{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,2]],"date-time":"2026-03-02T14:40:47Z","timestamp":1772462447953,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":145,"publisher":"Frontiers Media SA","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,19]],"date-time":"2023-12-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1702944000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100010665","name":"H2020 Marie Sk\u0142odowska-Curie Actions","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100010665","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["frontiersin.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Front. Genome Ed."],"abstract":"<jats:p>The advent of CRISPR-Cas9 in 2012 started revolutionizing the field of genetics by broadening the access to a method for precise modification of the human genome. It also brought renewed attention to the ethical issues of genetic modification and the societal acceptance of technology for this purpose. So far, many surveys assessing public attitudes toward genetic modification have been conducted worldwide. Here, we present the results of a systematic review of primary publications of surveys addressing public attitudes toward genetic modification as well as the awareness and knowledge about the technology required for genetic modification. A total of 53 primary publications (1987\u20132020) focusing on applications in humans and non-human animals were identified, covering countries in four continents. Of the 53 studies, 30 studies from until and including 2012 (pre-CRISPR) address gene therapy in humans and genetic modification of animals for food production and biomedical research. The remaining 23 studies from after 2013 (CRISPR) address gene editing in humans and animals. Across countries, respondents see gene therapy for disease treatment or prevention in humans as desirable and highly acceptable, whereas enhancement is generally met with opposition. When the study distinguishes between somatic and germline applications, somatic gene editing is generally accepted, whereas germline applications are met with ambivalence. The purpose of the application is also important for assessing attitudes toward genetically modified animals: modification in food production is much less accepted than for biomedical application in pre-CRISPR studies. A relationship between knowledge\/awareness and attitude toward genetic modification is often present. A critical appraisal of methodology quality in the primary publications with regards to sampling and questionnaire design, development, and administration shows that there is considerable scope for improvement in the reporting of methodological detail. Lack of information is more common in earlier studies, which probably reflects the changing practice in the field.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3389\/fgeed.2023.1284547","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,19]],"date-time":"2023-12-19T11:01:32Z","timestamp":1702983692000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["What do people think about genetic engineering? A systematic review of questionnaire surveys before and after the introduction of CRISPR"],"prefix":"10.3389","volume":"5","author":[{"given":"Pedro Dias","family":"Ramos","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Maria Strecht","family":"Almeida","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Ingrid Anna Sofia","family":"Olsson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"1965","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"B2","unstructured":"Human gene editing: international summit statement\n            BaltimoreD.\n            BaylisF.\n            BergP.\n            DaleyG. Q.\n            DoudnaJ. A.\n            LanderE. S.\n          2015"},{"key":"B3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"921","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1539-6924.2007.00932.x","article-title":"Belief in public efficacy, trust, and attitudes toward modern genetic science","volume":"27","author":"Barnett","year":"2007","journal-title":"Risk Anal."},{"key":"B4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17092","DOI":"10.1038\/nmicrobiol.2017.92","article-title":"A decade of discovery: CRISPR functions and applications","volume":"2","author":"Barrangou","year":"2017","journal-title":"Nat. Microbiol."},{"key":"B6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.3389\/fpubh.2018.00149","article-title":"Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer","volume":"6","author":"Boateng","year":"2018","journal-title":"Front. Public Health"},{"key":"B7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1089\/crispr.2018.0053","article-title":"The human right to science and the regulation of human germline engineering","volume":"2","author":"Boggio","year":"2019","journal-title":"CRISPR J."},{"key":"B8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.1038\/nbt.3227","article-title":"CRISPR germline engineering \u2013 the community speaks","volume":"33","author":"Bosley","year":"2015","journal-title":"Nat. Biotechnol."},{"key":"B9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1089\/crispr.2017.0024","article-title":"Do CRISPR germline ethics statements cut it?","volume":"1","author":"Brokowski","year":"2018","journal-title":"CRISPR J."},{"key":"B10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmb.2018.05.044","article-title":"CRISPR ethics: moral considerations for applications of a powerful tool","volume":"431","author":"Brokowski","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Mol. Biol."