{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T04:30:42Z","timestamp":1786595442326,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1786579200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Psychol."],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) can adapt English for Academic Purposes (EAP) reading materials by rewriting passages, adding support, or combining both. This study examined whether proficiency-sensitive GenAI adaptation chiefly changed passage-level structural complexity or text-embedded functional support while preserving academic fidelity.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A role-prompted workflow combined barrier analysis, adaptation, fidelity checking, and validation. In a 3 \u00d7 3 between-subjects design (\n                      <jats:italic>N<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 135;\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 15 per cell), proficiency level (low, intermediate, and high) was crossed with material condition (original, unified-AI, and differentiated-AI). Three EAP instructors evaluated 15 anonymized material versions. Automated structural-complexity indicators, leave-one-out discriminant analysis, within-proficiency planned contrasts, and omnibus outcome models were used to assess material and learner outcomes.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The instructors rated the materials favorably for academic fidelity (\n                      <jats:italic>M<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 4.24), proficiency appropriateness (\n                      <jats:italic>M<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 4.36), and teachability (\n                      <jats:italic>M<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 4.31), with acceptable inter-rater reliability,\n                      <jats:italic>ICC<\/jats:italic>\n                      (2,\n                      <jats:italic>k<\/jats:italic>\n                      ) = 0.84. Automated structural-complexity indicators showed limited separation (\n                      <jats:inline-formula>\n                        <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" id=\"M1\">\n                          <mml:mrow>\n                            <mml:msubsup>\n                              <mml:mrow>\n                                <mml:mi>\u03b7<\/mml:mi>\n                              <\/mml:mrow>\n                              <mml:mrow>\n                                <mml:mi>p<\/mml:mi>\n                              <\/mml:mrow>\n                              <mml:mrow>\n                                <mml:mn>2<\/mml:mn>\n                              <\/mml:mrow>\n                            <\/mml:msubsup>\n                            <mml:mo>=<\/mml:mo>\n                            <mml:mn>0<\/mml:mn>\n                            <mml:mo>.<\/mml:mo>\n                            <mml:mn>043<\/mml:mn>\n                          <\/mml:mrow>\n                        <\/mml:math>\n                      <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                      ), and leave-one-out discriminant analysis classified the intended proficiency labels at 11.1%, below the 33.3% balanced-task benchmark. Material differences were clearest in functional support, including glosses, sentence unpacking, rhetorical cues, claim-evidence notes, and critical prompts. Differentiated-AI exceeded unified-AI most strongly among high-proficiency learners (\n                      <jats:italic>d<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 1.40), followed by a moderate advantage among low-proficiency learners (\n                      <jats:italic>d<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.60) and a small difference among intermediate learners (\n                      <jats:italic>d<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.16). The omnibus reading-comprehension interaction identified this heterogeneity, F\n                      <jats:sub>(4, 126)<\/jats:sub>\n                      = 7.43,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      &amp;lt; 0.001, and\n                      <jats:inline-formula>\n                        <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" id=\"M2\">\n                          <mml:mrow>\n                            <mml:msubsup>\n                              <mml:mrow>\n                                <mml:mi>\u03b7<\/mml:mi>\n                              <\/mml:mrow>\n                              <mml:mrow>\n                                <mml:mi>p<\/mml:mi>\n                              <\/mml:mrow>\n                              <mml:mrow>\n                                <mml:mn>2<\/mml:mn>\n                              <\/mml:mrow>\n                            <\/mml:msubsup>\n                            <mml:mo>=<\/mml:mo>\n                            <mml:mn>0<\/mml:mn>\n                            <mml:mo>.<\/mml:mo>\n                            <mml:mn>191<\/mml:mn>\n                          <\/mml:mrow>\n                        <\/mml:math>\n                      <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                      . Supplementary process estimates were descriptive because the process indicators and outcomes were collected in the same session. Immediate unsupported application did not differ by material condition or interaction.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Discussion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The findings locate GenAI-supported differentiation primarily in proficiency-specific support-layer design rather than broad changes in passage-level structural complexity. The strongest learner evidence came from comparisons conducted within the same proficiency level.