{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,13]],"date-time":"2025-11-13T06:37:39Z","timestamp":1763015859013,"version":"3.45.0"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,13]],"date-time":"2025-11-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1762992000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Reprod. Health"],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Post-abortion family planning (PAFP), ideally initiated within 48\u2005h, is crucial for preventing unplanned pregnancies. Repeat-induced abortion remains a significant challenge to the sexual and reproductive health of women. Despite numerous systematic reviews and meta-analyses, inconsistent findings still hinder effective policy formulation and clinical decision-making. In Africa, high rates of unsafe abortion and unintended pregnancy persist, exacerbated by socioeconomic and health system barriers. This umbrella review consolidates global evidence on the prevalence, determinants, and use of PAFP to inform health policy, strengthen service delivery, and promote reproductive health equity, especially in regions with limited access to safe abortion services and contraception.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on observational studies was conducted. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews tool. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q and\n                      <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      statistics, while publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test and funnel plots. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled effect size, with analyses performed using Stata version 19. Subgroup analyses were performed by country and continent. Pooled results were synthesized using random-effects meta-analysis models. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251089314).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Result<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      This umbrella review included six systematic reviews and meta-analyses, comprising 198 primary studies conducted across 44 African countries, with a combined sample size of 420,832 women of reproductive age assessing post-abortion family planning utilization. This umbrella review found that the pooled prevalence of post-abortion family planning utilization among women of reproductive age in Africa was 62.82% (95% CI: 59.24%\u201366.40%), indicating substantial uptake but with high heterogeneity across studies (\n                      <jats:italic>I<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      \u2009=\u200998.81%). A subgroup umbrella meta-analysis revealed that the pooled prevalence of post-abortion family planning utilization was 69.31% (95% CI: 64.27%\u201374.35%) in Ethiopia, compared to 60.29% (95% CI: 57.11%\u201363.47%) in other African countries. This study determined that injectables were the most commonly utilized post-abortion family planning method (34.12%), followed by pills and implants, each with a nearly equal share of 22%. This umbrella review identified key pooled determinants of post-abortion family planning utilization among women of reproductive age in Africa, including marital status (being married), younger maternal age (15\u201324 years), educational attainment, receipt of post-abortion family planning counseling, prior use of family planning, history of abortion, unintended pregnancy, and contraceptive knowledge.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion and recommendation<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The high prevalence of PAFP utilization in Africa (62.82%), and particularly in Ethiopia (69.31%), reflects encouraging progress. However, the fact that 37.18% of post-abortion women in Africa and 30.69% in Ethiopia still do not use PAFP underscores a critical gap that demands targeted policy action. The predominance of injectable contraceptives highlights the need to expand access to a broader range of methods, including long-acting reversible contraceptives, to support informed and voluntary choice. Policymakers and health planners in Africa should urgently strengthen reproductive health policies by implementing a comprehensive, multipronged strategy to ensure universal access to post-abortion care.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Systematic Review Registration<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      <jats:ext-link>https:\/\/www.crd.york.ac.uk\/PROSPERO\/view\/CRD420251089314<\/jats:ext-link>\n                      , PROSPERO CRD420251089314.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/frph.2025.1687886","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,13]],"date-time":"2025-11-13T06:31:01Z","timestamp":1763015461000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Evidence and determinants of post-abortion family planning utilization among women of reproductive age in Africa: an umbrella review"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"7","author":[{"given":"Doreen Kainyu","family":"Kaura","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dereje Bayissa","family":"Demissie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Stefan","family":"Gebhardt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e626","DOI":"10.1016\/S2214-109X(24)00560-6","article-title":"Global and regional causes of maternal deaths 2009\u201320: a WHO systematic analysis","volume":"13","author":"Cresswell","year":"2025","journal-title":"Lancet Glob Health"},{"key":"B2","volume-title":"Trends in Maternal Mortality Estimates 2000 to 2023: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and UNDESA\/Population Division","year":"2025"},{"key":"B3","volume-title":"Access to Safe Abortion Critical for Health of Women and Girls","year":"2022"},{"key":"B4","first-page":"35","article-title":"What is abortion?","volume":"26","author":"Richards","year":"2006","journal-title":"Conscience"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2023.04.007","article-title":"Abortion bans will exacerbate already severe racial inequities in maternal mortality","volume":"33","author":"Treder","year":"2023","journal-title":"Women's Health Issues"},{"key":"B6","author":"Bell","year":""},{"key":"B7","year":""},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e009557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjgh-2022-009557","article-title":"Beyond safety: the 2022 WHO abortion guidelines and the future of abortion safety measurement","volume":"7","author":"Gerdts","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMJ Glob Health"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e467","DOI":"10.1016\/S2214-109X(21)00552-0","article-title":"Enabling access to quality abortion care: WHO\u2019s abortion care guideline","volume":"10","author":"Kim","year":"2022","journal-title":"Lancet Glob Health"},{"key":"B10","volume-title":"Abortion Care Guideline","year":"2022"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1604376","DOI":"10.3389\/phrs.2022.1604376","article-title":"Women who sell sex in Eastern and Southern Africa: a scoping review of non-barrier contraception, pregnancy and abortion","volume":"43","author":"Macleod","year":"2022","journal-title":"Public Health Rev"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1136\/jfprhc-2014-101096","article-title":"Effectiveness of peri-abortion counselling in preventing subsequent unplanned