{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,6]],"date-time":"2026-11-06T16:11:17Z","timestamp":1793981477390,"version":"4.8.0"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,16]],"date-time":"2023-02-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1676505600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Surg."],"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title><jats:p>Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES), as a new star of minimally invasive techniques, has been increasingly favored and promoted in the field of surgery around the world. Most previous studies were comparative studies of laparoscopic NOSES and conventional laparoscopic surgery. However, there is little research on comparing robotic colorectal cancer NOSES with conventional robotic-assisted colorectal cancer resection surgery.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Participant and methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>This study is a retrospective study of propensity score matching (PSM). This study included Ninety-one propensity score-matched pairs of the participant who had undergone robotic colorectal cancer resection surgery at our center between January 2017 and December 2020. The covariates used in the propensity score included gender, age, BMI, ASA score, maximum tumor diameter, the tumor's height from the anal verge, histological differentiation, AJCC stage, T stage, N stage, and history of previous abdominal surgery. The outcome measurement criteria included postoperative complications, inflammatory response, pelvic floor function, anal function, cosmetic outcome, quality of life, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The robotic NOSES group had faster recovery time from gastrointestinal function (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.014), shorter abdominal incision length (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&amp;lt;\u20090.001), less pain (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&amp;lt;\u20090.001), less additional analgesia required (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&amp;lt;\u20090.001), and lower postoperative indicators of white blood cell count (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&amp;lt;\u20090.001) and C-reactive protein content compared to the robotic-assisted resection surgery (RARS) group (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.035). Additionally, the robotic NOSES group had significantly better body imagery (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&amp;lt;\u20090.001), cosmetic scores (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&amp;lt;\u20090.001), somatic function (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.003), role function (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.039), emotional function (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.001), social function (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.004), and overall function (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&amp;lt;\u20090.001) than the RARS group. The two groups demonstrated no significant difference between DFS and OS.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Robotic colorectal cancer NOSES is a safe and feasible minimally invasive procedure and offers shorter abdominal incisions, less pain, less surgical stress response, and better postoperative quality of life. Therefore, this technique can be further promoted for colorectal cancer patients eligible for NOSES.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2023.1092128","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,16]],"date-time":"2023-02-16T12:35:51Z","timestamp":1676550951000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Comparison of transabdominal wall specimen retrieval and natural orifice specimen extraction robotic surgery in the outcome of colorectal cancer treatment"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Ju","family":"Houqiong","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wan","family":"Ziwen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zhong","family":"Chonghan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"He","family":"Penghui","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yu","family":"Hongxin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lu","family":"Weijie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Liu","family":"Dongning","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Li","family":"Taiyuan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21660","article-title":"Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries","volume":"71","author":"Sung","year":"2021","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1467","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(19)32319-0","article-title":"Colorectal cancer","volume":"394","author":"Dekker","year":"2019","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1324","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1414882","article-title":"A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer","volume":"372","author":"Bonjer","year":"2015","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaoncol.2022.4079","article-title":"Short-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted vs open surgery for patients with low rectal cancer: the LASRE randomized clinical trial","author":"Jiang","year":"2022","journal-title":"JAMA Oncol"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(08)70310-3","article-title":"Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial","volume":"10","author":"Buunen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"991","DOI":"10.1016\/S2468-1253(22)00248-5","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial","volume":"7","author":"Feng","year":"2022","journal-title":"Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1093\/bjs\/znaa067","article-title":"Urogenital function following robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: meta-analysis","volume":"108","author":"Fleming","year":"2021","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1034","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002523","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"267","author":"Prete","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers14010180","article-title":"Robotic-assisted vs. standard laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 19,731 patients","volume":"14","author":"Safiejko","year":"2021","journal-title":"Cancers"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1420","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-002-8837-3","article-title":"Wound complications of laparoscopic vs open colectomy","volume":"16","author":"Winslow","year":"2002","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"470","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2010.06.008","article-title":"Incisional hernia rates following laparoscopic colorectal resection","volume":"8","author":"Skipworth","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.scib.2022.05.014","article-title":"Short-term and oncological outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for colorectal cancer in China: a national database study\u00a0of 5055 patients","author":"Guan","year":"2022","journal-title":"Science Bulletin"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"651","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2021.05.028","article-title":"Natural