{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,5]],"date-time":"2026-09-05T22:05:32Z","timestamp":1788645932961,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,23]],"date-time":"2024-08-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1724371200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Surg."],"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>A cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) is a traumatic catastrophe that often leads to neurological dysfunction. The optimal surgical procedure for the treatment of CSCI remains debatable. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the neurological outcomes, complications, and clinical factors between anterior and posterior approach in CSCI treatment.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane library from their inceptions to october 2023. Preoperative and postoperative Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, and calculated recovery rates (RRs) were compared between the two strategies, and differences in complication rates, operation time, intraoperative blood loss and length of stay were also analyzed.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>A total of five studies containing 613 patients were included, with 320 patients undergoing the anterior approach and 293 patients undergoing the posterior approach. Four of the studies included were retrospective cohort studies of high quality as assessed by the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Additionally, there was one randomized controlled trial evaluated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Although both anterior and posterior approaches effectively facilitate spinal decompression and promote good neurological recovery, there was no significant difference in the incidences of neurological dysfunction and complications or other clinical features between the two approaches.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>There is no evidence thus far supports one approach over the other. Large-scale randomized controlled studies are warranted to further distinguish these two methods.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Systematic Review Registration<\/jats:title><jats:p><jats:uri>https:\/\/www.crd.york.ac.uk\/<\/jats:uri>, PROSPERO [CRD42023438831].<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2024.1410220","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,23]],"date-time":"2024-08-23T06:01:18Z","timestamp":1724392878000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Comparison of anterior and posterior approach in the treatment of acute and chronic cervical spinal cord injury: a\u00a0meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Yi","family":"Ding","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ning","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wenjing","family":"Hu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wenkang","family":"Jiang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Qianmiao","family":"Zhu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ting","family":"Jiang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Huilin","family":"Cheng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nec.2017.09.006","article-title":"Future directions and new technologies for the management of degenerative cervical myelopathy","volume":"29","author":"Ganau","year":"2018","journal-title":"Neurosurg Clin N Am"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"174s","DOI":"10.1177\/21925682231181883","article-title":"An update of a clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with acute spinal cord injury: recommendations on the role and timing of decompressive surgery","volume":"14","author":"Fehlings","year":"2024","journal-title":"Global Spine J"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1031","DOI":"10.1016\/j.suc.2017.06.008","article-title":"Trauma: spinal cord injury","volume":"97","author":"Eckert","year":"2017","journal-title":"Surg Clin North Am"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"998","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4779-7","article-title":"Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical arthroplasty for the management of cervical spondylosis: a meta-analysis","volume":"26","author":"Ma","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"b2535","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.b2535","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the prisma statement","volume":"339","author":"Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1007\/s10654-010-9491-z","article-title":"Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses","volume":"25","author":"Stang","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur J Epidemiol"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-14-45","article-title":"Newcastle-Ottawa scale: comparing reviewers\u2019 to authors\u2019 assessments","volume":"14","author":"Lo","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1539","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1186","article-title":"Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis","volume":"21","author":"Higgins","year":"2002","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1097\/00024720-200306000-00001","article-title":"Comparison of anterior and posterior approaches in cervical spinal cord injuries","volume":"16","author":"Brodke","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.3233\/bmr-210377","article-title":"Effectiveness of different surgical methods in the treatment of acute central cord syndrome without fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine","volume":"36","author":"Jia","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10346","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-020-67265-2","article-title":"Comparison of anterior and posterior approaches for treatment of traumatic cervical dislocation combined with spinal cord injury: minimum 10-year follow-up","volume":"10","author":"Ren","year":"2020","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8216339","DOI":"10.1155\/2022\/8216339","article-title":"The efficacy of anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion and posterior total laminectomy on cervical spinal cord injury and quality of life","volume":"2022","author":"Yin","year":"2022","journal-title":"Comput Math Methods Med"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5132134","DOI":"10.1155\/2022\/5132134","article-title":"Comparison of anterior and posterior approaches for acute traumatic central spinal cord syndrome with multilevel cervical canal stenosis without cervical fracture or dislocation","volume":"2022","author":"Zhou","year":"2022","journal-title":"Int J Clin Pract"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.08.018","article-title":"Cervical cord-canal mismatch: a new method for identifying predisposition to spinal cord injury","volume":"108","author":"Nouri","year":"2017","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17018","DOI":"10.1038\/nrdp.2017.18","article-title":"Traumatic spinal cord injury","volume":"3","author":"Ahuja","year":"2017","journal-title":"Nat Rev Dis Primers"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1495","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-020-06703-1","article-title":"Surgical outcome and risk factors for cervical spinal cord injury patients in chronic stage: a 2-year follow-up study","volume":"30","author":"Ji","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S33","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-009-1120-8","article-title":"Surgical treatment of upper, middle and lower cervical injuries and non-unions by anterior procedures","volume":"19","author":"Aebi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e137","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.03.213","article-title":"Surgical treatment of lower cervical fracture-dislocation with spinal cord injuries by anterior approach: 5- to 15-year follow-up","volume":"115","author":"Gao","year":"2018","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clineuro.2008.07.009","article-title":"Complications of anterior surgery in cervical spine trauma: an overview","volume":"111","author":"Kasimatis","year":"2009","journal-title":"Clin Neurol Neurosurg"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.02.130","article-title":"Management of esophageal and pharyngeal perforation as complications of anterior cervical spine surgery","volume":"102","author":"Kang","year":"2017","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"168","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.2004.1.2.0168","article-title":"Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine","volume":"1","author":"Ogawa","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"783762","DOI":"10.1155\/2012\/783762","article-title":"Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: factors in choosing the surgical approach","volume":"2012","author":"Yalamanchili","year":"2012","journal-title":"Adv Orthop"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1583","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-013-2817-2","article-title":"Anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systemic review and meta-analysis","volume":"22","author":"Zhu","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1621","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-015-3911-4","article-title":"Comparison of anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy","volume":"24","author":"Luo","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"530","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2019.06.144","article-title":"Comparison of anterior cervical decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes","volume":"130","author":"Montano","year":"2019","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"735","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-018-03102-6","article-title":"Anterior versus posterior approach for the therapy of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis and systematic review","volume":"139","author":"Zhang","year":"2019","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1428","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.08.017","article-title":"Reoperation rates of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical degenerative diseases: a population-based cohort study in Taiwan","volume":"16","author":"Lin","year":"2016","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1177\/21925682221114800","article-title":"A practical classification system for acute cervical spinal cord injury based on a three-phased modified delphi process from the aospine spinal cord injury knowledge forum","volume":"14","author":"Hachem","year":"2024","journal-title":"Global Spine J"},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2303","DOI":"10.1007\/s00701-020-04513-4","article-title":"Procedures performed during neurosurgery residency in Europe","volume":"162","author":"Stienen","year":"2020","journal-title":"Acta Neurochir"},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.25259\/sni_203_2022","article-title":"A scoping review on the challenges, improvement programs, and relevant output metrics for neurotrauma services in major trauma centers","volume":"13","author":"Dasic","year":"2022","journal-title":"Surg Neurol Int"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Surgery"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fsurg.2024.1410220\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,23]],"date-time":"2024-08-23T06:01:20Z","timestamp":1724392880000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fsurg.2024.1410220\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,23]]},"references-count":30,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fsurg.2024.1410220"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fsurg.2024.1410220","relation":{},"ISSN":["2296-875X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2296-875X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,23]]},"article-number":"1410220"}}