{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T04:59:26Z","timestamp":1785387566974,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1785369600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Oncol."],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The potential clinical benefits of robotic rectal cancer surgery compared with conventional laparoscopy remain a matter of debate. This study compared perioperative, pathological, and mid-term oncologic outcomes after robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer resection in a single-center cohort.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This retrospective sequential era-based cohort study included consecutive patients with UICC stage I\u2013III rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing elective minimally invasive rectal resection between 2015 and 2024. Laparoscopy represented the institutional standard until June 2018; following implementation of the da Vinci X platform, robotic surgery became the preferred minimally invasive approach. Thus, the present analysis reflects an institutional transition between two surgical eras rather than a contemporaneous comparison of coexisting surgical techniques. The primary outcomes were conversion to open surgery and quality of mesorectal excision. Secondary outcomes included operative duration, hospital stay, anastomotic leakage, major morbidity, reoperation, 30- and 90-day mortality, and oncologic survival endpoints. To reduce baseline imbalance between treatment groups, propensity score overlap weighting was applied.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The study included 239 patients, of whom 146 underwent robotic resection and 93 underwent laparoscopic resection. The rate of conversion to open surgery was significantly lower in the robotic group compared with the laparoscopic group (2.7% vs 15.1%; OR 0.15, 95% CI: [0.02; 0.95], p = 0.044). Mesorectal specimen quality did not differ substantially between groups. Compared with laparoscopy, the robotic approach was associated with a shorter postoperative stay (mean difference \u22124.72 days, 95% CI: [\u22126.62; \u22122.82], p &amp;lt; 0.0001) but a longer operative time (+35.33 min, 95% CI: [17.50; 53.15], p = 0.0001). No statistically significant between-group differences were found for anastomotic leakage, major complications, reoperation, or 30- and 90-day mortality. During follow-up of up to 60 months, no statistically significant differences were observed between groups regarding overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence, or distant metastasis.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Within the limitations of this sequential retrospective cohort, robotic rectal cancer surgery was associated with fewer conversions and shorter postoperative hospitalization, without an observed detriment in pathological quality or available mid-term oncologic outcomes. Although these findings suggest potential perioperative advantages of the robotic approach, the study was not powered to establish definitive oncologic equivalence.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2026.1874238","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T04:21:22Z","timestamp":1785385282000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery during institutional transition: a 10-year sequential cohort study"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"Zsolt","family":"Madarasz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, Bielefeld University, Medical School and University Medical School Ostwestfalen-Lippe (OWL) \u2013 Campus Hospital Lippe","place":["Detmold, Germany"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Krzysztof","family":"Nowakowski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, Bielefeld University, Medical School and University Medical School Ostwestfalen-Lippe (OWL) \u2013 Campus Hospital Lippe","place":["Detmold, Germany"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael","family":"Leitz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, Bielefeld University, Medical School and University Medical School Ostwestfalen-Lippe (OWL) \u2013 Campus Hospital Lippe","place":["Detmold, Germany"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bogdan-Cornel","family":"Sturzu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, Bielefeld University, Medical School and University Medical School Ostwestfalen-Lippe (OWL) \u2013 Campus Hospital Lippe","place":["Detmold, Germany"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Julia","family":"Michel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, Bielefeld University, Medical School and University Medical School Ostwestfalen-Lippe (OWL) \u2013 Campus Hospital Lippe","place":["Detmold, Germany"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kira","family":"Baginski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Biostatistics and Medical Biometry, Medical School Ostwestfalen-Lippe (OWL), Bielefeld University","place":["Bielefeld, Germany"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Annika","family":"Hoyer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Biostatistics and Medical Biometry, Medical School Ostwestfalen-Lippe (OWL), Bielefeld University","place":["Bielefeld, Germany"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Miljana","family":"Vladimirov","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, Bielefeld University, Medical School and University Medical School Ostwestfalen-Lippe (OWL) \u2013 Campus Hospital Lippe","place":["Detmold, Germany"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jens","family":"Hoeppner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, Bielefeld University, Medical School and University Medical School Ostwestfalen-Lippe (OWL) \u2013 Campus Hospital Lippe","place":["Detmold, Germany"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fabian","family":"Nimczewski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surgery, Bielefeld University, Medical School and University Medical School Ostwestfalen-Lippe (OWL) \u2013 Campus Hospital Lippe","place":["Detmold, Germany"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(13)70016-0","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial","volume":"14","author":"van der Pas","year":"2013","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(14)70205-0","article-title":"Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial","volume":"15","author":"Jeong","year":"2014","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2015.10529","article-title":"Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial","volume":"314","author":"Fleshman","year":"2015","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2015.12009","article-title":"Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: The ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial","volume":"314","author":"Stevenson","year":"2015","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"B5","article-title":"Robotic-assisted surgery compared with laparoscopic resectionsurgery for rectal cancer: the ROLARR RCT. Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library","author":"Jayne","year":"2019"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2025.8123","article-title":"Robotic vs laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer: The REAL randomized clinical trial","volume":"334","author":"Feng","year":"2025","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12893-025-02805-z","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"25","author":"Zou","year":"2025","journal-title":"BMC Surg"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002523","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"267","author":"Prete","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm14196743","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer","volume":"14","author":"Madarasz","year":"2025","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bjsopen\/zrae071","article-title":"Total mesorectal excision quality in rectal cancer surgery affects local recurrence rate but not distant recurrence and survival: population-based cohort study","volume":"8","author":"Collin","year":"2024","journal-title":"BJS Open"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2","article-title":"The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience","volume":"250","author":"Clavien","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2013.02.007","article-title":"Validation of the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer definition and severity grading of anastomotic leakage","volume":"153","author":"Kulu","year":"2013","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"390","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.2016.1260466","article-title":"Balancing covariates via propensity score weighting","volume":"113","author":"Li","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Am Stat Assoc"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002321","article-title":"Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A phase II open label prospective randomized controlled trial","volume":"267","author":"Kim","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000005788","article-title":"Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancers: The COLRAR randomized controlled trial","volume":"278","author":"Park","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-024-03460-3","article-title":"Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"409","author":"Khan","year":"2024","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-02628-3","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials evaluating functional recovery, complication risk, and oncologic quality","volume":"19","author":"Mirza","year":"2025","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.12875","article-title":"A meta-analysis to determine the oncological implications of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery","volume":"17","author":"Clancy","year":"2015","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-008-9813-3","article-title":"Impact of conversion on the long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer","volume":"22","author":"Chan","year":"2008","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000003805","article-title":"Robotic surgery for rectal cancer provides advantageous outcomes over laparoscopic approach: Results from a large retrospective cohort","volume":"274","author":"Crippa","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-021-08681-x","article-title":"Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study","volume":"36","author":"Myrseth","year":"2022","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-018-6042-2","article-title":"Laparoscopic conversion in colorectal cancer surgery; is there any improvement over time at a population level","volume":"32","author":"de Neree Tot Babberich","year":"2018","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"570","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-02755-x","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological, perioperative, and survival-related outcomes","volume":"19","author":"Liu","year":"2025","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0239909","article-title":"The severity of postoperative complications after robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression","volume":"15","author":"Wang","year":"2020","journal-title":"PloS One"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9227","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-024-57110-1","article-title":"Comparison of early surgical outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection reported by a busy district general hospital in England","volume":"14","author":"Butnari","year":"2024","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bjsopen\/zrae044","article-title":"Robotic, transanal, and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for locally advanced mid\/low rectal cancer: European multicentre, propensity score-matched study","volume":"8","author":"de'Angelis","year":"2024","journal-title":"BJS Open"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-023-01736-2","article-title":"Comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and oncological results between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer by multiple surgeon implementation: a propensity score-matched analysis","volume":"17","author":"Barzola","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-025-02358-6","article-title":"Comparison of surgical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"19","author":"Li","year":"2025","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7812\/TPP\/21.050","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A comprehensive review of oncological outcomes","volume":"25","author":"Lam","year":"2021","journal-title":"Perm J"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Oncology"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fonc.2026.1874238\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T04:21:23Z","timestamp":1785385283000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fonc.2026.1874238\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]]},"references-count":29,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fonc.2026.1874238"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fonc.2026.1874238","relation":{},"ISSN":["2234-943X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2234-943X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]]},"article-number":"1874238"}}