{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,24]],"date-time":"2026-09-24T17:41:41Z","timestamp":1790271701697,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,9]],"date-time":"2026-03-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1773014400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Vet. Sci."],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Brucellosis, a major zoonosis caused by\n                      <jats:italic>Brucella<\/jats:italic>\n                      spp., affects both animals and humans. Accurate serological diagnosis is crucial for effective disease control, yet current methods often lack optimal sensitivity and specificity. This study aimed to evaluate four recombinant\n                      <jats:italic>Brucella<\/jats:italic>\n                      antigens (rOmp19, rOmp2b, rOmp31, and rBP26) as diagnostic antigens, both individually and in combination, to identify an optimal multi-antigen cocktail for an improved indirect ELISA (iELISA).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Four recombinant\n                      <jats:italic>Brucella<\/jats:italic>\n                      antigens were expressed in\n                      <jats:italic>E. coli<\/jats:italic>\n                      and purified by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography. A total of 224 sheep serum samples without a history of brucellosis vaccination were employed. The samples were classified as reference-positive (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u202f=\u202f20) or reference-negative (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u202f=\u202f204) based on parallel testing with a commercial cELISA kit and the serum agglutination test (SAT), following relevant WOAH recommendations. iELISA conditions were optimized by checkerboard titration. Diagnostic performance was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Evaluation of single antigens revealed that rOmp19 had 100% sensitivity (20\/20; 95% CI: 83.2%\u2013100%) and the highest AUC (0.9931), but moderate specificity (93.62%; 95% CI: 89.1%\u201396.5%). Conversely, rOmp2b, rOmp31, and rBP26 each showed 100% specificity (95% CI: 98.2%\u2013100%) with lower sensitivity (85%; 95% CI: 62.1%\u201396.8%) and AUCs (0.9547, 0.9498, and 0.9645). Multi-antigen formulations improved overall diagnostic balance. The two-antigen combination (rOmp19\u202f+\u202frBP26) increased specificity to 98.04% (95% CI: 95.0%\u201399.5%) while maintaining 90.0% sensitivity (95% CI: 68.3%\u201398.8%; AUC\u202f=\u202f0.9841). The three-antigen cocktail (rOmp19\u202f+\u202frOmp31\u202f+\u202frBP26) achieved the optimal profile, retaining 100% sensitivity, elevating specificity to 99.51% (95% CI: 97.3%\u201399.9%), and yielding the best AUC among the multi-antigen combinations (AUC\u202f=\u202f0.9850). Notably, adding a fourth antigen (rOmp19\u202f+\u202frOmp2b\u202f+\u202frOmp31\u202f+\u202frBP26) substantially impaired performance, reducing sensitivity to 70%, specificity to 92.65%, and AUC to 0.8711.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The three-antigen combination (rOmp19\u202f+\u202frOmp31\u202f+\u202frBP26) identified in this study achieves an optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity, supporting its potential to enhance the performance of brucellosis serodiagnosis. This work provides experimental evidence and constitutes an important step toward the development of multi-antigen iELISA-based brucellosis detection kits. However, further validation and optimization are required before clinical or field application.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3389\/fvets.2026.1775573","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,9]],"date-time":"2026-03-09T05:30:48Z","timestamp":1773034248000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Optimizing ovine brucellosis serodiagnosis: evaluation of recombinant Brucella antigens and multi-antigen combinations for iELISA"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"13","author":[{"given":"Mixue","family":"Guo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Basic Medical Sciences, Ningxia Medical University","place":["Yinchuan, Ningxia, China"]},{"name":"Ningxia Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Common Infectious Diseases, Ningxia Medical University","place":["Yinchuan, Ningxia, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yan","family":"Huo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Basic Medical Sciences, Ningxia Medical University","place":["Yinchuan, Ningxia, China"]},{"name":"Ningxia Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Common Infectious Diseases, Ningxia Medical University","place":["Yinchuan, Ningxia, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tao","family":"Sun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Basic Medical Sciences, Ningxia Medical University","place":["Yinchuan, Ningxia, China"]},{"name":"Ningxia Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Common