{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,8]],"date-time":"2026-02-08T11:14:11Z","timestamp":1770549251712,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,17]],"date-time":"2023-08-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1692230400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Algorithms"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Recently, a hypothesis providing a detailed equation for the Plantower CF_1 algorithm for PM2.5 has been published. The hypothesis was originally validated using eight independent Plantower sensors in four PurpleAir PA-II monitors providing PM2.5 estimates from a single site in 2020. If true, the hypothesis makes important predictions regarding PM2.5 measurements using CF_1. Therefore, we test the hypothesis using 18 Plantower sensors from four datasets from two sites in later years (2021\u20132023). The four general models from these datasets agreed to within 10% with the original model. A competing algorithm known as \u201cpm2.5 alt\u201d has been published and is freely available on the PurpleAir API site. The accuracy, precision, and limit of detection for the two algorithms are compared. The CF_1 algorithm overestimates PM2.5 by about 60\u201370% compared to two calibrated PurpleAir monitors using the pm2.5 alt algorithm. A requirement that the two sensors in a single monitor agree to within 20% was met by 85\u201399% of the data using the pm2.5 alt algorithm, but by only 22\u201374% of the data using the CF_1 algorithm. The limit of detection (LOD) of the CF_1 algorithm was about 10 times the LOD of the pm2.5 alt algorithm, resulting in 71% of the CF_1 data falling below the LOD, compared to 1 % for the pm2.5 alt algorithm.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/a16080392","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,17]],"date-time":"2023-08-17T10:42:29Z","timestamp":1692268949000},"page":"392","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Testing a New \u201cDecrypted\u201d Algorithm for Plantower Sensors Measuring PM2.5: Comparison with an Alternative Algorithm"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"16","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6635-2303","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lance","family":"Wallace","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460, USA"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1016\/j.atmosenv.2017.10.003","article-title":"Development of an environmental chamber for evaluating the performance of low-cost air quality sensors under controlled conditions","volume":"171","author":"Papapostolou","year":"2017","journal-title":"Atmos. Environ."},{"key":"ref_2","unstructured":"(2023, July 21). AQ-SPEC, Available online: https:\/\/www.aqmd.gov\/aq-spec\/evaluations\/criteria-pollutants\/summary-pm."},{"key":"ref_3","first-page":"105194","article-title":"Development and application of a United States wide correction for PM2.5 data collected with the PurpleAir sensor","volume":"4","author":"Barkjohn","year":"2020","journal-title":"Atmos. Meas. Tech."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"116793","DOI":"10.1016\/j.envpol.2021.116763","article-title":"Characterizing outdoor infiltration and indoor contribution of PM2.5 with citizen-based low-cost monitoring data","volume":"276","author":"Bi","year":"2021","journal-title":"Environ. Pollut."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bulot, F.M.J., Russell, H.S., Rezaei, M., Johnson, M.S., Ossont, S.J.J., Morris, A.K.R., Basford, P.J., Easton, N.H.C., Foster, G.L., and Loxham, M. (2020). Laboratory Comparison of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors to Measure Transient Events of Pollution. Sensors, 20.","DOI":"10.3390\/s20082219"},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Delp, W.W., and Singer, B.C. (2020). Wildfire smoke adjustment factors for low-cost and professional PM2.5 monitors with optical sensors. Sensors, 20.","DOI":"10.3390\/s20133683"},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1029\/2018GH000136","article-title":"Impact of California fires on local and regional air quality: The role of a low-cost sensor network and satellite observations","volume":"2","author":"Gupta","year":"2018","journal-title":"GeoHealth"},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"232","DOI":"10.1080\/02786826.2019.1696015","article-title":"Performance characteristics of the low-cost Plantower PMS optical sensor","volume":"54","author":"He","year":"2020","journal-title":"Aerosol Sci. Technol."