{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,11]],"date-time":"2026-05-11T06:09:40Z","timestamp":1778479780448,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,11]],"date-time":"2026-05-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1778457600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Pain Res."],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Rechargeable stimulators have improved the management of patients treated with spinal cord stimulation by avoiding numerous interventions to replace stimulator devices whose batteries are reaching the end of their life. However, the recharging procedure can be restrictive for some patients and affect their satisfaction.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The aim of this work is to evaluate the usability of the recharging procedure through a quantitative and qualitative approach to explore the experience of unsatisfied patients.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The evaluation began with a retrospective analysis of 50 patients with neuropathic pain who have had a rechargeable spinal cord stimulator for more than one year. Patients completed the French version of the System Usability Scale (F-SUS) which is a scientifically validated usability questionnaire. Ten patients who were not satisfied with the recharging procedure (F-SUS score &amp;lt;70) has been interviewed and their speech has been analysed thematically.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>These were 26 women and 24 men, mean age 51.6 years, operated on in 2019 and 2020 for spinal cord stimulation using a rechargeable stimulator for the treatment of neuropathic pain refractory to medical therapy. Forty patients (80% of cases) were satisfied (F-SUS score \u226570\/100) and 10 patients not satisfied (F-SUS score &amp;lt;70) with the recharging procedure. The numerical pain scale improved by an average of 52% over the long term (mean follow-up 3.6 years). Rechargement time averaged 59.6\u2005min (\u00b135) and the interval between rechargement sessions 4.2 days (\u00b17.1). These data were not significantly different between satisfied and not satisfied patient groups. The qualitative study revealed that the duration of the rechargement session was the main cause of dissatisfaction among unsatisfied patients. This is linked to the fact that these patients must remain virtually motionless throughout the session, otherwise recharging is interrupted by loss of contact between the recharging box and the stimulator. This study also highlights the fact that patients who have improved well with spinal cord stimulation are better able to tolerate the inconvenience of recharging, which is not the case for patients whose pain has improved little or not at all. Overall, patients would like to be better prepared for the recharging procedure.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The mixed quantitative and qualitative analysis indicates that most patients are satisfied with the recharging procedure. The problem of contact between the recharging device and the stimulator device needs to be improved, as it is the main cause of dissatisfaction among patients who are not satisfied with the recharging procedure.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Ethics and dissemination<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study was approved by the French ethics committee (CPP Est I ID RCB: 2022-A00683-40) on June 3, 2022, and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05373654) on May 9, 2022.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fpain.2026.1727882","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,11]],"date-time":"2026-05-11T05:31:20Z","timestamp":1778477480000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Evaluation of the usability of the spinal cord stimulator recharging procedure in the treatment of neuropathic pain. A quantitative and qualitative study"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"7","author":[{"given":"Delphine","family":"Durand","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre d'Evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur (CETD), Clinique Bret\u00e9ch\u00e9, Elsan Group","place":["Nantes, France"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Pierre-Henri","family":"Garnier","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Service de Psychiatrie de l\u2019enfant et de l\u2019adolescent","place":[", CHU de Nantes, France"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sylvain","family":"Durand","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre d'Evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur (CETD), Clinique Bret\u00e9ch\u00e9, Elsan Group","place":["Nantes, France"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Julien","family":"Nizard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre d'Evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur (CETD), Soins Palliatifs et de Support","place":["CHU de Nantes, France"]},{"name":"UMR 1229 (M\u00e9decine Reg\u00e9n\u00e9ratrice et Squelette), INSERM, Universit\u00e9 de Nantes","place":["Nantes, France"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Vincent","family":"Wyart","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Sant\u00e9 Atlantique, Elsan Group","place":["Nantes, France"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C\u00e9line","family":"Brouillet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre d'Evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur (CETD), Clinique Bret\u00e9ch\u00e9, Elsan Group","place":["Nantes, France"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jean-Pascal","family":"Lefaucheur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"UR 4391, Team ENT (Nerve Excitability and Therapeutics), Universit\u00e9 Paris-Est Cr\u00e9teil","place":["Cr\u00e9teil, France"]},{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Assistance Publique\u2014H\u00f4pitaux de Paris (AP-HP)","place":["Cr\u00e9teil, France"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jean-Paul","family":"Nguyen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre d'Evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur (CETD), Clinique Bret\u00e9ch\u00e9, Elsan Group","place":["Nantes, France"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"00615","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neurol.2021.07.004","article-title":"French Guidelines for neuropathic pain: an update and commentary","volume":"177","author":"Moisset","year":"2021","journal-title":"Rev Neurol"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"380","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pain.2007.08.013","article-title":"Prevalence of chronic pain with neuropathic characteristics in the general population","volume":"136","author":"Bouhassira","year":"2008","journal-title":"PAIN"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.3390\/brainsci8080138","article-title":"Spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain: current trends and future applications","volume":"8","author":"Dones","year":"2018","journal-title":"Brain Sci"},{"key":"B4","year":"2014"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-018-0887-x","article-title":"Benefits in pain perception, ability function and health-related quality of life in patients with failed back surgery syndrome undergoing spinal cord stimulation in a clinical practice setting","volume":"16","author":"Scalone","year":"2018","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcomes"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.12035","article-title":"Spinal