{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T15:13:45Z","timestamp":1786115625691,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1785974400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Health Serv."],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Cervical cancer remains a major public health concern despite being largely preventable through early detection, regular screening, timely diagnosis, and effective treatment of precancerous lesions. Globally, cervical cancer continues to be one of the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality among women, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where access to preventive services remains limited. Although screening guidelines from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the South African Department of Health (DOH) are widely available, inadequate knowledge and poor dissemination of information to women continue to hinder participation in screening programmes. In South Africa, studies have highlighted inconsistencies and ineffective health education related to cervical cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment, resulting in low screening uptake and delayed healthcare-seeking behaviour. The lack of structured cervical cancer education within public healthcare settings contributes to delayed diagnosis, increased mortality, higher healthcare costs, and psychological distress among affected women. In response, technological interventions such as reminder systems, callback mechanisms, mass media campaigns, mobile health (mHealth) programmes, and digital health strategies have been recommended to improve awareness, knowledge, and screening uptake among women.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods and analysis<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The development of this protocol follows the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley for conducting scoping reviews, with enhancements recommended by Levac et al. and the Joanna Briggs Institute. The review selection process will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) to ensure methodological transparency and reproducibility. Rayyan will be used to facilitate the screening process and identify duplicate records during study selection. The population of interest will include women eligible for cervical cancer screening irrespective of age, with particular attention to adolescents, older women, rural residents, underserved populations, and healthcare providers where relevant. The review will focus on knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer, barriers to screening participation, and technological interventions including mHealth, SMS-based systems, telemedicine, and digital health platforms aimed at improving screening uptake and health education. Searches will be conducted on the Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus to identify relevant literature. A two-stage screening process involving title\/abstract screening followed by full-text review will be used to determine study eligibility, and data will be extracted using a standardized data-charting form.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Clinical Trial Registration<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      <jats:ext-link>https:\/\/osf.io\/4ms7w<\/jats:ext-link>\n                      .\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/frhs.2026.1857077","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T04:25:20Z","timestamp":1785990320000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Knowledge of cervical cancer screening, barriers to awareness, and the role of technological interventions in improving screening uptake: a scoping review protocol"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"6","author":[{"given":"Slindile","family":"Zondi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Public Health, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University Faculty of Health Sciences","place":["Pretoria, South Africa"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mabina","family":"Mogale","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Public Health, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University Faculty of Health Sciences","place":["Pretoria, South Africa"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elizabeth","family":"Khalongo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Public Health, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University Faculty of Health Sciences","place":["Pretoria, South Africa"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","volume-title":"Cervical Cancer Fact Sheet","year":"2024"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e191","DOI":"10.1016\/S2214-109X(19)30482-6","article-title":"Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis","volume":"8","author":"Arbyn","year":"2020","journal-title":"Lancet Glob Health"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21660","article-title":"Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries","volume":"71","author":"Sung","year":"2021","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"key":"B4","first-page":"153","article-title":"Barriers to cervical cancer screening among ethnic minority women","volume":"22","author":"Marlow","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Med Screen"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E154","DOI":"10.5888\/pcd13.160225","article-title":"Understanding barriers to cervical cancer screening in women with access to care, behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2014","volume":"13","author":"Crawford","year":"2016","journal-title":"Prev Chronic Dis"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0183924","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0183924","article-title":"Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation on screening rates: a systematic review","volume":"12","author":"Musa","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e12444","DOI":"10.1111\/ecc.12444","article-title":"Barriers to utilisation of cervical cancer screening in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review","volume":"26","author":"Lim","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0176711","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.017671","article-title":"Uptake of cervical cancer screening and associated factors among women in Uganda: a systematic review","volume":"12","author":"Ndejjo","year":"","journal-title":"PLOS One"},{"key":"B9","first-page":"216","article-title":"Knowledge, attitude and practice of cervical cancer screening among female students in a tertiary institution in Nigeria","volume-title":"Int J Med Biomed Res","author":"Durowade","year":"2012"},{"key":"B10","first-page":"101010","article-title":"Knowledge, awareness and barriers to cervical cancer screening among women: a systematic review","volume":"15","author":"Rashid","year":"2022","journal-title":"Clin Epidemiol Glob Health"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD007457","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007457.pub2","article-title":"Mobile phone messaging for preventive health care","volume":"12","author":"Vodopivec-Jamsek","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"B12","first-page":"255","article-title":"Women's intention to screen and willingness to vaccinate their daughters against cervical cancer: A cross-sectional study in eastern Uganda","volume-title":"BMC Public Health","author":"Ndejjo","year":"2017"},{"key":"B13","first-page":"504","article-title":"Programmatic HPV testing in cervical cancer prevention in Latin America","volume":"57","author":"Arrossi","year":"2015","journal-title":"Salud P\u00fablica de M\u00e9xico"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e001351","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjgh-2018-001351","article-title":"Self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"4","author":"Yeh","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ Glob Health"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12905-016-0306-6","article-title":"Cervical cancer prevention and treatment research in low-resource settings: a systematic review","volume":"16","author":"Finocchario-Kessler","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMC Women\u2019s Health"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1080\/1364557032000119616","article-title":"Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework","volume":"8","author":"Arksey","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Soc Res Methodol"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2119","DOI":"10.11124\/JBIES-20-00167","article-title":"Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews","volume":"18","author":"Peters","year":"2020","journal-title":"JBI Evidence Synthesis"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1865","DOI":"10.1002\/jcop.22231","article-title":"A scoping review: the utility of participatory research approaches in psychology","volume":"47","author":"Levac","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Community Psychol"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.5281\/zenodo.15258173","article-title":"Postgraduate students\u2019 experiences of using EndNote in research studies","volume":"11","author":"Sokhulu","year":"2024","journal-title":"Soc Sci Educ Res Rev"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/1748-5908-5-69","article-title":"Scoping studies: advancing the methodology","volume":"5","author":"Levac","year":"2010","journal-title":"Implement Sci"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Health Services"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/frhs.2026.1857077\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T04:25:22Z","timestamp":1785990322000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/frhs.2026.1857077\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]]},"references-count":20,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/frhs.2026.1857077"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/frhs.2026.1857077","relation":{},"ISSN":["2813-0146"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2813-0146","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]]},"article-number":"1857077"}}