{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,17]],"date-time":"2026-06-17T22:44:28Z","timestamp":1781736268968,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,30]],"date-time":"2025-10-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1761782400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Data"],"abstract":"<jats:p>The rapid adoption of generative AI raises questions not only about its transformative potential but also about its cognitive and societal risks. This study contributes to the debate by presenting cross-country experimental data (n = 150; Germany, Switzerland, United Kingdom) on how individuals engage with generative AI under different conditions: human-only, human + AI (unguided), human + AI (guided with structured prompting), and AI-only benchmarks. Across 450 evaluated responses, critical reasoning was assessed via expert rubric ratings, while perceived reflective engagement was captured through self-report indices. Results show that unguided AI use fosters cognitive offloading without improving reasoning quality, whereas structured prompting significantly reduces offloading and enhances both critical reasoning and reflective engagement. Mediation and latent class analyses reveal that guided AI use supports deeper human involvement and mitigates demographic disparities in performance. Beyond theoretical contributions, this study offers practical implications for business and society. As organisations integrate AI into workflows, unstructured use risks undermining workforce decision making and critical engagement. Structured prompting, by contrast, provides a scalable and low-cost governance tool that fosters responsible adoption, supports equitable access to technological benefits, and aligns with societal calls for human-centric AI. These findings highlight the dual nature of AI as both a productivity enabler and a cognitive risk, and position structured prompting as a promising intervention to navigate the emerging challenges of AI adoption in business and society.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/data10110172","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,31]],"date-time":"2025-10-31T02:48:28Z","timestamp":1761878908000},"page":"172","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["From Offloading to Engagement: An Experimental Study on Structured Prompting and Critical Reasoning with Generative AI"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"10","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4033-4403","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Michael","family":"Gerlich","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Center for Strategic Corporate Foresight and Sustainability, SBS Swiss Business School, 8302 Kloten, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","first-page":"39","article-title":"Who owns the thought? Epistemic responsibility in human\u2013AI collaboration","volume":"25","author":"Baasch","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ethics Inf. Technol."},{"key":"ref_2","first-page":"1124","article-title":"Automation and metacognition: Rethinking learner agency in AI-supported learning environments","volume":"53","author":"Rahimi","year":"2022","journal-title":"Br. J. Educ. Technol."},{"key":"ref_3","first-page":"104649","article-title":"Predictive text and learning performance: When writing feels easier, do we think less?","volume":"191","author":"Schmid","year":"2023","journal-title":"Comput. Educ."},{"key":"ref_4","first-page":"101782","article-title":"Cognitive Load in AI-Supported Learning: Rethinking Scaffolding through Prompt Design","volume":"85","author":"Liu","year":"2024","journal-title":"Learn. Instr."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1207\/s15430421tip4102_2","article-title":"Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview","volume":"41","author":"Zimmermann","year":"2002","journal-title":"Theory Into Pract."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gerlich, M. (2025). AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking. Societies, 15.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.5082524"},{"key":"ref_7","unstructured":"Kosmyna, N., Hauptmann, E., Yuan, Y., Situ, J., Liao, X.-H., Beresnitzky, A., Braunstein, I., and Maes, P. (2025). Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task. arXiv."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee, H.-P., Sarkar, A., Tankelevitch, L., Drosos, I., Rintel, S., Banks, R., and Wilson, N. (May, January 26). The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects from a Survey of Knowledge Workers. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Yokohama, Japan.","DOI":"10.1145\/3706598.3713778"},{"key":"ref_9","first-page":"601","article-title":"Prompt Literacy and Human Autonomy: Rethinking Competence in the Age of Language Models","volume":"2","author":"Schluter","year":"2021","journal-title":"AI Ethics"},{"key":"ref_10","first-page":"2379774","article-title":"dialogic approach to transform teaching, learning, and assessment with generative AI in secondary education: A proof of concept","volume":"19","author":"Tang","year":"2024","journal-title":"Pedagog. Int. J."},{"key":"ref_11","unstructured":"Facione, P.A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction (The Delphi Report), The California Academic Press for the American Philosophical Association."},{"key":"ref_12","unstructured":"Halpern, D.F. (2013). Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking, Psychology Press. [5th ed.]."},{"key":"ref_13","unstructured":"Norman, D.A. (1993). Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine, Addison-Wesley."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8","article-title":"Cognitive load theory","volume":"55","author":"Sweller","year":"2011","journal-title":"Psychol. Learn. Motiv."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1177\/1745691612460685","article-title":"Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate","volume":"8","author":"Evans","year":"2013","journal-title":"Perspect. Psychol. Sci."},{"key":"ref_16","unstructured":"Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus and Giroux."},{"key":"ref_17","first-page":"375","article-title":"Cross-country generalizability of the role of metacognitive knowledge in students\u2019 strategy use and reading competence","volume":"10","author":"Artelt","year":"2015","journal-title":"Metacogn. Learn."},{"key":"ref_18","first-page":"261","article-title":"Cognitive aging and decision making","volume":"16","author":"Mata","year":"2012","journal-title":"Trends Cogn. Sci."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gerlich, M. (2024). Exploring Motivators for Trust in the Dichotomy of Human\u2013AI Trust Dynamics. Soc. Sci., 13.","DOI":"10.3390\/socsci13050251"},{"key":"ref_20","first-page":"433","article-title":"The Persuasive Power of AI: Perceived Credibility, Bias Blindness, and Political Reasoning","volume":"38","author":"Yeo","year":"2023","journal-title":"AI Soc."},{"key":"ref_21","unstructured":"Gurney, N., Miller, J.H., and Pynadath, D.V. (2023, January 7\u201314). The Role of Heuristics and Biases during Complex Choices with an AI Teammate. Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-23), Washinton, DC, USA."},{"key":"ref_22","first-page":"102653","article-title":"Generative AI in practice: How knowledge workers use ChatGPT","volume":"71","author":"Dwivedi","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int. J. Inf. Manag."},{"key":"ref_23","first-page":"439","article-title":"Trustworthy AI in the Workplace: Between Functional Assistance and Cognitive Delegation","volume":"2","author":"Leufer","year":"2022","journal-title":"AI Ethics"},{"key":"ref_24","unstructured":"(2025, June 15). Gartner Inc. Stamford, CT, USA. Available online: https:\/\/www.gartner.com\/en\/newsroom."}],"container-title":["Data"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2306-5729\/10\/11\/172\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,31]],"date-time":"2025-10-31T03:39:50Z","timestamp":1761881990000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2306-5729\/10\/11\/172"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,30]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,11]]}},"alternative-id":["data10110172"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/data10110172","relation":{},"ISSN":["2306-5729"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2306-5729","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,30]]}}}