{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T15:08:43Z","timestamp":1787843323997,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,20]],"date-time":"2022-05-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1653004800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Psychol."],"abstract":"<jats:p>Judges are typically tasked to consider sentencing benefits but not costs. Previous research finds that both laypeople and prosecutors discount the costs of incarceration when forming sentencing attitudes, raising important questions about whether professional judges show the same bias during sentencing. To test this, we used a vignette-based experiment in which Minnesota state judges (<jats:italic>N<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u200987) reviewed a case summary about an aggravated robbery and imposed a hypothetical sentence. Using random assignment, half the participants received additional information about plausible negative consequences of incarceration. As predicted, our results revealed a mitigating effect of cost exposure on prison sentence term lengths. Critically, these findings support the conclusion that policies that increase transparency in sentencing costs could reduce sentence lengths, which has important economic and social ramifications.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2022.889933","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,20]],"date-time":"2022-05-20T07:44:13Z","timestamp":1653032653000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Nudges for Judges: An Experiment on the Effect of Making Sentencing Costs Explicit"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"13","author":[{"given":"Eyal","family":"Aharoni","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Heather M.","family":"Kleider-Offutt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sarah F.","family":"Brosnan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Morris B.","family":"Hoffman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1111\/lcrp.12161","article-title":"The price of justice: cost neglect increases criminal punishment recommendations","volume":"25","author":"Aharoni","year":"2019","journal-title":"Legal. Criminol. Psych."},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"778293","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2021.778293","article-title":"Correctional \u201cfree lunch\u201d? Cost neglect increases punishment in prosecutors","volume":"12","author":"Aharoni","year":"2021","journal-title":"Front. Psychol."},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"eo236764","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0236764","article-title":"Slippery scales: cost priming selectively modulates sentencing recommendations in laypeople","volume":"15","author":"Aharoni","year":"2020","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1002\/bsl.2388","article-title":"Justice at Any cost? The impact of cost\/benefit salience on criminal punishment judgments","volume":"37","author":"Aharoni","year":"2018","journal-title":"Behav. Sci. Law"},{"key":"ref5","article-title":"California Assembly Passes Bill Requiring Prosecutors and Judges to Consider Costs of Sentencing in Criminal Cases. California State Assembly Democratic Caucus","author":"Alpert","year":"2021"},{"key":"ref6","article-title":"Model Penal Code. Philadelphia, Pa. The American Law Institute","year":"2017"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1037\/1076-898X.6.3.183","article-title":"How serious are expressions of protected values?","volume":"6","author":"Baron","year":"2000","journal-title":"J. Exp. Psychol. Appl."},{"key":"ref8","volume-title":"Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach in the Economic Dimensions of Crime.","author":"Becker","year":"1968"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1177\/0734371X17704891","article-title":"Confronting cognitive \u201canchoring effect\u201d and \u201cblind spot\u201d biases in federal sentencing: A modest solution for reforming a fundamental flaw","volume":"37","author":"Bennett","year":"2014","journal-title":"J. Crim. Law. Crim."},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.36644\/mlr.116.2.rationing","article-title":"Rationing criminal justice","volume":"116","author":"Bierschbach","year":"2017","journal-title":"Mich. Law Rev."},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.2169664","article-title":"State supreme court ideology and \u201cnew style\u201d judicial campaigns","author":"Bonica","year":"2012","journal-title":"SSRN Electron. J."},{"key":"ref12","article-title":"\u00a716-11-102(1.9(c))","year":"2021"},{"key":"ref13","article-title":"Philadelphia\u2019s new top prosecutor is rolling out wild, unprecedented criminal justice reforms. Slate Magazine","author":"Ewing","year":"2018"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1525\/fsr.2012.24.3.164","article-title":"Cost and sentencing: some pragmatic and institutional doubts","volume":"24","author":"Flanders","year":"","journal-title":"Federal Sentencing Rep."},{"key":"ref15","first-page":"391.","article-title":"Cost as a sentencing factor: Missouri's experiment","volume":"77","author":"Flanders","year":"","journal-title":"Mo. L. Rev."},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"636","DOI":"10.1177\/0011128716687758","article-title":"The effect of message frames on public attitudes Toward criminal justice reform for nonviolent offenses","volume":"63","author":"Gottlieb","year":"2017","journal-title":"Crime Delinq."},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1177\/0956797615608267","article-title":"Opportunity cost neglect attenuates the effect of choices on preferences","volume":"27","author":"Greenberg","year":"2016","journal-title":"Psychol. Sci."},{"key":"ref18","volume-title":"Prolegomenon to the Principles of Punishment in Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law.","author":"Hart","year":"1968"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-criminol-032317-092045","article-title":"Collateral consequences of punishment: A critical review and path forward","volume":"1","author":"Kirk","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ann. Rev. Criminol."},{"key":"ref20","volume-title":"The Price of Prisons: Examining State Spending Trends, 2010\u20142015.","author":"Mai","year":"2017"},{"key":"ref21","volume-title":"Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines and Commentary.","year":"2021"},{"key":"ref22","first-page":"1586.","article-title":"Altering attention in adjudication","volume":"60","author":"Rachlinski","year":"2013","journal-title":"UCLA Law Rev."},{"key":"ref23","article-title":"303 Conn. 246 (Conn. 2011)","year":"2011"},{"key":"ref24","volume-title":"The Prison Paradox: More Incarceration Will Not Make Us Safer.","author":"Stemen","year":"2017"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"320","DOI":"10.1016\/S1364-6613(03)00135-9","article-title":"Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions","volume":"7","author":"Tetlock","year":"2003","journal-title":"Trends Cogn. Sci."},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"853","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.78.5.853","article-title":"The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals","volume":"78","author":"Tetlock","year":"2000","journal-title":"J. Pers. Soc. Psychol."},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1177\/0011128787033003002","article-title":"Popular moderation versus governmental authoritarianism: An interactionist view of public sentiments Toward criminal sanctions","volume":"33","author":"Thomson","year":"1987","journal-title":"Crime Delinq."},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-0285(73)90033-9","article-title":"Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability","volume":"5","author":"Tversky","year":"1973","journal-title":"Cogn. Psychol."},{"key":"ref29","article-title":"758 F.3d 193 (2nd Cir., 2014)","year":"2014"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Psychology"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2022.889933\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,1]],"date-time":"2022-06-01T09:40:26Z","timestamp":1654076426000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2022.889933\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,20]]},"references-count":29,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fpsyg.2022.889933"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2022.889933","relation":{},"ISSN":["1664-1078"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1664-1078","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,20]]},"article-number":"889933"}}