{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T04:59:39Z","timestamp":1785387579126,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1785369600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Robot. AI"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Collaborative robots (cobots) are increasingly deployed in industrial as well as non-industrial domains to support human-centered operation. While physical safety and task efficiency have received considerable attention, less is known about how feedback modality influences operator experience and physiological responses under different collaboration demands. This study examines the effects of feedback modalities in two human\u2013cobot collaboration scenarios representing distinct coordination structures: a low-collaboration turn-taking task and a high-collaboration synchronous shared-control task. Across these scenarios, auditory, visual, and combined auditory\u2013visual feedback modalities were evaluated, and an additional projected assistive interface (PAI) condition, designed specifically for the given scenario, was introduced in the high-collaboration task. Outcomes included task completion time, subjective user assessments of interaction quality and comfort, and physiological responses based on heart rate variability (HRV) indicators reflecting autonomic activity. The results indicate that feedback modality significantly influences performance, subjective experience, and physiological activation within each collaboration scenario. In the low-collaboration task, the no-feedback condition yielded the shortest completion times but was associated with lower perceived interaction quality and descriptively higher autonomic activation. In contrast, multimodal feedback improved perceived comfort and task understanding while slightly increasing completion time. In the high-collaboration task, the examined PAI guidance condition was associated with the shortest task completion times and the highest subjective ratings, while also being accompanied by increased sympathetic-dominant physiological activation. These findings indicate a design trade-off in which richer guidance can enhance coordination efficiency but may be associated with increased cognitive and physiological demands. Importantly, the results suggest that physiological activation should be interpreted in relation to task demands and performance outcomes, rather than as a direct indicator of detrimental stress. More broadly, the study suggests that collaboration configuration and feedback modality should be co-designed as interdependent parameters within the specific coordination demands of collaborative human\u2013robot interaction tasks. Although the PAI was designed for this specific scenario, future research may examine whether similarly tailored interfaces can support positive user evaluations in other complex collaborative tasks. By integrating subjective and physiological measures, this work provides evidence-informed guidance for designing feedback strategies that support efficient, safe, and sustainable human\u2013cobot collaboration.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3389\/frobt.2026.1836165","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T04:21:08Z","timestamp":1785385268000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Feedback modalities in human-cobot collaboration: experimental evaluation of performance, user experience, and physiological responses"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"13","author":[{"given":"Amir","family":"Biton","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ariel University","place":["Ari'el, Israel"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yuval","family":"Cohen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Engineering, Afeka College of Engineering","place":["Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shraga","family":"Shoval","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ariel University","place":["Ari'el, Israel"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"957","DOI":"10.1007\/s10514-017-9677-2","article-title":"Progress and prospects of the human\u2013robot collaboration","volume":"42","author":"Ajoudani","year":"2018","journal-title":"Aut. Robots"},{"key":"B2","volume-title":"Lightweight Robots in Manual assembly\u2013best to Start Simply","author":"Bauer","year":"2016"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1080\/00140139.2020.1830184","article-title":"Cardiac autonomic responses to different tasks in office workers with access to a sit-stand table\u2013a study in real work setting","volume":"64","author":"Brusaca","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ergonomics"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102789","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rcim.2024.102789","article-title":"Assembly complexity and physiological response in human-robot collaboration: insights from a preliminary experimental analysis","volume":"89","author":"Capponi","year":"2024","journal-title":"Robotics Computer-Integrated Manuf."},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apergo.2018.08.028","article-title":"Measuring mental workload using physiological measures: a systematic review","volume":"35","author":"Charles","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int. J. Human-Computer Interact."},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.3389\/fnins.2020.00268","article-title":"A neuroergonomics approach to human-machine cooperation","volume":"14","author":"Dehais","year":"2020","journal-title":"Front. Hum. Neurosci."},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104306","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apergo.2024.104306","article-title":"Human\u2013cobot collaboration\u2019s impact on success, time completion, errors, workload, gestures and acceptability during an assembly task","volume":"119","author":"Fournier","year":"2024","journal-title":"Appl. Ergon."},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101998","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rcim.2020.101998","article-title":"Emerging research fields in safety and ergonomics in industrial collaborative robotics: a systematic literature review","volume":"67","author":"Gualtieri","year":"2021","journal-title":"Robotics Computer-Integrated Manuf."},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1292","DOI":"10.1109\/TRO.2017.2723903","article-title":"Robot collisions: a survey on detection, isolation, and identification","volume":"33","author":"Haddadin","year":"2017","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Robotics"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"517","DOI":"10.1177\/0018720811417254","article-title":"A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction","volume":"53","author":"Hancock","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum. Factors"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103863","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apergo.2022.103863","article-title":"Physiological and perceptual consequences of trust in collaborative robots: an empirical investigation of human and robot factors","volume":"106","author":"Hopko","year":"2023","journal-title":"Appl. Ergon."},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2017.00213","article-title":"Heart rate variability and cardiac vagal tone in psychophysiological research: recommendations for experiment planning, data analysis, and data reporting","volume":"8","author":"Laborde","year":"2017","journal-title":"Front. Psychol."},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1561\/2300000052","article-title":"A survey of methods for safe human\u2013robot interaction","volume":"5","author":"Lasota","year":"2017","journal-title":"Found. Trends Robotics"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"00187208241226823","DOI":"10.1177\/00187208241226823","article-title":"Factors affecting workers\u2019 mental stress in handover activities during human\u2013robot collaboration","volume":"66","author":"Lu","year":"2024","journal-title":"Hum. Factors"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1075\/is.7.3.14nom","article-title":"Measurement of negative attitudes toward robots","volume":"7","author":"Nomura","year":"2006","journal-title":"Interact. Stud."},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780195177619.001.0001","volume-title":"Neuroergonomics: The Brain at Work","author":"Parasuraman","year":"2006"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104662","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apergo.2025.104662","article-title":"On the effect of using an augmented reality laser projection operator guidance system on cognitive workload and assembly task performance","volume":"130","author":"Sahoo","year":"2026","journal-title":"Appl. Ergon."},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/3572784","article-title":"Concerning trends in likert scale usage in human-robot interaction: towards improving best practices","volume":"12","author":"Schrum","year":"2023","journal-title":"ACM Trans. Human-Robot Interact."},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.3389\/fpubh.2017.00258","article-title":"An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms","volume":"5","author":"Shaffer","year":"2017","journal-title":"Front. Public Health"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104224","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apergo.2024.104224","article-title":"Exploring the impact of human-robot interaction on workers\u2019 mental stress in collaborative assembly tasks","volume":"116","author":"Su","year":"2024","journal-title":"Appl. Ergon."},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.3390\/robotics12030079","article-title":"Cobot applications\u2014recent advances and challenges","volume":"12","author":"Taesi","year":"2023","journal-title":"Robotics"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cmpb.2013.07.024","article-title":"Kubios hrv\u2013heart rate variability analysis software","volume":"113","author":"Tarvainen","year":"2014","journal-title":"Comput. Methods Programs Biomed."},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mechatronics.2018.02.009","article-title":"Survey on human\u2013robot collaboration in industrial settings: safety, intuitive interfaces and applications","volume":"55","author":"Villani","year":"2018","journal-title":"Mechatronics"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Robotics and AI"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/frobt.2026.1836165\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T04:21:08Z","timestamp":1785385268000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/frobt.2026.1836165\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]]},"references-count":23,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/frobt.2026.1836165"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/frobt.2026.1836165","relation":{},"ISSN":["2296-9144"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2296-9144","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]]},"article-number":"1836165"}}