{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,26]],"date-time":"2026-10-26T22:14:16Z","timestamp":1793052856743,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1774915200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Surg."],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Lumbar degenerative diseases are prevalent spinal disorders among the elderly population worldwide, significantly impairing their quality of life. Both minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and uniportal endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-PLIF) are established minimally invasive interbody fusion modalities for the management of these conditions. However, MIS-TLIF is associated with limitations such as soft tissue compression induced by dilator tubes and a comparatively prolonged postoperative recovery period. In the present study, we aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and radiographic outcomes of Endo-PLIF vs. MIS-TLIF in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases in elderly patients.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A retrospective analysis was performed of 77 elderly patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who were admitted to the Department of Spinal Minimally Invasive Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, between September 2021 and March 2022. The patients were divided into two groups: 35 patients underwent Endo-PLIF and 42 patients underwent MIS-TLIF. The groups were compared in terms of operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, Visual analogue score (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, radiographic parameters (including disc space height, lumbar lordosis angle, and fusion rate), the modified MacNab criteria, and the incidence of postoperative complications.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      All procedures were successfully completed in both cohorts, with a follow-up period of more than 12 months. No statistically significant difference was observed in operative time between the two groups (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009\n                      <jats:italic>&amp;gt;<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009\n                      <jats:italic>0<\/jats:italic>\n                      .05). The Endo-PLIF group demonstrated significantly superior outcomes regarding intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume and length of hospital stay (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&amp;lt;\u20090.05). Significant improvements in VAS scores and ODI were observed at all postoperative time points compared with preoperative baseline values in both groups (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&amp;lt;\u20090.05). The Endo-PLIF group exhibited significantly lower low back pain VAS scores at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively, as well as a superior ODI at 3 months, compared with the MIS-TLIF group (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009\n                      <jats:italic>&amp;lt;<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u20090.05). However, no significant intergroup differences were detected in low back pain VAS scores, ODI at other time points, or leg pain VAS scores across all assessed time points (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&amp;gt;\u20090.05). Furthermore, serum CRP levels at all postoperative intervals were significantly lower in the Endo-PLIF group than in the MIS-TLIF group (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&amp;lt;\u20090.05). No statistically significant differences were noted between the groups in terms of complication rates, the excellent-good rate based on the modified MacNab criteria at final follow-up, postoperative disc space height, postoperative lumbar lordosis angle, or the 12-month fusion rate (94% in the Endo-PLIF group and 95% in the MIS-TLIF group,\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&amp;gt;\u20090.05).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Both Endo-PLIF and MIS-TLIF achieve favorable short- to mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes in elderly patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. Moreover, the Endo-PLIF technique offers additional advantages, including minimal invasiveness, reduced postoperative drainage, and facilitation of accelerated postoperative recovery.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2026.1784345","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T13:30:55Z","timestamp":1774963855000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Uniportal endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for elderly patients with lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective comparative study of reduced surgical trauma and accelerated early pain relief"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"13","author":[{"given":"Juanming","family":"Lan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine","place":["Guangzhou, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bin","family":"Cao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine","place":["Guangzhou, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yongpeng","family":"Lin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orthopedics Department, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine","place":["Guangzhou, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Weixiong","family":"Hu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orthopedics Department, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine","place":["Guangzhou, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rui","family":"Lin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orthopedics Department, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine","place":["Guangzhou, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lulu","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine","place":["Guangzhou, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bolai","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orthopedics Department, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine","place":["Guangzhou, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(21)00733-9","article-title":"Low back pain","volume":"398","author":"Knezevic","year":"2021","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1688","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2022.5921","article-title":"Diagnosis and management of lumbar spinal stenosis: a review","volume":"327","author":"Katz","year":"2022","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joca.2013.10.019","article-title":"Prevalence and distribution of intervertebral disc degeneration over the entire spine in a population-based cohort: the wakayama spine study","volume":"22","author":"Teraguchi","year":"2014","journal-title":"Osteoarthritis Cartilage"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1629","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-017-5436-5","article-title":"Decompression with or without concomitant fusion in lumbar stenosis due to degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review","volume":"27","author":"Dijkerman","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"780","DOI":"10.14245\/ns.1938184.092","article-title":"Complications of spine surgery in elderly Japanese patients: implications for future of world