{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,31]],"date-time":"2026-08-31T03:12:04Z","timestamp":1788145924530,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,23]],"date-time":"2023-05-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1684800000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Physiol."],"abstract":"<jats:p><jats:bold>Objective:<\/jats:bold> This study aimed to evaluate the results and complications related to revision total hip arthroplasty within a short-to-medium follow up period.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods:<\/jats:bold> From January 2016 to January 2020, we reviewed 31 prosthetic hip arthroplasty stem revisions using a fluted, tapered modular stem with distal fixation. The median age of the patients was 74.55\u201379\u00a0years. The survival rate was 100%, and there were no re-revisions. The Harris hip score improved from an average of 36.5 \u00b1 7.8 before surgery to 81.8 \u00b1 6.2 at the final follow-up.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results:<\/jats:bold> The average final follow-up was 36 (24\u201360)\u00a0months. During this time, there was no periprosthetic infection, no prosthesis loosening or breakage, and no sciatic nerve injury. Complications included four (12.9%) intraoperative fractures and eight (25.8%) dislocations that had no stem fractures. The postoperative limb was lengthened by 17.8 \u00b1 9.8\u00a0mm. In most cases, bone regeneration was an early and important finding. Three cases underwent extended trochanteric osteotomy, and bone healing was achieved by the final follow-up.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusion:<\/jats:bold> The modular tapered stem reviewed in this study was very versatile, could be used in most femoral revision cases, and allowed for rapid bone reconstruction. However, a long-term follow-up study is needed to confirm these results.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3389\/fphys.2023.873584","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,23]],"date-time":"2023-05-23T05:14:42Z","timestamp":1684818882000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Revision total hip arthroplasty using a fluted, tapered, modular stem follow-up method for a mean of three years: A preliminary study"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"14","author":[{"given":"Shu-Xing","family":"Xing","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Qiang","family":"Huang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zheng-Jiang","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yong-Kui","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zhao-Nan","family":"Ban","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1788","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200210000-00008","article-title":"Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of risk factors and treatment options","volume":"84","author":"Alberton","year":"2002","journal-title":"J. Bone and Jt. Surgery-american"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-200403000-00021","article-title":"The use of tapered stems for femoral revision surgery","volume":"420","author":"B\u00f6hm","year":"2004","journal-title":"Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res."},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"476","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-010-1561-8","article-title":"Modular femoral stems for revision total hip arthroplasty","volume":"469","author":"Camilo","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin. Orthop. Relat. Research"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ocl.2014.03.001","article-title":"Component selection in revision total hip arthroplasty","volume":"45","author":"Chen","year":"2014","journal-title":"Orthop. Clin. N. Am."},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.95B11.32763","article-title":"Managing femoral bone loss in revision total hip replacement: Fluted tapered modular stems","author":"Cross","year":"2013","journal-title":"bone and Jt. J."},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1492","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2012.03.039","article-title":"Revision total hip arthroplasty using a modular femoral implant in Paprosky type III and IV femoral bone loss","volume":"27","author":"Desai","year":"2012","journal-title":"J. Arthroplasty"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198806000-00002","article-title":"The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty","volume":"231","author":"Engh","year":"1988","journal-title":"Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res."},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199008000-00022","article-title":"Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components","volume":"257","author":"Engh","year":"1990","journal-title":"Clin. Orthop."},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13692","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-020-70626-6","article-title":"Comparison of modular and nonmodular tapered fluted titanium stems in femoral revision hip arthroplasty: A minimum 6-year follow-up study","volume":"10","author":"Feng","year":"2020","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artd.2018.03.002","article-title":"What can the surgeon do to reduce the risk of junction breakage in modular revision stems?","volume":"4","author":"Fink","year":"2018","journal-title":"Arthroplasty today"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-197906000-00002","article-title":"Modes of failure\" of cemented stem-type femoral components: A radiographic analysis of loosening","volume":"141","author":"Gruen","year":"1979","journal-title":"Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res."},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-196951040-00012","article-title":"Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: Treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation","volume":"51","author":"Harris","year":"1969","journal-title":"J. Bone and Jt. Surgery-american Volume"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3108","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2017.05.021","article-title":"What is the difference between modular and nonmodular tapered fluted titanium stems in revision total hip arthroplasty","volume":"32","author":"Huang","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. arthroplasty"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1127","DOI":"10.1016\/s0140-6736(74)90884-8","article-title":"Measurement of pain","volume":"304","author":"Huskisson","year":"1974","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1007\/s002640000130","article-title":"The Wagner revision prosthesis consistently restores femoral bone structure","volume":"24","author":"Isacson","year":"2000","journal-title":"Int. Orthop."},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3692","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2020.06.038","article-title":"Modular fluted tapered stems in aseptic oncologic revision total hip arthroplasty: A game changer?","volume":"35","author":"J. S.","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Arthroplasty"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"839","DOI":"10.1016\/s0883-5403(97)90152-2","article-title":"5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery","volume":"12","author":"Krishnamurthy","year":"1997","journal-title":"J. Arthroplasty"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.21203\/rs.3.rs-80001\/v1","volume-title":"Implant breakage risk for modular fluted tapered stems in revision total hip arthroplasty at 5-year follow-up","author":"Lucena","year":"2020"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199510000-00014","article-title":"Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems","volume":"319","author":"Moreland","year":"1995","journal-title":"Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res."},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199912000-00024","article-title":"Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty","volume":"369","author":"Paprosky","year":"1999","journal-title":"Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res."},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.75B1.8110207","article-title":"An extended trochanteric osteotomy for revision total hip replacement","volume":"75","author":"Peters","year":"1993","journal-title":"J. Bone and Jt. Surg. Br."},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2309499019891638","DOI":"10.1177\/2309499019891638","article-title":"Clinical, radiographic, and survivorship analysis of a modular fluted tapered stem in revision hip arthroplasty","volume":"28","author":"Picado","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Orthop. Surg."},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"380","DOI":"10.5301\/hipint.5000272","article-title":"Management of femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty","volume":"25","author":"Sculco","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hip Int. J. Clin. Exp. Res. Hip Pathology Ther."},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1245","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.10.033","article-title":"Revision hip arthroplasty using a modular, cementless femoral stem: Intermediate-term follow-up","volume":"32","author":"Sivananthan","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cem. Femoral Stem Intermediate-Term Follow-Up"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2167","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2014.06.015","article-title":"Revision total hip arthroplasty with modular femoral stems","volume":"29","author":"Stimac","year":"2014","journal-title":"J. Arthroplasty"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"970","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198264070-00002","article-title":"A ten-year follow-up of one hundred consecutive Muller curved-stem total hip-replacement arthroplasties","volume":"64","author":"Sutherland","year":"1982","journal-title":"J. bone Jt. Surg. Am. volume"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1054\/arth.2002.32461","article-title":"Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty","volume":"17","author":"Weeden","year":"2002","journal-title":"J. arthroplasty"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Physiology"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fphys.2023.873584\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,23]],"date-time":"2023-05-23T05:14:45Z","timestamp":1684818885000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fphys.2023.873584\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,23]]},"references-count":27,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fphys.2023.873584"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fphys.2023.873584","relation":{},"ISSN":["1664-042X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1664-042X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,23]]},"article-number":"873584"}}