{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,9]],"date-time":"2026-04-09T15:06:35Z","timestamp":1775747195287,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,27]],"date-time":"2022-09-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1664236800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100009601","name":"Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["PX2020001"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["PX2020001"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100009601","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002799","name":"Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["Y2018-3"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["Y2018-3"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002799","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100009592","name":"Beijing Municipal Science \/ Technology Commission","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["D171100006517003"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["D171100006517003"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100009592","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Surg."],"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To investigate the safety, efficacy, and selection strategy of laparoscopic local gastrectomy for stromal tumors in the esophagogastric junction.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>Thirty-eight patients with mesenchymal tumors in the esophagogastric junction were retrospectively enrolled from April 2018 to July 2021 in which the upper edge of the tumor is less than 2\u2005cm from the Z-line or has invaded the Z-line &amp;lt;1\/2 circumference. Surgical outcomes, complications, recover, and postoperative gastroesophageal reflux of both groups were compared.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>27 patients underwent wedge resection, and 11 underwent resection by opening all of the layers of the stomach wall. Operative time (90.0 vs. 181.8\u2005min, respectively, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.001) was shorter for the WR group vs. RASW. Blood loss (20 vs. 50\u2005ml, respectively, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.012) was less for the WR group vs. RASW. Recovery of the RASW group was slower in terms of time to pass gas (2 vs. 3 days, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.034), time to oral intake (2 vs. 4 days, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.007), time to semi-liquid food intake (4 vs. 8 days, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.003), and postoperative hospitalization (5 vs. 8 days, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.001) vs. WR. In terms of short-term complications (\u226430 days), no significant between-group differences were observed. Cardia stenosis did not occur in either group. In the WR group, one patient experienced mild reflux at 6 months and recovered 1 year after surgery. In the RASW group, one patient experienced severe gastroesophageal reflux at 6 months and 1 year after surgery, which was not entirely relieved by taking antacids. No other patients have gastroesophageal reflux.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Laparoscopic local gastrectomy is safe and feasible for mesenchymal tumors in the esophagogastric junction in which the upper edge of the tumor is less than 2\u2005cm from the Z-line or has invaded the Z-line &amp;lt;1\/2 circumference, and has achieved an excellent short-term effect. The choice of surgery is based on the relationship between the tumor and the position of the cardia.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2022.1015126","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,27]],"date-time":"2022-09-27T06:07:45Z","timestamp":1664258865000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Safety, efficacy, and selection strategy of laparoscopic local gastrectomy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the esophagogastric junction"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Haiqiao","family":"Zhang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Xiaoye","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Zhi","family":"Zheng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jie","family":"Yin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jun","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69412","DOI":"10.18632\/oncotarget.5136","article-title":"Imatinib dose escalation versus sunitinib as a second line treatment in KIT exon 11 mutated GISTs: a retrospective analysis","volume":"7","author":"Vincenzi","year":"2016","journal-title":"Oncotarget"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1950","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2019.05.002","article-title":"Resection of GIST in the duodenum and proximal jejunum: a retrospective analysis of outcomes","volume":"45","author":"Huang","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"849","DOI":"10.12659\/AJCR.909798","article-title":"Successful laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in emergency for a gastric gastrointestinal stomal tumor (GIST) with acute bleeding: a case report","volume":"19","author":"Chetta","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Case Rep"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.5230\/jgc.2013.13.1.3","article-title":"Surgical treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor","volume":"13","author":"Kong","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Gastric Cancer"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2339","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-012-2186-7","article-title":"Laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is safe and effective, irrespective of tumor size","volume":"26","author":"De Vogelaere","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1089\/lps.1992.2.331","article-title":"Laparoscopic resection of benign stromal tumor of the stomach","volume":"2","author":"Lukaszczyk","year":"1992","journal-title":"J Laparoendosc Surg"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2271","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-016-5229-7","article-title":"Laparoscopic wedge resection for suspected large (>\/=5cm) gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors","volume":"31","author":"Khoo","year":"2017","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"905","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2015.04.001","article-title":"Outcome