{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,29]],"date-time":"2026-01-29T21:49:40Z","timestamp":1769723380562,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,6]],"date-time":"2023-01-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672963200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Surg."],"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To compare the differences in the correction effect for lumbosacral lordosis and clinical outcomes between OLIF with\/without posterior pedicle screw fixation (PSF) and MIS-TLIF through a retrospective cohort study.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Method<\/jats:title><jats:p>There were 98 consecutive patients originally enrolled for the study, but 15 patients were excluded due to intraoperative endplate injury or osteotomy performed for severe spinal deformity. Thus, 83 patients included in this study (36 males and 47 females, mean age 66.0\u2009\u00b1\u200910.8 years) underwent single to three-segment OLIF (including OLIF\u2009+\u2009PSF and OLIF Standalone) or MIS-TLIF surgery from 2016 to 2018. The operation time, bleeding and blood transfusion, fusion rate, complication, pre-and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were evaluated. In addition, radiological parameters including lumbosacral lordosis (LL), fused segment lordosis (FSL), anterior disc height (ADH) and posterior disc height (PDH) were measured. The clinical outcomes, LL, FSL, ADH and PDH restored and were compared between the OLIF group, OLIF subgroup<jats:ext-link>s<\/jats:ext-link> and MIS-TLIF group.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The average operation time and intraoperative bleeding were significantly less in the OLIF group than in the MIS-TLIF group (189\u2005\u00b1\u200583 vs. 229\u2005\u00b1\u200580 min, 113\u2005\u00b1\u2005138 vs. 421\u2005\u00b1\u2005210 ml), <jats:italic>P\u2009<\/jats:italic>&amp;lt;\u20090.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the OLIF group and the MIS-TLIF group in VAS and ODI improvements, fusion rate, complication, LL and FSL correction (<jats:italic>P\u2009<\/jats:italic>&amp;gt;\u20090.05). The ADH and PDH increases in the OLIF group were more than that in MIS-TLIF group (<jats:italic>P\u2009<\/jats:italic>&amp;lt;\u20090.001). The correction of LL was significantly more in the OLIF+PSF group than in the MIS-TLIF group (10.6\u2005\u00b1\u20058.7 vs. 4.0\u2005\u00b1\u20056.1 deg, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2005=\u20050.005).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>OLIF and MIS-TLIF are both safe and effective procedures, capable of restoring lumbosacral lordosis and disc height partly. Combined with PSF, OLIF can achieve a better correction effect of lumbosacral lordosis than MIS-TLIF.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2022.1063354","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,6]],"date-time":"2023-01-06T06:07:03Z","timestamp":1672985223000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Can oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) create more lumbosacral lordosis in lumbar spine surgery than minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF)?"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Jie","family":"Li","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yilei","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hao","family":"Wu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kaifeng","family":"Gan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dikai","family":"Bei","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tengdi","family":"Fan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jian","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Fengdong","family":"Zhao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Binhui","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2560","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-015-3933-y","article-title":"Clinical outcomes and sagittal alignment of single-level unilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a 4 to 5-year follow-up","volume":"24","author":"Liang","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1051","DOI":"10.3349\/ymj.2015.56.4.1051","article-title":"Mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar spinal degeneration disease","volume":"56","author":"Seiji","year":"2015","journal-title":"Yonsei Med J"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e31828a8447","article-title":"Sagittal alignment after lumbar interbody fusion: comparing anterior, lateral, and transforaminal approaches","volume":"27","author":"Th","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"785","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.7.SPINE13564","article-title":"Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs in the lateral position: an anatomic study","volume":"21","author":"Davis","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"545","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.10.026","article-title":"Technical description of oblique lateral interbody fusion at L1-L5 (OLIF25) and at L5-S1 (OLIF51) and evaluation of complication and fusion rates","volume":"17","author":"Woods","year":"2017","journal-title":"Spine J Official J North Am Spine Soc"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1478","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002139","article-title":"Complications associated with lateral interbody fusion: nationwide survey of 2998 cases during the first 2 years of its use in Japan","volume":"42","author":"Fujibayashi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568217712494","article-title":"Lumbar interbody fusions for degenerative spondylolisthesis: review of techniques, indications, and outcomes","year":"","journal-title":"Global Spine J"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S302","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182023438","article-title":"Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion","volume":"35","author":"Youssef","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"993","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.12.006","article-title":"Comparing the medium-term outcomes of lumbar interbody fusion via transforaminal and oblique approach in treating lumbar degenerative disc diseases","volume":"22","author":"Zhao","year":"2022","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"992","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jos.2020.10.013","article-title":"Clinical and radiologic comparison of anterior-posterior single-position lateral surgery versus MIS-TLIF for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"26","author":"Kotani","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Orthop Sci"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E233","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004303","article-title":"Comparison of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) for treatment of lumbar degeneration disease:a prospective cohort study","volume":"47","author":"Zhu","year":"2022","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.08.003","article-title":"Clinical and radiologic outcomes of direct versus indirect decompression with lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison analysis","author":"Lin","year":"2018","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"671","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-015-4170-0","article-title":"Radiographic evaluation of indirect decompression of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerated lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"26","author":"Sato","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/CORR.0000000000001915","article-title":"Poor bone quality, multilevel surgery, and narrow and tall cages are associated with intraoperative endplate injuries and late-onset cage subsidence in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review","author":"Wu","year":"2022","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2049","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.07.006","article-title":"Long-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive versus open single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis","volume":"21","author":"Heemskerk","year":"2021","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"755","DOI":"10.1007\/s10143-016-0806-8","article-title":"Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"41","author":"Keorochana","year":"2018","journal-title":"Neurosurg Rev"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.31616\/asj.2019.0342","article-title":"Comparison of outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion with percutaneous posterior fixation in lateral position and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis","volume":"15","author":"Koike","year":"2021","journal-title":"Asian Spine J"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"802","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-021-04687-7","article-title":"Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis","volume":"22","author":"Zhang","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"682","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000155425.04536.f7","article-title":"Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis","volume":"30","author":"Glassman","year":"2005","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.3978\/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05","article-title":"Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF\/ATP, LLIF and ALIF","volume":"1","author":"Mobbs","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Spine Surg"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.3171\/SPI-07\/10\/379","article-title":"Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance","volume":"7","author":"Hsieh","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E4","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.7.FOCUS15278","article-title":"Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature","volume":"39","author":"Joseph","year":"","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"418","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2020.10.016","article-title":"Inclusion of L5-S1 in oblique lumbar interbody fusion - techniques and early complications - A single center experience","volume":"21","author":"Caba","year":"2021","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-020-06667-2","article-title":"Importance of the epiphyseal ring in OLIF stand-alone surgery: a biomechanical study on cadaveric spines","volume":"30","author":"Zhang","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e898","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.08.003","article-title":"Clinical and radiologic outcomes of direct versusIndirect decompression with lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison analysis","volume":"119","author":"Lin","year":"2018","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Surgery"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fsurg.2022.1063354\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,28]],"date-time":"2023-04-28T16:53:54Z","timestamp":1682700834000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fsurg.2022.1063354\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,6]]},"references-count":25,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fsurg.2022.1063354"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fsurg.2022.1063354","relation":{},"ISSN":["2296-875X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2296-875X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,6]]},"article-number":"1063354"}}