orifice specimen extraction for colorectal cancer removal: the best of both worlds","volume":"94","author":"Thakkar","year":"2021","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"536","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.12885","article-title":"How do patients score cosmesis after laparoscopic natural orifice specimen extraction colectomy?","volume":"17","author":"Wolthuis","year":"2015","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001474","article-title":"Cosmesis and body image in patients undergoing single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial (SPOCC-trial)","volume":"262","author":"Lurje","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1097","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2011.08.007","article-title":"Patient-reported body image and cosmesis outcomes following kidney surgery: comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site, laparoscopic, and open surgery","volume":"60","author":"Park","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1492","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.076","article-title":"Responsiveness of the pelvic floor distress inventory (PFDI) and pelvic floor impact questionnaire (PFIQ) in women undergoing vaginal surgery and pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"194","author":"Barber","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"792","DOI":"10.1007\/s00266-016-0642-9","article-title":"Patient-reported outcome instruments for surgical and traumatic scars: a systematic review of their development, content, and psychometric validation","volume":"40","author":"Mundy","year":"2016","journal-title":"Aesthetic Plast Surg"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/85.5.365","article-title":"The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology","volume":"85","author":"Aaronson","year":"1993","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"811","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004054","article-title":"Management of fecal incontinence","volume":"136","author":"Brown","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.j5304","article-title":"The role of robotics in colorectal surgery","volume":"360","author":"Cheng","year":"2018","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1355","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2020.01355","article-title":"Safety and feasibility of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms during the initial learning curve","volume":"10","author":"Yao","year":"2020","journal-title":"Front Oncol"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.3760\/cma.j.cn.441530-20191017-00453","article-title":"Analysis of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery on 162 cases with rectal neoplasms","volume":"23","author":"Zhou","year":"2020","journal-title":"Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9818","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-89323-z","article-title":"Role of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms","volume":"11","author":"Yao","year":"2021","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6665","DOI":"10.26355\/eurrev_202209_29767","article-title":"Comparison of robotic-assisted resection alone and with natural orifice specimen extraction for rectal cancer by using Da vinci Xi","volume":"26","author":"Aslaner","year":"2022","journal-title":"Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-019-02058-y","article-title":"Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) surgery with rectal eversion and total extra-abdominal resection","volume":"23","author":"Efetov","year":"2019","journal-title":"Tech Coloproctol"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12848","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-020-69830-1","article-title":"Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of robotic assisted rectal cancer resection alone versus robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction: a matched analysis","volume":"10","author":"Liu","year":"2020","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1007\/s10585-018-9873-2","article-title":"Surgical stress response and promotion of metastasis in colorectal cancer: a complex and heterogeneous process","volume":"35","author":"Behrenbruch","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Exp Metastasis"},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1158\/0008-5472.CAN-12-1993","article-title":"Preventing postoperative metastatic disease by inhibiting surgery-induced dysfunction in natural killer cells","volume":"73","author":"Tai","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cancer Res"},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2019.10.031","article-title":"Reference values for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in early and metastatic breast cancer","volume":"125","author":"Mierzynska","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"key":"B31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1083","DOI":"10.1186\/s12885-021-08609-7","article-title":"Minimally important differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in prostate cancer clinical trials","volume":"21","author":"Gamper","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Cancer"},{"key":"B32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12981","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v20.i36.12981","article-title":"Laparoscopic natural orifice specimen extraction-colectomy: a systematic review","volume":"20","author":"Wolthuis","year":"2014","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"B33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1495","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-011-2066-6","article-title":"Prospective evaluation of peritoneal fluid contamination following transabdominal vs. transanal specimen extraction in laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections","volume":"26","author":"Costantino","year":"2012","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"B34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1093\/gastro\/goy055","article-title":"International consensus on natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for colorectal cancer","volume":"7","author":"Guan","year":"2019","journal-title":"Gastroenterol Rep"},{"key":"B35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-021-05077-z","article-title":"Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus traditional robotic-assisted surgery (NOTR) for patients with colorectal cancer: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial","volume":"22","author":"Luo","year":"2021","journal-title":"Trials"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Surgery"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fsurg.2023.1092128\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,16]],"date-time":"2023-02-16T12:35:56Z","timestamp":1676550956000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fsurg.2023.1092128\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,16]]},"references-count":35,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fsurg.2023.1092128"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fsurg.2023.1092128","relation":{},"ISSN":["2296-875X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2296-875X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,16]]},"article-number":"1092128"}}