pregnancy: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials","volume":"42","author":"Stewart","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1295","DOI":"10.4236\/ojog.2020.1090119","article-title":"Improving post abortion care (PAC) delivery in Sub-Saharan Africa: a literature review","volume":"10","author":"Ngalame","year":"2020","journal-title":"Open J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.29173\/cjfy29953","article-title":"Postabortion family planning utilization and associated factors among women seeking abortion services: a cross-sectional study","volume":"15","author":"Woldemichael","year":"2023","journal-title":"Can J Fam Youth"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-021-01731-4","article-title":"Post-abortion family planning use, method preference, and its determinant factors in Eastern Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"10","author":"Bizuneh","year":"2021","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1186\/s12978-021-01195-8","article-title":"Utilization and its factors of post abortion modern contraceptive in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"18","author":"Beyene","year":"2021","journal-title":"Reprod Health"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000003825","article-title":"Oral contraception following abortion a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"95","author":"Che","year":"2016","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1478797","DOI":"10.3389\/fgwh.2025.1478797","article-title":"Post-abortion contraceptive uptake, choices, and factors associated with it among women seeking abortion services in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"6","author":"Dagnew","year":"2025","journal-title":"Front Glob Womens Health"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.3102\/1076998609346961","article-title":"How many studies do you need? A primer on statistical power for meta-analysis","volume":"35","author":"Valentine","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Educ Behav Stat"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1097\/XEB.0000000000000055","article-title":"Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach","volume":"13","author":"Aromataris","year":"2015","journal-title":"JBI Evid Implement"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"j4008","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.j4008","article-title":"AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both","volume":"358","author":"Shea","year":"2017","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1539","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1186","article-title":"Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis","volume":"21","author":"Higgins","year":"2002","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(86)90046-2","article-title":"Meta-analysis in clinical trials","volume":"7","author":"DerSimonian","year":"1986","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials"},{"key":"B24","volume-title":"Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions","author":"Chandler","year":"2019"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.2174\/1573404817666210315150854","article-title":"Post abortion contraceptive use and determinant factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"18","author":"Cherie","year":"2022","journal-title":"Curr Women's Health Rev"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-025-02837-9","article-title":"Post-abortion family planning use and its determinants among women who received abortion care in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"14","author":"Mengistie","year":"2025","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"883710","DOI":"10.3389\/fpubh.2022.883710","article-title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis on post-abortion contraceptive utilization and associated factors in Ethiopia","volume":"10","author":"Wake","year":"2022","journal-title":"Front Public Health"},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14129","article-title":"Acceptability of immediate postpartum and post-abortion long-acting reversible contraception provision to adolescents: a systematic review","volume":"100","author":"Buckingham","year":"2021","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/13625180802549970","article-title":"Effectiveness of contraceptive counselling of women following an abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"14","author":"Ferreira","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000463","article-title":"Contraception after surgical and medical abortion: a review","volume":"72","author":"Roe","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"B31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1136\/jfprhc-2016-101469","article-title":"Access to contraception and sexual and reproductive health information post-abortion: a systematic review of literature from low- and middle-income countries","volume":"43","author":"Rogers","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"B32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1186\/s12978-021-01165-0","article-title":"Disclosure to social network members among abortion-seeking women in low-and middle-income countries with restrictive access: a systematic review","volume":"18","author":"Rossier","year":"2021","journal-title":"Reprod Health"},{"key":"B33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmz040","article-title":"Long-acting reversible contraception immediately after medical abortion: systematic review with meta-analyses","volume":"26","author":"Schmidt-Hansen","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"B34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.3109\/13625187.2015.1082175","article-title":"Contraception for adolescents after abortion","volume":"21","author":"Sedlecky","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"B35","author":"Tripney","year":""},{"key":"B36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0304221","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0304221","article-title":"Effectiveness of post-abortion care services to protect women\u2019s fertility in China: a systematic review with meta-analysis","volume":"19","author":"Wang","year":"2024","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"B37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"n71","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"B38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-017-1266-z","article-title":"A decade of progress providing safe abortion services in Ethiopia: results of national assessments in 2008 and 2014","volume":"17","author":"Dibaba","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Reproductive Health"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/frph.2025.1687886\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,13]],"date-time":"2025-11-13T06:31:03Z","timestamp":1763015463000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/frph.2025.1687886\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,13]]},"references-count":38,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/frph.2025.1687886"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/frph.2025.1687886","relation":{},"ISSN":["2673-3153"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2673-3153","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,13]]},"article-number":"1687886"}}