},{"key":"B11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.2217\/pme-2016-0047","article-title":"Emerging ethical perspectives in the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats genome-editing debate","volume":"13","author":"Camporesi","year":"2016","journal-title":"Per Med."},{"key":"B12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e3000223","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pbio.3000223","article-title":"Getting serious about the challenge of regulating germline gene therapy","volume":"17","author":"Caplan","year":"2019","journal-title":"PLoS Biol."},{"key":"B13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1421","DOI":"10.15252\/embr.201541337","article-title":"No time to waste--the ethical challenges created by CRISPR: CRISPR\/Cas, being an efficient, simple, and cheap technology to edit the genome of any organism, raises many ethical and regulatory issues beyond the use to manipulate human germ line cells","volume":"16","author":"Caplan","year":"2015","journal-title":"EMBO Rep."},{"key":"B14","first-page":"1","article-title":"Core principles and methods for conducting a systematic review of health interventions","volume-title":"Systematic reviews","author":"Centre of Reviews and Dissemination","year":""},{"key":"B15","first-page":"219","article-title":"Incorporating qualitative evidence in or alongside effectiveness reviews","volume-title":"Systematic reviews","author":"Centre of Reviews and Dissemination","year":""},{"key":"B16","volume-title":"Chinese public attitudes on gene editing","author":"Chen","year":"2018"},{"key":"B17","first-page":"117","article-title":"Willingness to pay for GM foods: results from a public survey in the USA","volume-title":"6th international conference of the international-consortium-on-agricultural-biotechnology-research","author":"Chen","year":"2004"},{"key":"B18","volume-title":"New Zealand public attitudes towards genetically modified food","author":"Chikhazhe","year":"2015"},{"key":"B19","volume-title":"Identifier NCT02793856, PD-1 knockout 150 engineered T cells for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer","year":""},{"key":"B20","volume-title":"Identifier NCT03872479, single ascending dose study in participants with LCA10","year":""},{"key":"B21","volume-title":"Identifier NCT03545815, study of CRISPR-cas9 mediated PD-1 and TCR gene-knocked out mesothelin-directed CAR-T cells in patients with mesothelin positive multiple solid tumors","year":"2018"},{"key":"B22","volume-title":"CRISPR and Animals: implications of genome editing for policy and society","year":"2018"},{"key":"B23","volume-title":"Opinions of Europeans on biotechnology in 1991","year":"1991"},{"key":"B24","volume-title":"Biotechnology and genetic engineering: what Europeans think about it in 1993","year":"1993"},{"key":"B25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-genom-082509-141740","article-title":"Public attitudes and beliefs about genetics","volume":"11","author":"Condit","year":"2010","journal-title":"Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet."},{"key":"B26","volume-title":"New Zealand public acceptance of biotechnology","author":"Cook","year":"2004"},{"key":"B27","first-page":"J2537","volume-title":"Community attitudes to gene technology","author":"Cormick","year":"2017"},{"key":"B29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1028","DOI":"10.1126\/science.307.5712.1028b","article-title":"Gene therapy. As Gelsinger case ends, gene therapy suffers another blow","volume":"307","author":"Couzin","year":"2005","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"B30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"704","DOI":"10.3389\/fgene.2018.00704","article-title":"Predicting public attitudes toward gene editing of germlines: the impact of moral and hereditary concern in human and animal applications","volume":"9","author":"Critchley","year":"2019","journal-title":"Front. Genet."},{"key":"B31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.02.008","article-title":"A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: alternative tool structure is proposed","volume":"64","author":"Crowe","year":"2011","journal-title":"J. Clin. Epidemiol."},{"key":"B32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20180106","DOI":"10.1098\/rstb.2018.0106","article-title":"The ethics of genome editing in non-human animals: a systematic review of reasons reported in the academic literature","volume":"374","author":"de Graeff","year":"2019","journal-title":"Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond B Biol. Sci."},{"key":"B33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1089\/hum.2019.197","article-title":"Public acceptability of gene therapy and gene editing for human use: a systematic review","volume":"31","author":"Delhove","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum. Gene Ther."},{"key":"B34","volume-title":"Statement on genome editing technologies","year":"2015"},{"key":"B35","first-page":"149","article-title":"Public perceptions of transgenic animals","volume":"24","author":"Einsieddel","year":"2005","journal-title":"Rev. Sci. Tech."