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Holder, A.L., Mebust, A.K., Maghran, L.A., McGown, M.R., Stewart, K.E., Vallano, D.M., Elleman, R.A., and Baker, K.R. (2020). Field Evaluation of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors for Measuring Wildfire Smoke. Sensors, 20.","DOI":"10.3390\/s20174796"},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1016\/j.envpol.2016.12.039","article-title":"Ambient and laboratory evaluation of a low-cost particulate matter sensor","volume":"221","author":"Kelly","year":"2017","journal-title":"Environ. Pollut."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"838","DOI":"10.1021\/acs.est.8b05174","article-title":"Field and Laboratory Evaluations of the Low-Cost Plantower Particulate Matter Sensor","volume":"53","author":"Zamora","year":"2018","journal-title":"Environ. Sci. Technol."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e2106478118","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.2106478118","article-title":"Wildfire smoke impacts on indoor air quality assessed using crowdsourced data in California","volume":"118","author":"Liang","year":"2021","journal-title":"Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA"},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Robinson, D.L. (2020). Accurate, low cost PM2.5 measurements demonstrate the large spatial variation in wood smoke pollution in regional Australia and improve modeling and estimates of health costs. Atmosphere, 11.","DOI":"10.3390\/atmos11080856"},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"932","DOI":"10.1016\/j.envpol.2018.11.065","article-title":"Long-term field evaluation of the Plantower PMS low-cost particulate matter sensors","volume":"245","author":"Sayahi","year":"2019","journal-title":"Environ. Pollut."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"624","DOI":"10.1111\/ina.12463","article-title":"Response of consumer and research grade indoor air quality monitors to residential sources of fine particles","volume":"28","author":"Singer","year":"2018","journal-title":"Indoor Air"},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117067","DOI":"10.1016\/j.atmosenv.2019.117067","article-title":"Laboratory evaluation of low-cost PurpleAir PM monitors and in-field correction using co-located portable filter samplers","volume":"220","author":"Tryner","year":"2020","journal-title":"Atmos. Environ."},{"key":"ref_17","unstructured":"(2022, March 30). US EPA, Available online: https:\/\/www.epa.gov\/air-sensor-toolbox\/how-use-air-sensors-air-sensor-guidebook."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wallace, L. (2022). Intercomparison of PurpleAir Sensor Performance over Three Years Indoors and Outdoors at a Home: Bias, Precision, and Limit of Detection Using an Improved Algorithm for Calculating PM2.5. Sensors, 22.","DOI":"10.20944\/preprints202202.0142.v1"},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118432","DOI":"10.1016\/j.atmosenv.2021.118432","article-title":"Calibration of low-cost PurpleAir outdoor monitors using an improved method of calculating PM2.5","volume":"256","author":"Wallace","year":"2021","journal-title":"Atmos. Environ."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wallace, L., Zhao, T., and Klepeis, N.E. (2022). Calibration of PurpleAir PA-I and PA-II monitors using daily mean PM2.5 concentrations measured in California, Washington, and Oregon from 2017 to 2021. Sensors, 22.","DOI":"10.20944\/preprints202205.0105.v1"},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e13105","DOI":"10.1111\/ina.13105","article-title":"Indoor contribution to PM2.5 exposure using all PurpleAir sites in Washington, Oregon, and California","volume":"32","author":"Wallace","year":"2022","journal-title":"Indoor Air"},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106654","DOI":"10.1016\/j.buildenv.2020.106654","article-title":"Performance of low-cost indoor air quality monitors for PM2.5 and PM10 from residential sources","volume":"174","author":"Wang","year":"2020","journal-title":"Build. Environ."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4823","DOI":"10.5194\/amt-11-4823-2018","article-title":"Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high- and low-concentration environments","volume":"11","author":"Zheng","year":"2018","journal-title":"Atmos. Meas. Tech."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jaerosci.2016.11.010","article-title":"Evaluation of new low-cost particle monitors for PM2.5 concentrations measurements","volume":"105","author":"Zikova","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. Aerosol Sci."