{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,8]],"date-time":"2026-01-08T08:01:49Z","timestamp":1767859309202,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,29]],"date-time":"2022-12-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672272000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"Alltech SARL (France)"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Data"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Antimicrobial resistance is a rising threat in the agrifood sector. The misuse of antibiotics exerts selective pressure, driving resistance mechanisms in bacteria, which could ultimately spread through many routes and render treatments for infectious diseases inefficient in humans and animals. Herein, we report antimicrobial susceptibility data obtained for six lactic acid bacteria, the members of which are commonly used in the food and feed chain. Fifteen antimicrobials were considered for the phenotypic testing: ampicillin, gentamicin, kanamycin, tetracycline, erythromycin, clindamycin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, vancomycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, bacitracin, sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, linezolid, and rifampicin. The reported dataset could be used for the comparison, generation, and reconsideration of new and\/or existing cut-off values when considering lactic acid bacteria, particularly lactobacilli and pediococci.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/data8010010","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,29]],"date-time":"2022-12-29T02:52:21Z","timestamp":1672282341000},"page":"10","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Antimicrobial Susceptibility Data for Six Lactic Acid Bacteria Tested against Fifteen Antimicrobials"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"8","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9275-1930","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ivana","family":"Nikodinoska","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Alltech European Headquarters, Sarney, Summerhill Road, Dunboyne, A86 X006 Co. Meath, Ireland"}]},{"given":"Jouni","family":"Heikkinen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Biosafe\u2013Biological Safety Solutions Ltd., Microkatu 1M, 70210 Kuopio, Finland"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9135-5074","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Colm A.","family":"Moran","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Regulatory Affairs Department, Alltech SARL, Rue Charles Amand, 14500 Vire, France"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"EFSA (2018). Guidance on the characterisation of microorganisms used as feed additives or as production organisms. EFSA J., 16, e05206.","DOI":"10.2903\/j.efsa.2018.5206"},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"EFSA (2021). EFSA statement on the requirements for whole genome sequence analysis of microorganisms intentionally used in the food chain. EFSA J., 19, e06506.","DOI":"10.2903\/j.efsa.2021.6506"},{"key":"ref_3","first-page":"e05709","article-title":"Technical specifications on harmonised monitoring of antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from food-producing animals and food","volume":"17","author":"Aerts","year":"2019","journal-title":"EFSA J."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"EFSA (2021). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus (formerly Lactobacillus rhamnosus) IMI 507023 for all animal species (All-Technology (Ireland) Limited [Alltech Ireland]). EFSA J., 19, 6700.","DOI":"10.2903\/j.efsa.2021.6700"},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"EFSA (2021). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of Pediococcus pentosaceus IMI 507024 for all animal species (All-Technology (Ireland) Limited [Alltech Ireland]). EFSA J., 19, 6701.","DOI":"10.2903\/j.efsa.2021.6701"},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"EFSA (2021). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of Pediococcus pentosaceus IMI 507025 for all animal species (All-Technology (Ireland) Limited [Alltech Ireland]). EFSA J., 19, 6702.","DOI":"10.2903\/j.efsa.2021.6702"},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"EFSA (2021). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (formerly Lactobacillus plantarum) IMI 507026 for all animal species (All-Technology (Ireland) Limited [Alltech Ireland]). EFSA J., 19, 6703.","DOI":"10.2903\/j.efsa.2021.6703"},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"EFSA (2021). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (formerly Lactobacillus plantarum) IMI 507027 for all animal species (All-Technology (Ireland) Limited [Alltech Ireland]). EFSA J., 19, 6704.","DOI":"10.2903\/j.efsa.2021.6704"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"EFSA (2021). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (formerly Lactobacillus plantarum) IMI 507028 for all animal species (All-Technology (Ireland) Limited [Alltech Ireland]). EFSA J., 19, 6705.","DOI":"10.2903\/j.efsa.2021.6705"},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"EFSA (2021). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus (formerly Lactobacillus rhamnosus) NCIMB 30121 for all animal species for the renewal of its authorisation (Lactosan GmbH & Co. KG). EFSA J., 19, 6901.","DOI":"10.2903\/j.efsa.2021.6901"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"EFSA (2016). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of a preparation of Lactobacillus fermentum NCIMB 41636, Lactobacillus plantarum NCIMB 41638 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus NCIMB 41640 as a feed additive for dogs. EFSA J., 14, 4340.","DOI":"10.2903\/j.efsa.2016.4340"},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"EFSA (2020). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Sorbiflore\u00ae Advance (Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3698 and Lactobacillus farciminis CNCM I-3699) as a feed additive for weaned piglets. EFSA J., 18, 6081.","DOI":"10.2903\/j.efsa.2020.6081"},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"EFSA (2022). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 32292 for all animal species (Marigot Ltd. t\/a Celtic Sea Minerals). EFSA J., 20, 7426.","DOI":"10.2903\/j.efsa.2022.7426"},{"key":"ref_14","unstructured":"EFSA (2017). Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus rhamnosus DSM 29226 as a silage additive for all animal species. EFSA J., 15, 4673."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e01738-18","DOI":"10.1128\/AEM.01738-18","article-title":"Genus-Wide Assessment of Antibiotic Resistance in Lactobacillus spp.","volume":"85","author":"Campedelli","year":"2019","journal-title":"Appl. Environ. Microbiol."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1002\/fft2.123","article-title":"Are spontaneously fermented plant-based foods potential sources of transferable antibiotic resistance genes?","volume":"3","author":"Jasiak","year":"2021","journal-title":"Food Front."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1016\/j.foodres.2015.09.016","article-title":"New insights in antibiotic resistance of Lactobacillus species from fermented foods","volume":"78","author":"Abriouel","year":"2015","journal-title":"Food Res. Int."