},{"key":"B36","volume-title":"Genome editing: scientific opportunities, public interests and policy options in the European Union","year":"2017"},{"key":"B37","volume-title":"Europeans and biotechnology in 2002","year":"2002"},{"key":"B38","volume-title":"Europeans and biotechnology in 2005: patterns and trends","year":"2006"},{"key":"B39","volume-title":"Europeans and biotechnology in 2010: winds of change?","year":"2010"},{"key":"B40","volume-title":"European opinions on modern biotechnology","year":"1996"},{"key":"B41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1159\/000083910","article-title":"The ethics of gene therapy and abortion: public opinion","volume":"20","author":"Evans","year":"2005","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther."},{"key":"B42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1016\/S0924-2244(03)00064-5","article-title":"10. Societal issues and public attitudes towards genetically modified foods","volume":"14","author":"Frewer","year":"2003","journal-title":"Trends Food Sci. Technol."},{"key":"B43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1181","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fct.2004.02.002","article-title":"Societal aspects of genetically modified foods","volume":"42","author":"Frewer","year":"2004","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"B44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"683","DOI":"10.1093\/erae\/jbx007","article-title":"Consumer acceptance and rejection of emerging agrifood technologies and their applications","volume":"44","author":"Frewer","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ."},{"key":"B45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"442","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tifs.2011.05.005","article-title":"Consumer response to novel agri-food technologies: implications for predicting consumer acceptance of emerging food technologies","volume":"22","author":"Frewer","year":"2011","journal-title":"Trends Food Sci. Technol."},{"key":"B46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1177\/016224399702200105","article-title":"Public concerns in the United Kingdom about general and specific applications of genetic engineering: risk, benefit, and ethics","volume":"22","author":"Frewer","year":"1997","journal-title":"Sci. Technol. Hum. Values"},{"key":"B47","volume-title":"Most Americans accept genetic engineering of animals that benefits human health, but many oppose other uses","author":"Funk","year":""},{"key":"B48","volume-title":"Public views of gene editing for babies depend on how it would Be used","author":"Funk","year":""},{"key":"B49","volume-title":"U.S. Public wary of biomedical technologies to \u201cEnhance\u201d human abilities","author":"Funk","year":"2016"},{"key":"B51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1021","DOI":"10.1038\/nbt.3958","article-title":"Public views on gene editing and its uses","volume":"35","author":"Gaskell","year":"2017","journal-title":"Nat. Biotechnol."},{"key":"B52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"667","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.gt.3301752","article-title":"Gene therapy and the public: a matter of trust","volume":"9","author":"Gottweis","year":"2002","journal-title":"Gene Ther."},{"key":"B53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1002\/agr.20149","article-title":"Public approval of plant and animal biotechnology in South Korea: an ordered probit analysis","volume":"24","author":"Govindasamy","year":"2008","journal-title":"Agribusiness"},{"key":"B54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1111\/japp.12249","article-title":"The ethics of germline gene editing","volume":"34","author":"Gyngell","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. Appl. Philos."},{"key":"B55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0138237","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0138237","article-title":"The role of Google scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching","volume":"17","author":"Haddaway","year":"2015","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"B56","first-page":"112","article-title":"Attitudes: content, structure and functions","volume-title":"Introduction to social psychology: a European perspective. BPS textbooks in psychology","author":"Haddock","year":"2008"},{"key":"B57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"490","DOI":"10.1108\/RAUSP-05-2019-0098","article-title":"Development and validation of attitudes measurement scales: fundamental and practical aspects","volume":"54","author":"Hair","year":"2019","journal-title":"RAUSP Manag. J."},{"key":"B58","volume-title":"Public perceptions of genetically modified foods: Americans know not what they eat","author":"Hallman","year":"2002"},{"key":"B59","volume-title":"Public perceptions of genetically modified foods: a national study of American knowledge and opinion","author":"Hallman","year":"2003"},{"key":"B60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1089\/crispr.2019.0042","article-title":"Societal and ethical impacts of germline genome editing: how can we secure human Rights?","volume":"2","author":"Halpern","year":"2019","journal-title":"CRISPR J."},{"key":"B61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1080\/713687604","article-title":"Attitudes towards genetic engineering","volume":"19","author":"Hampel","year":"2000","journal-title":"New Genet. Soc."},{"key":"B62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1265293","DOI":"10.1080\/20016689.2017.1265293","article-title":"Gene therapies development: slow progress and promising prospect","volume":"5","author":"Hanna","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. Mark. Access and Health Policy"},{"key":"B63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"hoy008","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoy008","article-title":"Reasons for being in favour of or against genome modification: a survey of the Dutch general public","volume":"2018","author":"Hendriks","year":"2018","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod. Open"},{"key":"B64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1007\/s40290-019-00276-1","article-title":"Genome editing: promoting responsible research","volume":"33","author":"Hirsch","year":"2019","journal-title":"Pharm. Med."