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2026.1887565","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T04:24:10Z","timestamp":1786595050000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["From unified to differentiated materials: generative AI\u2013supported adaptation of EAP reading materials"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"Xuewei","family":"Gao","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"School of General Education (Public Art Education Center), Xihang University, Xi'an","place":["Shaanxi, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12807","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2023.emnlp-main.790","article-title":"\u201cControlling pre-trained language models for grade-specific text simplification,\u201d","author":"Agrawal","year":"2023","journal-title":"Proceedings of the 2023 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6574","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2024.findings-acl.392","article-title":"\u201cText simplification via adaptive teaching,\u201d","author":"Bahrainian","year":"2024","journal-title":"Findings of the association for computational linguistics: ACL 2024"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102411","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijer.2024.102411","article-title":"ChatGPT in higher education: a systematic literature review and research challenges","volume":"127","author":"Baig","year":"2024","journal-title":"Int. J. Educ. Res"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100745","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asw.2023.100745","article-title":"Using ChatGPT for second language writing: pitfalls and potentials","volume":"57","author":"Barrot","year":"2023","journal-title":"Assess. Writ"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103484","DOI":"10.1016\/j.system.2024.103484","article-title":"Evaluating AI's impact on self-regulated language learning: a systematic review","volume":"126","author":"Chang","year":"2024","journal-title":"System"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1080\/14703297.2023.2190148","article-title":"Chatting and cheating: ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT","volume":"61","author":"Cotton","year":"2024","journal-title":"Innov. Educ. Teach. Int"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1186\/s41239-023-00392-8","article-title":"Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field","volume":"20","author":"Crompton","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1017\/S026719052510010X","article-title":"On the nascency of ChatGPT in foreign language teaching and learning","volume":"45","author":"Fang","year":"2025","journal-title":"Annu. Rev. Appl. Linguist"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.64152\/10125\/73501","article-title":"Emerging spaces for language learning: AI bots, ambient intelligence, and the metaverse","volume":"27","author":"Godwin-Jones","year":"2023","journal-title":"Lang. Learn. Technol"},{"key":"B10","volume-title":"Reading in a Second Language: Moving from Theory to Practice","author":"Grabe","year":"2009"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.3758\/BF03195564","article-title":"Coh-metrix: analysis of text on cohesion and language","volume":"36","author":"Graesser","year":"2004","journal-title":"Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1007\/s40979-024-00153-8","article-title":"Algorithmically driven writing and academic integrity: exploring educators' practices, perceptions, and policies in AI era","volume":"20","author":"Gustilo","year":"2024","journal-title":"Int. J. Educ. Integr"},{"key":"B13","volume-title":"Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 2nd Edn","author":"Hayes","year":"2017"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1177\/00336882231168504","article-title":"Artificial intelligence in english language teaching: the good, the bad and the ugly","volume":"54","author":"Hockly","year":"2023","journal-title":"RELC J"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203006603","author":"Hyland","year":"2006","journal-title":"English for Academic Purposes: An Advanced Resource Book"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1017\/S0261444818000101","article-title":"Sympathy for the devil? A defence of EAP","volume":"51","author":"Hyland","year":"2018","journal-title":"Lang. Teach"},{"key":"B17","volume-title":"Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing","author":"Hyland","year":"2019"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102274","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lindif.2023.102274","article-title":"ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education","volume":"103","author":"Kasneci","year":"2023","journal-title":"Learn. Indiv. Differ"},{"key":"B19","volume-title":"Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition","author":"Kintsch","year":"1998"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1177\/00336882231162868","article-title":"ChatGPT for language teaching and learning","volume":"54","author":"Kohnke","year":"2023","journal-title":"RELC J"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100291","DOI":"10.1016\/j.caeai.2024.100291","article-title":"A systematic review of conversational AI tools in ELT: publication trends, tools, research methods, learning outcomes, and antecedents","volume":"7","author":"Lai","year":"2024","journal-title":"Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1080\/10494820.2025.2498537","article-title":"Generative AI (GenAI) in the language classroom: a systematic