{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]],"date-time":"2026-09-03T08:16:00Z","timestamp":1788423360682,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":46,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]],"date-time":"2026-09-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788393600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Surg."],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In recent years, stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages (SA) and Zero-P implants (ZP) have been widely adopted clinically in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical degenerative disease (CDD). However, which is superior between SA and ZP remains highly controversial. This meta-analysis was designed to conduct a head-to-head comparison of the safety, clinical efficacy, and radiological effectiveness of ACDF with ZP and SA.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This research was carried out in accordance with the PRISMA Statement. Systematic retrieval of eligible literature was completed covering three core electronic bibliographic databases: PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, and Embase up to February 19, 2026. For dichotomous outcomes, including the fusion rate and subsidence rate, the effect sizes were calculated as the relative risk (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For continuous outcomes, including surgical time, blood loss, disc height, vertebral height, C2-7 Cobb angle, segmental Cobb angle, VAS score, and NDI score, the effect sizes are expressed as the mean difference (MD) with 95% CIs.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Eight eligible studies comparing ACDF with SA and ZP for CDD treatment were ultimately included. The pooled patient cohort consisted of 727 participants in total, with 384 patients assigned to the SA group for ACDF and 343 patients allocated to the ZP group. Compared with the ZP, the SA had a significantly shorter operative time and higher NDI score. The segmental Cobb angle, disc height and vertebral height of the SA were significantly lower than those of the ZP. The SA group had a significantly higher subsidence rate than the ZP group, with no remarkable difference observed in the C2-7 Cobb angle, fusion rate, VAS score between the two cohorts.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Discussion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Current pooled findings suggest that SA may be associated with shorter operative time, while ZP may correlate with lower subsidence rate and better preservation of cervical alignment. As all available evidence is derived exclusively from observational studies and rated as low to very low certainty, the conclusions must be interpreted with caution.<\/jats:p>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      <jats:bold>Clinical Trial Registration:<\/jats:bold>\n                      <jats:ext-link>https:\/\/www.crd.york.ac.uk\/PROSPERO\/view\/CRD420261325943<\/jats:ext-link>\n                      , PROSPERO, CRD420261325943.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2026.1945489","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]],"date-time":"2026-09-03T08:00:12Z","timestamp":1788422412000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparison of ACDF with stand-alone PEEK cage versus zero-p implant for the treatment of cervical degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"13","author":[{"given":"Yiheng","family":"Zhao","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University","place":["Chengdu, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Juan","family":"Xie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Emergency Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University\/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University","place":["Chengdu, China"]},{"name":"Disaster Medical Center, Sichuan University","place":["Chengdu, China"]},{"name":"Nursing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province","place":["Chengdu, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ling","family":"Zhu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Emergency Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University\/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University","place":["Chengdu, China"]},{"name":"Disaster Medical Center, Sichuan University","place":["Chengdu, China"]},{"name":"Nursing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province","place":["Chengdu, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jianna","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Emergency Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University\/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University","place":["Chengdu, China"]},{"name":"Disaster Medical Center, Sichuan University","place":["Chengdu, China"]},{"name":"Nursing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province","place":["Chengdu, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Junhui","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University","place":["Chengdu, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"B1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"607","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-195840030-00009","article-title":"The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion","volume":"40","author":"Smith","year":"1958","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"B2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2005.02.018","article-title":"A preliminary study of the use of cage and plating for single-segment fusion in degenerative cervical spine disease","volume":"13","author":"Song","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1097\/00006123-200202000-00001","article-title":"Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with cortical allograft","volume":"50","author":"Kaiser","year":"2002","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"639","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2006.04.003","article-title":"Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: analysis of surgical outcome with and without plating","volume":"14","author":"Mobbs","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"key":"B5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318198ce10","article-title":"Implant complications, fusion, loss of lordosis, and outcome after anterior cervical plating with dynamic or rigid plates: two-year results of a multi-centric, randomized, controlled study","volume":"34","author":"Pitzen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1689","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-007-0451-6","article-title":"Fusion and failure following anterior cervical plating with dynamic or rigid plates: 6-months results of a multi-centric, prospective, randomized, controlled study","volume":"16","author":"Stulik","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-025-08285-9","article-title":"Is screw position a greater contributor to adjacent segment disease than plate-to-disc distance