},{"key":"B65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1177\/0162243906296852","article-title":"Public expectations in gene therapy: scientific futures and their performative effects on scientific citizenship","volume":"32","author":"Horst","year":"2007","journal-title":"Sci. Technol. Hum. Values"},{"key":"B66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1089\/crispr.2020.0004","article-title":"What do we (not) know about global views of human gene editing? Insights and blind spots in the CRISPR era","volume":"3","author":"Howell","year":"2020","journal-title":"CRISPR J."},{"key":"B67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"759","DOI":"10.1177\/0963662519869097","article-title":"Fostering public trust in science: the role of social media","volume":"28","author":"Huber","year":"2019","journal-title":"Public Underst. Sci."},{"key":"B68","volume-title":"Public attitudes to human genetic information","year":"2001"},{"key":"B69","first-page":"1","article-title":"CRISPR democracy: gene editing and the need for inclusive deliberation","volume":"32","author":"Hurlbut","year":"2015","journal-title":"Issues Sci. Technol."},{"key":"B70","first-page":"78","article-title":"Attitudes to biotechnology in Japan in 2003","volume":"13","author":"Inaba","year":"","journal-title":"Eubios J. Asian Int. Biotech."},{"key":"B71","first-page":"178","article-title":"Japanese views of medical biotechnology","volume-title":"Asian bioethics in the 21st century","author":"Inaba","year":""},{"key":"B72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aad6778","article-title":"Editing policy to fit the genome?","volume":"351","author":"Isasi","year":"2016","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"B73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-018-03270-w","article-title":"A global observatory for gene editing","volume":"555","author":"Jasanoff","year":"2018","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"B74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.17691\/stm2019.11.3.16","article-title":"Ethical and legal aspects of using genome editing technologies in medicine (review)","volume":"11","author":"Karagyaur","year":"2019","journal-title":"Sovrem. Tekhnologii Med."},{"key":"B75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1286","DOI":"10.1111\/cobi.13310","article-title":"Public views about editing genes in wildlife for conservation","volume":"33","author":"Kohl","year":"2019","journal-title":"Conserv. Biol."},{"key":"B76","volume-title":"Public attitudes to life sciences research in six European countries","author":"Lakom\u00fd","year":"2018"},{"key":"B77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-019-00726-5","article-title":"Adopt a moratorium on heritable genome editing","volume":"567","author":"Lander","year":"2019","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"B78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"992","DOI":"10.1016\/j.theriogenology.2005.09.012","article-title":"After Dolly--ethical limits to the use of biotechnology on farm animals","volume":"65","author":"Lassen","year":"2006","journal-title":"Theriogenology"},{"key":"B79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1007\/s13238-015-0153-5","article-title":"CRISPR\/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human tripronuclear zygotes","volume":"6","author":"Liang","year":"2015","journal-title":"Protein Cell"},{"key":"B80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1080\/17524032.2019.1685558","article-title":"Modeling risk perceptions, benefit perceptions, and approval of releasing genetically engineered mosquitoes as a response to zika virus","volume":"14","author":"Lull","year":"2019","journal-title":"Environ. Commun."},{"key":"B81","first-page":"1","article-title":"The unknown of human animal chimera research","volume":"10","author":"Luna","year":"2017","journal-title":"Intersect"},{"key":"B82","first-page":"137","article-title":"Attitudes to biotechnology in Japan and New Zealand in 1997, with international comparisons","volume":"7","author":"Macer","year":"1997","journal-title":"Eubios J. Asian Inst. Biotech."},{"key":"B83","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"945","DOI":"10.1038\/79425","article-title":"Changing attitudes to biotechnology in Japan","volume":"18","author":"Macer","year":"2000","journal-title":"Nat. Biotechnol."},{"key":"B84","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"511","DOI":"10.1089\/hum.1992.3.5-511","article-title":"Public acceptance of human gene-therapy and perceptions of human genetic manipulation","volume":"3","author":"Macer","year":"1992","journal-title":"Hum. Gene Ther."},{"key":"B85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1201\/9781420049275.ch33","article-title":"Ethics and public acceptance of agricultural biotechnology","volume-title":"Biotechnology in agriculture","author":"Macer","year":"1997"},{"key":"B86","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"791","DOI":"10.1089\/hum.1995.6.6-791","article-title":"International perceptions and approval of gene-therapy","volume":"6","author":"Macer","year":"1995","journal-title":"Hum. Gene Ther."