{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T04:22:36Z","timestamp":1787026956249,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":56,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]],"date-time":"2025-12-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1765756800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000002","name":"National Institutes of Health","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["R01HD110994"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["R01HD110994"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000002","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000002","name":"National Institutes of Health","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["KL2 TR002530"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["KL2 TR002530"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000002","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000002","name":"National Institutes of Health","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["UL1 TR002529"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["UL1 TR002529"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000002","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Pain Res."],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Menstrual pain affects 45%\u201395% of reproductive-age females and increases the risk of other chronic pain conditions. Psychometrically sound measurement tools are essential for advancing research and clinical care in menstrual pain. Numerical rating scales (NRS) are widely used to measure pain severity. However, the minimally important difference (MID) and responsiveness to change of the NRS in the context of menstrual pain are not well understood. Understanding MID and responsiveness to change helps guide the evaluation of treatment efficacy and clinical decision-making. This study evaluated the MID and responsiveness to change in the NRS, ranging from 0 to 10, for menstrual pain severity.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Participants who were menstruating (aged 14\u201342,\n                      <jats:italic>N<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u2009100) completed two surveys 24\u2005h apart. In both surveys, we measured menstrual pain severity (worst, least, average menstrual pain in the past 24\u2005h, and current menstrual pain) on a 0 (no pain) to 10 (extremely severe) NRS. MIDs were estimated using distribution-based approaches (standard error of measurement and effect size) and anchor-based approaches (using symptom interference and retrospective recall of change as anchors). Responsiveness to change was evaluated using standard response means and area-under-the-curve analysis.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The MID estimates were close to 1 point. The NRS of menstrual pain severity was responsive to menstrual pain improvement (standard response means ranged from 0.44 to 0.61,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&amp;lt;\u20090.001 for between-group comparisons). Area-under-the-curve estimates ranged from 0.66 to 0.70.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The findings can inform the design and interpretation of studies testing interventions for menstrual pain, while also guiding clinicians in monitoring and adjusting treatment.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fpain.2025.1655464","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]],"date-time":"2025-12-15T06:30:02Z","timestamp":1765780202000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Minimally important difference and responsiveness to change for numerical rating scale of menstrual pain severity: a psychometric study"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"6","author":[{"given":"Chen X.","family":"Chen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jingyue","family":"Wu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chiyoung","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Juyoung","family":"Park","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hyochol","family":"Ahn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lifeng","family":"Lin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kurt","family":"Kroenke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"762","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmv039","article-title":"What we know about primary dysmenorrhea today: a critical review","volume":"21","author":"Iacovides","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1161","DOI":"10.1089\/jwh.2018.7615","article-title":"The prevalence and academic impact of dysmenorrhea in 21,573 young women: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"28","author":"Armour","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Women\u2019s Health"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"350","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.03.002","article-title":"Association between dysmenorrhea and chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies","volume":"223","author":"Li","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1966","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pain.2011.03.029","article-title":"Dysmenorrhoea is associated with central changes in otherwise healthy women","volume":"152","author":"Vincent","year":"2011","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbmt.2023.07.002","article-title":"Efficacy of manual therapy and pelvic floor exercises for pain reduction in primary dysmenorrhea: a prospective observational study","volume":"36","author":"Deodato","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Bodyw Mov Ther"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2095","DOI":"10.1002\/pri.2095","article-title":"Effect of aquatic exercise versus aerobic exercise on primary dysmenorrhea and quality of life in adolescent females: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"29","author":"Abdelrahman","year":"2024","journal-title":"Physiother Res Int"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.4065\/77.4.371","article-title":"Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures","volume":"77","author":"Guyatt","year":"2002","journal-title":"Mayo Clinic Proc"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012","article-title":"Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes","volume":"61","author":"Revicki","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1002\/ejp.556","article-title":"Self-report pain and symptom measures for primary dysmenorrhoea: a critical review","volume":"19","author":"Chen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Pain"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-022-01600-1","article-title":"Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for the numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain and the patient-rated wrist\/hand evaluation (PRWHE) for patients with osteoarthritis at the base of