Infectious Diseases, Ningxia Medical University","place":["Yinchuan, Ningxia, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Huqiang","family":"Dong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Public Health, Ningxia Medical University","place":["Yinchuan, Ningxia, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jihui","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Basic Medical Sciences, Ningxia Medical University","place":["Yinchuan, Ningxia, China"]},{"name":"Ningxia Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Common Infectious Diseases, Ningxia Medical University","place":["Yinchuan, Ningxia, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yana","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Basic Medical Sciences, Ningxia Medical University","place":["Yinchuan, Ningxia, China"]},{"name":"Ningxia Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Common Infectious Diseases, Ningxia Medical University","place":["Yinchuan, Ningxia, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wei","family":"Zhao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Basic Medical Sciences, Ningxia Medical University","place":["Yinchuan, Ningxia, China"]},{"name":"Ningxia Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Common Infectious Diseases, Ningxia Medical University","place":["Yinchuan, Ningxia, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jiahui","family":"Song","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Basic Medical Sciences, Ningxia Medical University","place":["Yinchuan, Ningxia, China"]},{"name":"Ningxia Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Common Infectious Diseases, Ningxia Medical University","place":["Yinchuan, Ningxia, China"]}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1621230","DOI":"10.3389\/fcimb.2025.1621230","article-title":"Brucellosis: bacteriology, pathogenesis, epidemiology and role of the metallophores in virulence: a review","volume":"15","author":"Ghssein","year":"2025","journal-title":"Front Cell Infect Microbiol"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1107\/S2053230X21013078","article-title":"Crystal structures of FolM alternative dihydrofolate reductase 1 from Brucella suis and Brucella canis","volume":"78","author":"Porter","year":"2022","journal-title":"Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Commun"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2290839","DOI":"10.1080\/22221751.2023.2290839","article-title":"Long ignored but making a comeback: a worldwide epidemiological evolution of human brucellosis","volume":"13","author":"Liu","year":"2024","journal-title":"Emerg Microbes Infect"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1007\/s10123-023-00374-w","article-title":"Comparative genomics of Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis unravels the gene sharing, virulence factors and SNP diversity among the standard, vaccine and field strains","volume":"27","author":"Anbazhagan","year":"2024","journal-title":"Int Microbiol Off J Span Soc Microbiol"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vetimm.2016.02.002","article-title":"A review of the basis of the immunological diagnosis of ruminant brucellosis","volume":"171","author":"Ducrotoy","year":"2016","journal-title":"Vet Immunol Immunopathol"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vetimm.2018.06.004","article-title":"Cell mediated immune response in goats after experimental challenge with the virulent Brucella melitensis strain 16M and the reduced virulence strain rev. 1","volume":"202","author":"Higgins","year":"2018","journal-title":"Vet Immunol Immunopathol"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0007509","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pntd.0007509","article-title":"Comparative performance of lateral flow immunochromatography, iELISA and rose Bengal tests for the diagnosis of cattle, sheep, goat and swine brucellosis","volume":"13","author":"Gusi","year":"2019","journal-title":"PLoS Negl Trop Dis"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e132","DOI":"10.1017\/s0950268824001018","article-title":"Spatiotemporal risk of human brucellosis under intensification of livestock keeping based on machine learning techniques in Shaanxi, China","volume":"152","author":"Shen","year":"2024","journal-title":"Epidemiol Infect"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.46234\/ccdcw2023.004","article-title":"Epidemic characteristics, high-risk areas and space-time clusters of human brucellosis\u2014China, 2020-2021","volume":"5","author":"Yang","year":"2023","journal-title":"China CDC Wkly"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1186\/s40249-021-00834-3","article-title":"Fluorescence polarization assay improves the rapid detection of human brucellosis in China","volume":"10","author":"Dong","year":"2021","journal-title":"Infect Dis