},{"key":"B87","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1504\/IJBT.2000.000142","article-title":"Attitudes to biotechnology in Asia","volume":"2","author":"Macer","year":"2000","journal-title":"Int. J. Biotechnol."},{"key":"B88","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1177\/0038038504043217","article-title":"Animals in their nature","volume":"38","author":"Macnaghten","year":"2004","journal-title":"Sociology"},{"key":"B89","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1006\/appe.2002.0486","article-title":"Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods","volume":"39","author":"Magnusson","year":"2002","journal-title":"Appetite"},{"key":"B90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.4135\/9781412973380.n5","article-title":"Questionnaire design and development","volume-title":"The handbook of marketing research: uses, misuses, and future advances","author":"Malhotra","year":"2006"},{"key":"B91","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"796","DOI":"10.1136\/jmg.32.10.796","article-title":"Public-attitudes towards the selection of desirable characteristics in children","volume":"32","author":"Marteau","year":"1995","journal-title":"J. Med. Genet."},{"key":"B92","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1089\/hum.2018.033","article-title":"A need for better understanding is the major determinant for public perceptions of human gene editing","volume":"30","author":"McCaughey","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum. Gene Ther."},{"key":"B93","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1016\/j.stem.2016.04.011","article-title":"A global social media survey of attitudes to human genome editing","volume":"18","author":"McCaughey","year":"2019","journal-title":"Cell Stem Cell"},{"key":"B94","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0216542","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0216542","article-title":"Public attitudes towards genetically modified polled cattle","volume":"14","author":"McConnachie","year":"2019","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"B96","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mayocp.2019.11.018","article-title":"Reexamining the ethics of human germline editing in the wake of scandal","volume":"95","author":"Meagher","year":"2020","journal-title":"Mayo Clin. Proc."},{"key":"B97","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1000097","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"6","author":"Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"PLoS Med."},{"key":"B98","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1089\/crispr.2018.29012.mon","article-title":"ARRIGE arrives: toward the responsible use of genome editing","volume":"1","author":"Montoliu","year":"2018","journal-title":"CRISPR J."},{"key":"B99","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1057\/s41599-019-0319-5","article-title":"CRISPR in context: towards a socially responsible debate on embryo editing","volume":"5","author":"Morrison","year":"2019","journal-title":"Palgrave Commun."},{"key":"B100","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1093\/bmb\/ldx002","article-title":"Ethical issues of CRISPR technology and gene editing through the lens of solidarity","volume":"122","author":"Mulvihill","year":"2017","journal-title":"Br. Med. Bull."},{"key":"B101","first-page":"400","article-title":"Ethical orientations of Ohio residents toward genetically engineered plants and animals: an urban\/rural comparison","volume":"2","author":"Napier","year":"2004","journal-title":"J. Food Agric. Environ."},{"key":"B102","volume-title":"Human genome editing: science, ethics, and governance","year":"2017"},{"key":"B103","first-page":"71","article-title":"Aetiology and risk factors","volume-title":"How to review the evidence: systematic identification and review of the scientific literature","author":"National Health and Medical Research Council","year":""},{"key":"B104","first-page":"23","article-title":"Appraising and selecting studies","volume-title":"How to review the evidence: systematic identification and review of the scientific literature","author":"National Health and Medical Research Council","year":""},{"key":"B105","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1574-0864.2006.00129.x","article-title":"Acceptance of genetically modified food: comparing consumer perspectives in the United States and South Korea","volume":"34","author":"Nayga","year":"2006","journal-title":"Agr. Econ."},{"key":"B106","first-page":"106","article-title":"Attitudes of the public and scientists to biotechnology in Japan at the start of 2000","volume":"10","author":"Ng","year":"2000","journal-title":"Eubios J. Asian Int. Bioeth."},{"key":"B107","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1186\/s13073-017-0475-4","article-title":"Key challenges in bringing CRISPR-mediated somatic cell therapy into the clinic","volume":"9","author":"Nicol","year":"2017","journal-title":"Genome Med."},{"key":"B108","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.52041\/serj.v11i2.333","article-title":"Surveys assessing students\u2019 attitudes toward statistics: a systematic review of validity and reliability","volume":"11","author":"Nolan","year":"2012","journal-title":"Stat. Ed. Res. J."},{"key":"B109","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1093\/jlb\/lsx043","article-title":"Cutting edges and weaving threads in the gene editing (\u042f)evolution: reconciling scientific progress with legal, ethical, and social concerns","volume":"5","author":"Nordberg","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Law Biosci."