{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,23]],"date-time":"2026-07-23T01:23:19Z","timestamp":1784769799222,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":47,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,12]],"date-time":"2020-02-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1581465600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Physiol."],"DOI":"10.3389\/fphys.2020.00074","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,11]],"date-time":"2020-02-11T23:25:51Z","timestamp":1581463551000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"title":["Impact of Day 7 Blastocyst Transfer on Obstetric and Perinatal Outcome of Singletons Born After Vitrified-Warmed Embryo Transfer"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Jiaan","family":"Huang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xiaoyan","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jiayi","family":"Wu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yanping","family":"Kuang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yun","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1016\/j.repbio.2017.12.003","article-title":"Embryo culture conditions are significantly improved during uninterrupted incubation: a randomized controlled trial.","volume":"18","author":"Alhelou","year":"2018","journal-title":"Reprod. Biol."},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1080\/00273171.2011.568786","article-title":"An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies.","volume":"46","author":"Austin","year":"2011","journal-title":"Multivariate Behav. Res."},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12916-016-0692-5","article-title":"Birth weight in relation to health and disease in later life: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.","volume":"14","author":"Belbasis","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMC Med."},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1016\/j.theriogenology.2011.07.043","article-title":"A review of the risk of contamination of semen and embryos during cryopreservation and measures to limit cross-contamination during banking to prevent disease transmission in ET practices.","volume":"77","author":"Bielanski","year":"2012","journal-title":"Theriogenology"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1006\/cryo.1999.2227","article-title":"Viral contamination of embryos cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen.","volume":"40","author":"Bielanski","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cryobiology"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2013.02.006","article-title":"Modelling a risk classification of aneuploidy in human embryos using non-invasive morphokinetics.","volume":"26","author":"Campbell","year":"2013","journal-title":"Reprod. Biomed. Online"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1173","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu033","article-title":"Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts.","volume":"29","author":"Capalbo","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1194.e2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.020","article-title":"Comparison of live-birth defects after luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs. conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization and vitrified embryo transfer cycles.","volume":"103","author":"Chen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril."},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1329","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-018-1195-4","article-title":"Continuous embryo culture elicits higher blastulation but similar cumulative delivery rates than sequential: a large prospective study.","volume":"35","author":"Cimadomo","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Assist. Reprod. Genet."},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0104779","article-title":"Birth weight reference percentiles for Chinese.","volume":"9","author":"Dai","year":"2014","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmu001","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes among singleton births after blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"20","author":"Dar","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod. Update"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dex361","article-title":"Birthweight of singletons born after cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer in fresh and warming cycles.","volume":"33","author":"De Vos","year":"2018","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1454.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032","article-title":"Single vitrified blastocyst transfer maximizes liveborn children per embryo while minimizing preterm birth.","volume":"103","author":"Devine","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.05.027","article-title":"Comparison of ectopic pregnancy risk among transfers of embryos vitrified on day 3, day 5, and day 6.","volume":"108","author":"Du","year":"2017","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1038","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey092","article-title":"Fertility and neonatal outcomes of embryos achieving blastulation on Day 7: are they of clinical value?","volume":"33","author":"Du","year":"2018","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.12.032","article-title":"Outcomes of singleton births after blastocyst versus nonblastocyst transfer in assisted reproductive technology.","volume":"97","author":"Fernando","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"B17","first-page":"378","article-title":"In vitro culture of human blastocyst","author":"Gardner","year":"1999","journal-title":"Towards Reproductive Certainty: Infertiliy and Genetics Beyond 1999"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"378.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.040","article-title":"Neonatal and maternal outcome after blastocyst transfer: a population-based registry study.","volume":"214","author":"Ginstrom Ernstad","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD002118.pub5","article-title":"Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.","volume":"6","author":"Glujovsky","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst. Rev."},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"991","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey091","article-title":"Should extended blastocyst culture include Day 7?","volume":"33","author":"Hammond","year":"2018","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1697","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dez129","article-title":"What is the reproductive potential of day 7 euploid embryos?","volume":"34","author":"Hernandez-Nieto","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"B22","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes following transfer of human blastocysts vitrified at day 5, 6 and 7.","volume":"20","author":"Hiraoka","year":"2009","journal-title":"J. Exp. Clin. Assist. Reprod."},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89.e2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.03.033","article-title":"Improved outcomes after blastocyst-stage frozen-thawed embryo transfers compared with cleavage stage: a society for assisted reproductive technologies clinical outcomes reporting system study.","volume":"110","author":"Holden","year":"2018","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"379.