{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,24]],"date-time":"2026-09-24T06:03:11Z","timestamp":1790229791887,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,24]],"date-time":"2026-09-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790208000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Res. Metr. Anal."],"abstract":"<jats:p>\n                    Measurement-model specification remains a persistent source of conceptual and statistical error in social science research. Existing guidance distinguishes reflective, causal-indicator\/formative, hybrid, higher-order, and composite models, yet applied studies often select among them through disciplinary convention, software defaults, or\n                    <jats:italic>post hoc<\/jats:italic>\n                    empirical performance. This conceptual article reframes the problem as construct\u2013measurement alignment and develops an explanatory and diagnostic framework rather than another binary decision rule. A structured conceptual synthesis was used to compare foundational and contemporary literature across five domains: construct ontology, indicator role, formal specification, validation logic, and contextual interpretation. The analysis integrates common-factor CFA and SEM, MIMIC models, higher-order structures, and composite-based SEM, with explicit attention to identification, measurement error, and empirically equivalent models. From inconsistencies across these five domains, the framework derives a taxonomy of seven recurrent forms of misalignment: ontological\u2013structural, indicator\u2013construct, epistemological\u2013statistical, conceptual\u2013identification, error\u2013specification, level-of-abstraction, and context\u2013interpretation misalignment. Three worked applications demonstrate that the same construct label can warrant different model specifications when its definition, level, purpose, or indicator role changes. The framework therefore explains why measurement decisions fail, identifies where misalignment occurs, and specifies the evidence required for diagnosis and correction. It offers researchers, reviewers, and editors a transparent basis for model justification while limiting claims that statistical fit alone can establish construct meaning or causal direction.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3389\/frma.2026.1870385","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,24]],"date-time":"2026-09-24T05:43:56Z","timestamp":1790228636000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Reflective, formative, hybrid, and composite measurement models in social science research: a diagnostic construct\u2013measurement alignment framework"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Taisith","family":"Kruasom","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Management Science, Ubon Ratchathani University","place":["Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1111\/isj.12487","article-title":"Reconsidering the implications of formative versus reflective measurement model misspecification","volume":"34","author":"Aguirre-Urreta","year":"2024","journal-title":"Inf. Syst. J."},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"946","DOI":"10.1177\/10963480241258510","article-title":"Understanding and employing formative constructs: conceptualization, operationalization, and threats of misspecification","volume":"49","author":"Berbekova","year":"2025","journal-title":"J. Hosp. Tour. Res."},{"key":"B3","volume-title":"Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research","author":"Blalock","year":"1964"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.2307\/23044047","article-title":"Evaluating effect, composite, and causal indicators in structural equation models","volume":"35","author":"Bollen","year":"2011","journal-title":"MIS Q."},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/9781009312806","author":"Bollen","year":"2026","journal-title":"Elements of Structural Equation Models (SEMs)"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1037\/a0024448","article-title":"Three Cs in measurement models: causal indicators, composite indicators, and covariates","volume":"16","author":"Bollen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Psychol. Methods"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"581","DOI":"10.1037\/met0000056","article-title":"In defense of causal\u2013formative indicators: a minority report","volume":"22","author":"Bollen","year":"2017","journal-title":"Psychol. Methods"},{"key":"B8","volume-title":"Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, 2nd Edn","author":"Brown","year":"2015"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.2753\/MTP1069-6679170306","article-title":"Model misspecification: contrasting formative and reflective indicators for a model of e-service quality","volume":"17","author":"Collier","year":"2009","journal-title":"J. Mark. Theory Pract."},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1108\/17465660610667775","article-title":"The error term in formative measurement models: interpretation and modeling implications","volume":"1","author":"Diamantopoulos","year":"2006","journal-title":"J. Model. Manag."},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1203","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2008.01.009","article-title":"Advancing formative measurement models","volume":"61","author":"Diamantopoulos","year":"2008","journal-title":"J. Bus. Res."},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"370","DOI":"10.1177\/1094428110378369","article-title":"The fallacy of formative measurement","volume":"14","author":"Edwards","year":"2011","journal-title":"Organ. Res. Methods"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.2307\/270819","article-title":"The treatment of unobservable variables in path analysis","volume":"3","author":"Hauser","year":"1971","journal-title":"Sociol. Methodol."},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780195121360.003.0010","article-title":"\u201cThe meaning of theoretical terms: a critique of the standard empiricist construal,\u201d","author":"Hempel","year":"2001","journal-title":"The philosophy of Carl G. Hempel: Studies in Science, Explanation, and Rationality"},{"key":"B15","volume-title":"Composite-Based Structural Equation Modeling: Analyzing Latent and Emergent Variables","author":"Henseler","year":"2021"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1080\/0960085X.2024.2357123","volume":"34","author":"Henseler","year":"2025","journal-title":"Eur. J. Inf. Syst."},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1086\/376806","article-title":"A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research","volume":"30","author":"Jarvis","year":"2003","journal-title":"J. Consum. Res."},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"631","DOI":"10.2307\/2285946","article-title":"Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable","volume":"70","author":"J\u00f6reskog","year":"1975","journal-title":"J. Am. Stat. Assoc."},{"key":"B19","volume-title":"Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 5th Edn","author":"Kline","year":"2023"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.08.004","article-title":"Problems with formative and higher-order reflective variables","volume":"66","author":"Lee","year":"2013","journal-title":"J. Bus. Res."},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"710","DOI":"10.1037\/0021-9010.90.4.710","article-title":"The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions","volume":"90","author":"MacKenzie","year":"2005","journal-title":"J. Appl. Psychol."},{"key":"B22","first-page":"206","article-title":"\u201cModel selection in structural equation modeling,\u201d","volume-title":"Handbook of structural equation modeling","author":"Preacher","year":"2023"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2997","DOI":"10.1108\/IMDS-07-2023-0429","article-title":"PLS-SEM in information systems: seizing the opportunity and marching ahead full speed to adopt methodological updates","volume":"123","author":"Sabol","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ind. Manag. Data Syst."},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1108\/VJIKMS-03-2024-0085","volume":"56","author":"Sabol","year":"2026","journal-title":"VINE J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. Syst."},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"843","DOI":"10.1037\/met0000432","article-title":"The Henseler\u2013Ogasawara specification of composites in structural equation modeling: a tutorial","volume":"28","author":"Schuberth","year":"2023","journal-title":"Psychol. Methods"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"747","DOI":"10.1080\/10705511.2024.2339396","article-title":"A causal framework for the comparability of latent variables","volume":"31","author":"Sterner","year":"2024","journal-title":"Struct. Equ. Model."},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1097\/EDE.0000000000001434","article-title":"Constructed measures and causal inference: towards a new model of measurement for psychosocial constructs","volume":"33","author":"VanderWeele","year":"2022","journal-title":"Epidemiology"},{"key":"B28","first-page":"247","article-title":"\u201cEquivalent models: concepts, problems, alternatives,\u201d","volume-title":"Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling","author":"Williams","year":"2012"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/frma.2026.1870385\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,24]],"date-time":"2026-09-24T05:43:58Z","timestamp":1790228638000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/frma.2026.1870385\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,24]]},"references-count":28,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/frma.2026.1870385"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/frma.2026.1870385","relation":{},"ISSN":["2504-0537"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2504-0537","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,24]]},"article-number":"1870385"}}