cord stimulation as treatment for complex regional pain syndrome should be considered earlier than last resort therapy","volume":"16","author":"Poree","year":"2013","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.14797\/mdcj-9-2-99","article-title":"Spinal cord stimulation for chronic limb ischemia","volume":"9","author":"Naoum","year":"2013","journal-title":"Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"937","DOI":"10.1111\/papr.12926","article-title":"Longevity and utilization cost of rechargeable and non-rechargeable spinal cord stimulation implants: a comparative study","volume":"20","author":"Costandi","year":"2020","journal-title":"Pain Pract"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"iii, ix","DOI":"10.3310\/hta13170","article-title":"Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain of neuropathic or ischaemic origin: systematic review and economic evaluation","volume":"13","author":"Simpson","year":"2009","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1195","DOI":"10.4184\/asj.2016.10.6.1195","article-title":"Spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome: review of clinical use, quality of life and cost-effectiveness","volume":"10","author":"Waszak","year":"2016","journal-title":"Asian Spine J"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1525-1403.2009.00269.x","article-title":"Patient perspectives on the efficacy and ergonomics of rechargeable spinal cord stimulators","volume":"13","author":"Lam","year":"2010","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1097\/AJP.0b013e31816216a9","article-title":"The restore rechargeable, implantable neurostimulator: handling and clinical results of a multicenter study","volume":"24","author":"Van Buyten","year":"2008","journal-title":"Clin J Pain"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1525-1403.2012.00456.x","article-title":"A questionnaire-based study on patients\u2019 experiences with rechargeable implanted programmable generators for spinal cord stimulation to treat chronic lumbar spondylosis pain","volume":"16","author":"McAuley","year":"2013","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.3109\/02688697.2014.889657","article-title":"Rechargeable occipital nerve stimulator systems: a patient satisfaction study","volume":"28","author":"Sciacca","year":"2014","journal-title":"Br J Neurosurg"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1159\/000500993","article-title":"Patient experience with rechargeable implantable pulse generator deep brain stimulation for movement disorders","volume":"97","author":"Mitchell","year":"2019","journal-title":"Stereotact Funct Neurosurg"},{"key":"B16","first-page":"189","article-title":"SUS: a \u201cquick and dirty\u201d usability scale","volume-title":"Usability Evaluation in Industry","author":"Brooke","year":"1996"},{"key":"B17","first-page":"29","article-title":"SUS: a retrospective","volume":"8","author":"Brooke","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Usability Stud"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1571","DOI":"10.1080\/10447318.2021.1898828","article-title":"Psychometric evaluation of the F-SUS: creation and validation of the French version of the system usability scale","volume":"37","author":"Gronier","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Hum Comput Interact"},{"key":"B19","first-page":"19","article-title":"Using likert-type scales in the social sciences","volume":"40","author":"Croasmun","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Adult Educ"},{"key":"B20","author":"Blanchet","year":"2015"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1207\/S15327590IJHC1304_07","article-title":"The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness","volume":"13","author":"Hassenzahl","year":"2001","journal-title":"Int J Hum Comput Interact"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e24927","DOI":"10.2196\/24927","article-title":"User evaluation of the Swedish patient accessible electronic health record: system usability scale","volume":"8","author":"H\u00e4gglund","year":"2021","journal-title":"JMIR Hum Factors"},{"key":"B23","author":"Lallemand","year":"2015"},{"key":"B24","first-page":"66","article-title":"The mid-point on a rating scale: is it desirable?","volume":"2","author":"Garland","year":"1991","journal-title":"Mark Bull"},{"key":"B25","first-page":"121","article-title":"The use of midpoint on Likert scale: the implication for educational research","volume":"11","author":"Tsang","year":"2012","journal-title":"Hong Kong Teachers\u2019 Centre J"},{"key":"B26","first-page":"114","article-title":"Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale","volume":"4","author":"Bangor","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Usability Stud"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa","article-title":"Using thematic analysis in psychology","volume":"3","author":"Braun","year":"2006","journal-title":"Qual Res Psychol"},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6947-11-15","article-title":"The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers\u2019 perspectives","volume":"11","author":"Money","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMC Med Inform Decis Mak"},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.70953\/ERPv38.11005","article-title":"Validity and reliability in social science research","volume":"38","author":"Drost","year":"2011","journal-title":"Educ Res Pers"},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pain.2010.05.001","article-title":"A systematic literature review of psychological characteristics as determinants of outcome for spinal cord stimulation therapy","volume":"150","author":"Sparkes","year":"2010","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"B31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.13277","article-title":"Experiences from the patient perspective on spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome: a qualitatively driven mixed method analysis","volume":"24","author":"Witkam","year":"2021","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"},{"key":"B32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8127","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-11778-5","article-title":"Questionnaire-based approach to evaluate the convenience of rechargeable extracorporeal pulse generators for wireless spinal cord stimulation","volume":"12","author":"Hajiabadi","year":"2022","journal-title":"Sci Rep."},{"key":"B33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1111\/ner.12885","article-title":"An exploration of the experiences and educational needs of patients with failed back surgery syndrome receiving spinal cord stimulation","volume":"22","author":"Ryan","year":"2019","journal-title":"Neuromodulation"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Pain Research"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fpain.2026.1727882\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,11]],"date-time":"2026-05-11T05:31:21Z","timestamp":1778477481000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fpain.2026.1727882\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,11]]},"references-count":33,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fpain.2026.1727882"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpain.2026.1727882","relation":{},"ISSN":["2673-561X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2673-561X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,11]]},"article-number":"1727882"}}