{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]],"date-time":"2026-05-26T07:02:06Z","timestamp":1779778926608,"version":"3.53.1"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]],"date-time":"2026-05-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1779753600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Transplant."],"abstract":"<jats:p>Deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) is an essential strategy to improve access to kidney replacement therapy in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where haemodialysis capacity remains insufficient and long-term peritoneal dialysis is under-utilised. In Sri Lanka, deceased donation has evolved from sporadic, centre-driven activity towards a more structured national programme with clearer policy direction, defined retrieval zones, and gradually standardised clinical workflows. However, safe expansion of DDKT requires more than policy development. It depends on practical investment in implementation systems, including protected transplant coordination roles, secure and reliable information platforms, and timely access to quality-assured immunobiology services. At present, consistent national execution is constrained by the incomplete availability of three key enabling components: (i) a real-time national transplant waitlist with accurate candidate status, (ii) an end-to-end organ offer and acceptance workflow that produces a permanent audit trail, and (iii) time-critical immunobiology capacity to support compatibility assessment for each deceased donor offer. In this context, zone-based coordination with standardised but largely manual allocation processes continues to function as a pragmatic transitional safety framework. Nevertheless, this model limits reproducibility, equity monitoring, and systematic programme learning. This Perspective summarises the current policy and operational environment, identifies predictable bottlenecks across the donation-to-transplant pathway, and proposes a staged systems roadmap that prioritises safety and auditability before automation. Key priorities include structured manual allocation processes with mandatory documentation and key performance indicator (KPI) reporting, development of a minimum viable national registry with a secure offer workflow, and phased strengthening of immunobiology services to enable gradually automated and quality-assured national allocation. The Sri Lankan experience offers practical and potentially transferable lessons for LMIC transplant programmes seeking to scale deceased donor transplantation while maintaining patient safety, equity, and public trust.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3389\/frtra.2026.1811682","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]],"date-time":"2026-05-26T06:02:33Z","timestamp":1779775353000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The evolving deceased donor kidney transplantation programme in Sri Lanka: current landscape, constraints, and next steps"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"5","author":[{"given":"Anura","family":"Hewageegana","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Nephrology, National Hospital of Sri Lanka","place":["Colombo, Sri Lanka"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1725","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199912023412303","article-title":"Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant","volume":"341","author":"Wolfe","year":"1999","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2093","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-6143.2011.03686.x","article-title":"Systematic review: kidney transplantation compared with dialysis in clinically relevant outcomes","volume":"11","author":"Tonelli","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Transplant"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1377","DOI":"10.1097\/00007890-200211270-00005","article-title":"Waiting time on dialysis as the strongest modifiable risk factor for renal transplant outcomes","volume":"74","author":"Meier-Kriesche","year":"2002","journal-title":"Transplantation"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S11","DOI":"10.1097\/TP.0000000000003136","article-title":"KDIGO clinical practice guideline on the evaluation and management of candidates for kidney transplantation","volume":"104","author":"Chadban","year":"2020","journal-title":"Transplantation"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1975","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61601-9","article-title":"Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review","volume":"385","author":"Liyanage","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1093\/ckj\/sfx149","article-title":"The ERA-EDTA registry annual report: a summary","volume":"11","author":"Kramer","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Kidney J"},{"key":"B7","year":""},{"key":"B8","year":""},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1111\/ajt.15616","article-title":"Evaluation of kidney allocation critical data validity in the OPTN registry using dialysis dates","volume":"20","author":"Tsapepas","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Transplant"},{"key":"B10","year":""},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1414","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)61486-4","article-title":"A call for government accountability to achieve national self-sufficiency in organ donation and transplantation","volume":"378","author":"Delmonico","year":"2011","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151274","DOI":"10.1016\/j.semnephrol.2022.09.002","article-title":"Kidney organ allocation system: how to be fair","volume":"42","author":"Yeung","year":"2022","journal-title":"Semin Nephrol"},{"key":"B13","first-page":"1606","article-title":"Sensitization in transplantation: assessment of risk and approaches to management","volume":"30","author":"Stegall","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin Transplant"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1097\/TP.0b013e31827a19cc","article-title":"Consensus guidelines on the testing and clinical management issues associated with HLA and non-HLA antibodies in transplantation","volume":"95","author":"Tait","year":"2013","journal-title":"Transplantation"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1111\/iji.12558","article-title":"BSHI\/BTS guidance on crossmatching before deceased donor kidney transplantation","volume":"49","author":"Peacock","year":"2022","journal-title":"Int J Immunogenet"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ekir.2022.03.006","article-title":"Principles of virtual crossmatch testing for kidney transplantation","volume":"7","author":"Bhaskaran","year":"2022","journal-title":"Kidney Int Rep"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajt.2022.11.013","article-title":"Clinical recommendations for posttransplant assessment of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies: a sensitization in transplantation: assessment of risk (STAR) consensus document","volume":"23","author":"Lefaucheur","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Transplant"},{"key":"B18","year":""},{"key":"B19","year":""},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S7","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-1755.2005.09402.x","article-title":"Matching and allocation in kidney transplantation: lessons from eurotransplant","volume":"94","author":"Persijn","year":"2005","journal-title":"Kidney Int Suppl"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1353\/hcr.0.0136","article-title":"Conversations with kidney vendors in Pakistan: an ethnographic study","volume":"39","author":"Moazam","year":"2009","journal-title":"Hastings Cent Rep"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1880","DOI":"10.2215\/CJN.00030115","article-title":"How should we use kidney paired donation to increase transplantation?","volume":"10","author":"Reese","year":"2015","journal-title":"Clin J Am Soc Nephrol"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Transplantation"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/frtra.2026.1811682\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]],"date-time":"2026-05-26T06:02:34Z","timestamp":1779775354000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/frtra.2026.1811682\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]]},"references-count":22,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/frtra.2026.1811682"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/frtra.2026.1811682","relation":{},"ISSN":["2813-2440"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2813-2440","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]]},"article-number":"1811682"}}