{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,12]],"date-time":"2025-10-12T04:05:36Z","timestamp":1760241936892,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":46,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,29]],"date-time":"2018-10-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1540771200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Data"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Surveys are a common method in the social and behavioral sciences to collect data on attitudes, personality and social behavior. Methodological reports should provide researchers with a complete and comprehensive overview of the design, collection and statistical processing of the survey data that are to be analyzed. As an important aspect of open science practices, they should enable secondary users to assess the quality and the analytical potential of the data. In the present article, we propose guidelines for the documentation of survey data that are based on the total survey error approach. Considering these guidelines, we conclude that both scientists and data-holding institutions should become more sensitive to the quality of survey data documentation.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/data3040045","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,29]],"date-time":"2018-10-29T11:10:41Z","timestamp":1540811441000},"page":"45","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Improving the Quality of Survey Data Documentation: A Total Survey Error Perspective"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"3","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3511-0368","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alexander","family":"Jedinger","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"GESIS\u2014Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Unter Sachsenhausen 6\u20138, 50667 Cologne, Germany"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1634-9229","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Oliver","family":"Watteler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"GESIS\u2014Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Unter Sachsenhausen 6\u20138, 50667 Cologne, Germany"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5451-4598","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Andr\u00e9","family":"F\u00f6rster","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Service Center eSciences, Trier University, 54286 Trier, Germany"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","unstructured":"OECD (2007). OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding, OECD Publications."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, aac4716.","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aac4716"},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1422","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aab2374","article-title":"Promoting an open research culture","volume":"348","author":"Nosek","year":"2015","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1177\/2515245917751886","article-title":"Data Sharing in Psychology: A Survey on Barriers and Preconditions","volume":"1","author":"Houtkoop","year":"2018","journal-title":"Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.1017\/S1049096516000184","article-title":"How Are We Doing? Data Access and Replication in Political Science","volume":"49","author":"Key","year":"2016","journal-title":"PS Political Sci. Politics"},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1002\/bult.2014.1720400609","article-title":"Funding Agency Responses to Federal Requirements for Public Access to Research Results","volume":"40","author":"Kozlowski","year":"2014","journal-title":"Bull. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1177\/2515245918758319","article-title":"Data: Sharing Is Caring","volume":"1","author":"Levenstein","year":"2018","journal-title":"Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Biemer, P.P., and Lyberg, L.E. (2003). Introduction to Survey Quality, Wiley.","DOI":"10.1002\/0471458740"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Blasius, J., and Thiessen, V. (2012). Assessing the Quality of Survey Data, Sage.","DOI":"10.4135\/9781446251874"},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Weisberg, H.F. (2005). The Total Survey Error Approach: A Guide to the New Science of Survey Research, University of Chicago Press.","DOI":"10.7208\/chicago\/9780226891293.001.0001"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Callegaro, M., Baker, R., Bethlehem, J., G\u00f6ritz, A.S., Krosnick, J.A., and Lavrakas, P.J. (2014). A Critical Review of Studies Investigating the Quality of Data Obtained with Online Panels Based on Probability and Nonprobability Samples. Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective, Wiley.","DOI":"10.1002\/9781118763520"},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"464","DOI":"10.1093\/ijpor\/edq052","article-title":"Refining the Total Survey Error Perspective","volume":"23","author":"Smith","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int. J. Public Opin. Res."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards (2008). Reporting Standards for Research in Psychology: Why do we Need Them? What Might they Be?. Am. Psychol., 63, 839\u2013851.","DOI":"10.1037\/0003-066X.63.9.839"},{"key":"ref_14","unstructured":"American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) (2015). The AAPOR Code of Professional Ethics and Practices, American Association for Public Opinion Research."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Von Elm, E., Altman, D.G., Egger, M., Pocock, S.J., G\u00f8tzsche, P.C., Vandenbroucke, J.P., and Strobe, I. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies. PLoS Med., 4.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.0040296"},{"key":"ref_16","unstructured":"Eurostat (2015). ESS Handbook for Quality Reports\u20142014 Edition, Publications Office of the European Union."},{"key":"ref_17","unstructured":"Groves, R.M., Fowler, F.J., Couper, M., Lepkowski, J.M., Singer, E., and Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey Methodology, Wiley. [2nd ed.]."},{"key":"ref_18","unstructured":"Marsden, P.V., and Wright, J.D. (2010). Archiving, Documentation, and Dissemination. Handbook of Survey Research, Emerald Group. [2nd ed.]."