},{"key":"B110","first-page":"172","article-title":"The Australian public's perception of genetically-engineered foods","volume":"8","author":"Norton","year":"1998","journal-title":"Austral Biotech."},{"key":"B111","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tifs.2006.12.005","article-title":"Adoption of GM technology in livestock production chains: an integrating framework","volume":"18","author":"Novoselova","year":"2007","journal-title":"Trends Food Sci. Tech."},{"key":"B112","volume-title":"Genome Editing: an ethical review","year":"2016"},{"key":"B113","volume-title":"New developments in biotechnology\u2014background paper: public perceptions of biotechnology","year":"1987"},{"key":"B114","volume-title":"Jury duty for global warming: citizen help solve the puzzle for climate action. Science","author":"O\u2019Grady","year":"2020"},{"key":"B115","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e94419","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0094419","article-title":"Quality assessment of TPB-based questionnaires: a systematic review","volume":"9","author":"Oluka","year":"2014","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"B117","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijnurstu.2011.07.002","article-title":"Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review","volume":"49","author":"Pace","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int. J. Nurs. Stud."},{"key":"B118","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-12-822596-7.00008-5","article-title":"Engaging with citizens","volume-title":"Science for policy handbook","author":"Pereira","year":"2020"},{"key":"B119","volume-title":"Systematic reviews in the social sciences \u2013 a practical guide","author":"Petticrew","year":"2005"},{"key":"B121","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"809","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-017-0010-4","article-title":"Google search as an additional source in systematic reviews","volume":"24","author":"Piasecki","year":"2018","journal-title":"Sci. Eng. Ethics"},{"key":"B122","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"413","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.2697333","article-title":"CRISPR-Cas9 and the non-germline non-controversy","volume":"3","author":"Polcz","year":"2016","journal-title":"J. Law Biosci."},{"key":"B123","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"939","DOI":"10.1038\/79412","article-title":"US public opinion divided over biotechnology?","volume":"18","author":"Priest","year":"2000","journal-title":"Nat. Biotechnol."},{"key":"B124","first-page":"257","article-title":"I will not eat it with a fox; I will not eat it in a box: what determines acceptance of GM food for American consumers?","volume":"20","author":"Puduri","year":"2005","journal-title":"Choices"},{"key":"B125","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0278169","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0278169","article-title":"Both trust in, and polarization of trust in, relevant sciences have increased through the COVID-19 pandemic","volume":"18","author":"Radrizzani","year":"2023","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"B126","volume-title":"The Nobel prize in Chemistry 2020","year":"2020"},{"key":"B127","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1007\/s11569-019-00356-1","article-title":"From asilomar to genome editing: research ethics and models of decision","volume":"13","author":"Rufo","year":"2019","journal-title":"NanoEthics"},{"key":"B128","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1016\/j.appet.2006.01.015","article-title":"Attitudes towards genetically modified and organic foods","volume":"46","author":"Saher","year":"2006","journal-title":"Appetite"},{"key":"B130","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1007\/s10728-006-0026-4","article-title":"Public, experts, and acceptance of advanced medical technologies: the case of organ transplant and gene therapy in Japan","volume":"14","author":"Sato","year":"2006","journal-title":"Health Care Anal."},{"key":"B131","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"553","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aan3708","article-title":"U.S. attitudes on human genome editing","volume":"357","author":"Scheufele","year":"2017","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"B132","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"686","DOI":"10.1177\/0963662510362834","article-title":"Attitudes towards the use of genetically modified animals in research","volume":"19","author":"Schuppli","year":"2010","journal-title":"Public Underst. Sci."},{"key":"B133","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1186\/s40504-020-00103-5","article-title":"Consolidating RRI and Open Science: understanding the potential for transformative change","volume":"16","author":"Shelley-Egan","year":"2020","journal-title":"Life Sci. Soc. Policy"},{"key":"B134","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"786","DOI":"10.1093\/jlb\/lsy020","article-title":"Is it 'gene therapy","volume":"5","author":"Sherkow","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Law Biosci."},{"key":"B135","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1080\/00288233.2005.9513672","article-title":"Understanding public responses to genetic engineering through exploring intentions to purchase a hypothetical functional food derived from genetically modified dairy cattle","volume":"48","author":"Small","year":"2005","journal-title":"New Zeal J. Agr. Res."