{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T15:16:36Z","timestamp":1786115796088,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1785974400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Reprod. Health"],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Nuclear errors (NE) observed at the two-cell stage reflect early mitotic disturbances, but their clinical relevance for embryo implantation and live birth remains un-clear. We investigated whether nuclear status at the two-cell stage predicts pregnancy and live birth outcomes following cleavage-stage and blastocyst transfer.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This retrospective cohort study included 3,793 single embryo transfers with clinical outcomes performed at a university-affiliated reproductive medicine centre. Embryos were retrospectively assessed at the two-cell stage and classified as normal or exhibiting nuclear errors, further stratified by the number of affected blastomeres and by phenotype (multinucleation, micronucleation, split nuclei, or mixed errors). Live birth rate (LBR) was the primary outcome; pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates were secondary outcomes. Associations were evaluated using contingency analyses, regression models of nuclear error occurrence, and mixed-effects logistic regression analyses of clinical outcomes adjusted for maternal age, paternal age, fertilisation method, and patient-level clustering.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>NE occurred in 24% of transferred embryos and were more frequent after ICSI than IVF (adjusted OR\u202f1.74). In cleavage-stage transfers, NE were associated with reduced LBR compared with embryos without NE (23.2% vs. 34.8%). The clinical outcomes decreased with increased numbers of affected blastomeres. Micronucleation and split nuclei showed the poorest outcomes and remained adversely associated with reproductive outcomes after adjustment, whereas multinucleation was not detrimental. No association between NE and outcomes was observed after blastocyst transfers.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Nuclear error phenotypes at the two-cell stage provided prognostic information relevant for cleavage-stage embryo transfer but had limited influence for blastocyst selection. Outcome differences associated with early nuclear abnormalities were no longer detectable among transferred blastocysts.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/frph.2026.1905720","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T05:31:24Z","timestamp":1785994284000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Nuclear error phenotypes at the first mitosis predict cleavage-stage outcomes but not blastocyst competence"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Emma","family":"Adolfsson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, \u00d6rebro University","place":["\u00d6rebro, Sweden"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Amanda","family":"Stenberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, \u00d6rebro University Hospital","place":["\u00d6rebro, Sweden"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Juliane","family":"Baumgart","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, \u00d6rebro University","place":["\u00d6rebro, Sweden"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"577","DOI":"10.1016\/s0015-0282(02)04694-0","article-title":"Conception, early pregnancy loss, and time to clinical pregnancy: a population-based prospective study","volume":"79","author":"Wang","year":"2003","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"588","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh655","article-title":"Oocyte number per live birth in IVF: were Steptoe and Edwards less wasteful?","volume":"20","author":"Inge","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1016\/s1472-6483(10)60769-9","article-title":"High rate of biological loss in assisted reproduction: it is in the seed, not in the soil","volume":"14","author":"Patrizio","year":"2007","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2129","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/12.10.2129","article-title":"Utilization of retrieved oocytes as an index of the efficiency of superovulation strategies for in-vitro fertilization treatment","volume":"12","author":"Meniru","year":"1997","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.32607\/actanaturae.25255","article-title":"Chromosomal aberrations as a biological phenomenon in human embryonic development","volume":"15","author":"Ivanova","year":"2023","journal-title":"Acta Naturae"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"494","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2017.06.015","article-title":"The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of ART laboratory performance indicators","volume":"35","year":"2017","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6755","DOI":"10.1038\/s41467-022-34294-6","article-title":"The first mitotic division of human embryos is highly error prone","volume":"13","author":"Currie","year":"2022","journal-title":"Nat Commun"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(98)00100-9","article-title":"Multinucleation in normally fertilized embryos is associated with an accelerated ovulation induction response and lower implantation and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles","volume":"70","author":"Jackson","year":"1998","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1062","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg201","article-title":"Multinucleation in cleavage stage embryos","volume":"18","author":"Royen","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2005.03.059","article-title":"Nuclear status of four-cell preembryos predicts implantation potential in in vitro fertilization treatment cycles","volume":"84","author":"Saldeen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7827-12-54","article-title":"Analysis of embryo morphokinetics, multinucleation and cleavage anomalies using continuous time-lapse monitoring in blastocyst transfer cycles","volume":"12","author":"Desai","year":"2014","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.06.030","article-title":"Frequency of embryo multinucleation detected by time-lapse system and its impact on pregnancy