{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T18:47:06Z","timestamp":1789757226944,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":66,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,7]],"date-time":"2024-11-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1730937600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Surg."],"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title><jats:p>Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) refers to a narrowing of the space within the spinal canal, which can occur at any level but is most common in the lumbar spine. Open laminectomy and minimally invasive laminectomy (MIL) procedures are the most common surgical gold standard techniques for treating LSS. This study aims to review clinical and biomechanical literature to draw comparisons between open laminectomy and various MIL techniques. The MIL variation comprises microendoscopic decompression laminotomy, unilateral partial hemilaminectomy, and microendoscopic laminectomy.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>A review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We reviewed 25 clinical, 6 finite element, and 3 cadaveric studies associated with treating LSS. We reviewed literature that discusses factors such as operation time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, reoperation rate, effect on elderly patients, patients\u2019 satisfaction, and adjacent segment disease degeneration for the clinical studies, whereas the range of motion (ROM), von Mises stresses, and stability was compared in biomechanical studies.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>MIL involves less bone and ligament removal, resulting in shorter hospital stays and lower reoperation and complication rates than open laminectomy. It improves the quality of health-related living standards and reduces postoperative pain. Biomechanical studies suggest that laminectomy and facetectomy increase annulus stress and ROM, leading to segmental instability.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Although theoretically, MIL means less tissue injury, pain, and faster recovery in the short term, the long-term results depend on the adequacy of the decompression procedure and tend to be independent of MIL or open laminectomy.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2024.1357897","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,7]],"date-time":"2024-11-07T06:11:24Z","timestamp":1730959884000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["Open laminectomy vs. minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a review"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Utpal K.","family":"Dhar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Emma Lilly","family":"Menzer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maohua","family":"Lin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Timothy","family":"O\u2019Connor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nischal","family":"Ghimire","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elias","family":"Dakwar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ioannis D.","family":"Papanastassiou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kamran","family":"Aghayev","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chi-Tay","family":"Tsai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Frank D.","family":"Vrionis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1227\/01.NEU.0000255332.87909.58","article-title":"Minimally invasive lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: outcomes of 50 patients aged 75 years and older","volume":"60","author":"Rosen","year":"2007","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"783","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joca.2013.02.656","article-title":"Associations between radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis and clinical symptoms in the general population: the Wakayama spine study","volume":"21","author":"Ishimoto","year":"2013","journal-title":"Osteoarthritis Cartilage"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2129","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-019-06261-1","article-title":"Clinical outcomes of lumbar spinal surgery in patients 80 years or older with lumbar stenosis or spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"29","author":"Liang","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B4","article-title":"Electrodiagnostic evaluation of spinal stenosis","volume-title":"StatPearls","author":"Patel","year":"2024"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1196\/annals.1395.015","article-title":"Lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients","volume":"1100","author":"Kaptan","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ann N Y Acad Sci"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.2005.3.2.0129","article-title":"Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy","volume":"3","author":"Thom\u00e9","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E2","DOI":"10.3171\/2019.2.FOCUS18651","article-title":"Long-term clinical outcomes after bilateral laminotomy or total laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-institution experience","volume":"46","author":"Pietrantonio","year":"2019","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e224","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2022.04.079","article-title":"Radiological analysis of minimally invasive microscopic laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis with a focus on multilevel stenosis and spondylolisthesis","volume":"164","author":"Awaya","year":"2022","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2010.10.043","article-title":"Reoperations after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"75","author":"Javalkar","year":"2011","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.4.SPINE13420","article-title":"Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article","volume":"21","author":"Mobbs","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1080\/10790268.2020.1762827","article-title":"Endoscopic modified total laminoplasty for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"45","author":"Du","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Spinal Cord Med"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.3390\/medicina58030384","article-title":"Microendoscopic lumbar posterior decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: literature review","volume":"58","author":"Suzuki","year":"2022","journal-title":"Medicina (Kaunas)"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"581","DOI":"10.3233\/BMR-200051","article-title":"Single-segment central lumbar spinal stenosis: correlation with lumbar x-ray measurements","volume":"34","author":"Yang","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e224291","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2022.4291","article-title":"Comparison of 3 different minimally invasive surgical techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"5","author":"Hermansen","year":"2022","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1310","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2019.04.009","article-title":"Supervised physical therapy vs. home exercise for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"19","author":"Minetama","year":"2019","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1262","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2020.11.145","article-title":"Minimally invasive versus open surgery for degenerative spine disorders for elderly patients: experiences from a single institution","volume":"146","author":"Yolcu","year":"2021","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1451","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000003573","article-title":"Outcomes