Poverty"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0012030","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pntd.0012030","article-title":"Diagnosis of human brucellosis: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"18","author":"Freire","year":"2024","journal-title":"PLoS Negl Trop Dis"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0012442","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pntd.0012442","article-title":"Diagnosis of brucellosis: combining tests to improve performance","volume":"18","author":"Loubet","year":"2024","journal-title":"PLoS Negl Trop Dis"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e00420","DOI":"10.1016\/j.parepi.2025.e00420","article-title":"Epidemic status of echinococcosis, brucellosis, and tuberculosis among rural residents in three counties of Wuzhong City, Ningxia, China in 2023","volume":"29","author":"Huo","year":"2025","journal-title":"Parasite Epidemiol Control"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1623","DOI":"10.3390\/pathogens10121623","article-title":"Microbiological laboratory diagnosis of human brucellosis: an overview","volume":"10","author":"Bonaventura","year":"2021","journal-title":"Pathogens"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1211","DOI":"10.1128\/JCM.00010-06","article-title":"Evaluation of different PCR assays for early detection of acute and relapsing brucellosis in humans in comparison with conventional methods","volume":"45","author":"Mitka","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Clin Microbiol"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prevetmed.2018.01.005","article-title":"A systematic review of current immunological tests for the diagnosis of cattle brucellosis","volume":"151","author":"Ducrotoy","year":"2018","journal-title":"Prev Vet Med"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.12834\/VetIt.1176.6539.2","article-title":"Cross-reactivity in serological tests for brucellosis: a comparison of immune response of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 vs Brucella spp","volume":"54","author":"Bonfini","year":"2018","journal-title":"Vet Ital"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.3390\/tropicalmed8050274","article-title":"False positives in brucellosis serology: wrong bait and wrong pond?","volume":"8","author":"B\u00e1ny\u00e1sz","year":"2023","journal-title":"Trop Med Infect Dis"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0013185","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pntd.0013185","article-title":"What do we really know about brucellosis diagnosis in livestock worldwide? A systematic review","volume":"19","author":"Vection","year":"2025","journal-title":"PLoS Negl Trop Dis"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1976","DOI":"10.3390\/microorganisms11081976","article-title":"Evaluation of a lateral flow immunochromatography assay (LFIA) for diagnosis and surveillance of brucellosis in French alpine ibex (Capra ibex)","volume":"11","author":"Freddi","year":"2023","journal-title":"Microorganisms"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cimid.2016.01.006","article-title":"An evaluation of ELISA using recombinant Brucella abortus bacterioferritin (Bfr) for bovine brucellosis","volume":"45","author":"Hop","year":"2016","journal-title":"Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.1007\/s42770-019-00097-z","article-title":"Recombinant Omp2b antigen-based ELISA is an efficient tool for specific serodiagnosis of animal brucellosis","volume":"50","author":"Vatankhah","year":"2019","journal-title":"Braz J Microbiol"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.30466\/vrf.2021.524590.3141","article-title":"Development of a diagnostic indirect ELISA test for detection of Brucella antibody using recombinant outer membrane protein 16 kDa (rOMP16)","volume":"13","author":"Golchin","year":"2022","journal-title":"Vet Res Forum"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1389728","DOI":"10.3389\/fvets.2024.1389728","article-title":"Production and evaluation of anti-BP26 monoclonal antibodies for the serological detection of animal brucellosis","volume":"11","author":"Guo","year":"2024","journal-title":"Front Vet Sci"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1186\/s12896-023-00817-2","article-title":"Serodiagnosis of human brucellosis by an indirect ELISA test using recombinant outer membrane protein 19 kDa (rOMP19) as an antigen","volume":"23","author":"Golchin","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMC Biotechnol"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1189368","DOI":"10.3389\/fcimb.2023.1189368","article-title":"The outer membrane proteins based seroprevalence strategy for Brucella ovis natural infection in sheep","volume":"13","author":"Zhang","year":"2023","journal-title":"Front Cell Infect Microbiol"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1390","DOI":"10.14202\/vetworld.2023.1390-1399","article-title":"Brucellosis detection and the role of