{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,23]],"date-time":"2026-07-23T06:05:56Z","timestamp":1784786756661,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,23]],"date-time":"2026-07-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1784764800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Psychol."],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study explores how postcolonial criticism is pedagogically translated into classroom practice and received by students in multicultural literature classrooms. It examines students\u2019 engagement with five focal postcolonial concepts\u2014otherness, hybridity, mimicry, subalternity, and ambivalence\u2014and considers how their cultural backgrounds and prior understanding of postcolonial criticism shape their reception of these concepts.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Adopting a qualitative research design, the study collected data over one academic semester through semi-structured interviews and classroom observations. Participants included 10 undergraduate students in literature-related humanities programs, with two each from Malaysia, Japan, South Korea, Russia, and China, together with three university instructors teaching literature and literary theory. Classroom observations were conducted across 12 teaching sessions. Interview transcripts and observational field notes were analyzed thematically, with cross-cultural comparison and triangulation used to identify conceptual difficulties, pedagogical practices, and patterns of student reception.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Students struggled with the complexity of theoretical language and displayed uneven prior understanding of postcolonial criticism\u2019s anti-colonial and anti-Eurocentric foundations. Their understanding also varied across the five concepts: otherness and hybridity were relatively more accessible because students could connect them with experiences of marginality, cultural mixing, and identity negotiation, whereas mimicry, subalternity, and ambivalence required greater conceptual and historical clarification. Localized examples, dialogic teaching methods, and peer perspectives improved the accessibility of theoretical discourse. Reception also varied across cultural contexts: Malaysian and Chinese students connected the theory to identity and marginality; Japanese and South Korean participants showed ambivalence toward its relevance and applicability; and Russian students often resisted its application to their own literary and cultural contexts.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Discussion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The findings highlight the classroom as an interpretive community in which postcolonial theory is not only simplified for pedagogical purposes but also negotiated, contested, and reimagined through cross-cultural interaction. Students\u2019 resistance and ambivalence may therefore function as forms of critical engagement rather than simply as failures of comprehension. These results underscore the need for adaptive pedagogical strategies that balance theoretical rigor, conceptual clarity, historical grounding, and cultural sensitivity in literary education.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2026.1821140","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,23]],"date-time":"2026-07-23T05:38:33Z","timestamp":1784785113000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["From theoretical discourse to classroom practice: postcolonial criticism, pedagogical translation, and student reception in multicultural contexts"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"Zhanchen","family":"Wan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Education, University of Malaya","place":["Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xiaoyu","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Korean Linguistic and Literature, Sungkyunkwan University (Humanities and Social Sciences Campus)","place":["Seoul, Republic of Korea"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1111\/flan.12780","article-title":"Pedagogical translation for reading comprehension in mixed HL-L2 secondary classrooms","volume":"58","author":"Albrecht","year":"2024","journal-title":"Foreign Lang. Ann."},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1057\/9780230337794","volume-title":"Actionable Postcolonial Theory in Education","author":"Andreotti","year":"2011"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.69848\/sreports.v1i1.4621","article-title":"Metaphorical competence in the context of Spanish language education","volume":"1","author":"Bakhronova","year":"2024","journal-title":"SPAST Rep."},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203820551","volume-title":"The Location of Culture","author":"Bhabha","year":"2012"},{"key":"ref6","volume-title":"Literary Theory: An Introduction, 2nd Edn., Anniversary Edn. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell","author":"Eagleton","year":"2008"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1080\/13688790.2021.1985248","article-title":"The author, the text, and the (post)critic: notes on the encounter between postcritique and postcolonial criticism","volume":"24","author":"Habed","year":"2021","journal-title":"Postcolon. Stud."},{"key":"ref8","volume-title":"Teaching Literature: Text and Dialogue in the English Classroom. London: Palgrave Macmillan","author":"Knights","year":"2017"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1080\/17449855.2022.2124882","article-title":"Can the subaltern laugh? Humour, translatability, and the inequalities of world literature","volume":"58","author":"Labanieh","year":"2022","journal-title":"J. Postcolon. Writ."},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1507019","DOI":"10.3389\/feduc.2024.1507019","article-title":"Intercultural competence in multimodal reading comprehension: content validation of a didactic proposal for a multicultural classroom","volume":"9","author":"Mardones","year":"2024","journal-title":"Front. Educ."},{"key":"ref11","volume-title":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education","author":"Mukherjee","year":"2019"},{"key":"ref9001","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.4324\/9781003105220-33","article-title":"\u201cLocalizing theory in a Spanish-language translation program,\u201d in Teaching Literature in Translation: Pedagogical Contexts and Reading Practices, eds. B. J. Baer and M. Woods (London: Routledge)","author":"P\u00e9rez Bernardo","year":"2022"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/23311983.2023.2167533","article-title":"A comparative and epistemic approach to Anglophone and Latin American postcolonial theory and criticism","volume":"10","author":"Redondo-Olmedilla","year":"2023","journal-title":"Cogent Arts Human."},{"key":"ref13","volume-title":"The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work","author":"Rosenblatt","year":"1994"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.5040\/9781350225282","volume-title":"Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples, 3rd Edn. London: Zed Books","author":"Tuhiwai Smith","year":"2021"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.29140\/vli.v12n1.1213","article-title":"Which vocabulary learning strategies are important and useful for Japanese university students? A text-mining approach","volume":"12","author":"Ueno","year":"2023","journal-title":"Vocab. Learn. Instr."},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/9781119316817","volume-title":"Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction","author":"Young","year":"2016"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Psychology"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2026.1821140\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,23]],"date-time":"2026-07-23T05:38:35Z","timestamp":1784785115000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2026.1821140\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,23]]},"references-count":16,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fpsyg.2026.1821140"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2026.1821140","relation":{},"ISSN":["1664-1078"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1664-1078","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,23]]},"article-number":"1821140"}}