},{"key":"B136","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1016\/s0739-7240(99)00027-2","article-title":"The animal scientist in a changing society","volume":"17","author":"Spencer","year":"1999","journal-title":"Domest. Anim. Endocrin"},{"key":"B137","volume-title":"The public and genetic editing, testing, and therapy","year":"2016"},{"key":"B138","first-page":"23","article-title":"A short introduction to survey research","volume-title":"Quantitative methods for the social sciences: a practical introduction with examples in SPSS and Stata","author":"Stockemer","year":""},{"key":"B139","first-page":"57","article-title":"Conducting a survey","volume-title":"Quantitative methods for the social sciences: a practical introduction with examples in SPSS and Stata","author":"Stockemer","year":""},{"key":"B140","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1080\/14636770500037693","article-title":"Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating the opinions of a better-informed public","volume":"24","author":"Sturgis","year":"2005","journal-title":"New Genet. Soc."},{"key":"B141","article-title":"Proportionate and adaptive governance of innovative technologies (PAGIT)","volume-title":"Case study: responsible governance of innovative technologies","author":"Tait","year":"2017"},{"key":"B143","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"745","DOI":"10.1038\/s10038-018-0430-2","article-title":"Survey on the perception of germline genome editing among the general public in Japan","volume":"63","author":"Uchiyama","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Hum. Genet."},{"key":"B144","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fct.2011.06.006","article-title":"State of the art in benefit-risk analysis: consumer perception","volume":"50","author":"Ueland","year":"2012","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"B145","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/s0734-9750(00)00033-1","article-title":"The impact of genetic modification of human foods in the 21st century: a review","volume":"18","author":"Uzogara","year":"2000","journal-title":"Biotechnol. Adv."},{"key":"B146","volume-title":"Potential uses for genetic technologies: dialogue and engagement research conducted on behalf of the Royal Society","author":"van Mill","year":"2017"},{"key":"B147","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1089\/hum.1991.2.2-115","article-title":"Human gene therapy: ethics and public policy","volume":"2","author":"Walters","year":"1991","journal-title":"Hum. Gene Ther."},{"key":"B148","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omtm.2017.05.008","article-title":"Public attitudes toward gene therapy in China","volume":"6","author":"Wang","year":"2017","journal-title":"Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev."},{"key":"B149","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.3389\/fpubh.2017.00117","article-title":"A CRISPR new world: attitudes in the public toward innovations in human genetic modification","volume":"5","author":"Weisberg","year":"2017","journal-title":"Front. Public Health"},{"key":"B150","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1017\/S1742170507002128","article-title":"The barriers to further adoption of organic farming and genetic engineering in Australia: views of agricultural professionals and their information sources","volume":"23","author":"Wheeler","year":"2008","journal-title":"Renew. Agr. Food Syst."},{"key":"B151","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e30247","DOI":"10.7554\/eLife.30247","article-title":"A transatlantic perspective on 20 emerging issues in biological engineering","volume":"6","author":"Wintle","year":"2017","journal-title":"Elife"},{"key":"B152","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"859","DOI":"10.1080\/17524032.2020.1811478","article-title":"Societal debates about emerging genetic technologies: toward a science of public engagement","volume":"14","author":"Wirz","year":"2020","journal-title":"Environ. Commun."},{"key":"B153","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"977","DOI":"10.1177\/0963662521998025","article-title":"The dangers of blind trust: examining the interplay among social media news use, misinformation identification, and news trust on conspiracy beliefs","volume":"30","author":"Xiao","year":"2021","journal-title":"Public Underst. Sci."},{"key":"B154","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0218176","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0218176","article-title":"Is gene editing an acceptable alternative to castration in pigs?","volume":"14","author":"Yunes","year":"2019","journal-title":"PLoS One"}],"container-title":["Frontiers in Genome Editing"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fgeed.2023.1284547\/full","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,19]],"date-time":"2023-12-19T11:02:09Z","timestamp":1702983729000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fgeed.2023.1284547\/full"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,19]]},"references-count":145,"alternative-id":["10.3389\/fgeed.2023.1284547"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fgeed.2023.1284547","relation":{},"ISSN":["2673-3439"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2673-3439","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,19]]},"article-number":"1284547"}}