{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]],"date-time":"2026-09-03T07:16:08Z","timestamp":1788419768505,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]],"date-time":"2026-09-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788393600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Reprod. Health"],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In 2024, an international consensus statement on non-invasive imaging techniques for the diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis was published, recommending transvaginal sonography as the first-line imaging modality because of cost, availability, and low impact on the environment. Despite the increasing body of evidence supporting the use of imaging in the preoperative diagnosis of endometriosis, there is a paucity of data to confirm patient awareness. The aim of this study was to use an online survey or questionnaire from patients to collect quantitative data regarding their awareness, exposure, and experience with preoperative imaging for the diagnosis of endometriosis.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This was a cross-sectional study, based on an online, international survey completed by patients with self-reported endometriosis from multiple online endometriosis groups. The survey went live from November 2025 to March 2026 and consisted of women and gender-diverse individuals with self-reported endometriosis, with a minimum required number of 100 participants.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 180 participants started the survey, of which 142 (78.9%) completed the exercise. The mean age of the participants was 31.6 [standard deviation (SD) 8.7] years, with a median time of endometriosis diagnosis of 2 years (interquartile range 1\u20135), of whom 99 (69.7%) had at least one surgery, with a mean number of surgeries of 1.8 (SD 1.2). The majority of participants were from Australia (66.2%), followed by Canada (16.9%), New Zealand (11.3%), and the United Kingdom (2.1%), and an equal number were from Brazil, India, the Philippines, and Spain (0.7% each). Overall, 53.5% of participants agreed that endometriosis can be diagnosed without surgery, while only 32.4% agreed that bowel endometriosis can be diagnosed before surgery. Of these, the percentages of participants who agreed that bowel endometriosis can be preoperatively diagnosed with ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and colonoscopy were 32%, 35%, 15%, and 15%, respectively. The participants obtained knowledge about endometriosis investigations and treatments from various sources, including their gynecologists (71.8%), general practitioners (57%), fertility specialists (11.3%), family members (12%), friends (21.8%), social media (68.3%), and other sources (29.6%).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      There is a disparity between participant awareness in our study and the evidence in the literature regarding the availability and accuracy of preoperative imaging for the diagnosis of deep endometriosis, possibly due to the misinformation disseminated via social media\n                      <jats:bold>.<\/jats:bold>\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/frph.2026.1917458","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]],"date-time":"2026-09-03T06:41:38Z","timestamp":1788417698000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Preoperative imaging for endometriosis awareness: an online survey study"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Bassem","family":"Gerges","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, Nepean Hospital, University of Sydney","place":["Kingswood, NSW, Australia"]},{"name":"Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery (SWAPS), Blacktown Hospital","place":["Blacktown, NSW, Australia"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Allie","family":"Eathorne","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Medical Research Institute of New Zealand","place":["Wellington, New Zealand"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"George","family":"Condous","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, Nepean Hospital, University of Sydney","place":["Kingswood, NSW, Australia"]},{"name":"Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery (SWAPS), Blacktown Hospital","place":["Blacktown, NSW, Australia"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2389","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMcp1000274","article-title":"Clinical practice. Endometriosis","volume":"362","author":"Giudice","year":"2010","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1552","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det050","article-title":"Consensus on current management of endometriosis","volume":"28","author":"Johnson","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"591","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.05.031","article-title":"Endometriosis and infertility: a committee opinion","volume":"98","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1034","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(98)00081-8","article-title":"Fecundity of infertile women with minimal or mild endometriosis and women with unexplained infertility. The Canadian Collaborative Group on Endometriosis","volume":"69","author":"Berube","year":"1998","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.02.093","article-title":"Pathogenic mechanisms in endometriosis-associated infertility","volume":"90","author":"Gupta","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15955","article-title":"Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group","volume":"48","author":"Guerriero","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.05.002","article-title":"Ultrasound techniques in the diagnosis of deep pelvic endometriosis: algorithm based on a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"104","author":"Noventa","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8858","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for non-invasive diagnosis of bowel endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"37","author":"Hudelist","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"488","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.07.016","article-title":"Can enhanced techniques improve the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging for rectosigmoid endometriosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"42","author":"Pereira","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.23148","article-title":"Optimal imaging modality for detection of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"58","author":"Gerges","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"hoab041","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoab041","article-title":"Meta-analysis and systematic review to determine the optimal imaging modality for the detection of uterosacral ligaments\/torus uterinus, rectovaginal septum and vaginal deep endometriosis","volume":"2021","author":"Gerges","year":"2021","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.04.030","article-title":"Meta-analysis and systematic review to determine the optimal imaging modality for the detection of bladder deep endometriosis","volume":"261","author":"Gerges","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111450","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2024.111450","article-title":"Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement","volume":"176","author":"Condous","year":"2024","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.27560","article-title":"Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement","volume":"64","author":"Condous","year":"2024","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.04.006","article-title":"Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement","volume":"31","author":"Condous","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"hoae029","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoae029","article-title":"Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement","volume":"2024","author":"Condous","year":"2024","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.52054\/FVVO.16.2.012","article-title":"Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement","volume":"16","author":"Condous","year":"2024","journal-title":"Facts Views Vis Obgyn"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1312","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.328.7451.1312","article-title":"Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire","volume":"328","author":"Boynton","year":"2004","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x","article-title":"Researching internet-based populations: advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services","volume":"10","author":"Wright","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Comput Mediat Commun"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e061","DOI":"10.1097\/og9.0000000000000061","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography for endometriosis according to the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis consensus","volume":"2","author":"Mick","year":"2025","journal-title":"O G Open"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD009591","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009591.pub2","article-title":"Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis","volume":"2","author":"Nisenblat","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2023.12.017","article-title":"Noninvasive diagnostic imaging for endometriosis part 2: a systematic review of recent developments in magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine and computed tomography","volume":"121","author":"Avery","year":"2024","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.3390\/healthcare12010121","article-title":"Social media, endometriosis, and evidence-based information: an analysis of Instagram content","volume":"12","author":"Adler","year":"2024","journal-title":"Healthcare (Basel)"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e043866","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-043866","article-title":"The pandemic of online research in times of COVID-19","volume":"11","author":"De Man","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1007\/s00127-009-0171-9","article-title":"Advantages and limitations of web-based surveys: evidence from a child mental health survey","volume":"46","author":"Heiervang","year":"2011","journal-title":"Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e23021","DOI":"10.2196\/23021","article-title":"Threats of bots and other bad actors to data quality following research participant recruitment through social media: cross-sectional questionnaire","volume":"22","author":"Pozzar","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e68092","DOI":"10.2196\/68092","article-title":"Increasing rigor in online health surveys through the reduction of fraudulent data","volume":"27","author":"Ng","year":"2025","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2181","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaf160","article-title":"Reliability of self-reported endometriosis and adenomyosis data in online surveys: results from the ComPaRe-Endometriosis e-cohort","volume":"40","author":"Gouesbet","year":"2025","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Reproductive Health"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/frph.2026.1917458\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]],"date-time":"2026-09-03T06:41:42Z","timestamp":1788417702000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/frph.2026.1917458\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]]},"references-count":28,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/frph.2026.1917458"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/frph.2026.1917458","relation":{},"ISSN":["2673-3153"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2673-3153","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]]},"article-number":"1917458"}}