population aging","volume":"16","author":"Umekawa","year":"2019","journal-title":"Neurospine"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1068","DOI":"10.14245\/ns.2448624.312","article-title":"National trends in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with stenosis treated with fusion versus decompression","volume":"21","author":"Ball","year":"2024","journal-title":"Neurospine"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nec.2024.08.001","article-title":"Posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: recent advances in technique and technology","volume":"36","author":"Patel","year":"2025","journal-title":"Neurosurg Clin N Am"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1317","DOI":"10.1111\/os.13289","article-title":"A comparative study of a new retractor-assisted wiltse tlif, mis-tlif, and traditional plif for treatment of single-level lumbar degenerative diseases","volume":"14","author":"Liu","year":"2022","journal-title":"Orthop Surg"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"479","DOI":"10.14245\/ns.2244122.061","article-title":"History and evolution of the minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"19","author":"Prabhu","year":"2022","journal-title":"Neurospine"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.5603\/pjnns.97784","article-title":"Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (mis tlif) in treatment of degenerative diseases of lumbosacral spine compared to modified open tlif: a prospective randomised controlled study","volume":"58","author":"Kalina","year":"2024","journal-title":"Neurol Neurochir Pol"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"380","DOI":"10.14444\/8455","article-title":"Single-level endoscopic tlif has decreased surgery duration, blood loss, and length of hospital stay while achieving similar 1-year clinical and radiological outcomes compared with conventional minimally invasive tlif","volume":"17","author":"Sim","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"418","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.06.147","article-title":"Full-endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a review and technical note","volume":"189","author":"Nakajima","year":"2024","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"B13","first-page":"165","article-title":"Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: a consecutive case series with mean 2-year follow-up","volume":"23","author":"Jin","year":"2020","journal-title":"Pain Physician"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-018-0740-2","article-title":"Outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease in patients under or over 65 years of age","volume":"13","author":"Jin","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e475","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2020.08.204","article-title":"Full-endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion via an interlaminar approach versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary retrospective study","volume":"144","author":"Li","year":"2020","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E212","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000001719","article-title":"Clinical comparison of endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion and open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"38","author":"Yang","year":"2025","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-023-03875-6","article-title":"Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective observational study","volume":"18","author":"Chen","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318163f9ee","article-title":"Use of c-reactive protein after spinal surgery: comparison with erythrocyte sedimentation rate as predictor of early postoperative infectious complications","volume":"33","author":"Mok","year":"2008","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2020.02.043","article-title":"Comparison of preliminary clinical outcomes between percutaneous endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases in a tertiary hospital: is percutaneous endoscopic procedure superior to mis-tlif? A prospective cohort study","volume":"76","author":"Ao","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"123553","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.12.012","article-title":"Comparative efficacy of 3 methods of lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases in a tertiary public hospital","volume":"194","author":"Yuan","year":"2025","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1528","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.03.016","article-title":"Trailblazing: the historical development of the posterior lumbar interbody fusion (plif)","volume":"21","author":"Fenton-White","year":"2021","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-022-05287-9","article-title":"Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic and open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-segmental lumbar degenerative diseases","volume":"23","author":"He","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.2147\/IJGM.S298591","article-title":"Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique note and comparison of early outcomes with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"14","author":"Zhang","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Gen Med"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1080\/17434440.2019.1601013","article-title":"Device solutions for a challenging spine surgery: minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (mis tlif)","volume":"16","author":"Sayari","year":"2019","journal-title":"Expert Rev Med Devices"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2095","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-019-06002-4","article-title":"Differences in the interbody bone graft area and fusion rate between minimally invasive and traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective short-term image analysis","volume":"28","author":"Yao","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"591","DOI":"10.5114\/wiitm.2022.118680","article-title":"Percutaneous endoscopic versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a meta-analysis","volume":"17","author":"Song","year":"2022","journal-title":"Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"835","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-024-05315-5","article-title":"Comparative efficacy and fusion outcomes of unilateral bi-portal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treating single-segment degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with lumbar spinal stenosis: a two-year retrospective study","volume":"19","author":"Bahir","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Surgery"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fsurg.2026.1784345\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T13:30:56Z","timestamp":1774963856000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fsurg.2026.1784345\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]]},"references-count":27,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fsurg.2026.1784345"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fsurg.2026.1784345","relation":{},"ISSN":["2296-875X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2296-875X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]]},"article-number":"1784345"}}