},{"key":"ref_19","unstructured":"Rose, D. (2000). Dissemination Issues for Panel Studies: Metadata and Documentation. Researching Social and Economic Change: The Uses of Household Panel Studies, Routledge."},{"key":"ref_20","unstructured":"de Leeuw, E.D., Hox, J.J., and Dillman, D.A. (2008). Survey Documentation: Toward Professional Knowledge Management in Sample Surveys. International Handbook of Survey Methodology, Erlbaum."},{"key":"ref_21","unstructured":"Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., and Woollard, M. (2014). Managing and Sharing Research Data: A Guide to Good Practice, Sage."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Valliant, R., Dever, J.A., and Kreuter, F. (2013). Practical Tools for Designing and Weighting Survey Samples, Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4614-6449-5"},{"key":"ref_23","unstructured":"American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) (2016). Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, American Association for Public Opinion Research. [9th ed.]."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"711","DOI":"10.1093\/poq\/nfq048","article-title":"AAPOR Report on Online Panels","volume":"74","author":"Baker","year":"2010","journal-title":"Public Opin. Q."},{"key":"ref_25","unstructured":"Marsden, P.V., and Wright, J.D. (2010). Internet Surveys. Handbook of Survey Research, Emerald Group. [2nd ed.]."},{"key":"ref_26","unstructured":"ESOMAR (2012). 28 Questions to Help Reseach Buyers of Onlime Samples, European Society for Opinion and Market Research."},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Callegaro, M., Baker, R., Bethlehem, J., G\u00f6ritz, A.S., Krosnick, J.A., and Lavrakas, P.J. (2014). Professional Respondents in Nonprobability Online Panels. Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective, Wiley.","DOI":"10.1002\/9781118763520"},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fowler, F.J. (2009). Survey Research Methods, Sage. [4th ed.].","DOI":"10.4135\/9781452230184"},{"key":"ref_29","first-page":"233","article-title":"To Mix or Not to Mix Data Collection Modes in Surveys","volume":"21","year":"2005","journal-title":"J. Off. Stat."},{"key":"ref_30","unstructured":"Marsden, P.V., and Wright, J.D. (2010). Mixed-Mode Surveys. Handbook of Survey Research, Emerald Group. [2nd ed.]."},{"key":"ref_31","unstructured":"Marsden, P.V., and Wright, J.D. (2010). How Good is Survey Measurement? Assessing the Reliability and Validity of Survey Measures. Handbook of Survey Research, Emerald Group. [2nd ed.]."},{"key":"ref_32","unstructured":"de Leeuw, E.D., Hox, J.J., and  Dillman, D.A. (2008). Testing Survey Questions. International Handbook of Survey Methodology, Erlbaum."},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Willis, G.B. (2005). Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design, Sage.","DOI":"10.4135\/9781412983655"},{"key":"ref_34","first-page":"219","article-title":"Data Collection Quality Assurance in Cross-National Surveys: The Example of the ESS","volume":"3","author":"Koch","year":"2009","journal-title":"Methods Data Anal."},{"key":"ref_35","unstructured":"B\u00f6rsch-Supan, A., and Malter, F. (2013). Fieldwork Management and Monitoring in SHARE Wave Four. SHARE Wave 4: Innovations and Methodology, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA)."},{"key":"ref_36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1093\/poq\/nfn011","article-title":"The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias: A Meta-Analysis","volume":"72","author":"Groves","year":"2008","journal-title":"Public Opin. Q."},{"key":"ref_37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Biemer, P., de Leeuw, E., Eckman, S., Edwards, B., Kreuter, F., Lyberg, L.E., Tucker, N.C., and West, B.T. (2017). Total Survey Error for Longitudinal Surveys. Total Survey Error in Practice, Wiley.","DOI":"10.1002\/9781119041702"},{"key":"ref_38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1008","DOI":"10.1093\/poq\/nfn065","article-title":"Computing Response Metrics for Online Panels","volume":"72","author":"Callegaro","year":"2008","journal-title":"Public Opin. Q."},{"key":"ref_39","unstructured":"ICPSR (2012). Guide to Social Science Data Preparation and Archiving, Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. [5th ed.]."},{"key":"ref_40","unstructured":"de Leeuw, E.D., Hox, J.J., and Dillman, D.A. (2008). Weighting Survey Data. International Handbook of Survey Methodology, Erlbaum."},{"key":"ref_41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wolf, C., Joye, D., Smith, T.W., and Fu, Y.-C. (2016). Analytical Potential Versus Data Confidentiality\u2014Finding the Optimal Balance. The Sage Handbook of Survey Methodology, Sage.","DOI":"10.4135\/9781473957893"},{"key":"ref_42","unstructured":"Faden, R.R., and Beauchamp, T.L. (1986). A History and Theory of Informed Consent, Oxford University Press."},{"key":"ref_43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gideon, L. (2012). Sensitive Issues in Surveys: Reducing Refusals While Increasing Reliability and Quality of Responses to Sensitive Survey Items. Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences, Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4614-3876-2"},{"key":"ref_44","unstructured":"European Commission (2010). European Textbook on Ethics in Research, Publications Office of the European Union."},{"key":"ref_45","unstructured":"Marsden, P.V., and Wright, J.D. (2010). Interviewers and Interviewing. Handbook of Survey Research, Emerald Group. [2nd ed.]."},{"key":"ref_46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Groves, R.M. (1989). Survey Errors and Survey Costs, Wiley.","DOI":"10.1002\/0471725277"}],"container-title":["Data"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2306-5729\/3\/4\/45\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T15:26:49Z","timestamp":1760196409000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2306-5729\/3\/4\/45"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,29]]},"references-count":46,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,12]]}},"alternative-id":["data3040045"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/data3040045","relation":{},"ISSN":["2306-5729"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2306-5729"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,29]]}}}