{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,12]],"date-time":"2026-01-12T23:01:34Z","timestamp":1768258894134,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,1]],"date-time":"2019-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1569888000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002428","name":"Austrian Science Fund","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["DK W 1237-N23"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["DK W 1237-N23"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002428","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Data"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Livability is a popular term for describing the satisfaction of residents with living in a city. The assessment of livability can be of high relevance for urban planning; however, existing assessment methods have various limitations, especially in terms of transferability. In our main research article, we developed a conceptual framework and an assessment workflow to provide a transferable way of assessing livability, also considering intra-urban differences of the identified livability assessment factors to use for further geospatial analysis. As a key part of this assessment, we developed a survey to investigate residential preference and satisfaction concerning different urban factors. The current Data Descriptor introduces the questionnaire we used, the distribution of the responses, and the most important findings for the socioeconomic and demographic parameters influencing urban livability. We found that the development of an area, the number of persons in the household, and the income level are significant circumstances in assessing how satisfied a person would be with living in a given city.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/data4040134","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,1]],"date-time":"2019-10-01T11:11:16Z","timestamp":1569928276000},"page":"134","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Assessing Urban Livability through Residential Preference\u2014An International Survey"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"4","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6688-2179","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anna","family":"Kovacs-Gy\u00f6ri","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Geoinformatics\u2014Z_GIS, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria"}]},{"given":"Pablo","family":"Cabrera-Barona","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Public Affairs, Latin American Social Sciences Institute\u2014FLACSO, Quito 170135, Ecuador"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/S0169-2046(02)00232-3","article-title":"Urban environmental quality and human well-being: Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study","volume":"65","author":"Leidelmeijer","year":"2003","journal-title":"Landsc. Urban. Plan."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ble\u010di\u0107, I., Bibo Cecchini, A., and Talu, V. (2013). The capability approach in urban quality of life and urban policies: Towards a conceptual framework. City Project and Public Space, Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-6037-0_17"},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.2747\/0272-3638.11.1.1","article-title":"Urban Liveability: A Review","volume":"11","author":"Pacione","year":"1990","journal-title":"Urban. Geogr."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kovacs-Gy\u00f6ri, A., Cabrera-Barona, P., Resch, B., and Meha, M. (2019). Assessing and Representing Livability through the Analysis of Residential Preference. Sustainability, 11.","DOI":"10.3390\/su11184934"},{"key":"ref_5","unstructured":"Young, E., and Hermanson, V. (2012). Livability Literature Review: A Synthesis of Current Practice, TRID."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1007\/s11205-011-9939-x","article-title":"City Life: Rankings (Livability) Versus Perceptions (Satisfaction)","volume":"110","year":"2013","journal-title":"Soc. Indic. Res."},{"key":"ref_7","unstructured":"(2017, April 19). IMCL The Value of Rankings and the Meaning of Livablity. Available online: http:\/\/www.livablecities.org\/blog\/value-rankings-and-meaning-livability."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1016\/j.foar.2016.03.003","article-title":"Urban livability across disciplinary and professional boundaries","volume":"5","author":"Kashef","year":"2016","journal-title":"Front. Archit. Res."},{"key":"ref_9","unstructured":"Conger, B.W. (2015). On Livability, Liveability and the Limited Utility of Quality-Of-Life Rankings. SSRN, 7, Available online: https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2614678."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Slade, M., Oades, L., and Jarden, A. (2017). Living Well in Cities: Towards a Location-Based Model of Perceived Urban Liveability. Well-being, Recovery and Mental Health, Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/9781316339275"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1504\/WRSTSD.2014.065677","article-title":"A new approach to measuring the liveability of cities: The Global Liveable Cities Index","volume":"11","author":"Giap","year":"2014","journal-title":"World Rev. Sci. Tech. Sustain. Dev."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cabrera-Barona, P., and Merschdorf, H. (2018). A Conceptual Urban Quality Space-Place Framework: Linking Geo-Information and Quality of Life. Urban. Sci., 2.","DOI":"10.3390\/urbansci2030073"},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/S0169-2046(02)00234-7","article-title":"Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing\u2014a social geographical perspective","volume":"65","author":"Pacione","year":"2003","journal-title":"Landsc. Urban. Plan."},{"key":"ref_14","unstructured":"INIDE (2016). Anuario Estad\u00edstico 2015, INIDE."},{"key":"ref_15","unstructured":"(2019, August 15). Demographia World Urban Areas: 15th Annual Addition. Available online: http:\/\/www.demographia.com\/db-worldua.pdf."},{"key":"ref_16","unstructured":"INEC (2013). Proyecci\u00f3n de la Poblaci\u00f3n Ecuatoriana, INEC."},{"key":"ref_17","unstructured":"Statistik Austria (2019). Die gr\u00f6\u00dften St\u00e4dte in \u00d6sterreich am 1. Januar 2019 (in Einwohnern), Statistik Austria."},{"key":"ref_18","unstructured":"(2018, October 02). United States of America Census Bureau City and Town Population Totals: 2010\u20132018, Available online: https:\/\/www.census.gov\/data\/tables\/time-series\/demo\/popest\/2010s-total-cities-and-towns.html."},{"key":"ref_19","unstructured":"K\u00f6zponti Statisztikai Hivatal (2018). Magyarorsz\u00e1g K\u00f6zigazgat\u00e1si Helyn\u00e9vk\u00f6nyve, K\u00f6zponti Statisztikai Hivatal."}],"container-title":["Data"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2306-5729\/4\/4\/134\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T13:26:41Z","timestamp":1760189201000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2306-5729\/4\/4\/134"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,1]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,12]]}},"alternative-id":["data4040134"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/data4040134","relation":{},"ISSN":["2306-5729"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2306-5729","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,1]]}}}