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105329","DOI":"10.1016\/j.envint.2019.105329","article-title":"Calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors: Model development for a multi-city epidemiological study","volume":"134","author":"Zusman","year":"2020","journal-title":"Environ. Int."},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164874","DOI":"10.1016\/j.scitotenv.2023.164874","article-title":"Cracking the code\u2014Matching a proprietary algorithm for a low-cost sensor measuring PM1 and PM2.5","volume":"893","author":"Wallace","year":"2023","journal-title":"Sci. Total Environ."},{"key":"ref_27","first-page":"100093","article-title":"Secondhand exposure from vaping marijuana: Concentrations, emissions, and exposures determined using both research-grade and low-cost monitors","volume":"8","author":"Wallace","year":"2020","journal-title":"Atmos. Environ. X"},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117731","DOI":"10.1016\/j.atmosenv.2020.117731","article-title":"Characteristics of secondhand cannabis smoke from common smoking methods: Calibration factor, emission rate, and particle removal rate","volume":"242","author":"Zhao","year":"2020","journal-title":"Atmos. Environ."},{"key":"ref_29","first-page":"113","article-title":"Derivation of an indoor air averaging time model from the mass balance equation for the case of in-dependent source inputs and fixed air exchange rates","volume":"2","author":"Switzer","year":"1992","journal-title":"J. Expos. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1038\/jes.2010.15","article-title":"Validation of continuous particle monitors for personal, indoor, and outdoor exposures","volume":"21","author":"Wallace","year":"2010","journal-title":"J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol."},{"key":"ref_31","first-page":"389","article-title":"Reassessment of the Lethal London Fog of 1952: Novel Indicators of Acute and Chronic Consequences of Acute Exposure to Air Pollution","volume":"109","author":"Bell","year":"2001","journal-title":"Environ. Health Perspect."},{"key":"ref_32","unstructured":"(2023, January 01). Brittanica. Available online:https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Great-Smog-of-London."},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1080\/02786829808965535","article-title":"Aerosol Instrumentation in Occupational Hygiene: An Historical Perspective","volume":"28","author":"Walton","year":"1998","journal-title":"Aerosol Sci. Technol."},{"key":"ref_34","first-page":"403","article-title":"Particle Size-Selective Sampling in the Workplace: Rationale and Recommended Techniques","volume":"32","author":"Phalen","year":"1988","journal-title":"Ann. Occup. Hyg."},{"key":"ref_35","unstructured":"(2023, July 20). CEN 1995. Workplace atmospheres\u2014Guidance for the assessment of exposure by inhalation to chemical agents for compar-ison with limit values and measurement strategy. CEN 689, 1995. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), rue de Stassart 36, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium. Available online: https:\/\/standards.iteh.ai\/catalog\/standards\/cen\/cf6e7b0a-00ef-46c6-a0f3-89f61e2c5866\/en-689-1995."},{"key":"ref_36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"926","DOI":"10.3390\/atmos11090926","article-title":"Field Evaluation of Low-Cost PM Sensors (Purple Air PA-II) Under Variable Urban Air Quality Conditions, in Greece","volume":"11","author":"Stavroulas","year":"2020","journal-title":"Atmosphere"},{"key":"ref_37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1181","DOI":"10.5194\/amt-13-1181-2020","article-title":"Evaluation of a low-cost optical particle counter (Alphasense OPC-N2) for ambient air monitoring Atmos","volume":"13","author":"Crilley","year":"2018","journal-title":"Meas. Tech."}],"container-title":["Algorithms"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1999-4893\/16\/8\/392\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]],"date-time":"2025-10-10T20:35:41Z","timestamp":1760128541000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1999-4893\/16\/8\/392"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,17]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,8]]}},"alternative-id":["a16080392"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/a16080392","relation":{},"ISSN":["1999-4893"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1999-4893","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,17]]}}}