{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,30]],"date-time":"2025-07-30T16:23:57Z","timestamp":1753892637734,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,5]],"date-time":"2023-05-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1683244800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Psychol."],"abstract":"<jats:p>Scholars have proposed that incarceration rates might be reduced by a requirement that judges justify incarceration decisions with respect to their operational costs (e.g., prison capacity). In an Internet-based vignette experiment (<jats:italic>N<\/jats:italic> = 214), we tested this prediction by examining whether criminal punishment judgments (prison vs. probation) among university undergraduates would be influenced by a prompt to provide a justification for one's judgment, and by a brief message describing prison capacity costs. We found that (1) the justification prompt alone was sufficient to reduce incarceration rates, (2) the prison capacity message also independently reduced incarceration rates, and (3) incarceration rates were most strongly reduced (by about 25%) when decision makers were asked to justify their sentences with respect to the expected capacity costs. These effects survived a test of robustness and occurred regardless of whether participants reported that prison costs should influence judgments of incarceration. At the individual crime level, the least serious crimes were most amenable to reconsideration for probation. These findings are important for policymakers attempting to manage high incarceration rates.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2023.1157460","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,5]],"date-time":"2023-05-05T06:10:20Z","timestamp":1683267020000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Punishment as a scarce resource: a potential policy intervention for managing incarceration rates"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"14","author":[{"given":"Eyal","family":"Aharoni","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Eddy","family":"Nahmias","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Morris B.","family":"Hoffman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sharlene","family":"Fernandes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1037\/a0025821","article-title":"Punishment without reason: Isolating retribution in lay punishment of criminal offenders","volume":"18","author":"Aharoni","year":"2012","journal-title":"Psychol. Publ. Pol. Law"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"778293","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2021.778293","article-title":"Correctional \u201cfree lunch\u201d? Cost neglect increases punishment in prosecutors","volume":"12","author":"Aharoni","year":"2021","journal-title":"Front. Psychol"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0236764","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0236764","article-title":"Slippery scales: Cost prompts, but not benefit prompts, modulate sentencing recommendations in laypeople","volume":"15","author":"Aharoni","year":"2020","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"889933","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2022.889933","article-title":"Nudges for judges: An experiment on the effect of making sentencing costs explicit","volume":"13","author":"Aharoni","year":"2022","journal-title":"Front. Psychol"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1002\/bsl.2388","article-title":"Justice at any cost? The impact of cost-benefit salience on criminal punishment judgments","volume":"37","author":"Aharoni","year":"2019","journal-title":"Behav. Sci. Law"},{"volume-title":"The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness","year":"2010","author":"Alexander","key":"B6"},{"unstructured":"Model Penal Code2017","key":"B7"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"AustinJ.\n            EisenL. B.\n            CullenJ.\n            FrankJ.\n            ChettiarI.\n            BrooksC. W.\n          How Many Americans Are Unnecessarily Incarcerated (No. 29). Fed. Sent'g Rep2016","key":"B8","DOI":"10.1525\/fsr.2017.29.2-3.140"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.36644\/mlr.116.2.rationing","article-title":"Rationing criminal justice","volume":"116","author":"Bierschbach","year":"2017","journal-title":"Michigan Law Rev."