Brucella spp. cell wall proteins","volume":"16","author":"Bulashev","year":"2023","journal-title":"Vet World"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1439","DOI":"10.14202\/vetworld.2020.1439-1447","article-title":"Use of recombinant Brucella outer membrane proteins 19, 25, and 31 for serodiagnosis of bovine brucellosis","volume":"13","author":"Bulashev","year":"2020","journal-title":"Vet World"},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2187","DOI":"10.14202\/vetworld.2021.2187-2196","article-title":"Evaluation of chimeric proteins for serological diagnosis of brucellosis in cattle","volume":"14","author":"Bulashev","year":"2021","journal-title":"Vet World"},{"key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104345","DOI":"10.1016\/j.micpath.2020.104345","article-title":"Immunoproteomics of Brucella abortus reveals potential of recombinant antigens for discriminating vaccinated from naturally infected cattle","volume":"147","author":"Faria","year":"2020","journal-title":"Microb Pathog"},{"key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4093","DOI":"10.2147\/IDR.S372411","article-title":"Evaluation of the combined use of major outer membrane proteins in the serodiagnosis of brucellosis","volume":"15","author":"Yao","year":"2022","journal-title":"Infect Drug Resist"},{"key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"708008","DOI":"10.3389\/fvets.2021.708008","article-title":"A multi-epitope fusion protein-based p-ELISA method for diagnosing bovine and goat brucellosis","volume":"8","author":"Yin","year":"2021","journal-title":"Front Vet Sci"},{"key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.micpath.2015.05.004","article-title":"Evaluation of the combined use of the recombinant Brucella abortus Omp10, Omp19 and Omp28 proteins for the clinical diagnosis of bovine brucellosis","author":"Simborio","year":"2015","journal-title":"Microb Pathog"},{"key":"ref34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5301","DOI":"10.2147\/IDR.S374432","article-title":"Comparison of BP26, Omp25 and Omp31 and a multiepitope-based fusion protein in the serological detection of canine brucellosis","volume":"15","author":"Yao","year":"2022","journal-title":"Infect Drug Resist"},{"key":"ref35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"879","DOI":"10.3724\/abbs.2024023","article-title":"A subunit vaccine based on Brucella rBP26 induces Th1 immune responses and M1 macrophage activation","volume":"56","author":"Wen","year":"2024","journal-title":"Acta Biochim Biophys Sin"},{"key":"ref36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0012995","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pntd.0012995","article-title":"Establishment of an I-ELISA method based on multi-epitope fusion protein for diagnosis of human brucellosis","volume":"19","author":"Xie","year":"2025","journal-title":"PLoS Negl Trop Dis"},{"key":"ref37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0286224","DOI":"10.1128\/spectrum.02862-24","article-title":"Follow-up of antibody changes in brucellosis patients in Gansu, China","volume":"13","author":"Sha","year":"2025","journal-title":"Microbiol Spectrum"},{"key":"ref38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/j.molimm.2016.01.001","article-title":"Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of Brucella abortus recombinant protein cocktail (rOmp19+rP39) against B. abortus 544 and B. melitensis 16M infection in murine model","volume":"71","author":"Tadepalli","year":"2016","journal-title":"Mol Immunol"},{"key":"ref39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1306","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinbiochem.2017.08.015","article-title":"The investigation of interferences in immunoassay","volume":"50","author":"Ward","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin Biochem"},{"key":"ref40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0009630","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pntd.0009630","article-title":"Latent class evaluation of the performance of serological tests for exposure to Brucella spp. in cattle, sheep, and goats in Tanzania","volume":"15","author":"Bodenham","year":"2021","journal-title":"PLoS Negl Trop Dis"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Veterinary Science"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fvets.2026.1775573\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,9]],"date-time":"2026-03-09T05:30:49Z","timestamp":1773034249000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fvets.2026.1775573\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,9]]},"references-count":40,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fvets.2026.1775573"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fvets.2026.1775573","relation":{},"ISSN":["2297-1769"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2297-1769","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,9]]},"article-number":"1775573"}}