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.1103","article-title":"Does maternal age at retrieval influence the implantation potential of euploid blastocysts?","volume":"220","author":"Irani","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.09.025","article-title":"Impact of frozen-thawed single-blastocyst transfer on maternal and neonatal outcome: an analysis of 277,042 single-embryo transfer cycles from 2008 to 2010 in Japan.","volume":"101","author":"Ishihara","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2219","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew156","article-title":"Influence of embryo culture medium (G5 and HTF) on pregnancy and perinatal outcome after IVF: a multicenter RCT.","volume":"31","author":"Kleijkers","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1008","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.06.021","article-title":"Should embryos developing to blastocysts on day 7 be cryopreserved and transferred: an analysis of pregnancy and implantation rates.","volume":"100","author":"Kovalevsky","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"608","DOI":"10.1016\/s1472-6483(10)61169-8","article-title":"Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination.","volume":"11","author":"Kuwayama","year":"2005","journal-title":"Reprod. Biomed. Online"},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"86511","DOI":"10.18632\/oncotarget.13442","article-title":"Altered DNA methylation in neonates born large-for-gestational-age is associated with cardiometabolic risk in children.","volume":"7","author":"Lin","year":"2016","journal-title":"Oncotarget"},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"828","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des410","article-title":"Does long in vitro culture promote large for gestational age babies?","volume":"28","author":"Makinen","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"B31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"954","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.01.024","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes among singletons after assisted reproductive technology with single-embryo or double-embryo transfer versus no assisted reproductive technology.","volume":"107","author":"Martin","year":"2017","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"B32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2245","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew183","article-title":"Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study.","volume":"31","author":"Minasi","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"B33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hox017","article-title":"Blastocyst culture in the Era of PGS and FreezeAlls: is a \u2018C\u2019 a failing grade?","volume":"2017","author":"Morbeck","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod. Open"},{"key":"B34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.018","article-title":"Extended embryo culture is not associated with increased adverse obstetric or perinatal outcome.","volume":"211","author":"Oron","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"B35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dms044","article-title":"Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis.","volume":"19","author":"Pinborg","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod. Update"},{"key":"B36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2700","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.03.002","article-title":"Effects of ovarianendometrioma on embryo quality.","volume":"95","author":"Reinblatt","year":"2011","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"B37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"354.e2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022","article-title":"Factors associated with birth outcomes from cryopreserved blastocysts: experience from 4,597 autologous transfers of 7,597 cryopreserved blastocysts.","volume":"106","author":"Richter","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"B38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"330.e9","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.10.019","article-title":"Pregnancy-related complications and perinatal outcomes resulting from transfer of cryopreserved versus fresh embryos in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis.","volume":"109","author":"Sha","year":"2018","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"B39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.08.092","article-title":"Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony.","volume":"89","author":"Shapiro","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"B40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/13.3.676","article-title":"The rate of development and time of transfer play different roles in influencing the viability of human blastocysts.","volume":"3","author":"Shoukir","year":"1998","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"B41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.5935\/1518-0557.20180089","article-title":"Day 7 blastocyst euploidy supports routine implementation for cycles using preimplantation genetic testing.","volume":"23","author":"Whitney","year":"2019","journal-title":"JBRA Assist. Reprod."},{"key":"B42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1685","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew127","article-title":"Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development.","volume":"31","author":"Wirleitner","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"B43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1530\/revreprod\/3.3.155","article-title":"Large offspring syndrome in cattle and sheep.","volume":"3","author":"Young","year":"1998","journal-title":"Rev. Reprod."},{"key":"B44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.10.006","article-title":"Effect of in vitro culture period on birth weight after vitrified-warmed transfer cycles: analysis of 4,201 singleton newborns.","volume":"111","author":"Zhang","year":"2019","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"B45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-014-0361-6","article-title":"The clinical outcomes of day 3 4-cell embryos after extended in vitro culture.","volume":"32","author":"Zhao","year":"2015","journal-title":"J. Assist. Reprod. Genet."},{"key":"B46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"448","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det460","article-title":"Effect of in vitro culture period on birthweight of singleton newborns.","volume":"29","author":"Zhu","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"B47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"892","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034","article-title":"Live birth rate and neonatal outcome following cleavage-stage embryo transfer versus blastocyst transfer using the freeze-all strategy.","volume":"38","author":"Zhu","year":"2019","journal-title":"Reprod. Biomed. Online"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Physiology"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/article\/10.3389\/fphys.2020.00074\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,11]],"date-time":"2020-02-11T23:25:53Z","timestamp":1581463553000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/article\/10.3389\/fphys.2020.00074\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,12]]},"references-count":47,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fphys.2020.00074"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fphys.2020.00074","relation":{},"ISSN":["1664-042X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1664-042X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,12]]},"article-number":"74"}}