{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,17]],"date-time":"2026-06-17T22:41:22Z","timestamp":1781736082138,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,23]],"date-time":"2025-05-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1747958400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Entropy"],"abstract":"<jats:p>A desirable property of any theory of causal reasoning is to explain not only why people make causal reasoning errors but also when they make them. The mutation sampler is a rational process model of human causal reasoning that yields normatively correct inferences when sufficient cognitive resources are available but introduces systematic errors when they are not. The mutation sampler has been shown to account for a number of causal reasoning errors, including Markov violations, the phenomenon in which human reasoners treat causally related variables as statistically dependent when they are normatively independent. A Markov violation arises, for example, when an individual reasoning about a causal chain X\u2192Y\u2192Z treats X as informative about the state of Z even when the state of Y is known. Recently, the mutation sampler was used to predict the existence of previously untested experimental conditions in which the sign of Markov violations would switch from positive to negative. Here, it was used to predict the existence of conditions in which Markov violations should disappear entirely. In fact, asking subjects to reason about a novel causal structure with nothing but generative causal relations (a cause makes its effect more likely) resulted in Markov violations in the usual positive direction. But simply describing one of four causal relations as inhibitory (the cause makes its effect less likely) resulted in the elimination of those violations. Theoretical model fitting confirmed how this novel result is predicted by the mutation sampler.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/e27060548","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,23]],"date-time":"2025-05-23T06:16:03Z","timestamp":1747980963000},"page":"548","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["A Magic Act in Causal Reasoning: Making Markov Violations Disappear"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"27","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7795-7108","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bob","family":"Rehder","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Psychology Department, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10012, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1107","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-015-0734-0","article-title":"Causal Bayes nets as psychological theories of causal reasoning: Evidence from psychological research","volume":"193","author":"Hagmayer","year":"2016","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Waldmann, M.R. (2017). Concepts as causal models: Classification. The Oxford Handbook of Causal Reasoning, Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordhb\/9780199399550.001.0001"},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Waldmann, M.R. (2017). Concepts as causal models: Induction. The Oxford Handbook of Causal Reasoning, Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordhb\/9780199399550.001.0001"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1037\/a0031903","article-title":"Reasoning about causal relationships: Inferences on causal networks","volume":"140","author":"Rottman","year":"2014","journal-title":"Psychol. Bull."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-psych-010814-015135","article-title":"Causality in thought","volume":"66","author":"Sloman","year":"2015","journal-title":"Annu. Rev. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Waldmann, M.R. (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Causal Reasoning, Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordhb\/9780199399550.001.0001"},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e12839","DOI":"10.1111\/cogs.12839","article-title":"A process model of causal reasoning","volume":"44","author":"Davis","year":"2020","journal-title":"Cogn. Sci."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cogpsych.2017.05.001","article-title":"Where do hypotheses come from?","volume":"96","author":"Dasgupta","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cogn. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2018.04.017","article-title":"Remembrance of inferences past: Amortization in human hypothesis generation","volume":"178","author":"Dasgupta","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cognition"},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1037\/dec0000050","article-title":"A computational model of the attention process in risky choice","volume":"3","author":"Johnson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Decision"},{"key":"ref_11","unstructured":"Lieder, F., Griffiths, T., and Goodman, N. (2012, January 3\u20136). Burn-in, bias, and the rationality of anchoring. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe, NV, USA."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1111\/cogs.12101","article-title":"One and done? Optimal decisions from very few samples","volume":"38","author":"Vul","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cogn. Sci."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1162\/opmi_a_00080","article-title":"The Bayesian Mutation Sampler explains distributions of causal judgments","volume":"7","author":"Kolvoort","year":"2023","journal-title":"Open Mind Discov. Cogn. Sci."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1007\/s42113-024-00223-7","article-title":"Models of variability in probabilistic causal judgments","volume":"8","author":"Kolvoort","year":"2025","journal-title":"Comput. Brain Behav."