thumb","volume":"22","author":"Stjernberg-Salmela","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1016\/s0304-3959(01)00349-9","article-title":"Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale","volume":"94","author":"Farrar","year":"2001","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejpain.2003.09.004","article-title":"Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale","volume":"8","author":"Salaffi","year":"2004","journal-title":"Eur J Pain"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1080\/09513590.2022.2099831","article-title":"Numerical rating scale for dysmenorrhea-related pain: a clinimetric study","volume":"38","author":"de Arruda","year":"2022","journal-title":"Gynecol Endocrinol"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2041","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-017-1562-0","article-title":"Psychometric validation of the dysmenorrhea daily diary (DysDD): a patient-reported outcome for dysmenorrhea","volume":"26","author":"Nguyen","year":"2017","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.07.013","article-title":"Responsiveness and thresholds for clinically meaningful changes in worst pain numerical rating scale for dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain in women with moderate to severe endometriosis","volume":"115","author":"Pokrzywinski","year":"2021","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2399","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pain.2011.07.005","article-title":"Validity of four pain intensity rating scales","volume":"152","author":"Ferreira-Valente","year":"2011","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"846","DOI":"10.1097\/EDE.0b013e318187ac9e","article-title":"Measuring menstrual discomfort: a comparison of interview and diary data","volume":"19","author":"Jukic","year":"2008","journal-title":"Epidemiology"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"993","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-013-3073-8","article-title":"The 24-h progression of menstrual pain in women with primary dysmenorrhea when given diclofenac potassium: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study","volume":"289","author":"Iacovides","year":"2014","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"364","DOI":"10.1177\/0193945920942252","article-title":"Development and testing of the dysmenorrhea symptom interference (DSI) scale","volume":"43","author":"Chen","year":"2021","journal-title":"West J Nurs Res"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.52589\/BJCE-FY266HK9","article-title":"Sample size determination in test-retest and cronbach alpha reliability estimates","volume":"2","author":"Kennedy","year":"2022","journal-title":"Br J Contemp Educ"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4167","DOI":"10.1111\/jocn.17293","article-title":"Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for women with dysmenorrhea: a systematic review","volume":"33","author":"de Arruda","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Clin Nurs"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101065","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjpt.2024.101065","article-title":"Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and measurement properties of the dysmenorrhea symptom interference (DSI) scale-Brazilian version","volume":"28","author":"Mantovan","year":"2024","journal-title":"Braz J Phys Ther"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.11.018","article-title":"Minimally important differences were estimated for six patient-reported outcomes measurement information system-cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients","volume":"64","author":"Yost","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"775","DOI":"10.1097\/j.pain.0000000000001121","article-title":"Estimating minimally important differences for the PROMIS pain interference scales: results from 3 randomized clinical trials","volume":"159","author":"Chen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpain.2007.09.005","article-title":"Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: iMMPACT recommendations","volume":"9","author":"Dworkin","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Pain"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7525-4-54","article-title":"Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change","volume":"4","author":"de Vet","year":"2006","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcomes"},{"key":"B27","volume-title":"Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences","author":"Cohen","year":"1988"},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jad.2020.01.101","article-title":"Minimally important differences and severity thresholds are estimated for the PROMIS depression scales from three randomized clinical trials","volume":"266","author":"Kroenke","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Affect Disord"},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02310555","article-title":"Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests","volume":"16","author":"Cronbach","year":"1951","journal-title":"Psychometrika"},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6920-10-40","article-title":"The standard error of measurement is a more appropriate measure of quality for postgraduate medical assessments than is reliability: an analysis of MRCP(UK) examinations","volume":"10","author":"Tighe","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMC Med Educ"},{"key":"B31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1745-3992.1991.tb00195.x","article-title":"Standard error of measurement","volume":"10","author":"Harvill","year":"1991","journal-title":"Educ Meas: Issues Pract"},{"key":"B32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-199905000-00006","article-title":"Linking clinical relevance and statistical significance in evaluating intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life","volume":"37","author":"Wyrwich","year":"1999","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"B33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"861","DOI":"10.1016\/S0895-4356(99)00071-2","article-title":"Further evidence supporting an SEM-based criterion for identifying meaningful intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life","volume":"52","author":"Wyrwich","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"B34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1081\/BIP-120028508","article-title":"Minimal important difference thresholds and the standard error of measurement: is there a connection?","volume":"14","author":"Wyrwich","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Biopharm Stat"},{"key":"B35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1067","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465231152484","article-title":"The minimal clinically important difference changes greatly based on the different calculation methods","volume":"51","author":"Franceschini","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Sports Med"},{"key":"B36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-018-1055-z","article-title":"Distribution- and anchor-based methods to determine the minimally important difference on