},{"unstructured":"131 S. Ct. 1910. Oyez2011","key":"B10"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jesp.2005.06.007","article-title":"The roles of retribution and utility in determining punishment","volume":"42","author":"Carlsmith","year":"2006","journal-title":"J. Exp. Soc. Psychol"},{"key":"B12","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Prisoners in 2020\u2013Statistical tables","author":"Carson","year":"2021"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-8721.00203","article-title":"Regret in decision making","volume":"11","author":"Connolly","year":"2002","journal-title":"Curr. Direct. Psycholog. Sci"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6889","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1018033108","article-title":"Extraneous factors in judicial decisions","volume":"108","author":"Danziger","year":"2011","journal-title":"Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1177\/0146167205282152","article-title":"Playing dice with criminal sentences: The influence of irrelevant anchors on experts' judicial decision making","volume":"32","author":"Englich","year":"2006","journal-title":"Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bullet"},{"key":"B16","first-page":"727","article-title":"Sentencing reform in Minnesota, ten years after: Reflections on Dale G. Parent's structuring criminal sentences: The evolution of Minnesota's sentencing guidelines","volume":"75","author":"Frase","year":"1991","journal-title":"Minnesota Law Rev"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"636","DOI":"10.1177\/0011128716687758","article-title":"The effect of message frames on public attitudes toward criminal justice reform for nonviolent offenses","volume":"63","author":"Gottlieb","year":"2017","journal-title":"Crime Delinquency"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"777","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.257634","article-title":"Inside the judicial mind","volume":"86","author":"Guthrie","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cornell Law Rev"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1002\/1099-0771(200101)14:1<69::AID-BDM366>3.0.CO;2-T","article-title":"Accounting and convincing: The effect of two types of justification on the decision process","volume":"14","author":"Huber","year":"2001","journal-title":"J. Behav. Decision Mak"},{"key":"B20","first-page":"215","article-title":"\u201cThe American prison: Imagining a different future,\u201d","volume-title":"The Small Prison","author":"Jonson","year":"2014"},{"unstructured":"Kang-BrownJ.\n            MontagnetC.\n            HeissJ.\n          Vera Institute of JusticePeople in Jail and Prison in Spring 20212021","key":"B21"},{"key":"B22","first-page":"1071","article-title":"Differences in punitiveness across three cultures: A test of American exceptionalism in justice attitudes","volume":"103","author":"Kugler","year":"2013","journal-title":"J. Crim. Law Criminol"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"793","DOI":"10.1177\/0146167217697695","article-title":"Cognitive and interpersonal features of intellectual humility","volume":"43","author":"Leary","year":"2017","journal-title":"Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bullet"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1177\/1948550617741181","article-title":"Expertise fails to attenuate gendered biases in judicial decision-making","volume":"10","author":"Miller","year":"2019","journal-title":"Soc. Psycholog. Personal. Sci"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266267113000217","article-title":"Folk retributivism and the communication confound","volume":"29","author":"Nadelhoffer","year":"2013","journal-title":"Econ. Philos"},{"unstructured":"Community Corrections Partnership Alameda County2011","key":"B26"},{"key":"B27","first-page":"1586","article-title":"Altering attention in adjudication","volume":"60","author":"Rachlinski","year":"2013","journal-title":"UCLA Law Rev"},{"key":"B28","first-page":"469","article-title":"Evaluating juries by comparison to judges: A benchmark for judging","volume":"32","author":"Robbennolt","year":"2005","journal-title":"Florida State Univ. Law Rev"},{"key":"B29","first-page":"1829","article-title":"Concordance and conflict in intuitions of justice","volume":"91","author":"Robinson","year":"2007","journal-title":"Minnesota Law Rev"},{"unstructured":"Countries With the Largest Number of Prisoners per 100,000 of the National Population, as of January 20232023","key":"B30"},{"unstructured":"StemenD.\n          27021149Vera Institute of JusticeThe Prison Paradox: More Incarceration Will Not Make Us Safer2017","key":"B31"},{"key":"B32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordhb\/9780199945474.013.0026","article-title":"\u201cJudicial decision-making: A behavioral perspective,\u201d","author":"Teichman","year":"2014","journal-title":"The Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Economics and the Law"},{"unstructured":"Enrollment Context2022","key":"B33"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Psychology"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2023.1157460\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,5]],"date-time":"2023-05-05T06:10:28Z","timestamp":1683267028000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2023.1157460\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,5]]},"references-count":33,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fpsyg.2023.1157460"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2023.1157460","relation":{},"ISSN":["1664-1078"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1664-1078"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,5]]},"article-number":"1157460"}}