outcome","volume":"102","author":"Ergin","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.10.013","article-title":"Does the addition of time-lapse morphokinetics in the selection of embryos for transfer improve pregnancy rates? A randomized controlled trial","volume":"105","author":"Goodman","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2392","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deae186","article-title":"Embryo multinucleation: detection, possible origins, and implications for treatment","volume":"39","author":"Coticchio","year":"2024","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"608","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.041","article-title":"Impact of multinucleated blastomeres on embryo developmental competence, morphokinetics, and aneuploidy","volume":"106","author":"Balakier","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"595","DOI":"10.1262\/jrd.2015-052","article-title":"Developmental capacity and implantation potential of the embryos with multinucleated blastomeres","volume":"61","author":"Egashira","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Reprod Dev"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0274502","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0274502","article-title":"Nucleation status of day 2 pre-implantation embryos, acquired by time-lapse imaging during IVF, is associated with live birth","volume":"17","author":"Sayed","year":"2022","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"hoac049","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoac049","article-title":"Binucleated embryos at the two-cell stage show higher blastocyst formation rates and higher pregnancy and live birth rates compared to non-multinucleated embryos","volume":"2022","author":"Talbot","year":"2022","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aar7462","article-title":"Dual-spindle formation in zygotes keeps parental genomes apart in early mammalian embryos","volume":"361","author":"Reichmann","year":"2018","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"V1","DOI":"10.1530\/rep-20-0188","article-title":"The impact of embryo binucleation depends upon its origin","volume":"160","author":"Gomes Paim","year":"2020","journal-title":"Reproduction"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1093\/mutage\/geq052","article-title":"Molecular mechanisms of micronucleus, nucleoplasmic bridge and nuclear bud formation in mammalian and human cells","volume":"26","author":"Fenech","year":"2011","journal-title":"Mutagenesis"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7281","DOI":"10.3390\/ijms22147281","article-title":"Nuclear envelope integrity in health and disease: consequences on genome instability and inflammation","volume":"22","author":"Gauthier","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Mol Sci"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1019","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dead067","article-title":"The first mitotic division: a perilous bridge connecting the zygote and the early embryo","volume":"38","author":"Coticchio","year":"2023","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"dev281","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dev281","article-title":"Human embryos commonly form abnormal nuclei during development: a mechanism of DNA damage, embryonic aneuploidy, and developmental arrest","volume":"31","author":"Kort","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5381","DOI":"10.1038\/s41467-024-49815-8","article-title":"Shape of the first mitotic spindles impacts multinucleation in human embryos","volume":"15","author":"Ono","year":"2024","journal-title":"Nat Commun"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1142\/s2661318222740796","article-title":"Multinucleation in the two-cell stage embryo matters","volume":"4","author":"Lazzaro","year":"2022","journal-title":"Fertil Reproduction"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2838","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cell.2024.04.029","article-title":"The first two blastomeres contribute unequally to the human embryo","volume":"187","author":"Junyent","year":"2024","journal-title":"Cell"},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.03.036","article-title":"Study of nucleation status in the second cell cycle of human embryo and its impact on implantation rate","volume":"106","author":"Aguilar","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.03.025","article-title":"Multinucleation per se is not always sufficient as a marker of abnormality to decide against transferring human embryos","volume":"106","author":"Hashimoto","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1299","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.12.028","article-title":"Is the nuclear status of an embryo an independent factor to predict its ability to develop to term?","volume":"99","author":"Fauque","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.09.022","article-title":"Embryo multinucleation at the two-cell stage is an independent predictor of intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes","volume":"107","author":"Desch","year":"2017","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-024-03354-9","article-title":"Nuclear error phenotypes in the two-cell embryo are correlated to blastocyst formation rate after assisted reproduction","volume":"42","author":"Stenberg","year":"2025","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"B33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1097\/00001703-199906000-00013","article-title":"Culture and transfer of human blastocysts","volume":"11","author":"Gardner","year":"1999","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Reproductive Health"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/frph.2026.1905720\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T05:31:25Z","timestamp":1785994285000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/frph.2026.1905720\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]]},"references-count":33,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/frph.2026.1905720"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/frph.2026.1905720","relation":{},"ISSN":["2673-3153"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2673-3153","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]]},"article-number":"1905720"}}