patient-reported outcome questionnaires in oncology: a structured review","volume":"16","author":"Ousmen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcomes"},{"key":"B37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"892","DOI":"10.1111\/1365-2656.12382","article-title":"On the variety of methods for calculating confidence intervals by bootstrapping","volume":"84","author":"Puth","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Anim Ecol"},{"key":"B38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"m1714","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.m1714","article-title":"Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability study","volume":"369","author":"Devji","year":"2020","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"B39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2755","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-021-02957-4","article-title":"Triangulation of multiple meaningful change thresholds for patient-reported outcome scores","volume":"30","author":"Trigg","year":"2021","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"B40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e15","DOI":"10.5334\/ijic.65","article-title":"Statistical significant change versus relevant or important change in (quasi) experimental design: some conceptual and methodological problems in estimating magnitude of intervention-related change in health services research","volume":"2","author":"Middel","year":"2002","journal-title":"Int J Integr Care"},{"key":"B41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2015.08.035","article-title":"Clinical validity of PROMIS (\u00ae) pain interference and pain behavior in diverse clinical populations","volume":"73","author":"Askew","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"B42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"837","DOI":"10.2307\/2531595","article-title":"Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach","volume":"44","author":"DeLong","year":"1988","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"key":"B43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"764","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpain.2012.05.004","article-title":"Comparative responsiveness of pain measures in cancer patients","volume":"13","author":"Kroenke","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Pain"},{"key":"B44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.4097\/kja.21209","article-title":"Receiver operating characteristic curve: overview and practical use for clinicians","volume":"75","author":"Nahm","year":"2022","journal-title":"Korean J Anesthesiol"},{"key":"B45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0229228","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0229228","article-title":"Clinically significant changes in pain along the pain intensity numerical rating scale in patients with chronic low back pain","volume":"15","author":"Suzuki","year":"2020","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"B46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.23970\/AHRQEPCCER228","article-title":"AHRQ Comparative effectiveness reviews","volume-title":"Nonopioid Pharmacologic Treatments for Chronic Pain","author":"McDonagh","year":"2020"},{"key":"B47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"664","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpain.2018.11.010","article-title":"Comparative responsiveness of the PROMIS pain interference short forms with legacy pain measures: results from three randomized clinical trials","volume":"20","author":"Chen","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Pain"},{"key":"B48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-021-01674-3","article-title":"Responsiveness of PROMIS and patient health questionnaire (PHQ) depression scales in three clinical trials","volume":"19","author":"Kroenke","year":"2021","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcomes"},{"key":"B49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"414","DOI":"10.1097\/mlr.0000000000000497","article-title":"Comparative responsiveness of the PROMIS pain interference short forms, brief pain inventory, PEG, and SF-36 bodily pain subscale","volume":"54","author":"Kean","year":"2016","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"B50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-022-00488-1","article-title":"Comparative responsiveness and minimally important difference of fatigue symptom inventory (FSI) scales and the FSI-3 in trials with cancer survivors","volume":"6","author":"Mosher","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"key":"B51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"890","DOI":"10.1097\/mlr.0000000000001185","article-title":"Comparative responsiveness and minimally important difference of common anxiety measures","volume":"57","author":"Kroenke","year":"2019","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"B52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1653","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpain.2013.08.006","article-title":"Comparative responsiveness of verbal and numerical rating scales to measure pain intensity in patients with chronic pain","volume":"14","author":"Chien","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Pain"},{"key":"B53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7525-4-70","article-title":"Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes","volume":"4","author":"Revicki","year":"2006","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcomes"},{"key":"B54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1334","DOI":"10.1089\/jwh.2020.8581","article-title":"Perceived ineffectiveness of pharmacological treatments for dysmenorrhea","volume":"30","author":"Chen","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Womens Health (Larchmt)"},{"key":"B55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1002\/nur.21726","article-title":"Beliefs about dysmenorrhea and their relationship to self-management","volume":"39","author":"Chen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Res Nurs Health"},{"key":"B56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-019-0100-y","article-title":"An overview of using qualitative techniques to explore and define estimates of clinically important change on clinical outcome assessments","volume":"3","author":"Staunton","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Pain Research"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fpain.2025.1655464\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]],"date-time":"2025-12-15T06:30:04Z","timestamp":1765780204000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fpain.2025.1655464\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]]},"references-count":56,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fpain.2025.1655464"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpain.2025.1655464","relation":{},"ISSN":["2673-561X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2673-561X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]]},"article-number":"1655464"}}