review","volume":"34","author":"Lee","year":"2025","journal-title":"Interact. Learn. Environ"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100445","DOI":"10.1016\/j.caeai.2025.100445","article-title":"Two years of innovation: a systematic review of empirical generative AI research in language learning and teaching","volume":"9","author":"Li","year":"2025","journal-title":"Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1186\/s40561-024-00342-5","article-title":"Exploring the application of ChatGPT in ESL\/EFL education and related research issues: a systematic review of empirical studies","volume":"11","author":"Lo","year":"2024","journal-title":"Smart Learn. Environ"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"474","DOI":"10.1075\/ijcl.15.4.02lu","article-title":"Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing","volume":"15","author":"Lu","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int. J. Corpus Linguist"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16383","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2023.acl-long.905","article-title":"\u201cLENS: a learnable evaluation metric for text simplification,\u201d","author":"Maddela","year":"2023","journal-title":"Proceedings of the 61st annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, Vol. 1: long papers"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.3758\/BRM.42.2.381","article-title":"MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: a validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment","volume":"42","author":"McCarthy","year":"2010","journal-title":"Behav. Res. Methods"},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2433814","DOI":"10.1080\/2331186X.2024.2433814","article-title":"Enabling learner independence and self-regulation in language education using AI tools: a systematic review","volume":"12","author":"Mohebbi","year":"2025","journal-title":"Cogent Educ"},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139858656","author":"Nation","year":"2013","journal-title":"Learning Vocabulary in Another Language, 2nd Edn"},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1207\/S15326985EP3801_8","article-title":"Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory","volume":"38","author":"Paas","year":"2003","journal-title":"Educ. Psychol"},{"key":"B31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1177\/2381336917718820","article-title":"Interactional scaffolding for reading comprehension: a systematic review","volume":"66","author":"Reynolds","year":"2017","journal-title":"Lit. Res. Theory Method Pract"},{"key":"B32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139524827","author":"Swales","year":"2004","journal-title":"Research Genres: Explorations and Applications"},{"key":"B33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8","article-title":"Cognitive load theory","volume":"55","author":"Sweller","year":"2011","journal-title":"Psychol. Learn. Motiv"},{"key":"B34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1186\/s40561-023-00237-x","article-title":"What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education","volume":"10","author":"Tlili","year":"2023","journal-title":"Smart Learn. Environ"},{"key":"B35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1075\/itl.165.2.04vaj","article-title":"Readability assessment for text simplification: from analysing documents to identifying sentential simplifications","volume":"165","author":"Vajjala","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int. J. Appl. Linguist"},{"key":"B36","volume-title":"Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes","author":"Vygotsky","year":"1978"},{"key":"B37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/17501229.2025.2509759","article-title":"A scoping review of empirical studies on generative artificial intelligence in language education","author":"Wang","year":"2025","journal-title":"Innov. Lang. Learn. Teach"},{"key":"B38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101071","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jslw.2023.101071","article-title":"The affordances and contradictions of AI-generated text for writers of english as a second or foreign language","volume":"62","author":"Warschauer","year":"2023","journal-title":"J. Second Lang. Writ"},{"key":"B39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.21832\/9781783093496","author":"Wingate","year":"2015","journal-title":"Academic Literacy and Student Diversity: The Case for Inclusive Practice"},{"key":"B40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x","article-title":"The role of tutoring in problem solving","volume":"17","author":"Wood","year":"1976","journal-title":"J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry"},{"key":"B41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103498","DOI":"10.1016\/j.system.2024.103498","article-title":"Artificial intelligence in L2 learning: a meta-analysis of contextual, instructional, and social-emotional moderators","volume":"126","author":"Wu","year":"2024","journal-title":"System"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Psychology"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2026.1887565\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T04:24:11Z","timestamp":1786595051000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2026.1887565\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]]},"references-count":41,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fpsyg.2026.1887565"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2026.1887565","relation":{},"ISSN":["1664-1078"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1664-1078","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]]},"article-number":"1887565"}}