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1463","DOI":"10.1037\/xlm0001395","article-title":"Extending a Rational Process Model of Causal Reasoning: Assessing Markov Violations and Explaining Away with Inhibitory Causal Relations","volume":"50","author":"Rehder","year":"2024","journal-title":"J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn."},{"key":"ref_16","unstructured":"Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference, Springer."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2011.02.005","article-title":"The mental representation of causal conditional reasoning: Mental models or causal models","volume":"119","author":"Ali","year":"2011","journal-title":"Cognition"},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2012.682655","article-title":"Cognitive shortcuts in causal inference","volume":"4","author":"Fernbach","year":"2013","journal-title":"Argum. Comput."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"856","DOI":"10.1037\/0278-7393.30.4.856","article-title":"The advantage of timely intervention","volume":"30","author":"Lagnado","year":"2004","journal-title":"J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1111\/cogs.12132","article-title":"Agents and Causes: Dispositional Intuitions As a Guide to Causal Structure","volume":"39","author":"Mayrhofer","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cogn. Sci."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cogpsych.2013.09.002","article-title":"Mechanistic beliefs determine adherence to the Markov property in causal reasoning","volume":"67","author":"Park","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cogn. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cogpsych.2004.09.002","article-title":"Feature inference and the causal structure of categories","volume":"50","author":"Rehder","year":"2005","journal-title":"Cogn. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cogpsych.2014.02.002","article-title":"Independence and dependence in human causal reasoning","volume":"72","author":"Rehder","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cogn. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cogpsych.2018.01.003","article-title":"Beyond Markov: Accounting for independence violations in causal reasoning","volume":"103","author":"Rehder","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cogn. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.3758\/s13421-016-0662-3","article-title":"Failures of explaining away and screening off in described versus experienced causal learning scenarios","volume":"45","author":"Rehder","year":"2017","journal-title":"Mem. Cogn."},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cogpsych.2016.05.002","article-title":"Do people reason rationally about causally related events? Markov violations, weak inferences, and failures of explaining away","volume":"87","author":"Rottman","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cogn. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_27","unstructured":"Walsh, C.R., and Sloman, S.A. (2004, January 4\u20137). Revising causal beliefs. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Chicago, IL, USA."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cruz, N., Hahn, U., Fenton, N., and Lagnado, D. (2020). Explaining away, augmentation, and the assumption of independence. Front. Psychol., 11.","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2020.502751"},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1016\/S0023-9690(03)00042-0","article-title":"Inferring non-observed correlations from causal scenarios: The role of causal knowledge","volume":"35","author":"Perales","year":"2004","journal-title":"Learn. Motiv."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"670","DOI":"10.1037\/xlm0000048","article-title":"The role of functional form in causal-based categorization","volume":"41","author":"Rehder","year":"2015","journal-title":"J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn."},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burnham, K.P., and Anderson, D.R. (1998). Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretical Approach, Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4757-2917-7_3"},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tics.2014.06.006","article-title":"Probabilistic models, learning algorithms, and response variability: Sampling in cognitive development","volume":"18","author":"Bonawitz","year":"2014","journal-title":"Trends Cogn. Sci."},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2012.10.010","article-title":"Rational variability in children\u2019s causal inferences: The sampling hypothesis","volume":"126","author":"Denison","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cognition"},{"key":"ref_34","first-page":"1","article-title":"Confidence and gradation in causal judgment","volume":"223","author":"Henne","year":"2022","journal-title":"Cognition"},{"key":"ref_35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"719","DOI":"10.1037\/rev0000190","article-title":"The Bayesian sampler: Generic Bayesian inference causes incoherence in human probability judgments","volume":"127","author":"Zhu","year":"2020","journal-title":"Psychol Rev."},{"key":"ref_36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Huang, J., Busemeyer, J.R., Ebelt, Z., and Pothos, E.M. (2024). Bridging the gap between subjective probability and probability judgments: The quantum sequential sampler. Psychol Rev.","DOI":"10.1037\/rev0000489"}],"container-title":["Entropy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1099-4300\/27\/6\/548\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,9]],"date-time":"2025-10-09T17:38:47Z","timestamp":1760031527000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1099-4300\/27\/6\/548"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,23]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,6]]}},"alternative-id":["e27060548"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/e27060548","relation":{},"ISSN":["1099-4300"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1099-4300","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,23]]}}}