{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,8]],"date-time":"2026-09-08T06:07:37Z","timestamp":1788847657831,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":60,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,8]],"date-time":"2026-09-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788825600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Reprod. Health"],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Fertility preservation is the process of saving or protecting a person's reproductive substance of human origin intended to be used later in that person's life. Fertility preservation technologies have benefits and risks. Among the most discussed issues is the access to these technologies and their funding. Our study aims at the identification and analysis of specific ethical challenges associated with fertility preservation through the perspective of experts in this field.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Between March and July 2026, 16 qualitative interviews with experts were conducted. The interview guide consisted of 12 open-ended main questions and 5 follow-up questions. The content of the interviews was analysed using thematic analysis by Braun and Clarke.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Themes identified through the method of thematic analysis were: 1) autonomous decision-making; 2) benefits and risks of fertility preservation; 3) access to fertility preservation; and 4) funding. Within the themes, sub-themes could be identified. The experts supported the involvement of children in decision-making in an age-appropriate manner. Most experts did not support the allowance of postmortem reproduction, but supported information provision in this regard. Medical benefits and risks prevailed over social benefits and risks. All patients\u2019 groups, including those for non-medical indications, should have access to fertility preservation, but funding through health insurance was unanimously supported only for medical indications.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The decisions about fertility preservation are decisions influencing the rest of the life of the patients and the fulfilment of the right to reproduction. All patient groups that can benefit from fertility preservation technologies should have access to them, including minors, healthy women, and transgender individuals. Medical indications for fertility preservation should be covered by health insurance, while the funding of non-medical indications is still debatable. The importance of informed consent for fertility preservation was underlined, particularly in paediatric cancer cases, where the involvement of children in decision-making is supported in accordance with their maturity. As successful as fertility preservation technologies might be, full, proper, and individualised information should be provided to patients to avoid the risk of false hope.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/frph.2026.1952541","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,8]],"date-time":"2026-09-08T05:34:07Z","timestamp":1788845647000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Ethical perspectives of fertility preservation through experts\u2019 opinions"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Silviya","family":"Aleksandrova-Yankulovska","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute of the History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, Ulm University","place":["Ulm, Germany"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marcin","family":"Orzechowski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute of the History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, Ulm University","place":["Ulm, Germany"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Katharina","family":"Hancke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University","place":["Ulm, Germany"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Karin","family":"Bundschu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University","place":["Ulm, Germany"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Florian","family":"Steger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute of the History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, Ulm University","place":["Ulm, Germany"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","year":"2024"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.5114\/wo.2024.144135","article-title":"Exploring the perspectives of female cancer patients on the donation of reproductive cells for fertility preservation and research purposes","volume":"28","author":"Czekajewska","year":"2024","journal-title":"Contemp Oncol (Pozn)"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.5603\/OCP.2023.0033","article-title":"Fertility preservation during oncological treatment","volume":"20","author":"Kufel-Grabowska","year":"2024","journal-title":"Oncol Clin Pract"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101149","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jemep.2025.101149","article-title":"Social egg freezing and its ethical issues - a systematic literature review","volume":"33","author":"Zisch","year":"2025","journal-title":"Ethics Med Public Health"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2813","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-024-03222-6","article-title":"Patient experience of social and medical fertility preservation fully reimbursed in France","volume":"41","author":"Hagege","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"390","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm13020390","article-title":"Social egg freezing - a trend or modern reality?","volume":"13","author":"Katsani","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3031","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-025-03579-2","article-title":"Oocyte cryopreservation for fertility preservation in transgender and gender diverse individuals: a SWOT analysis","volume":"42","author":"Barbe","year":"2025","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"26334941231222120","DOI":"10.1177\/26334941231222120","article-title":"Barriers to fertility preservation access in transgender and gender diverse adolescents: a narrative review","volume":"18","author":"Nadgauda","year":"2024","journal-title":"Ther Adv Reprod Health"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1007\/s41974-024-00300-6","article-title":"Social egg freezing.","volume":"34","author":"Skala","year":"2024","journal-title":"Gyn\u00e4kologie in der Praxis"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"170","DOI":"10.3109\/14647273.2014.939723","article-title":"Reproductive technology and the life course: