{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,29]],"date-time":"2026-07-29T07:00:20Z","timestamp":1785308420386,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,29]],"date-time":"2026-07-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1785283200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Public Health"],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Access to assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) remains highly unequal globally, with rural populations facing significant geographic, financial, and institutional barriers to fertility care. In South Africa, despite constitutional guarantees of access to reproductive healthcare, advanced fertility services remain concentrated in urban centres and the private healthcare sector, limiting access for many rural communities.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This qualitative study explored institutional barriers to ART access from the perspectives of medical officers working in the uMhlabuyalingana Local Municipality, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 medical officers and analysed using thematic analysis. Institutional Theory provided the conceptual lens through which findings were interpreted.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Three major themes emerged from the analysis: (1) limited scope of infertility management in rural healthcare facilities, constrained by infrastructure, personnel, and resource limitations; (2) inadequate patient and provider education, resulting in low fertility awareness and delayed care-seeking; and (3) weak health system capacity, characterised by fragmented referral pathways, workforce shortages, and limited access to specialised fertility services. Participants described how these barriers collectively restrict the availability, accessibility, and continuity of infertility care for rural populations.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The findings demonstrate that inequitable access to ART in rural South Africa is shaped not only by geographic distance but also by broader institutional arrangements that systematically disadvantage rural communities. Strengthening health system capacity, decentralising selected fertility services, improving referral systems, and integrating infertility education into primary healthcare are critical steps toward advancing reproductive justice and achieving equitable access to reproductive healthcare.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fpubh.2026.1842990","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,29]],"date-time":"2026-07-29T06:02:52Z","timestamp":1785304972000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Institutional barriers to assisted reproductive technology access in rural South Africa: a qualitative study of medical officers\u2019 perspectives"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"14","author":[{"given":"Nomfundo N.","family":"Mthembu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Law, College of Law and Management Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal","place":["Durban, South Africa"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Betty C.","family":"Mubangizi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"College of Law and Management Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal","place":["Durban, South Africa"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1023","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.02.101","article-title":"Geographic access to assisted reproductive technology health care in the United States: a population-based cross-sectional study","volume":"107","author":"Harris","year":"2017","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2355790","DOI":"10.1080\/26410397.2024.2355790","article-title":"Access to assisted reproductive technologies in subSaharan Africa: fertility professionals\u2019 views","volume":"32","author":"Whittaker","year":"2024","journal-title":"Sex Reproduct Health Matters"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1080\/23293691.2024.2421496","article-title":"Access to assisted reproductive technology: a qualitative study of couples with infertility in Cape Town, South Africa","volume":"12","author":"Mabweazara","year":"2024","journal-title":"Women's Reprod Health"},{"key":"ref4","year":"2024"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1007\/s11673-023-10240-z","article-title":"Going the distance: ethics of space and location on accessing reproductive Services in Australia","volume":"20","author":"Sassano","year":"2023","journal-title":"J. Bioethical Inq."},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3195","DOI":"10.51891\/rease.v9i6.10468","article-title":"Barreiras e desafios no acesso aos servi\u00e7os de sa\u00fade reprodutiva das mulheres em \u00e1reas rurais","volume":"9","author":"Nery","year":"2023","journal-title":"Revista Ibero-Americana de Humanidades, Ci\u00eancias e Educa\u00e7\u00e3o"},{"key":"ref7","first-page":"15","article-title":"Accessing reproductive technologies: invisible barriers, indelible harms","volume-title":"bepress Legal Series","author":"Daar","year":"2008"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1221","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-02411710-9","article-title":"Barriers and facilitators to women\u2019s access to sexual and reproductive health services in rural Australia: a systematic review","volume":"24","author":"Wood","year":"2024","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"key":"ref9","volume-title":"Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities","author":"Scott","year":"2014"},{"key":"ref10","year":"2024"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-022-00984-5","article-title":"Impact of in vitro fertilization state mandates for third party insurance coverage in the United States: a review and critical assessment","volume":"20","author":"Peipert","year":"2022","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2003.007542","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technologies and equity of access issues","volume":"31","author":"Peterson","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Med Ethics"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2505","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-022-02607-9","article-title":"Geographic distribution of assisted reproductive technology clinics in the USA: a multilevel sociodemographic analysis","volume":"39","author":"Tierney","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2662","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deac205","article-title":"Residential proximity to a fertility clinic is independently associated with likelihood of women having ART and IUI treatment","volume":"37","author":"Lazzari","year":"2022","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1080\/14647273.2021.1969043","article-title":"The distribution and accessibility of assisted reproductive technology clinics in mainland China from 2006 to 2018: a population-based retrospective study","volume":"26","author":"Ma","year":"2023","journal-title":"Hum Fertil"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.2307\/2095101","article-title":"The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields","volume":"48","author":"DiMaggio","year":"1983","journal-title":"Am Sociol Rev"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1097\/MLR.0000000000001831","article-title":"Examining veterans\u2019 experiences with in vitro fertilization provided under P.L. 114\u2013223","volume":"61","author":"Mattocks","year":"2023","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2054","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der158","article-title":"Inequitable access to assisted reproductive technology for the low-income Brazilian population: a qualitative study","volume":"26","author":"Makuch","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"R13","DOI":"10.1530\/RAF-20-0046","article-title":"Effects of lifestyle factors on fertility: practical recommendations for modification","volume":"2","author":"Emokpae","year":"2021","journal-title":"Reproduct Fertility"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e6737","DOI":"10.55905\/rdelosv18.n72espec-005","article-title":"Desigualdade no acesso \u00e0 reprodu\u00e7\u00e3o assistida no Brasil: an\u00e1lise cr\u00edtica da legisla\u00e7\u00e3o e pr\u00e1ticas cl\u00ednicas","volume":"18","author":"Gon\u00e7alves","year":"2025","journal-title":"REVISTA DELOS"},{"key":"ref21","first-page":"102","article-title":"The economic impact of infertility on women in developing countries: A systematic review","volume":"4","author":"Dyer","year":"2012","journal-title":"Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e55418","DOI":"10.2196\/55418","article-title":"Geographic disparities in access to assisted reproductive technology centers in China: A spatial-statistical study","volume":"10","author":"Zhou","year":"2024","journal-title":"JMIR Public Health and Surveillance"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.4135\/9781848608030.n7","article-title":"1.6 institutions and institutional work","volume":"2","author":"Lawrence","year":"2006","journal-title":"The Sage handbook of organization studies"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa","article-title":"Using thematic analysis in psychology","volume":"3","author":"Braun","year":"2006","journal-title":"Qualitative research in psychology"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmv016","article-title":"Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century","volume":"21","author":"Inhorn","year":"2015","journal-title":"Human reproduction update"},{"key":"ref26","year":"2023","journal-title":"Infertility prevalence estimates, 1990\u20132021"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Public Health"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fpubh.2026.1842990\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,29]],"date-time":"2026-07-29T06:02:54Z","timestamp":1785304974000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fpubh.2026.1842990\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,29]]},"references-count":26,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fpubh.2026.1842990"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpubh.2026.1842990","relation":{},"ISSN":["2296-2565"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2296-2565","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,29]]},"article-number":"1842990"}}