following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?","volume":"26","author":"Wang","year":"2025","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e71813","DOI":"10.1002\/ccr3.71813","article-title":"Esophageal perforation following C4-C6 anterior cervical corpectomy with anterior plate fixation: a rare but life-threatening complication requiring surgical repair","volume":"14","author":"Gharayba","year":"2026","journal-title":"Clin Case Rep"},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.21037\/jss-24-32","article-title":"Clinical and radiographic outcomes after index anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with interbody spacer with integrated anchor fixation: a single-surgeon case study","volume":"10","author":"Venkatraman","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Spine Surg"},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.4103\/jcvjs.jcvjs_35_24","article-title":"Analyzing results of cervical sagittal parameters in patients operated with polyetheretherketone cages without plate","volume":"15","author":"Olivares-Camacho","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Craniovertebr Junction Spine"},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2699","DOI":"10.1111\/os.14182","article-title":"Does the angulation of the screws in the zero-P implant affect the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients?","volume":"16","author":"Huang","year":"2024","journal-title":"Orthop Surg"},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.02.079","article-title":"Assessing surgical outcomes for cage plate system versus stand-alone cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"185","author":"Elias","year":"2024","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-023-06657-7","article-title":"Zero-P and ROI-C implants versus traditional titanium plate with cage to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy: clinical and radiological results with 5 years of follow-up","volume":"24","author":"Wang","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"B14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"364","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-024-04729-5","article-title":"Comparative efficacy of zero-profile implant and conventional cage-plate implant in the treatment of single-level degenerative cervical spondylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"19","author":"Zhang","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"key":"B15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1007\/s10143-025-03939-7","article-title":"Cervical disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using stand-alone cage for degenerative cervical spondylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials","volume":"49","author":"Zhang","year":"2026","journal-title":"Neurosurg Rev"},{"key":"B16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.4055\/cios24036","article-title":"Comparing outcomes between cage alone and plate fixation in single-level anterior cervical fusion: a retrospective clinical series","volume":"17","author":"Shin","year":"2025","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Surg"},{"key":"B17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2014","DOI":"10.1177\/21925682241279528","article-title":"Revision surgery after single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate vs stand-alone cage over 2 to 5 year follow-up","volume":"15","author":"Durand","year":"2025","journal-title":"Global Spine J"},{"key":"B18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E1","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000001630","article-title":"Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical plate fixation versus integrated fixation cage for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"38","author":"Murphy","year":"2025","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"key":"B19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"736680","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2021.736680","article-title":"Comparative analysis of cage subsidence in anterior cervical decompression and fusion: zero profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) vs. Conventional cage and plate construct","volume":"8","author":"Jin","year":"2021","journal-title":"Front Surg"},{"key":"B20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.07.102","article-title":"Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with zero-profile anchored spacer versus plate and cage for 3-level contiguous cervical degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"190","author":"Chen","year":"2024","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"B21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3364","DOI":"10.1177\/21925682251327599","article-title":"Comparison of stand-alone anchored spacer and plate-cage construct for surgical treatment of multilevel cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a meta-analysis","volume":"15","author":"Chang","year":"2025","journal-title":"Global Spine J"},{"key":"B22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"n71","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"B23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"i4919","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i4919","article-title":"ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions","volume":"355","author":"Sterne","year":"2016","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"B24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39489.470347.AD","article-title":"GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations","volume":"336","author":"Guyatt","year":"2008","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.4103\/jcvjs.jcvjs_195_25","article-title":"Comparative review of anchored cage devices and standalone cages in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgeries","volume":"17","author":"Shaikh","year":"2026","journal-title":"J Craniovertebr Junction Spine"},{"key":"B26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E17","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000137","article-title":"Segmental kyphosis after cervical interbody fusion with stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages: a comparative study on 2 different PEEK cages","volume":"28","author":"Kim","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"B27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1002744","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2022.1002744","article-title":"Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with zero-profile versus stand-alone cages for two-level cervical spondylosis: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"9","author":"Mu","year":"2022","journal-title":"Front Surg"},{"key":"B28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2339","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-022-05493-z","article-title":"Standalone cage versus anchored cage for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a comparative analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes","volume":"46","author":"Virkar","year":"2022","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"904","DOI":"10.1080\/02688697.2021.2005772","article-title":"A