after laparoscopic versus open wedge resection for suspected gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a matched-pair case-control study","volume":"41","author":"Goh","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-007-9493-4","article-title":"Laparoscopic approaches to resection of suspected gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on tumor location","volume":"22","author":"Privette","year":"2008","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1177\/1553350606295960","article-title":"Laparoscopic resection of clinically suspected gastric stromal tumors","volume":"13","author":"Berindoague","year":"2006","journal-title":"Surg Innov"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"831","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001488","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: what is the impact on postoperative outcome and oncologic results?","volume":"262","author":"Piessen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1258","DOI":"10.3760\/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2016.11.012","article-title":"Current status of surgical treatment of gastric gastrointestinal tumors: a national multi-center\u00a0retrospective study","volume":"19","author":"Feng","year":"2016","journal-title":"Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"476","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0043-104526","article-title":"Laparoscopic and luminal endoscopic cooperative surgery can be a standard treatment for submucosal tumors of the stomach: a retrospective multicenter study","volume":"49","author":"Matsuda","year":"2017","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1002\/ags3.12365","article-title":"Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: a review","volume":"4","author":"Nunobe","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ann Gastroenterol Surg"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"983","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-017-5776-6","article-title":"Laparoscopic resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors in esophagogastric junction (EGJ): how to protect the EGJ","volume":"32","author":"Xiong","year":"2018","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"854","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v27.i9.854","article-title":"Surgical resection of esophagogastric junction stromal tumor: how to protect the cardiac function","volume":"27","author":"Zheng","year":"2021","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae","article-title":"Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey","volume":"240","author":"Dindo","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1111\/nyas.13168","article-title":"Normal and abnormal physiology, pharmacology, and anatomy of the gastroesophageal junction high-pressure zone","volume":"1380","author":"Miller","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann N Y Acad Sci"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1186\/s12876-017-0693-7","article-title":"Gastroesophageal flap valve reflected EGJ morphology and correlated to acid reflux","volume":"17","author":"Xie","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Gastroenterol"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5085(79)80124-9","article-title":"Muscular equivalent of the lower esophageal sphincter","volume":"76","author":"Liebermann-Meffert","year":"1979","journal-title":"Gastroenterology"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13188","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-017-13342-y","article-title":"Three-dimensional myoarchitecture of the lower esophageal sphincter and esophageal hiatus using optical sectioning microscopy","volume":"7","author":"Zifan","year":"2017","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1007\/s00276-007-0276-3","article-title":"Does an anatomical sphincter exist in the distal esophagus?","volume":"30","author":"Apaydin","year":"2008","journal-title":"Surg Radiol Anat"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"952","DOI":"10.1177\/000313481708300931","article-title":"Age and achalasia: how does age affect patient presentation, hospital course, and surgical outcomes?","volume":"83","author":"Downs","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am Surg"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1440-1746.2003.03307.x","article-title":"Responses of human clasp and sling fibers to neuromimetics","volume":"19","author":"Tian","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Gastroenterol Hepatol"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"708","DOI":"10.1007\/s00595-012-0121-0","article-title":"Safe laparoscopic resection of a gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor close to the esophagogastric junction","volume":"42","author":"Sakamoto","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surg Today"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"553","DOI":"10.1007\/s10120-016-0641-1","article-title":"Nonexposure laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (closed laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery) for gastric submucosal tumor","volume":"20","author":"Kikuchi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Gastric Cancer"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"843","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-016-5042-3","article-title":"Safety analysis of laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for selected gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a propensity score-matched study","volume":"31","author":"Balde","year":"2017","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Surgery"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fsurg.2022.1015126\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,27]],"date-time":"2022-09-27T06:07:51Z","timestamp":1664258871000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fsurg.2022.1015126\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,27]]},"references-count":27,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fsurg.2022.1015126"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fsurg.2022.1015126","relation":{},"ISSN":["2296-875X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2296-875X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,27]]},"article-number":"1015126"}}