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"687071","DOI":"10.3389\/fvets.2021.687071","article-title":"Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains of Potential Use as Feed Additives\u2014The Basic Safety and Usefulness Criterion","volume":"8","author":"Garbowska","year":"2021","journal-title":"Front. Veter.-Sci."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1407","DOI":"10.1007\/s00284-019-01769-7","article-title":"Antibiotic Resistance of Lactobacillus Strains","volume":"76","author":"Anisimova","year":"2019","journal-title":"Curr. Microbiol."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0168-1605(02)00254-4","article-title":"Susceptibility of Lactobacillus spp. to antimicrobial agents","volume":"82","author":"Danielsen","year":"2002","journal-title":"Int. J. Food Microbiol."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1160","DOI":"10.4315\/JFP-20-363","article-title":"Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles of Pediococcus pentosaceus from Various Origins and Their Implications for the Safety Assessment of Strains with Food-Technology Applications","volume":"84","author":"Shani","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Food Prot."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fm.2006.11.001","article-title":"Antibiotic resistance in non-enterococcal lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria","volume":"24","author":"Ammor","year":"2007","journal-title":"Food Microbiol."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.3389\/fmicb.2013.00202","article-title":"Antibiotic resistance in probiotic bacteria","volume":"4","author":"Gueimonde","year":"2013","journal-title":"Front. Microbiol."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"900","DOI":"10.1093\/jac\/dkm035","article-title":"Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Lactobacillus, Pediococcus and Lactococcus human isolates and cultures intended for probiotic or nutritional use","volume":"59","author":"Klare","year":"2007","journal-title":"J. Antimicrob. Chemother."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"EFSA (2021). Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the feed additive consisting of Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 12834 for all animal species for the renewal of its authorisation (Lactosan GmbH & Co KG). EFSA J., 19, 6713.","DOI":"10.2903\/j.efsa.2021.6713"},{"key":"ref_26","unstructured":"EFSA (2019). Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the application for renewal of authorisation of Bactocell\u00ae (Pediococcus acidilactici CNCM I-4622) as a feed additive for all fish and shrimps and its extension of use for all crustaceans. EFSA J., 17, 5691."},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"EFSA (2021). Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the feed additive consisting of Pediococcus acidilactici DSM 16243 for all animal species for the renewal of its authorisation (Lactosan GmbH & Co.KG). EFSA J., 19, 6697.","DOI":"10.2903\/j.efsa.2021.6697"},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1007\/s10482-012-9749-4","article-title":"Presence of erythromycin and tetracycline resistance genes in lactic acid bacteria from fermented foods of Indian origin","volume":"102","author":"Thumu","year":"2012","journal-title":"Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek"},{"key":"ref_29","first-page":"384","article-title":"Susceptibility of Pediococcus spp. to antimicrobial agents","volume":"102","author":"Danielsen","year":"2006","journal-title":"J. Appl. Microbiol."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1574-6976.2009.00208.x","article-title":"The extracellular biology of the lactobacilli","volume":"34","author":"Kleerebezem","year":"2010","journal-title":"FEMS Microbiol. Rev."},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103934","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fm.2021.103934","article-title":"Antibiotic resistance and virulence factors in lactobacilli: Something to carefully consider","volume":"103","author":"Colautti","year":"2021","journal-title":"Food Microbiol."},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.11.018","article-title":"Resistance of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacterial of African and European origin to antimicrobials: Determination and transferability of the resistance genes to other bacteria","volume":"121","author":"Ouoba","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int. J. Food Microbiol."},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.3855\/jidc.10765","article-title":"Characterization and transfer of antimicrobial resistance in lactic acid bacteria from fermented dairy products in China","volume":"13","author":"Yang","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Infect. Dev. Ctries."},{"key":"ref_34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e01217-21","DOI":"10.1128\/mra.01217-21","article-title":"Draft Genome Sequence of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus IMI 507023","volume":"11","author":"Nikodinoska","year":"2022","journal-title":"Microbiol. Resour. Announc."},{"key":"ref_35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e01216-21","DOI":"10.1128\/mra.01216-21","article-title":"Draft Genome Sequence of Pediococcus pentosaceus IMI 507024","volume":"11","author":"Nikodinoska","year":"2022","journal-title":"Microbiol. Resour. Announc."},{"key":"ref_36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108446","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dib.2022.108446","article-title":"Pediococcus pentosaceus IMI 507025 genome sequencing data","volume":"43","author":"Nikodinoska","year":"2022","journal-title":"Data Brief"},{"key":"ref_37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e00305-22","DOI":"10.1128\/mra.00305-22","article-title":"Draft Genome Sequence of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum IMI 507026","volume":"11","author":"Nikodinoska","year":"2022","journal-title":"Microbiol. Resour. Announc."},{"key":"ref_38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108025","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dib.2022.108025","article-title":"Whole genome sequence data of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum IMI 507027","volume":"42","author":"Nikodinoska","year":"2022","journal-title":"Data Brief"},{"key":"ref_39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108190","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dib.2022.108190","article-title":"Genome sequence data of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum IMI 507028","volume":"42","author":"Nikodinoska","year":"2022","journal-title":"Data Brief"}],"container-title":["Data"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2306-5729\/8\/1\/10\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T01:54:58Z","timestamp":1760147698000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2306-5729\/8\/1\/10"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,29]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,1]]}},"alternative-id":["data8010010"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/data8010010","relation":{},"ISSN":["2306-5729"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2306-5729","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,29]]}}}