of minimally invasive versus open surgery for intermediate to high-grade spondylolisthesis: a 10-year retrospective, multicenter experience","volume":"45","author":"Lak","year":"2020","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2006-947996","article-title":"Minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis in younger age patients could lead to higher stresses in the remaining neural arch\u2014a finite element investigation","volume":"50","author":"Ivanov","year":"2007","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Neurosurg"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"827","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568218775069","article-title":"Treatment of the fractional curve of adult scoliosis with circumferential minimally invasive surgery versus traditional, open surgery: an analysis of surgical outcomes","volume":"8","author":"Chou","year":"2018","journal-title":"Global Spine J"},{"key":"B20","first-page":"32","article-title":"Lumbar microlaminectomy vs traditional laminectomy","volume":"34","author":"Lundberg","year":"2017","journal-title":"Fed Pract"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1705","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.07.461","article-title":"Minimally invasive compared with open lumbar laminotomy: no functional benefits at 6 or 24 months after surgery","volume":"15","author":"Ang","year":"2015","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"h1603","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h1603","article-title":"Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study","volume":"350","author":"Nerland","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.09.039","article-title":"Minimally invasive versus open surgery for lumbar synovial cysts","volume":"108","author":"Vergara","year":"2017","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E11","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.5.FOCUS15129","article-title":"Comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for intradural-extramedullary spine tumors","volume":"39","author":"Wong","year":"2015","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.4103\/jnrp.jnrp_472_16","article-title":"Minimally invasive versus open spine surgery: what does the best evidence tell us?","volume":"8","author":"McClelland","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Neurosci Rural Pract"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2011.04.024","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of multilevel hemilaminectomy for lumbar stenosis-associated radiculopathy","volume":"11","author":"Parker","year":"2011","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1080\/02688697.2020.1777253","article-title":"Bilateral laminotomy through a unilateral approach (minimally invasive) versus open laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"35","author":"Horan","year":"2021","journal-title":"Br J Neurosurg"},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1360","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2011.02.022","article-title":"Complications of open compared to minimally invasive lumbar spine decompression","volume":"18","author":"Shih","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1737","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182a056c1","article-title":"Lumbar spinous process splitting decompression provides equivalent outcomes to conventional midline decompression in degenerative lumbar canal stenosis: a prospective, randomized controlled study of 51 patients","volume":"38","author":"Rajasekaran","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-1022542","article-title":"Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the \u201cclassic\u201d open approach","volume":"51","author":"Rahman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Neurosurg"},{"key":"B31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1016\/j.medengphy.2003.11.006","article-title":"Effects of laminectomy and facetectomy on the stability of the lumbar motion segment","volume":"26","author":"Lee","year":"2004","journal-title":"Med Eng Phys"},{"key":"B32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1753","DOI":"10.1080\/10255842.2014.953491","article-title":"Lamina replacement with titanium plate fixation improves spinal stability after total lumbar laminectomy","volume":"18","author":"Nong","year":"2015","journal-title":"Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin"},{"key":"B33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105011","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinbiomech.2020.105011","article-title":"Lumbar stability following graded unilateral and bilateral facetectomy: a finite element model study","volume":"75","author":"Ahuja","year":"2020","journal-title":"Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)"},{"key":"B34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E573","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181aa0214","article-title":"Biomechanical effects of laminoplasty versus laminectomy","volume":"34","author":"Subramaniam","year":"2009","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"B35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.3171\/2020.3.SPINE191239","article-title":"Open versus minimally invasive decompression for low-grade spondylolisthesis: analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database","volume":"33","author":"Bisson","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"B36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100045","DOI":"10.1016\/j.xnsj.2020.100045","article-title":"Biomechanical evaluation of a novel decompression surgery: transforaminal full-endoscopic lateral recess decompression (TE-LRD)","volume":"5","author":"Matsumoto","year":"2020","journal-title":"N Am Spine Soc J"},{"key":"B37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1785","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-013-2699-3","article-title":"Torsion biomechanics of the spine following lumbar laminectomy: a human cadaver study","volume":"22","author":"Bisschop","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"912","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinbiomech.2014.06.016","article-title":"Single level lumbar laminectomy alters segmental biomechanical behavior without affecting adjacent segments","volume":"29","author":"Bisschop","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Biomech"},{"key":"B39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2020.07.016","article-title":"Biomechanical effects of laminectomies in the human lumbar spine: a finite element study","volume":"21","author":"Spina","year":"2021","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"B40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1019510","DOI":"10.3389\/fbioe.2022.1019510","article-title":"Biomechanical effects of individualized artificial titanium alloy lamina implantation after laminectomy: a finite element analysis","volume":"10","author":"Gong","year":"2022","journal-title":"Front Bioeng Biotechnol"},{"key":"B41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1789","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181c9b8d6","article-title":"The effect of bilateral laminotomy versus laminectomy on the motion and stiffness of the human lumbar spine: a biomechanical comparison","volume":"35","author":"Lee","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"B42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"949","DOI":"10.31616\/asj.2022.0295","article-title":"A review of finite element modeling for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"17","author":"Lin","year":"2023","journal-title":"Asian Spine J"},{"key":"B43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"957","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-023-07530-w","article-title":"Factors