current debates and research in social egg freezing","volume":"17","author":"Baldwin","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Fertil (Camb)"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1007\/s11673-017-9781-1","article-title":"Testicular tissue cryopreservation and ethical considerations: a scoping review","volume":"14","author":"Petropanagos","year":"2017","journal-title":"Bioeth Inq"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2019.03.017","article-title":"Egg freezing and late motherhood","volume":"125","author":"Mintziori","year":"2019","journal-title":"Maturitas"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"470","DOI":"10.1097\/MED.0000000000000292","article-title":"Ethics of medical and nonmedical oocyte cryopreservation","volume":"23","author":"Patrizio","year":"2016","journal-title":"Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"860","DOI":"10.1634\/theoncologist.2016-0373","article-title":"Oncofertility: fertile ground for conflict between patient autonomy and medical values","volume":"22","author":"Walsh","year":"2017","journal-title":"Oncologist"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1037\/cpp0000230","article-title":"Ethical considerations in fertility preservation for transgender youth: a case illustration","volume":"6","author":"Chen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Pract Pediatr Psychol"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1076","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.05.025","article-title":"Differences in perceived stress during ovarian stimulation between women with infertility and those pursing oocyte cryopreservation","volume":"114","author":"Adeleye","year":"2020","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1205","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-015-0500-8","article-title":"Does company-sponsored egg freezing promote or confine women\u2019s reproductive autonomy?","volume":"32","author":"Mertes","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"642","DOI":"10.1007\/s00129-013-3193-z","article-title":"Jetzt oder nie- ethische aspekte der fertilit\u00e4tsprotektion bei onkologischen patientinnen","volume":"46","author":"B\u00f6ttcher","year":"2013","journal-title":"Die Gyn\u00e4kologie"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"w13746","DOI":"10.4414\/smw.2013.13746","article-title":"Social freezing in Switzerland and worldwide - a blessing for women today?","volume":"143","author":"Wunder","year":"2013","journal-title":"Swiss Med Wkly"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1136\/jme-2023-108916","article-title":"\u2018False hope\u2019 in assisted reproduction: the normative significance of the external outlook and moral negotiation","volume":"50","author":"Accoe","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Med Ethics"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e113","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16025","article-title":"Elective egg freezing for non-medical reasons","volume":"127","author":"Anderson","year":"2020","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1186\/s12910-022-00774-z","article-title":"I feel that injustice is being done to me': a qualitative study of women\u2019s viewpoints on the (lack of) reimbursement for social egg freezing","volume":"23","author":"De Proost","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMC Med Ethics"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20420188231178371","DOI":"10.1177\/20420188231178371","article-title":"Fertility preservation options for transgender and nonbinary individuals","volume":"14","author":"Reckhow","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1186\/s12910-026-01393-8","article-title":"Ethical analysis of the European normative framework on fertility preservation","volume":"27","author":"Aleksandrova-Yankulovska","year":"2026","journal-title":"BMC Med Ethics"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"999","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-024-03059-z","article-title":"Ethical, legal, social, and policy issues of ovarian tissue cryopreservation in prepubertal girls: a critical interpretive review","volume":"41","author":"Affdal","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.1089\/jayao.2019.0030","article-title":"The voices of young women with breast cancer: providing support and information for improved fertility preservation discussions","volume":"8","author":"Srikanthan","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e20161484","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2016-1484","article-title":"Informed consent in decision-making in pediatric practice","volume":"138","year":"2016","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3050","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/del287","article-title":"ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 11: posthumous assisted reproduction","volume":"21","author":"Pennings","year":"2006","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"B29","year":""},{"key":"B30","year":""},{"key":"B31","first-page":"140","volume-title":"Einf\u00fchrung in die Qualitative Sozialforschung","author":"Mayring","year":"2023"},{"key":"B32","first-page":"338","volume-title":"Thematic Analysis. A Practical Guide","author":"Braun","year":"2022"},{"key":"B33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa","article-title":"Using thematic analysis in psychology","volume":"3","author":"Braun","year":"2006","journal-title":"Qual Res Psychol"},{"key":"B34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jadohealth.2011.01.005","article-title":"Who decides? Decision making and fertility preservation in teens with cancer: a review of the literature","volume":"49","author":"Quinn","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Adolesc Health"},{"key":"B35","author":"Bach","year":"2024"},{"key":"B36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1186\/s12910-015-0067-z","article-title":"Informed consent instead of assent is appropriate in children from the age of twelve: policy implications of new findings on children\u2019s competence to consent to clinical research","volume":"16","author":"Hein","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Med Ethics"},{"key":"B37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e6","DOI":"10.1017\/pcm.2024.3","article-title":"Ethical frameworks of informed consent in the age of pediatric precision medicine","volume":"2","author":"Chen","year":"2024","journal-title":"Camb Prism Precis Med"},{"key":"B38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5828","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers15245828","article-title":"Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient