEA (0.30 [0.12, 0.45] vs. 0.42 [0.22, 0.62], p=0.041). EEA was associated with lower rates of electrolyte imbalance (17.6% vs. 42.4%, p=0.021), transient diabetes insipidus (DI) (20.6% vs. 45.5%, p=0.028), persistent DI (\u22653 months) (14.7% vs. 30.3%, p=0.048), and new hypopituitarism (any axis) (41.2% vs. 69.7%, p=0.022). The pituitary stalk was anatomically preserved more frequently in EEA cases (67.6% vs. 48.5%, p=0.042). Median follow-up was 35\u201337 months; recurrence\/progression at last follow-up occurred in 8.8% of EEA patients versus 21.2% of TCA patients (p=0.047).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this retrospective cohort with detailed anatomical reclassification, EEA was associated with higher GTR, shorter hospitalization, and fewer short-term endocrine\/electrolyte complications, with comparable overall safety. Because corridor selection is anatomy-driven and this unadjusted observational comparison is susceptible to confounding by indication, these findings should be interpreted as comparative outcomes among selected patients rather than causal evidence of superiority.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2026.1845822","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,24]],"date-time":"2026-06-24T04:52:28Z","timestamp":1782276748000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparative outcomes of transcranial craniotomy and endoscopic endonasal surgery for craniopharyngioma: a single-center retrospective cohort study"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"Lei","family":"Zhang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University","place":["Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ben Li","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurobiology, Xuzhou Medical University","place":["Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shuo","family":"Wei","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University","place":["Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fa An","family":"Miao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University","place":["Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hong Fu","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University","place":["Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yue Chao","family":"Fan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University","place":["Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pei Zhi","family":"Ji","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University","place":["Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hui","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University","place":["Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1530\/endoabs.35.s4.1","article-title":"Craniopharyngioma","volume":"5","author":"Muller","year":"2019","journal-title":"Nat Rev Dis Primers"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MOP.0b013e3282495a22","article-title":"Craniopharyngioma: modern concepts in pathogenesis and treatment","volume":"19","author":"Garre","year":"2007","journal-title":"Curr Opin Pediatr"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.14153","article-title":"Clinicopathological features of craniopharyngioma: a 15-year study from a tertiary care center in Pakistan","volume":"13","author":"Haroon","year":"2021","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.3171\/ped.2007.106.1.3","article-title":"Pediatric craniopharyngiomas: classification and treatment according to the degree of hypothalamic involvement","volume":"106","author":"Puget","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3892\/etm.2014.1561","article-title":"Pituitary stalk management during the microsurgery of craniopharyngiomas","volume":"7","author":"Xiao","year":"2014","journal-title":"Exp Ther Med"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neo.2024.101060","article-title":"Distinction of papillary and adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma: clinical features, surgical nuances and hypothalamic outcomes","volume":"57","author":"Yang","year":"2024","journal-title":"Neoplasia"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/2016.9.focus16284","article-title":"Microscopic versus endoscopic approaches for craniopharyngiomas: choosing the optimal surgical corridor for maximizing extent of resection and complication avoidance using a personalized, tailored approach","volume":"41","author":"Liu","year":"2016","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2014.07.023","article-title":"The role of the endoscopic endonasal route in the management of craniopharyngiomas","volume":"82","author":"Cavallo","year":"2014","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.mlg.0000234933.37779.e4","article-title":"A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap","volume":"116","author":"Hadad","year":"2006","journal-title":"Laryngoscope"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.1.focus09319","article-title":"Early outcomes of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for adult craniopharyngiomas","volume":"28","author":"Jane","year":"2010","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/2020.7.jns20257","article-title":"Endoscopic endonasal versus transcranial surgery for primary resection of craniopharyngiomas based on a new QST classification system: a comparative series of 315 patients","volume":"135","author":"Fan","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/brainsci13060842","article-title":"Current role of endoscopic endonasal approach for craniopharyngiomas: a 10-year systematic review and meta-analysis comparison with the open transcranial approach","volume":"13","author":"Figueredo","year":"2023","journal-title":"Brain Sci"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2011.07.011","article-title":"Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of craniopharyngiomas","volume":"77","author":"Komotar","year":"2012","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1186\/s12957-024-03411-8","article-title":"Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach improves endocrine function and surgical outcome in primary craniopharyngioma resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"22","author":"Li","year":"2024","journal-title":"World J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10143-020-01343-x","article-title":"Quality of life and olfactory function after suprasellar craniopharyngioma surgery-a single-center experience comparing transcranial and endoscopic endonasal approaches","volume":"44","author":"Marx","year":"2021","journal-title":"Neurosurg Rev"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2022.1058329","article-title":"Craniopharyngioma resection by endoscopic endonasal approach versus transcranial approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies","volume":"12","author":"Na","year":"2022","journal-title":"Front Oncol"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.12.jns141591","article-title":"Long-term quality of life after endonasal endoscopic resection of adult craniopharyngiomas","volume":"123","author":"Patel","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/neurol-India.neurol-India-d-24-00677","article-title":"Hypothalamic morbidities and endocrinological outcomes following transcranial and endoscopic endonasal resection of craniopharyngiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"73","author":"Sadhasivam","year":"2025","journal-title":"Neurol India"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1007\/s00381-025-06788-3","article-title":"Endoscopic endonasal versus open approach for craniopharyngioma treatment: a systematic review of clinical characteristics","volume":"41","author":"Jung","year":"2025","journal-title":"Childs Nerv Syst"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/2016.9.focus16299","article-title":"Endoscopic endonasal versus open transcranial resection of craniopharyngiomas: a case-matched single-institution analysis","volume":"41","author":"Moussazadeh","year":"2016","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/2021.10.peds21392","article-title":"A propensity-adjusted comparison of endoscopic endonasal surgery versus transcranial microsurgery for pediatric craniopharyngioma: a single-center study","volume":"29","author":"Wu","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Pediatr"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39335.541782.ad","article-title":"The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies","volume":"147","author":"von Elm","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.14791\/btrt.2022.0014","article-title":"Surgical outcomes of endoscopic endonasal versus transcranial resections of adult craniopharyngioma: a meta-analysis","volume":"10","author":"Rafaqat","year":"2022","journal-title":"Brain Tumor Res Treat"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1781","DOI":"10.1186\/s12885-025-15154-0","article-title":"Comparative analysis of the outcomes of craniotomy and endoscopic resection for recurrent craniopharyngioma: a single institution study","volume":"25","author":"Wu","year":"2025","journal-title":"BMC Cancer"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2019.03.048","article-title":"Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: history and evolution","volume":"127","author":"Cavallo","year":"2019","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s40618-025-02616-2","article-title":"Protect the pituitary stalks in craniopharyngioma resection by endoscopic endonasal approach","volume":"48","author":"Cao","year":"2025","journal-title":"J Endocrinol Invest"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2012.00025","article-title":"Outcome of endoscopy-assisted microscopic extended transsphenoidal surgery for suprasellar adult craniopharyngiomas","volume":"3","author":"Ikeda","year":"2012","journal-title":"Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)"},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2015.03.007","article-title":"Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the third ventricle: multimodal anatomical study with surgical implications","volume":"84","author":"Cavallo","year":"2015","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Oncology"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fonc.2026.1845822\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,24]],"date-time":"2026-06-24T04:52:36Z","timestamp":1782276756000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fonc.2026.1845822\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,24]]},"references-count":28,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fonc.2026.1845822"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fonc.2026.1845822","relation":{},"ISSN":["2234-943X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2234-943X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,24]]},"article-number":"1845822"}}