influencing cage subsidence in anterior cervical corpectomy and discectomy: a systematic review","volume":"32","author":"Dhar","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1000097","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"6","author":"Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"B45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.9.SPINE1457","article-title":"Surgical outcomes of modified lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"22","author":"Kanbara","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"B46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.2007.6.3.229","article-title":"Split-spinous process laminotomy and discectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a preliminary report","volume":"6","author":"Cho","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"B47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S146","DOI":"10.1097\/00006123-200211002-00020","article-title":"Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis","volume":"51","author":"Khoo","year":"2002","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"key":"B48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"624","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.2005.2.5.0624","article-title":"Short-term results of microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Technical note","volume":"2","author":"Ikuta","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"B49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E732","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31828fc84c","article-title":"Modified unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: technical note","volume":"38","author":"Liu","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"B50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.10.SPINE09708","article-title":"Lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: Is a unilateral microsurgical approach sufficient for decompression? Clinical article","volume":"14","author":"Morgalla","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"B51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1824","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-013-3411-y","article-title":"Elderly patients have similar outcomes compared to younger patients after minimally invasive surgery for spinal stenosis","volume":"472","author":"Aleem","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"B52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1233","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2022.06.015","article-title":"Efficacy of spinous process splitting decompression compared with conventional laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis","volume":"164","author":"Ovalioglu","year":"2022","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"B53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e3181a3d889","article-title":"Microdecompressive laminatomy with a 5-year follow-up period for severe lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"23","author":"Celik","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"B54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.9.SPINE09933","article-title":"Reduced postoperative wound pain after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study. Clinical article","volume":"14","author":"Watanabe","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"B55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-1004543","article-title":"Open versus minimally invasive lumbar microdiscectomy: comparison of operative times, length of hospital stay, narcotic use and complications","volume":"51","author":"Harrington","year":"2008","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Neurosurg"},{"key":"B56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"514","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181657dde","article-title":"Long-term outcomes of two different decompressive techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"33","author":"Fu","year":"2008","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"B57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.3171\/2009.1.SPINE08288","article-title":"Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis: clinical article","volume":"10","author":"Yagi","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"B58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.5457\/ams.v41i1.261","article-title":"Spinal instability following surgery for degenerative lumbar stenosis","volume":"41","author":"Ercegovic","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Medica Saliniana"},{"key":"B59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1815","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.03.010","article-title":"In-hospital complication rate following microendoscopic versus open lumbar laminectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis","volume":"18","author":"Oichi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"B60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.60B2.659472","article-title":"The fatigue strength of the lumbar neural arch in spondylolysis","author":"Cyron","year":"1978","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"key":"B61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318191438b","article-title":"A biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis: comparison of a minimally invasive approach with two standard laminectomy techniques","volume":"34","author":"Bresnahan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"B62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2640","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-012-2250-y","article-title":"Which factors prognosticate spinal instability following lumbar laminectomy?","volume":"21","author":"Bisschop","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1237702","DOI":"10.3389\/fbioe.2023.1237702","article-title":"Effect of graded posterior element and ligament removal on annulus stress and segmental stability in lumbar spine stenosis: a finite element analysis study","volume":"11","author":"Lin","year":"2023","journal-title":"Front Bioeng Biotechnol"},{"key":"B64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nec.2019.02.003","article-title":"Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: definition, natural history, conservative management, and surgical treatment","volume":"30","author":"Bydon","year":"2019","journal-title":"Neurosurg Clin N Am"},{"key":"B65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"893","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000003924","article-title":"Patient outcomes after single-level coflex interspinous implants versus single-level laminectomy","volume":"46","author":"Zhong","year":"2021","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"B66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinbiomech.2008.11.005","article-title":"Biomechanical comparison of traditional and minimally invasive intradural tumor exposures using finite element analysis","volume":"24","author":"Ogden","year":"2009","journal-title":"Clin Biomech"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Surgery"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fsurg.2024.1357897\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,7]],"date-time":"2024-11-07T06:11:28Z","timestamp":1730959888000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fsurg.2024.1357897\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,7]]},"references-count":66,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fsurg.2024.1357897"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fsurg.2024.1357897","relation":{},"ISSN":["2296-875X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2296-875X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,7]]},"article-number":"1357897"}}