{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,12]],"date-time":"2026-09-12T06:36:38Z","timestamp":1789194998203,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,12]],"date-time":"2022-10-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1665532800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Surg."],"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title><jats:p>Cauda Equina syndrome (CES) is a potentially devastating condition and is treated usually with urgent open surgical decompression of the spinal canal. Currently, the role of minimally invasive discectomy (MID) as an alternative surgical technique for CES is unclear.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes following MID and open laminectomy and discectomy for the treatment of CES.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>The study cohort included patients that underwent surgery due to CES at our institute. Patients' outcomes included: surgical complications, length of hospitalization, postoperative lower extremity motor score (LEMS), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for leg and back pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the EQ-5D health-related quality of life questionnaire.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Twelve patients underwent MID and 12 underwent open laminectomy and discectomy. Complications and revisions rates were comparable between the groups. Postoperative urine incontinence and saddle dysesthesia improved in 50% of patients in both groups. LEMS improved from 47.08\u2009\u00b1\u20095.4 to 49.27\u2009\u00b1\u20090.9 in the MID group and from 44.46\u2009\u00b1\u20095.9 to 49.0\u2009\u00b1\u20091.4 in the open group. Although, leg pain improved in both groups from 8.4\u2009\u00b1\u20092.4 to 3\u2009\u00b1\u20092.1 in the MID and from 8.44\u2009\u00b1\u20093.3 to 3.88\u2009\u00b1\u20093 in the open group, significant improvement in back pain was found only in the MID group. Final functional scores were similar between groups.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>Our preliminary results suggest that minimally invasive discectomy is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of CES when compared to open laminectomy and discectomy. However, MID in these cases should only be considered by surgeons experienced in minimally invasive spine surgery. Further studies with bigger sample sizes and long-term follow-ups are needed.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2022.1031919","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,12]],"date-time":"2022-10-12T06:21:58Z","timestamp":1665555718000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Minimally invasive discectomy versus open laminectomy and discectomy for the treatment of cauda equina syndrome: A preliminary study and case series"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Morsi","family":"Khashan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dror","family":"Ofir","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alon","family":"Grundshtein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Boris","family":"Kuzmenko","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Khalil","family":"Salame","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dana","family":"Niry","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Uri","family":"Hochberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zvi","family":"Lidar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gilad J.","family":"Regev","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rboe.2017.11.006","article-title":"Epidemiology of cauda equina syndrome. What changed until 2015","volume":"53","author":"Dias","year":"2018","journal-title":"Rev Bras Ortop"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198668030-00011","article-title":"Cauda equina syndrome and lumbar disc herniation","volume":"68","author":"Kostuik","year":"1986","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1515","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200006150-00010","article-title":"Cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis of surgical outcomes","volume":"25","author":"Ahn","year":"2000","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E1005","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002605","article-title":"Outcomes reported after surgery for cauda equina syndrome: a systematic literature review","volume":"43","author":"Srikandarajah","year":"2018","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1007\/s40615-017-0369-6","article-title":"Outcomes following surgical management of cauda equina syndrome: does race matter?","volume":"5","author":"Jain","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Racial Ethn Health Disparities"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1435","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.04.023","article-title":"Early intervention in cauda equina syndrome associated with better outcomes: a myth or reality? Insights from the nationwide inpatient sample database (2005\u20132011)","volume":"17","author":"Thakur","year":"2017","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"222","DOI":"10.5606\/tftrd.2019.3169","article-title":"Urgent operation improves weakness in cauda equina syndrome due to lumbar disc herniation","volume":"65","author":"Uckun","year":"2019","journal-title":"Turk J Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1080\/0268869021000032887","article-title":"Cauda equina syndrome: what is the relationship between timing of surgery and outcome?","volume":"16","author":"Gleave","year":"2002","journal-title":"Br J Neurosurg"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e31817baad8","article-title":"Cauda equina syndrome (CES) from lumbar disc herniations","volume":"22","author":"Olivero","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e5","DOI":"10.3171\/foc.1999.7.6.6","article-title":"Microendoscopic approach to far-lateral lumbar disc herniation","volume":"7","author":"Foley","year":"1999","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E7","DOI":"10.3171\/2017.5.FOCUS17202","article-title":"Tubular microdiscectomy: techniques, complication avoidance, and review of the literature","volume":"43","author":"Clark","year":"2017","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.4.SPINE13420","article-title":"Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article","volume":"21","author":"Mobbs","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-1022542","article-title":"Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the \u201cclassic\u201d open approach","volume":"51","author":"Rahman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Neurosurg"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"756","DOI":"10.1016\/0003-9993(94)90131-7","article-title":"Prediction of ambulatory performance based on motor scores derived from standards of the American spinal injury association","volume":"75","author":"Waters","year":"1994","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S146","DOI":"10.1097\/00006123-200211002-00020","article-title":"Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis","volume":"51","author":"Khoo","year":"2002","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3171\/2019.12.SPINE19839","article-title":"What is the incidence of cauda equina syndrome? A systematic review","author":"Hoeritzauer","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1887","DOI":"10.1007\/s00701-019-03973-7","article-title":"An assessment of patient-reported long-term outcomes following surgery for cauda equina syndrome","volume":"161","author":"Hazelwood","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Neurochir"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"894","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-017-4943-8","article-title":"Cauda Equina syndrome: presentation, outcome, and predictors with focus on micturition, defecation, and sexual dysfunction","volume":"26","author":"Korse","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.3109\/17453674.2010.483985","article-title":"Clinical classification of cauda equina syndrome for proper treatment","volume":"81","author":"Shi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.2152\/jmi.62.100","article-title":"Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for a huge herniated disc causing acute cauda equina syndrome: a case report","volume":"62","author":"Jha","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Med Invest"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1007\/s13760-015-0530-0","article-title":"Treatment of cauda equina\u00a0syndrome caused by lumbar disc herniation with percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy","volume":"116","author":"Li","year":"2016","journal-title":"Acta Neurol Belg"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1219","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2011.01.018","article-title":"Minimally invasive discectomy for the treatment of disc herniation causing cauda equina syndrome","volume":"18","author":"Shih","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"471","DOI":"10.3171\/2009.5.SPINE08633","article-title":"Surgical site infection rates after minimally invasive spinal surgery","volume":"11","author":"O\u2019Toole","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"771","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.1.SPINE10571","article-title":"Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior\/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients","volume":"14","author":"McGirt","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1711","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-014-3495-z","article-title":"Complications associated with the initial learning curve of minimally invasive spine surgery: a systematic review","volume":"472","author":"Sclafani","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000251750.20508.84","article-title":"Cauda equina syndrome: factors affecting long-term functional and sphincteric outcome","volume":"32","author":"McCarthy","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Surgery"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fsurg.2022.1031919\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,12]],"date-time":"2022-10-12T06:21:59Z","timestamp":1665555719000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fsurg.2022.1031919\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,12]]},"references-count":26,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fsurg.2022.1031919"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fsurg.2022.1031919","relation":{},"ISSN":["2296-875X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2296-875X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,12]]},"article-number":"1031919"}}