{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,14]],"date-time":"2026-10-14T19:47:34Z","timestamp":1792007254100,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,13]],"date-time":"2025-08-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1755043200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Surg."],"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title><jats:p>Robotic-assisted proctectomy (RAP) is increasingly used for rectal cancer, but its long-term benefits over laparoscopic proctectomy (LP) remain debated. While RAP offers technical advantages, its clinical equivalence requires further validation, particularly in anatomically challenging cases.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>We conducted a retrospective analysis of all eligible patients who underwent RAP or LP for rectal cancer at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital between 2019 and 2024.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>In the overall cohort, RAP demonstrated significantly longer operative times (246.69 vs. 174.53\u2005min, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&amp;lt;\u20090.001), greater blood loss (109.77 vs. 57.58\u2005ml, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&amp;lt;\u20090.001), and higher costs (117,030.88 vs. 81,054.16 yuan, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&amp;lt;\u20090.001) compared to LP, with only a marginally shorter postoperative stay (8.47 vs. 8.64 days, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&amp;lt;\u20090.05). In terms of postoperative complications, RAP showed a trend towards fewer overall Clavien-Dindo Grade\u2009\u2265\u2009III complications (1.2% vs. 6.6%) compared to LP, although this difference was not statistically significant (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.064). There were no significant differences in disease-free survival (DFS) (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.575) or overall survival (OS) (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.619) between the two groups. For the subgroup analysis of rectal cancers\u2009\u2264\u20095\u2005cm from the anus, RAP achieved superior surgical precision, with 100% negative circumferential resection margin (CRM) (vs. 87.1% in LP, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.042) and 100% complete mesorectal integrity (vs. 83.9% in LP, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.053), alongside faster functional recovery (time to first flatus: 3.47 vs. 3.90 days, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.034; time to urination: 2.10 vs. 2.65 days, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.007). Recurrence rates were lower with RAP (10% vs. 19.4%), though survival outcomes remained similar between RAP and LP (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.253)<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>While RAP incurs longer operative times and higher costs, it demonstrates superior precision in anatomically complex cases, evidenced by improved CRM status and mesorectal preservation. Although survival outcomes remain comparable, RAP's advantages in functional recovery and potential recurrence reduction warrant further investigation.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2025.1628649","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,13]],"date-time":"2025-08-13T14:20:47Z","timestamp":1755094847000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Comparing robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer surgical and oncological outcomes"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Wenpeng","family":"Wang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jia","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jiefu","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jinghao","family":"Huang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Junfeng","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.3393\/ac.2024.00388.0055","article-title":"Essential knowledge and technical tips for total mesorectal excision and related procedures for rectal cancer","volume":"40","author":"Cho","year":"2024","journal-title":"Ann Coloproctol"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800691019","article-title":"The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery\u2013the clue to pelvic recurrence?","volume":"69","author":"Heald","year":"1982","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1093\/gastro\/gow023","article-title":"Pelvic autonomic nerve preservation in radical rectal cancer surgery: changes in the past 3 decades","volume":"4","author":"Chew","year":"2016","journal-title":"Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1607","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaoncol.2022.4079","article-title":"Short-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted vs open surgery for patients with low rectal cancer: the LASRE randomized clinical trial","volume":"8","author":"Jiang","year":"2022","journal-title":"JAMA Oncol"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-017-2925-2","article-title":"Outcomes of open versus laparoscopic surgery in patients with rectal cancer","volume":"33","author":"Quintana","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2025.8123","article-title":"Robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer: the REAL randomized clinical trial","volume":"334","author":"Feng","year":"2025","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000005788","article-title":"Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancers: the COLRAR randomized controlled trial","volume":"278","author":"Park","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1569","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2017.7219","article-title":"Effect of robotic-assisted vs, conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial","volume":"318","author":"Jayne","year":"2017","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21160","article-title":"The current status of robotic oncologic surgery","volume":"63","author":"Yu","year":"2013","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22943","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-02438-1","article-title":"Impact of the distal resection margin on local recurrence after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and rectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancer","volume":"11","author":"Song","year":"2021","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3673","DOI":"10.1002\/cam4.1662","article-title":"Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: a large population-based retrospective study","volume":"7","author":"Liu","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cancer Med"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1729","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2002.07.010","article-title":"Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control","volume":"20","author":"Nagtegaal","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2","article-title":"The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience","volume":"250","author":"Clavien","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2113","DOI":"10.1002\/rcs.2113","article-title":"A systematic review of the true benefit of robotic surgery: ergonomics","volume":"16","author":"Wee","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Med Robot"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121937","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2023.1219371","article-title":"Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term comparison of outcomes","volume":"13","author":"Eoh","year":"2023","journal-title":"Front Oncol"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-011-0315-2","article-title":"Specific learning curve for port placement and docking of da Vinci((R)) surgical system: one surgeon\u2019s experience in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy","volume":"6","author":"Dal Moro","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3727","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-012-2429-9","article-title":"Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis","volume":"19","author":"Yang","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1419","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-014-3818-x","article-title":"Robotic surgery for rectal cancer can overcome difficulties associated with pelvic anatomy","volume":"29","author":"Baek","year":"2015","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.4103\/ijc.IJC_86_19","article-title":"Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center","volume":"58","author":"Hu","year":"2021","journal-title":"Indian J Cancer"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0b013e318244a8f2","article-title":"Criteria to determine readiness for hospital discharge following colorectal surgery: an international consensus using the Delphi technique","volume":"55","author":"Fiore","year":"2012","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"839","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers15030839","article-title":"Outcomes of robot-assisted surgery in rectal cancer compared with open and laparoscopic surgery","volume":"15","author":"Khajeh","year":"2023","journal-title":"Cancers (Basel)"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1556","DOI":"10.3390\/biomedicines11061556","article-title":"Robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection could harvest more lateral pelvic lymph nodes over laparoscopic approach for mid-to-low rectal cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study","volume":"11","author":"Bae","year":"2023","journal-title":"Biomedicines"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.4174\/astr.2023.105.5.245","article-title":"Weighing the benefits of lymphadenectomy in early-stage colorectal cancer","volume":"105","author":"Baik","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ann Surg Treat Res"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S84","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2022.09.413","article-title":"EE163 analysis of healthcare resource use of the robotic surgery system for rectal cancer in Japan","volume":"25","author":"Yoshihara","year":"2022","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1807","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-016-2660-0","article-title":"Learning curve in robotic rectal cancer surgery: current state of affairs","volume":"31","author":"Jim\u00e9nez-Rodr\u00edguez","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Surgery"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fsurg.2025.1628649\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,13]],"date-time":"2025-08-13T14:20:47Z","timestamp":1755094847000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fsurg.2025.1628649\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,13]]},"references-count":25,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fsurg.2025.1628649"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fsurg.2025.1628649","relation":{},"ISSN":["2296-875X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2296-875X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,13]]},"article-number":"1628649"}}