{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,10]],"date-time":"2026-07-10T14:19:05Z","timestamp":1783693145087,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,21]],"date-time":"2022-09-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1663718400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Surg."],"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title><jats:p>The anterior approach to the cervical spine is the most commonly used surgery with effective decompression and less surgical trauma. Anterior plate construct (APC) is considered a standard technique. However, it appears to cause implant failure and postoperative dysphagia. Due to these reasons, locking stand-alone cages (LSCs) without the addition of an anterior plate have been developed and gained popularity in the past decade. In theory, an LSC could provide immediate load-bearing support to the anterior column of the cervical spine and may enhance the rate of arthrodesis. However, screw skiving and backing off are known complications of LSC. Given the characteristic shape of cervical discs, we wondered whether there may be a role for a shape-conforming cage without screws and plates to achieve desired outcomes, i.e., a true stand-alone cage (TSC). A single surgeon cohort using the cage in a heterogenic set of indications was evaluated.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>A total of 45 patients with degenerative cervical conditions who underwent surgery using TSC using CoRoent Small Contoured peek cage (Nuvasive, San Diego, CA) and Orthoblend\u2122 (Medtronics, Memphis, TN) were retrospectively reviewed. Comparisons between preoperative and postoperative Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the modified AAOS-Modems disability outcome, Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores, and Short Form 36 were evaluated. Operative time, the occurrence rate of fusion, lordosis change of cervical spine, and occurrence rate of complications were evaluated.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>There were one-level (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u200915), two-level (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u200924), and three-level (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20096) cases making a total of 81 cages implanted and studied. The mean operative time was 132.7\u2005min. The group demonstrated significant improvements in NRS, AAOS-Modems disability outcome, and NDI scores after surgery (mean follow-up 12 months). The cervical lordosis at pre- and last follow-up period was 8.7\u2009\u00b1\u20092.2\u00b0 and 8.3\u2009\u00b1\u20093.2\u00b0, respectively. The complication rate was 21.2%.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>TSC yielded satisfactory long-term clinical and radiological outcomes; this preliminary report can form the basis of a cost\u2013benefit analysis study either prospectively or by way of meta-modeling comparing APC, LSC to TSC.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2022.934018","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,21]],"date-time":"2022-09-21T04:22:25Z","timestamp":1663734145000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Stand-alone anterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery: A cohort study evaluating a shaped cage without plates or screws"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Xiaolong","family":"Chen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alisha","family":"Sial","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Charmian","family":"Stewart","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jose","family":"Vargas Castillo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ashish D.","family":"Diwan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.14245\/kjs.2016.13.1.13","article-title":"Stand-alone cages for anterior cervical fusion: are there no problems?","volume":"13","author":"Han","year":"2016","journal-title":"Korean J Spine"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.3171\/2009.3.SPINE08728","article-title":"Cervical surgical techniques for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy","volume":"11","author":"Mummaneni","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ocl.2009.12.010","article-title":"Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a review of the evidence","volume":"41","author":"Klineberg","year":"2010","journal-title":"Orthop Clin North Am"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2886","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181b64f2c","article-title":"The efficacy of plate construct augmentation versus cage alone in anterior cervical fusion","volume":"34","author":"Song","year":"2009","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"607","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-195840030-00009","article-title":"The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion","author":"Smith","year":"1958","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318198ce10","article-title":"Implant complications, fusion, loss of lordosis, and outcome after anterior cervical plating with dynamic or rigid plates: two-year results of a multi-centric, randomized, controlled Study","volume":"34","author":"Pitzen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E259","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002323","article-title":"A randomized trial comparing clinical outcomes between zero-profile and traditional multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery for cervical myelopathy","volume":"43","author":"He","year":"2018","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1881","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4500-x","article-title":"Comparison of a zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with an anterior plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy","volume":"25","author":"Liu","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.06.088","article-title":"Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct","volume":"14","author":"Stein","year":"2014","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-014-3628-9","article-title":"The application of zero-profile anchored spacer in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"24","author":"Wang","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2734","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-020-06561-x","article-title":"Locking stand-alone cage versus anterior plate construct in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials","volume":"29","author":"Zhao","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568220906173","article-title":"Degenerative cervical disorder-stand-alone cage versus cage and cervical plate: a systematic review","volume":"11","author":"Boer","year":"2021","journal-title":"Global Spine J"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2255","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4391-x","article-title":"A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with ACDF using cage and plate in the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up","volume":"25","author":"Chen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E563","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000864","article-title":"Does a zero-profile anchored cage offer additional stabilization as anterior cervical plate?","volume":"40","author":"Lee","year":"2015","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.3171\/2013.4.SPINE12838","article-title":"Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review","volume":"19","author":"Scheer","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1343","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-014-2047-z","article-title":"Risk factors for subsidence in anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages: a review of 82 cases and 182 levels","volume":"134","author":"Kao","year":"2014","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"630","DOI":"10.31616\/asj.2018.0234","article-title":"Locking stand-alone cage constructs for the treatment of cervical spine degenerative disease","volume":"13","author":"De Leo-Vargas","year":"2019","journal-title":"Asian Spine J"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-003-0539-6","article-title":"Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning","volume":"12","author":"Gercek","year":"2003","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1147","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-012-2620-5","article-title":"Dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective study comparing two anterior surgical approaches","volume":"22","author":"Fengbin","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39127.608299.80","article-title":"Cervical spondylosis and neck pain","volume":"334","author":"Binder","year":"2007","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1007\/s12178-007-9017-9","article-title":"When should a cervical collar be used to treat neck pain?","volume":"1","author":"Muzin","year":"2008","journal-title":"Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e31824c7d22","article-title":"Stand-alone cervical cages versus anterior cervical plate in 2-level cervical anterior interbody fusion patients: clinical outcomes and radiologic changes","volume":"26","author":"Oh","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Surgery"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fsurg.2022.934018\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,21]],"date-time":"2022-09-21T04:22:28Z","timestamp":1663734148000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fsurg.2022.934018\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,21]]},"references-count":22,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fsurg.2022.934018"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fsurg.2022.934018","relation":{},"ISSN":["2296-875X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2296-875X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,21]]},"article-number":"934018"}}