{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,10]],"date-time":"2026-06-10T05:28:19Z","timestamp":1781069299147,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,27]],"date-time":"2025-05-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1748304000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"Open Access Publication Fund of Humboldt-Universit\u00e4t zu Berlin"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Data"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Effective research data management (RDM) is essential for ensuring research integrity, reproducibility, and compliance with FAIR principles. Despite the development of comprehensive RDM frameworks, many institutions still struggle to ensure widespread engagement and compliance among researchers and staff. Adoption of RDM practices remains slow due to limited awareness, unclear benefits, and perceived administrative burdens. Using Mendelow\u2019s Matrix, this study draws on survey data to map key stakeholders, such as researchers, RDM professionals, institutional leadership, funding bodies, and infrastructure providers, based on their power and interest to ensure developing tailored communication strategies. This paper presents a communication strategy to enhance RDM adoption by improving visibility, fostering engagement, and encouraging the integration of RDM into research workflows and curricula. It outlines key approaches, including awareness campaigns, targeted publishing, strategic partnerships, and knowledge-driven promotion to embed RDM into research workflows.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/data10060083","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,29]],"date-time":"2025-05-29T04:46:38Z","timestamp":1748493998000},"page":"83","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Strategies for Embedding Research Data Management Through Effective Communication"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"10","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-2091-1802","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Fadwa","family":"Alshawaf","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Computer and Media Service, Humboldt-Universit\u00e4t zu Berlin, Geschwister-Scholl-Stra\u00dfe 1\u20133, 10117 Berlin, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kanza, S., and Knight, N.J. (2022). Behind every great research project is great data management. BMC Res. Notes, 15.","DOI":"10.1186\/s13104-022-05908-5"},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1038\/s41597-021-00981-0","article-title":"Data sharing practices and data availability upon request differ across scientific disciplines","volume":"8","author":"Tedersoo","year":"2021","journal-title":"Sci. Data"},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Colavizza, G., Hrynaszkiewicz, I., Staden, I., Whitaker, K., and McGillivray, B. (2020). The citation advantage of linking publications to research data. PLoS ONE, 15.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0230416"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160018","DOI":"10.1038\/sdata.2016.18","article-title":"The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship","volume":"3","author":"Wilkinson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Sci. Data"},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Perrier, L., Blondal, E., Ayala, A.P., Dearborn, D., Kenny, T., Lightfoot, D., Reka, R., Thuna, M., Trimble, L., and MacDonald, H. (2017). Research data management in academic institutions: A scoping review. PLoS ONE, 12.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0178261"},{"key":"ref_6","unstructured":"OpenAIRE (2025, March 09). How to Comply with the Horizon Europe Mandate for Research Data Management. Available online: https:\/\/www.openaire.eu\/how-to-comply-with-horizon-europe-mandate-for-rdm."},{"key":"ref_7","unstructured":"LIBER (2025, April 02). The Six Pillars of Engaging Researchers in Research Data Management (RDM). Available online: https:\/\/libereurope.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/The-6-Pillars-of-Engaging-Researchers-in-Research-Data-Management-RDM.pdf."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cox, A., and Verbaan, E. (2018). RDM: Drivers and barriers. Exploring Research Data Management, Facet.","DOI":"10.29085\/9781783302802"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"O\u2019Brien, E., and Mick, J. (2024). In the Academy, data science is lonely: Barriers to adopting data science methods for scientific research. Harv. Data Sci. Rev., 6.","DOI":"10.1162\/99608f92.7ca04767"},{"key":"ref_10","unstructured":"Appel, J. (2024, January 27\u201330). Conception and initial results of a systematic mapping of OER stakeholders in German education. Proceedings of the European Conference on Educational Research 2024 (ECER), Nicosia, Cyprus."},{"key":"ref_11","unstructured":"Kotter, J.P. (1996). Leading Change, Harvard Business School Press."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1177\/001872674700100103","article-title":"Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change","volume":"1","author":"Lewin","year":"1947","journal-title":"Hum. Relations"},{"key":"ref_13","unstructured":"Helling, P., Lemaire, M., Asef, E., Assmann, C., Christ, A., Engelhardt, C., Herwig, A., Kellendonk, S., Mertzen, D., and Thaut, A. (2024). Handreichung f\u00fcr die Beratung im Forschungsdatenmanagement. Zenodo."},{"key":"ref_14","unstructured":"Manske, A., and Z\u00e4nkert, S. (2024). Agents of change\u2014Skills & strategies for RDM professionals. Zenodo."},{"key":"ref_15","unstructured":"Mendelow, A. (1991, January 7\u20139). Stakeholder mapping. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Systems, Cambridge, MA, USA."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lrp.2010.08.001","article-title":"Strategic management of stakeholders: Theory and practice","volume":"44","author":"Ackermann","year":"2011","journal-title":"Long Range Plan."},{"key":"ref_17","unstructured":"Alshawaf, F. (2025). Power and Interest Scores for Stakeholders in Research Data Management [Data set]. Zenodo."},{"key":"ref_18","unstructured":"Research Data Alliance (2025, May 15). RDA Strategic Plan 2020\u20132023: Consolidating the Global Research Data Alliance (RDA). Available online: https:\/\/www.rd-alliance.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/RDA-Strategic-Plan-2020-2023_Final.pdf."}],"container-title":["Data"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2306-5729\/10\/6\/83\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,9]],"date-time":"2025-10-09T17:41:24Z","timestamp":1760031684000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2306-5729\/10\/6\/83"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,27]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,6]]}},"alternative-id":["data10060083"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/data10060083","relation":{},"ISSN":["2306-5729"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2306-5729","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,27]]}}}