experiences in fertility preservation: a systematic review of the literature on adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer","volume":"15","author":"Klijn","year":"2023","journal-title":"Cancers (Basel)"},{"key":"B39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"725","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.23.01616","article-title":"Fertility preservation in adolescents and young adults with cancer: a case-based review","volume":"42","author":"Burns","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"key":"B40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpag.2016.04.005","article-title":"Fertility preservation after a cancer diagnosis: a systematic review of adolescents\u2019, parents\u2019, and Providers\u2019 perspectives, experiences, and preferences","volume":"29","author":"Taylor","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol"},{"key":"B41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e10463","DOI":"10.2196\/10463","article-title":"Fertility preservation in children and adolescents with cancer: pilot of a decision aid for parents of children and adolescents with cancer","volume":"1","author":"Allingham","year":"2018","journal-title":"JMIR Pediatr Parent"},{"key":"B42","author":"Hyder-Rahman","year":"2020"},{"key":"B43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"hoaa052","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoaa052","article-title":"ESHRE guideline: female fertility preservation","volume":"2020","author":"Anderson","year":"2020","journal-title":"Human Reproduction Open"},{"key":"B44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1147898","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2023.1147898","article-title":"Fertility preservation in pediatric healthcare: a review","volume":"14","author":"Chen","year":"2023","journal-title":"Front. Endocrinol"},{"key":"B45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1076","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2021-107702","article-title":"Fertility preservation for transgender children and young people in paediatric healthcare: a systematic review of ethical considerations","volume":"48","author":"Warton","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Med Ethics"},{"key":"B46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4393","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers15174393","article-title":"Fertility preservation in children and adolescents during oncological treatment-A review of healthcare system factors and attitudes of patients and their caregivers","volume":"15","author":"Paw\u0142owski","year":"2023","journal-title":"Cancers (Basel)"},{"key":"B47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.35108","article-title":"Fertility preservation before and after cancer treatment in children, adolescents, and young adults","volume":"130","author":"Yang","year":"2024","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"B48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"726","DOI":"10.1089\/jayao.2023.0191","article-title":"Determinants of decision regret regarding fertility preservation in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: a systematic review","volume":"13","author":"Kuntz","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol"},{"key":"B49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"459","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.10.026","article-title":"Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval","volume":"105","author":"Doyle","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1256","DOI":"10.3390\/children9081256","article-title":"Ovarian tissue cryopreservation in children and adolescents","volume":"9","author":"Arapaki","year":"2022","journal-title":"Children"},{"key":"B51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e96","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2024.07.335","article-title":"Reviewing the upper age limit for ovarian tissue cryopreservation in oncologic and non-oncologic populations","volume":"122","author":"Patel","year":"2024","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-025-01388-x","article-title":"Ovarian tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation: a two-decade single-center experience with 451 children and adolescents","volume":"23","author":"Emrich","year":"2025","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"key":"B53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2025.12.001","article-title":"Fertility preservation in patients with medical indications: a committee opinion","volume":"125","year":"2026","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"B54","year":"2021"},{"key":"B55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1111\/bioe.13347","article-title":"Are companies ethically justified in offering nonmedical egg freezing as an employee benefit?","volume":"39","author":"Espinosa-Herrera","year":"2025","journal-title":"Bioethics"},{"key":"B56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1080\/20502877.2023.2300233","article-title":"Women\u2019s reproductive choice and (elective) egg freezing: is an extension of the storage limit missing a bigger issue?","volume":"30","author":"Nakou","year":"2024","journal-title":"New Bioeth"},{"key":"B57","year":"2025"},{"key":"B58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1909","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deae163","article-title":"Survey on ART and IUI: legislation, regulation, funding, and registries in European countries-an update","volume":"39","author":"Calhaz-Jorge","year":"2024","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"B59","year":"2026"},{"key":"B60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11553-025-01278-5","article-title":"Finanzielle belastung durch fertilit\u00e4tserhaltende ma\u00dfnahmen \u2013 entlastet die kryo-richtlinie onkologische patient:innen?","author":"Strampfer","year":"2025","journal-title":"Pr\u00e4v Gesundheitsf"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Reproductive Health"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/frph.2026.1952541\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,8]],"date-time":"2026-09-08T05:34:08Z","timestamp":1788845648000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/frph.2026.1952541\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,8]]},"references-count":60,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/frph.2026.1952541"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/frph.2026.1952541","relation":{},"ISSN":["2673-3153"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2673-3153","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,8]]},"article-number":"1952541"}}