pragmatic single centre retrospective comparative review of complication profile between PEEK cages and zero-P cage screw constructs","volume":"38","author":"Balakumar","year":"2024","journal-title":"Br J Neurosurg"},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.3340\/jkns.2015.58.2.119","article-title":"Cervical stand-alone polyetheretherketone cage versus zero-profile anchored spacer in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: minimum 2-year assessment of radiographic and clinical outcome","volume":"58","author":"Cho","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Korean Neurosurg Soc"},{"key":"B31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e775","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.775","article-title":"Outcomes evaluation of zero-profile devices compared to stand-alone PEEK cages for the treatment of three- and four-level cervical disc disease","volume":"8","author":"Gerszten","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"B32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1097\/BCO.0000000000000853","article-title":"Cervical stand-alone peek cage versus anchored cage with screws in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective cohort study","volume":"31","author":"Khattab","year":"2020","journal-title":"Curr Orthop Pract"},{"key":"B33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.14245\/kjs.2016.13.3.91","article-title":"Comparison of radiologic outcomes of different methods in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"13","author":"Kwon","year":"2016","journal-title":"Korean J Spine"},{"key":"B34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E563","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000864","article-title":"Does a zero-profile anchored cage offer additional stabilization as anterior cervical plate?","volume":"40","author":"Lee","year":"2015","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"B35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e38864","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.38864","article-title":"A retrospective evaluation and review of radiographic outcomes for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures: northern Ireland\u2019s experience","volume":"15","author":"McKee","year":"2023","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"B36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.14245\/kjs.2014.11.3.169","article-title":"Surgical outcome of a zero-profile device comparing with stand-alone cage and anterior cervical plate with iliac bone graft in the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"11","author":"Shin","year":"2014","journal-title":"Korean J Spine"},{"key":"B37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004465","article-title":"Comparing clinical and radiographic outcomes between the self-locking stand-alone cage and conventional cage-plate construct: a five-year retrospective cohort study","volume":"48","author":"Li","year":"2023","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"B38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1129","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4739-2","article-title":"A comparison of a new zero-profile, stand-alone fidji cervical cage and anterior cervical plate for single and multilevel ACDF: a minimum 2-year follow-up study","volume":"26","author":"Li","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"B39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102748","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bas.2024.102748","article-title":"The efficacy of anchored stand-alone spacers in comparison to conventional cage and plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials for clinical and radiological outcomes","volume":"4","author":"McDonnell","year":"2024","journal-title":"Brain Spine"},{"key":"B40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-023-03885-4","article-title":"Self-locking stand-alone cage versus cage-plate fixation in monosegmental anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a minimum 2-year follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"18","author":"Zhang","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"key":"B41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"644","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-023-04134-4","article-title":"Zero-profile anchored spacer versus conventional plate-cage construct in bilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"18","author":"Zhang","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"key":"B42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E375","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000768","article-title":"A zero-profile anchored spacer in multilevel cervical anterior interbody fusion: biomechanical comparison to established fixation techniques","volume":"40","author":"Scholz","year":"2015","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"B43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1756","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000172148.86756.ce","article-title":"Is autograft the gold standard in achieving radiographic fusion in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid anterior plate fixation?","volume":"30","author":"Samartzis","year":"2005","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"B44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2015.07.019","article-title":"Successful anterior fusion following posterior cervical fusion for revision of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion pseudarthrosis","volume":"24","author":"Elder","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"key":"B45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"222","DOI":"10.14444\/8207","article-title":"Anterior 1-2 level cervical corpectomy and fusion for degenerative cervical disease: a retrospective study with lordotic porous tantalum cages. Long-term changes in sagittal alignment and their clinical and radiological implications after cage subsidence","volume":"16","author":"Tome-Bermejo","year":"2022","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"},{"key":"B46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1308\/rcsann.2022.0050","article-title":"Does titanium cage subsidence affect clinical outcomes in ACDF surgery? A tertiary center experience","volume":"105","author":"Milczynska","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ann R Coll Surg Engl"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Surgery"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fsurg.2026.1945489\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]],"date-time":"2026-09-03T08:00:13Z","timestamp":1788422413000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fsurg.2026.1945489\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]]},"references-count":46,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fsurg.2026.1945489"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fsurg.2026.1945489","relation":{},"ISSN":["2296-875X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2296-875X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]]},"article-number":"1945489"}}